缺血性脑卒中患者颅骨减压切除术后的预后:一项队列研究。

IF 1.5 Q2 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
Mohammad Jamali, Mahyar Noorollahi, Ehsan Mohammad Hosseini, Abdolkarim Rahmanian, Mohammad Sayari, Sulmaz Ghahramani
{"title":"缺血性脑卒中患者颅骨减压切除术后的预后:一项队列研究。","authors":"Mohammad Jamali, Mahyar Noorollahi, Ehsan Mohammad Hosseini, Abdolkarim Rahmanian, Mohammad Sayari, Sulmaz Ghahramani","doi":"10.30476/ijms.2024.102797.3589","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Decompressive craniectomy (DC) is effective in reducing mortality and improving outcomes in stroke patients. However, there is a need for a better understanding of the outcomes and complications of stroke, particularly in regions such as Iran, where comprehensive studies on DC outcomes are scarce. This study investigated the effects of DC in stroke patients.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This cohort study was conducted at Nemazi Hospital in Shiraz, Iran, from 2018 to 2020. All patients aged over 18 years with ischemic stroke requiring DC were included using census sampling. Data on demographics, clinical history, and imaging findings were collected. Outcomes were assessed using the modified rankin scale (mRS), Glasgow outcome score extended (GOSE), and aphasia severity rating (ASR).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 144 cerebral infarction patients underwent DC; 22 (15.3%) were lost to follow-up, and 67 (55%) of the remaining patients died either during hospitalization or within at least 6 months of follow-up. Patients over 60 years old (OR=0.152), those with a history of stroke (OR=0.227), and those with COVID-19 infection (OR=0.164) were associated with a decreased likelihood of survival. However, an increase in the Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) score on admission was associated with an increased probability of survival (OR=1.199). The ordered logistic regression analysis showed that an increase in GCS score was associated with a higher probability of achieving better outcomes across all models: GOSE (OR=1.177), mRS (OR=0.839, with lower scores indicating better outcomes), and ASR (OR=1.354). The analysis showed that patients over 60 had a lower probability of achieving better outcomes in the GOSE model (OR=0.185) and were likely to have worse outcomes in the mRS model (OR=5.182).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>These findings underscored the critical role of comorbidities (such as COVID-19 and prior stroke) and GCS scores in predicting patient survival and functional outcomes following DC. In particular, the higher mortality rates and poorer functional outcomes observed in older patients highlighted the need for careful consideration in this age group.</p>","PeriodicalId":14510,"journal":{"name":"Iranian Journal of Medical Sciences","volume":"50 7","pages":"445-454"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12334788/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Outcome of Ischemic Stroke Patients Following Decompressive Craniectomy: A Cohort Study.\",\"authors\":\"Mohammad Jamali, Mahyar Noorollahi, Ehsan Mohammad Hosseini, Abdolkarim Rahmanian, Mohammad Sayari, Sulmaz Ghahramani\",\"doi\":\"10.30476/ijms.2024.102797.3589\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Decompressive craniectomy (DC) is effective in reducing mortality and improving outcomes in stroke patients. However, there is a need for a better understanding of the outcomes and complications of stroke, particularly in regions such as Iran, where comprehensive studies on DC outcomes are scarce. This study investigated the effects of DC in stroke patients.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This cohort study was conducted at Nemazi Hospital in Shiraz, Iran, from 2018 to 2020. All patients aged over 18 years with ischemic stroke requiring DC were included using census sampling. Data on demographics, clinical history, and imaging findings were collected. Outcomes were assessed using the modified rankin scale (mRS), Glasgow outcome score extended (GOSE), and aphasia severity rating (ASR).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 144 cerebral infarction patients underwent DC; 22 (15.3%) were lost to follow-up, and 67 (55%) of the remaining patients died either during hospitalization or within at least 6 months of follow-up. Patients over 60 years old (OR=0.152), those with a history of stroke (OR=0.227), and those with COVID-19 infection (OR=0.164) were associated with a decreased likelihood of survival. However, an increase in the Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) score on admission was associated with an increased probability of survival (OR=1.199). The ordered logistic regression analysis showed that an increase in GCS score was associated with a higher probability of achieving better outcomes across all models: GOSE (OR=1.177), mRS (OR=0.839, with lower scores indicating better outcomes), and ASR (OR=1.354). The analysis showed that patients over 60 had a lower probability of achieving better outcomes in the GOSE model (OR=0.185) and were likely to have worse outcomes in the mRS model (OR=5.182).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>These findings underscored the critical role of comorbidities (such as COVID-19 and prior stroke) and GCS scores in predicting patient survival and functional outcomes following DC. In particular, the higher mortality rates and poorer functional outcomes observed in older patients highlighted the need for careful consideration in this age group.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":14510,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Iranian Journal of Medical Sciences\",\"volume\":\"50 7\",\"pages\":\"445-454\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12334788/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Iranian Journal of Medical Sciences\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.30476/ijms.2024.102797.3589\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Iranian Journal of Medical Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.30476/ijms.2024.102797.3589","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:减压颅骨切除术(DC)在降低卒中患者死亡率和改善预后方面是有效的。然而,有必要更好地了解脑卒中的结果和并发症,特别是在伊朗等地区,对脑卒中结果的综合研究很少。本研究探讨DC对脑卒中患者的影响。方法:本队列研究于2018 - 2020年在伊朗设拉子Nemazi医院进行。所有年龄在18岁以上需要DC的缺血性卒中患者均纳入普查抽样。收集了人口统计学、临床病史和影像学结果的数据。结果采用改良排名量表(mRS)、格拉斯哥结局评分扩展(GOSE)和失语严重程度评分(ASR)进行评估。结果:144例脑梗死患者行DC;22例(15.3%)失访,其余患者中67例(55%)在住院期间或至少6个月内死亡。60岁以上患者(OR=0.152)、卒中史患者(OR=0.227)和COVID-19感染患者(OR=0.164)与生存可能性降低相关。然而,入院时格拉斯哥昏迷量表(GCS)评分的增加与生存概率的增加相关(OR=1.199)。有序逻辑回归分析显示,GCS评分的增加与所有模型中获得更好结果的可能性更高相关:GOSE (OR=1.177)、mRS (OR=0.839,分数越低表明结果越好)和ASR (OR=1.354)。分析显示,60岁以上患者在GOSE模型中获得较好预后的概率较低(OR=0.185),而在mRS模型中可能出现较差的预后(OR=5.182)。结论:这些发现强调了合并症(如COVID-19和既往卒中)和GCS评分在预测DC后患者生存和功能结局方面的关键作用。特别是,在老年患者中观察到的较高死亡率和较差的功能结局突出了对该年龄组进行仔细考虑的必要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Outcome of Ischemic Stroke Patients Following Decompressive Craniectomy: A Cohort Study.

Background: Decompressive craniectomy (DC) is effective in reducing mortality and improving outcomes in stroke patients. However, there is a need for a better understanding of the outcomes and complications of stroke, particularly in regions such as Iran, where comprehensive studies on DC outcomes are scarce. This study investigated the effects of DC in stroke patients.

Methods: This cohort study was conducted at Nemazi Hospital in Shiraz, Iran, from 2018 to 2020. All patients aged over 18 years with ischemic stroke requiring DC were included using census sampling. Data on demographics, clinical history, and imaging findings were collected. Outcomes were assessed using the modified rankin scale (mRS), Glasgow outcome score extended (GOSE), and aphasia severity rating (ASR).

Results: A total of 144 cerebral infarction patients underwent DC; 22 (15.3%) were lost to follow-up, and 67 (55%) of the remaining patients died either during hospitalization or within at least 6 months of follow-up. Patients over 60 years old (OR=0.152), those with a history of stroke (OR=0.227), and those with COVID-19 infection (OR=0.164) were associated with a decreased likelihood of survival. However, an increase in the Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) score on admission was associated with an increased probability of survival (OR=1.199). The ordered logistic regression analysis showed that an increase in GCS score was associated with a higher probability of achieving better outcomes across all models: GOSE (OR=1.177), mRS (OR=0.839, with lower scores indicating better outcomes), and ASR (OR=1.354). The analysis showed that patients over 60 had a lower probability of achieving better outcomes in the GOSE model (OR=0.185) and were likely to have worse outcomes in the mRS model (OR=5.182).

Conclusion: These findings underscored the critical role of comorbidities (such as COVID-19 and prior stroke) and GCS scores in predicting patient survival and functional outcomes following DC. In particular, the higher mortality rates and poorer functional outcomes observed in older patients highlighted the need for careful consideration in this age group.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Iranian Journal of Medical Sciences
Iranian Journal of Medical Sciences MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL-
CiteScore
3.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
84
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Iranian Journal of Medical Sciences (IJMS) is an international quarterly biomedical publication, which is sponsored by Shiraz University of Medical Sciences. The IJMS intends to provide a scientific medium of com­muni­cation for researchers throughout the globe. The journal welcomes original clinical articles as well as clinically oriented basic science re­search experiences on prevalent diseases in the region and analysis of various regional problems.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信