慢性偏头痛患者的疼痛应对与药物过度使用性头痛

IF 2.7 3区 心理学 Q2 BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES
Thomas C. van den Hoek, Judith A. Pijpers, Erik W. van Zwet, Irene de Boer, Gisela M. Terwindt
{"title":"慢性偏头痛患者的疼痛应对与药物过度使用性头痛","authors":"Thomas C. van den Hoek,&nbsp;Judith A. Pijpers,&nbsp;Erik W. van Zwet,&nbsp;Irene de Boer,&nbsp;Gisela M. Terwindt","doi":"10.1002/brb3.70739","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Background</h3>\n \n <p>Chronic migraine (CM) is a leading cause of disability and often linked to medication overuse headache (MOH). Psychological factors, such as pain coping, may contribute to chronification and medication overuse. While behavioral therapy can help, identifying patients who will benefit remains challenging. This study compared pain coping in individuals with CM and MOH to those with episodic migraine (EM) and controls without headache. It also assessed whether baseline pain coping in CM patients could predict withdrawal treatment success.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>In patients that received behavioral therapy as part of the Chronification and Reversibility of Migraine clinical trial, patients with CM and MOH were assessed at baseline and after treatment on pain acceptance with the Acceptance and Action Questionnaire II for Pain (AAQ-II-P), and with the Pain-catastrophizing scale (PCS) and Headache Specific Locus of Control (HSLC) questionnaires. The non-headache groups were assessed once. In total, 65 CM, 34 EM, and 49 non-headache controls were included.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>Patients with CM experienced less pain acceptance compared with EM patients and healthy controls with AAQ-II-P (adjusted mean difference [AMD]: 10.0 [95% CI: 3.7–16.2], <i>p</i> &lt; 0.001 and AMD: 13.9 [95% CI: 7.8–20.1], <i>p</i> &lt; 0.001, respectively) and had higher PCS (AMD: 12.1 [95% CI: 5.2–19.0], <i>p</i> &lt; 0.001, AMD: 17.3 [95% CI: 10.5—24.0], <i>p</i> &lt; 0.001, respectively), but comparable PCS to patients with back pain or depression. Patients with CM were more likely to believe their headaches were due to coincidence compared to EM, HSLC-chance (AMD: 4.0 [95% CI: 0.3–7.7], <i>p</i> = 0.034). Importantly, higher PCS scores were associated with greater reduction in migraine days after treatment (OR: 1.06 [95% CI 1.01–1.11], <i>p</i> = 0.030).</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\n \n <p>Patients with CM demonstrated poorer pain coping compared to those with EM and healthy controls. High catastrophizing in patients with CM predicts a better response to behavioral withdrawal treatment.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":9081,"journal":{"name":"Brain and Behavior","volume":"15 8","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/brb3.70739","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Pain Coping in Patients With Chronic Migraine and Medication Overuse Headache\",\"authors\":\"Thomas C. van den Hoek,&nbsp;Judith A. Pijpers,&nbsp;Erik W. van Zwet,&nbsp;Irene de Boer,&nbsp;Gisela M. Terwindt\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/brb3.70739\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n \\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Background</h3>\\n \\n <p>Chronic migraine (CM) is a leading cause of disability and often linked to medication overuse headache (MOH). Psychological factors, such as pain coping, may contribute to chronification and medication overuse. While behavioral therapy can help, identifying patients who will benefit remains challenging. This study compared pain coping in individuals with CM and MOH to those with episodic migraine (EM) and controls without headache. It also assessed whether baseline pain coping in CM patients could predict withdrawal treatment success.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Methods</h3>\\n \\n <p>In patients that received behavioral therapy as part of the Chronification and Reversibility of Migraine clinical trial, patients with CM and MOH were assessed at baseline and after treatment on pain acceptance with the Acceptance and Action Questionnaire II for Pain (AAQ-II-P), and with the Pain-catastrophizing scale (PCS) and Headache Specific Locus of Control (HSLC) questionnaires. The non-headache groups were assessed once. In total, 65 CM, 34 EM, and 49 non-headache controls were included.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Results</h3>\\n \\n <p>Patients with CM experienced less pain acceptance compared with EM patients and healthy controls with AAQ-II-P (adjusted mean difference [AMD]: 10.0 [95% CI: 3.7–16.2], <i>p</i> &lt; 0.001 and AMD: 13.9 [95% CI: 7.8–20.1], <i>p</i> &lt; 0.001, respectively) and had higher PCS (AMD: 12.1 [95% CI: 5.2–19.0], <i>p</i> &lt; 0.001, AMD: 17.3 [95% CI: 10.5—24.0], <i>p</i> &lt; 0.001, respectively), but comparable PCS to patients with back pain or depression. Patients with CM were more likely to believe their headaches were due to coincidence compared to EM, HSLC-chance (AMD: 4.0 [95% CI: 0.3–7.7], <i>p</i> = 0.034). Importantly, higher PCS scores were associated with greater reduction in migraine days after treatment (OR: 1.06 [95% CI 1.01–1.11], <i>p</i> = 0.030).</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\\n \\n <p>Patients with CM demonstrated poorer pain coping compared to those with EM and healthy controls. High catastrophizing in patients with CM predicts a better response to behavioral withdrawal treatment.</p>\\n </section>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":9081,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Brain and Behavior\",\"volume\":\"15 8\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-12\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/brb3.70739\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Brain and Behavior\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"102\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/brb3.70739\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"心理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Brain and Behavior","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/brb3.70739","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

慢性偏头痛(CM)是致残的主要原因,通常与药物过度使用头痛(MOH)有关。心理因素,如疼痛应对,可能导致慢性和药物滥用。虽然行为疗法有所帮助,但确定哪些患者将从中受益仍然具有挑战性。本研究比较了CM和MOH患者与发作性偏头痛(EM)患者和无头痛对照组的疼痛应对能力。它还评估了CM患者的基线疼痛应对是否可以预测戒断治疗的成功。方法在作为偏头痛慢性化和可逆性临床试验的一部分接受行为治疗的患者中,采用疼痛接受和行动问卷II (AAQ-II-P)、疼痛灾难化量表(PCS)和头痛特异性控制点(HSLC)问卷对CM和MOH患者在基线和治疗后的疼痛接受度进行评估。非头痛组评估一次。共纳入65例CM、34例EM和49例非头痛对照。结果CM患者的疼痛接受度低于EM患者和健康对照组(校正平均差值[AMD]: 10.0 [95% CI: 3.7-16.2], p <;0.001和AMD: 13.9 [95% CI: 7.8-20.1], p <;0.001)和较高的PCS (AMD: 12.1 [95% CI: 5.2-19.0], p <;0.001, AMD: 17.3 [95% CI: 10.5-24.0], p <;分别为0.001),但与背痛或抑郁症患者的PCS比较。与EM、hslc相比,CM患者更倾向于认为头痛是巧合(AMD: 4.0 [95% CI: 0.3-7.7], p = 0.034)。重要的是,PCS评分越高,治疗后偏头痛天数减少越多(OR: 1.06 [95% CI 1.01-1.11], p = 0.030)。结论与EM和健康对照相比,CM患者表现出较差的疼痛应对能力。CM患者的高灾难化预示着对行为戒断治疗的更好反应。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Pain Coping in Patients With Chronic Migraine and Medication Overuse Headache

Pain Coping in Patients With Chronic Migraine and Medication Overuse Headache

Background

Chronic migraine (CM) is a leading cause of disability and often linked to medication overuse headache (MOH). Psychological factors, such as pain coping, may contribute to chronification and medication overuse. While behavioral therapy can help, identifying patients who will benefit remains challenging. This study compared pain coping in individuals with CM and MOH to those with episodic migraine (EM) and controls without headache. It also assessed whether baseline pain coping in CM patients could predict withdrawal treatment success.

Methods

In patients that received behavioral therapy as part of the Chronification and Reversibility of Migraine clinical trial, patients with CM and MOH were assessed at baseline and after treatment on pain acceptance with the Acceptance and Action Questionnaire II for Pain (AAQ-II-P), and with the Pain-catastrophizing scale (PCS) and Headache Specific Locus of Control (HSLC) questionnaires. The non-headache groups were assessed once. In total, 65 CM, 34 EM, and 49 non-headache controls were included.

Results

Patients with CM experienced less pain acceptance compared with EM patients and healthy controls with AAQ-II-P (adjusted mean difference [AMD]: 10.0 [95% CI: 3.7–16.2], p < 0.001 and AMD: 13.9 [95% CI: 7.8–20.1], p < 0.001, respectively) and had higher PCS (AMD: 12.1 [95% CI: 5.2–19.0], p < 0.001, AMD: 17.3 [95% CI: 10.5—24.0], p < 0.001, respectively), but comparable PCS to patients with back pain or depression. Patients with CM were more likely to believe their headaches were due to coincidence compared to EM, HSLC-chance (AMD: 4.0 [95% CI: 0.3–7.7], p = 0.034). Importantly, higher PCS scores were associated with greater reduction in migraine days after treatment (OR: 1.06 [95% CI 1.01–1.11], p = 0.030).

Conclusions

Patients with CM demonstrated poorer pain coping compared to those with EM and healthy controls. High catastrophizing in patients with CM predicts a better response to behavioral withdrawal treatment.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Brain and Behavior
Brain and Behavior BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES-NEUROSCIENCES
CiteScore
5.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
352
审稿时长
14 weeks
期刊介绍: Brain and Behavior is supported by other journals published by Wiley, including a number of society-owned journals. The journals listed below support Brain and Behavior and participate in the Manuscript Transfer Program by referring articles of suitable quality and offering authors the option to have their paper, with any peer review reports, automatically transferred to Brain and Behavior. * [Acta Psychiatrica Scandinavica](https://publons.com/journal/1366/acta-psychiatrica-scandinavica) * [Addiction Biology](https://publons.com/journal/1523/addiction-biology) * [Aggressive Behavior](https://publons.com/journal/3611/aggressive-behavior) * [Brain Pathology](https://publons.com/journal/1787/brain-pathology) * [Child: Care, Health and Development](https://publons.com/journal/6111/child-care-health-and-development) * [Criminal Behaviour and Mental Health](https://publons.com/journal/3839/criminal-behaviour-and-mental-health) * [Depression and Anxiety](https://publons.com/journal/1528/depression-and-anxiety) * Developmental Neurobiology * [Developmental Science](https://publons.com/journal/1069/developmental-science) * [European Journal of Neuroscience](https://publons.com/journal/1441/european-journal-of-neuroscience) * [Genes, Brain and Behavior](https://publons.com/journal/1635/genes-brain-and-behavior) * [GLIA](https://publons.com/journal/1287/glia) * [Hippocampus](https://publons.com/journal/1056/hippocampus) * [Human Brain Mapping](https://publons.com/journal/500/human-brain-mapping) * [Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour](https://publons.com/journal/7330/journal-for-the-theory-of-social-behaviour) * [Journal of Comparative Neurology](https://publons.com/journal/1306/journal-of-comparative-neurology) * [Journal of Neuroimaging](https://publons.com/journal/6379/journal-of-neuroimaging) * [Journal of Neuroscience Research](https://publons.com/journal/2778/journal-of-neuroscience-research) * [Journal of Organizational Behavior](https://publons.com/journal/1123/journal-of-organizational-behavior) * [Journal of the Peripheral Nervous System](https://publons.com/journal/3929/journal-of-the-peripheral-nervous-system) * [Muscle & Nerve](https://publons.com/journal/4448/muscle-and-nerve) * [Neural Pathology and Applied Neurobiology](https://publons.com/journal/2401/neuropathology-and-applied-neurobiology)
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信