20- 45岁青壮年原发性非复杂性孔源性视网膜脱离的手术效果。

IF 0.8 Q4 OPHTHALMOLOGY
Michael J Ammar, Jessica J Lee, Louis Cai, Kristine Y Wang, Anthony Obeid, Claire Ryan, Omesh P Gupta, Jason Hsu, Nora J Forbes, Matthew R Starr, Luv G Patel, Taku Wakabayashi, Antonio Capone, Geoffrey G Emerson, Dean Eliott, Daniel P Joseph, Carl D Regillo, Edwin H Ryan, Yoshihiro Yonekawa
{"title":"20- 45岁青壮年原发性非复杂性孔源性视网膜脱离的手术效果。","authors":"Michael J Ammar, Jessica J Lee, Louis Cai, Kristine Y Wang, Anthony Obeid, Claire Ryan, Omesh P Gupta, Jason Hsu, Nora J Forbes, Matthew R Starr, Luv G Patel, Taku Wakabayashi, Antonio Capone, Geoffrey G Emerson, Dean Eliott, Daniel P Joseph, Carl D Regillo, Edwin H Ryan, Yoshihiro Yonekawa","doi":"10.1177/24741264251359055","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Purpose:</b> To analyze anatomic and visual outcomes of young adults with uncomplicated primary rhegmatogenous retinal detachment (RRD) treated with scleral buckle, pars plana vitrectomy (PPV), or combined PPV and scleral buckle. <b>Methods:</b> Patients included in the Primary Retinal Detachment Outcomes study with a minimum of 6 months follow-up were evaluated in this multicenter interventional cohort study,. Patients with complex RRDs were excluded. Primary outcomes were single surgery anatomic success and final visual acuity (VA). <b>Results:</b> Scleral buckle was performed in 91 eyes (55%), PPV in 32 (19%), and combined PPV and scleral buckle in 42 (25%). Single surgery anatomic success rates were 79.3% for PPV alone, 83.7% for primary scleral buckle, and 92.7% for combined PPV and scleral buckle (analysis of variance, <i>P</i> = .25). When adjusting for potential risk factors, eyes that had PPV alone were more likely to redetach compared with those that had combined PPV and scleral buckle (hazard ratio [HR], 7.24, 95% CI, 1.25-42.1; <i>P</i> = .03), while rates of redetachment were similar in eyes that had scleral buckle alone and combined PPV and scleral buckle (HR, 3.24, 95% CI, 0.63-16.63; <i>P</i> = .16). However, eyes that had combined PPV and scleral buckle were less likely to result in good vision compared with eyes that had scleral buckle alone (odds ratio [OR], 0.26, 95% CI, 0.07-0.94; <i>P</i> = .04). Similarly, eyes that had PPV alone were less likely to obtain good vision compared with eyes that only had scleral buckle (OR, 0.20, 95% CI, 0.05-0.81; <i>P</i> = .02). <b>Conclusions:</b> For young adults in this study, the best visual outcomes resulted from scleral buckle, and a higher single surgery success rate was found with combined PPV and scleral buckle.</p>","PeriodicalId":17919,"journal":{"name":"Journal of VitreoRetinal Diseases","volume":" ","pages":"24741264251359055"},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12334409/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Surgical Outcomes of Primary Noncomplex Rhegmatogenous Retinal Detachment in 20- to 45-Year-Old Young Adults.\",\"authors\":\"Michael J Ammar, Jessica J Lee, Louis Cai, Kristine Y Wang, Anthony Obeid, Claire Ryan, Omesh P Gupta, Jason Hsu, Nora J Forbes, Matthew R Starr, Luv G Patel, Taku Wakabayashi, Antonio Capone, Geoffrey G Emerson, Dean Eliott, Daniel P Joseph, Carl D Regillo, Edwin H Ryan, Yoshihiro Yonekawa\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/24741264251359055\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p><b>Purpose:</b> To analyze anatomic and visual outcomes of young adults with uncomplicated primary rhegmatogenous retinal detachment (RRD) treated with scleral buckle, pars plana vitrectomy (PPV), or combined PPV and scleral buckle. <b>Methods:</b> Patients included in the Primary Retinal Detachment Outcomes study with a minimum of 6 months follow-up were evaluated in this multicenter interventional cohort study,. Patients with complex RRDs were excluded. Primary outcomes were single surgery anatomic success and final visual acuity (VA). <b>Results:</b> Scleral buckle was performed in 91 eyes (55%), PPV in 32 (19%), and combined PPV and scleral buckle in 42 (25%). Single surgery anatomic success rates were 79.3% for PPV alone, 83.7% for primary scleral buckle, and 92.7% for combined PPV and scleral buckle (analysis of variance, <i>P</i> = .25). When adjusting for potential risk factors, eyes that had PPV alone were more likely to redetach compared with those that had combined PPV and scleral buckle (hazard ratio [HR], 7.24, 95% CI, 1.25-42.1; <i>P</i> = .03), while rates of redetachment were similar in eyes that had scleral buckle alone and combined PPV and scleral buckle (HR, 3.24, 95% CI, 0.63-16.63; <i>P</i> = .16). However, eyes that had combined PPV and scleral buckle were less likely to result in good vision compared with eyes that had scleral buckle alone (odds ratio [OR], 0.26, 95% CI, 0.07-0.94; <i>P</i> = .04). Similarly, eyes that had PPV alone were less likely to obtain good vision compared with eyes that only had scleral buckle (OR, 0.20, 95% CI, 0.05-0.81; <i>P</i> = .02). <b>Conclusions:</b> For young adults in this study, the best visual outcomes resulted from scleral buckle, and a higher single surgery success rate was found with combined PPV and scleral buckle.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":17919,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of VitreoRetinal Diseases\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"24741264251359055\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-07\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12334409/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of VitreoRetinal Diseases\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/24741264251359055\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"OPHTHALMOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of VitreoRetinal Diseases","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/24741264251359055","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"OPHTHALMOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:分析年轻成人无并发症原发性孔源性视网膜脱离(RRD)巩膜扣、玻璃体切割(PPV)或玻璃体切除联合巩膜扣治疗的解剖和视力结果。方法:在这项多中心介入队列研究中,对纳入原发性视网膜脱离结局研究的患者进行了至少6个月的随访。排除复杂rrd患者。主要结果是单次手术解剖成功和最终视力(VA)。结果:巩膜扣带91例(55%),PPV 32例(19%),PPV联合巩膜扣带42例(25%)。单次手术解剖成功率:单纯PPV为79.3%,原发性巩膜扣为83.7%,联合PPV和巩膜扣为92.7%(方差分析,P = 0.25)。当调整潜在的危险因素时,单独使用PPV的眼睛比联合使用PPV和巩膜扣的眼睛更容易再脱离(风险比[HR], 7.24, 95% CI, 1.25-42.1;P = .03),而单独使用巩膜扣环和联合使用PPV和巩膜扣环的眼睛的再脱离率相似(HR, 3.24, 95% CI, 0.63-16.63;P = .16)。然而,与单独使用巩膜扣的眼睛相比,联合使用PPV和巩膜扣的眼睛更不可能获得良好的视力(优势比[OR], 0.26, 95% CI, 0.07-0.94;P = .04)。同样,单独使用PPV的眼睛与仅使用巩膜扣的眼睛相比,获得良好视力的可能性更小(OR, 0.20, 95% CI, 0.05-0.81;P = .02)。结论:在本研究中,青壮年患者巩膜扣带的视力效果最好,且PPV联合巩膜扣带的单次手术成功率较高。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Surgical Outcomes of Primary Noncomplex Rhegmatogenous Retinal Detachment in 20- to 45-Year-Old Young Adults.

Purpose: To analyze anatomic and visual outcomes of young adults with uncomplicated primary rhegmatogenous retinal detachment (RRD) treated with scleral buckle, pars plana vitrectomy (PPV), or combined PPV and scleral buckle. Methods: Patients included in the Primary Retinal Detachment Outcomes study with a minimum of 6 months follow-up were evaluated in this multicenter interventional cohort study,. Patients with complex RRDs were excluded. Primary outcomes were single surgery anatomic success and final visual acuity (VA). Results: Scleral buckle was performed in 91 eyes (55%), PPV in 32 (19%), and combined PPV and scleral buckle in 42 (25%). Single surgery anatomic success rates were 79.3% for PPV alone, 83.7% for primary scleral buckle, and 92.7% for combined PPV and scleral buckle (analysis of variance, P = .25). When adjusting for potential risk factors, eyes that had PPV alone were more likely to redetach compared with those that had combined PPV and scleral buckle (hazard ratio [HR], 7.24, 95% CI, 1.25-42.1; P = .03), while rates of redetachment were similar in eyes that had scleral buckle alone and combined PPV and scleral buckle (HR, 3.24, 95% CI, 0.63-16.63; P = .16). However, eyes that had combined PPV and scleral buckle were less likely to result in good vision compared with eyes that had scleral buckle alone (odds ratio [OR], 0.26, 95% CI, 0.07-0.94; P = .04). Similarly, eyes that had PPV alone were less likely to obtain good vision compared with eyes that only had scleral buckle (OR, 0.20, 95% CI, 0.05-0.81; P = .02). Conclusions: For young adults in this study, the best visual outcomes resulted from scleral buckle, and a higher single surgery success rate was found with combined PPV and scleral buckle.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.20
自引率
16.70%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信