Shiri Sherf-Dagan, Charlene Wright, Laura Heusschen, Daniela Alceste, Lior Mor-Sasson, Dale S Bond, Tair Ben-Porat
{"title":"弥合差距：评估代谢减肥手术后饮食相关行为建议依从性的工具-范围审查。","authors":"Shiri Sherf-Dagan, Charlene Wright, Laura Heusschen, Daniela Alceste, Lior Mor-Sasson, Dale S Bond, Tair Ben-Porat","doi":"10.1111/obr.70012","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and aims: </strong>Adherence to dietary-related behavioral recommendations following metabolic bariatric surgery (MBS) is important for achieving optimal surgical outcomes, but standardized definitions and tools are lacking. This scoping review aimed to map existing tools for assessing adherence to dietary-related behavioral recommendations after MBS, evaluate their content and psychometric properties, and identify gaps to guide future research and tool development.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The review was registered on the Open Science Framework and followed PRISMA-ScR guidelines. Searches were conducted in PubMed and Embase from inception through April 2024, supplemented by hand-searching the reference lists of included reports. The review included studies of adults who underwent MBS, using tools with at least two items assessing adherence to dietary-related recommendations, with detailed tool descriptions, and, when available, information on validity and reliability. Screening and data extraction were performed independently by two reviewers, with discrepancies resolved by a third reviewer.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>From 3223 publications, 16 reports from 10 countries were included. Tools assessing dietary adherence post-MBS varied widely in content and behavioral targets, with most robust psychometric properties lacking. Reliability was assessed via Cronbach's alpha and test-retest methods and validity via face, content, construct, and criterion measures. Standardized recall periods and comprehensive scoring systems were notably absent.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Existing tools for assessing adherence to dietary-related behavioral recommendations after MBS show significant variability, with most lacking standardized psychometric properties and recall periods, limiting their utility. Future research should focus on standardizing dietary-related \"core principles,\" facilitating the development of new instruments in research and clinical settings.</p>","PeriodicalId":216,"journal":{"name":"Obesity Reviews","volume":" ","pages":"e70012"},"PeriodicalIF":7.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Bridging the Gap: Evaluating Tools for Adherence to Dietary-Related Behavioral Recommendations After Metabolic Bariatric Surgery-A Scoping Review.\",\"authors\":\"Shiri Sherf-Dagan, Charlene Wright, Laura Heusschen, Daniela Alceste, Lior Mor-Sasson, Dale S Bond, Tair Ben-Porat\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/obr.70012\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background and aims: </strong>Adherence to dietary-related behavioral recommendations following metabolic bariatric surgery (MBS) is important for achieving optimal surgical outcomes, but standardized definitions and tools are lacking. This scoping review aimed to map existing tools for assessing adherence to dietary-related behavioral recommendations after MBS, evaluate their content and psychometric properties, and identify gaps to guide future research and tool development.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The review was registered on the Open Science Framework and followed PRISMA-ScR guidelines. Searches were conducted in PubMed and Embase from inception through April 2024, supplemented by hand-searching the reference lists of included reports. The review included studies of adults who underwent MBS, using tools with at least two items assessing adherence to dietary-related recommendations, with detailed tool descriptions, and, when available, information on validity and reliability. Screening and data extraction were performed independently by two reviewers, with discrepancies resolved by a third reviewer.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>From 3223 publications, 16 reports from 10 countries were included. Tools assessing dietary adherence post-MBS varied widely in content and behavioral targets, with most robust psychometric properties lacking. Reliability was assessed via Cronbach's alpha and test-retest methods and validity via face, content, construct, and criterion measures. Standardized recall periods and comprehensive scoring systems were notably absent.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Existing tools for assessing adherence to dietary-related behavioral recommendations after MBS show significant variability, with most lacking standardized psychometric properties and recall periods, limiting their utility. Future research should focus on standardizing dietary-related \\\"core principles,\\\" facilitating the development of new instruments in research and clinical settings.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":216,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Obesity Reviews\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"e70012\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":7.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Obesity Reviews\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1111/obr.70012\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Obesity Reviews","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/obr.70012","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM","Score":null,"Total":0}
Bridging the Gap: Evaluating Tools for Adherence to Dietary-Related Behavioral Recommendations After Metabolic Bariatric Surgery-A Scoping Review.
Background and aims: Adherence to dietary-related behavioral recommendations following metabolic bariatric surgery (MBS) is important for achieving optimal surgical outcomes, but standardized definitions and tools are lacking. This scoping review aimed to map existing tools for assessing adherence to dietary-related behavioral recommendations after MBS, evaluate their content and psychometric properties, and identify gaps to guide future research and tool development.
Methods: The review was registered on the Open Science Framework and followed PRISMA-ScR guidelines. Searches were conducted in PubMed and Embase from inception through April 2024, supplemented by hand-searching the reference lists of included reports. The review included studies of adults who underwent MBS, using tools with at least two items assessing adherence to dietary-related recommendations, with detailed tool descriptions, and, when available, information on validity and reliability. Screening and data extraction were performed independently by two reviewers, with discrepancies resolved by a third reviewer.
Results: From 3223 publications, 16 reports from 10 countries were included. Tools assessing dietary adherence post-MBS varied widely in content and behavioral targets, with most robust psychometric properties lacking. Reliability was assessed via Cronbach's alpha and test-retest methods and validity via face, content, construct, and criterion measures. Standardized recall periods and comprehensive scoring systems were notably absent.
Conclusions: Existing tools for assessing adherence to dietary-related behavioral recommendations after MBS show significant variability, with most lacking standardized psychometric properties and recall periods, limiting their utility. Future research should focus on standardizing dietary-related "core principles," facilitating the development of new instruments in research and clinical settings.
期刊介绍：
Obesity Reviews is a monthly journal publishing reviews on all disciplines related to obesity and its comorbidities. This includes basic and behavioral sciences, clinical treatment and outcomes, epidemiology, prevention and public health. The journal should, therefore, appeal to all professionals with an interest in obesity and its comorbidities.
Review types may include systematic narrative reviews, quantitative meta-analyses and narrative reviews but all must offer new insights, critical or novel perspectives that will enhance the state of knowledge in the field.
The editorial policy is to publish high quality peer-reviewed manuscripts that provide needed new insight into all aspects of obesity and its related comorbidities while minimizing the period between submission and publication.
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：
京公网安备 11010802042870号
