探索企业社会倡导和社交媒体参与:来自本杰里的见解

IF 3.4 3区 管理学 Q2 BUSINESS
Beris Artan Özoran , Aycan Ulusan
{"title":"探索企业社会倡导和社交媒体参与:来自本杰里的见解","authors":"Beris Artan Özoran ,&nbsp;Aycan Ulusan","doi":"10.1016/j.pubrev.2025.102616","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>This study investigates corporate social advocacy (CSA) and social media engagement through an in-depth analysis of Ben &amp; Jerry’s Instagram communication as a multinational company. A mixed-methods design was employed, combining (1) a quantitative content analysis of 1257 Instagram posts shared across six English-speaking country accounts, and (2) a supervised machine-learning analysis of 11,695 user comments posted under racial and criminal justice-related CSA content on the U.S. account. The post-level analysis examined the frequency, type, and geographic variation of CSA versus CSR content. The comment-level analysis explored the distribution of user responses—such as criticism, support, boycott, and others—using a multi-class classification model trained on a manually coded sample. The findings suggest that both the volume and thematic focus of CSA content varied across national contexts, reflecting differing sociopolitical sensitivities. The comment analysis revealed a broad range of audience reactions associated with CSA category, underscoring the complex and sometimes polarizing nature of CSA communication. This study contributes theoretically by offering a cross-national perspective on CSA messaging strategies and consumer response patterns. Methodologically, it advances the use of machine learning for analyzing large-scale audience discourse. Practically, it offers guidance for brands navigating CSA in diverse cultural environments while managing reputational risks and stakeholder expectations.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48263,"journal":{"name":"Public Relations Review","volume":"51 4","pages":"Article 102616"},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Exploring corporate social advocacy and social media engagement: Insights from Ben & Jerry’s\",\"authors\":\"Beris Artan Özoran ,&nbsp;Aycan Ulusan\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.pubrev.2025.102616\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>This study investigates corporate social advocacy (CSA) and social media engagement through an in-depth analysis of Ben &amp; Jerry’s Instagram communication as a multinational company. A mixed-methods design was employed, combining (1) a quantitative content analysis of 1257 Instagram posts shared across six English-speaking country accounts, and (2) a supervised machine-learning analysis of 11,695 user comments posted under racial and criminal justice-related CSA content on the U.S. account. The post-level analysis examined the frequency, type, and geographic variation of CSA versus CSR content. The comment-level analysis explored the distribution of user responses—such as criticism, support, boycott, and others—using a multi-class classification model trained on a manually coded sample. The findings suggest that both the volume and thematic focus of CSA content varied across national contexts, reflecting differing sociopolitical sensitivities. The comment analysis revealed a broad range of audience reactions associated with CSA category, underscoring the complex and sometimes polarizing nature of CSA communication. This study contributes theoretically by offering a cross-national perspective on CSA messaging strategies and consumer response patterns. Methodologically, it advances the use of machine learning for analyzing large-scale audience discourse. Practically, it offers guidance for brands navigating CSA in diverse cultural environments while managing reputational risks and stakeholder expectations.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48263,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Public Relations Review\",\"volume\":\"51 4\",\"pages\":\"Article 102616\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-12\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Public Relations Review\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"91\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0363811125000785\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"管理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"BUSINESS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Public Relations Review","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0363811125000785","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"BUSINESS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本研究通过深入分析Ben &;作为一家跨国公司,杰瑞的Instagram交流。采用混合方法设计,结合(1)对六个英语国家帐户共享的1257个Instagram帖子进行定量内容分析,以及(2)对美国帐户上与种族和刑事司法相关的CSA内容下发布的11,695条用户评论进行监督机器学习分析。后水平分析检查了CSA与CSR内容的频率、类型和地理差异。评论级分析使用在手动编码样本上训练的多类分类模型探索用户响应的分布——比如批评、支持、抵制等。研究结果表明,CSA内容的数量和主题重点在不同的国家背景下有所不同,反映了不同的社会政治敏感性。评论分析揭示了与CSA类别相关的广泛的受众反应,强调了CSA传播的复杂性,有时甚至是两极化的性质。本研究提供了CSA信息传递策略和消费者反应模式的跨国视角,从而在理论上做出了贡献。在方法上,它推进了机器学习用于分析大规模受众话语的使用。实际上,它为品牌在不同的文化环境中导航CSA提供了指导,同时管理声誉风险和利益相关者的期望。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Exploring corporate social advocacy and social media engagement: Insights from Ben & Jerry’s
This study investigates corporate social advocacy (CSA) and social media engagement through an in-depth analysis of Ben & Jerry’s Instagram communication as a multinational company. A mixed-methods design was employed, combining (1) a quantitative content analysis of 1257 Instagram posts shared across six English-speaking country accounts, and (2) a supervised machine-learning analysis of 11,695 user comments posted under racial and criminal justice-related CSA content on the U.S. account. The post-level analysis examined the frequency, type, and geographic variation of CSA versus CSR content. The comment-level analysis explored the distribution of user responses—such as criticism, support, boycott, and others—using a multi-class classification model trained on a manually coded sample. The findings suggest that both the volume and thematic focus of CSA content varied across national contexts, reflecting differing sociopolitical sensitivities. The comment analysis revealed a broad range of audience reactions associated with CSA category, underscoring the complex and sometimes polarizing nature of CSA communication. This study contributes theoretically by offering a cross-national perspective on CSA messaging strategies and consumer response patterns. Methodologically, it advances the use of machine learning for analyzing large-scale audience discourse. Practically, it offers guidance for brands navigating CSA in diverse cultural environments while managing reputational risks and stakeholder expectations.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
8.00
自引率
19.00%
发文量
90
期刊介绍: The Public Relations Review is the oldest journal devoted to articles that examine public relations in depth, and commentaries by specialists in the field. Most of the articles are based on empirical research undertaken by professionals and academics in the field. In addition to research articles and commentaries, The Review publishes invited research in brief, and book reviews in the fields of public relations, mass communications, organizational communications, public opinion formations, social science research and evaluation, marketing, management and public policy formation.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信