H Ulrich, A-S Heldele, M Gierig, T Letzel, J E Drewes
{"title":"城市污水及混合液中PFAS的筛选——以TOP法为求和参数。","authors":"H Ulrich, A-S Heldele, M Gierig, T Letzel, J E Drewes","doi":"10.1016/j.chemosphere.2025.144612","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Wastewater treatment plants (WWTPs) are a point source for the release of per- and polyfluorinated alkyl substances (PFAS) into the environment. In our study we investigated wastewater effluent and mixed liquor samples for PFAS in order to obtain information on the current PFAS contamination in municipal WWTPs in Bavaria, Germany. In addition to PFAS target analysis, the total oxidizable precursor (TOP) assay was used as a PFAS sum parameter to obtain information on the precursor concentration in the samples. The sewersheds of the investigated wastewater treatment plants were characterized according to the industrial sectors that discharge into the public sewer system using the Statistical Classification of Economic Activities in the European Community (NACE) code. Known PFAS were detected in all effluent samples, except one, and in concentrations up to 4.700 ng L<sup>-1</sup>. The concentrations in effluent samples varied widely between the different sampling dates at the individual WWTPs and also between the different WWTPs. The PFAS concentration in the effluent of 65 % of the WWTPs investigated increased significantly by a factor of 2.9 on average after the TOP assay. In the mixed liquor samples, the PFAS concentration ranged between 56 and 440 μg kg<sup>-1</sup> dw. The concentration varied less than in the effluent samples. After the TOP assay the PFAS concentration in the mixed liquor samples increased on average by a factor of 4. The NACE codes alone cannot be used to determine whether low or high PFAS concentrations are to be expected in a municipal WWTP. However, they can provide an indication of PFAS dischargers and help to prioritize further investigations. Without the TOP assay, the PFAS concentration in the effluent and the mixed liquor samples is clearly underestimated. Our investigations identified hotspots with very high PFAS concentrations in the WWTP effluents. Measures must be taken at the sources to prevent the further release of PFAS into the environment via municipal WWTPs.</p>","PeriodicalId":93933,"journal":{"name":"Chemosphere","volume":"386 ","pages":"144612"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"PFAS screening in municipal wastewater effluents and mixed liquor - using TOP assay as a sum parameter.\",\"authors\":\"H Ulrich, A-S Heldele, M Gierig, T Letzel, J E Drewes\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.chemosphere.2025.144612\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Wastewater treatment plants (WWTPs) are a point source for the release of per- and polyfluorinated alkyl substances (PFAS) into the environment. In our study we investigated wastewater effluent and mixed liquor samples for PFAS in order to obtain information on the current PFAS contamination in municipal WWTPs in Bavaria, Germany. In addition to PFAS target analysis, the total oxidizable precursor (TOP) assay was used as a PFAS sum parameter to obtain information on the precursor concentration in the samples. The sewersheds of the investigated wastewater treatment plants were characterized according to the industrial sectors that discharge into the public sewer system using the Statistical Classification of Economic Activities in the European Community (NACE) code. Known PFAS were detected in all effluent samples, except one, and in concentrations up to 4.700 ng L<sup>-1</sup>. The concentrations in effluent samples varied widely between the different sampling dates at the individual WWTPs and also between the different WWTPs. The PFAS concentration in the effluent of 65 % of the WWTPs investigated increased significantly by a factor of 2.9 on average after the TOP assay. In the mixed liquor samples, the PFAS concentration ranged between 56 and 440 μg kg<sup>-1</sup> dw. The concentration varied less than in the effluent samples. After the TOP assay the PFAS concentration in the mixed liquor samples increased on average by a factor of 4. The NACE codes alone cannot be used to determine whether low or high PFAS concentrations are to be expected in a municipal WWTP. However, they can provide an indication of PFAS dischargers and help to prioritize further investigations. Without the TOP assay, the PFAS concentration in the effluent and the mixed liquor samples is clearly underestimated. Our investigations identified hotspots with very high PFAS concentrations in the WWTP effluents. Measures must be taken at the sources to prevent the further release of PFAS into the environment via municipal WWTPs.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":93933,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Chemosphere\",\"volume\":\"386 \",\"pages\":\"144612\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Chemosphere\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2025.144612\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/8/8 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Chemosphere","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2025.144612","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/8/8 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
污水处理厂(WWTPs)是全氟和多氟烷基物质(PFAS)排放到环境中的点源。在我们的研究中,我们调查了废水和混合液样品的PFAS,以获得目前在德国巴伐利亚州城市污水处理厂中PFAS污染的信息。除PFAS靶分析外,总氧化前体(TOP)测定法作为PFAS和参数,可获得样品中前体浓度的信息。采用欧共体经济活动统计分类(NACE)规范,根据向公共下水道系统排放污水的工业部门,对所调查的污水处理厂的下水道进行了表征。除一个外,在所有废水样品中都检测到已知的PFAS,其浓度高达4.700 ng L-1。在各个污水处理厂的不同采样日期之间以及不同污水处理厂之间,污水样品中的浓度差异很大。65%污水处理厂的出水PFAS浓度在TOP试验后平均显著增加2.9倍。混合液样品中PFAS浓度在56 ~ 440 μg kg-1 dw之间。浓度变化小于流出样品。TOP测定后,混合液样品中PFAS浓度平均增加4倍。仅凭国家环境污染评估标准不能确定城市污水处理厂的PFAS浓度是低还是高。然而,它们可以提供PFAS放电的指示,并有助于确定进一步调查的优先顺序。如果不采用TOP分析,则出水和混合液样品中的PFAS浓度明显被低估。我们的调查确定了污水处理厂污水中PFAS浓度非常高的热点地区。必须在源头采取措施,防止PFAS通过市政污水处理厂进一步排放到环境中。
PFAS screening in municipal wastewater effluents and mixed liquor - using TOP assay as a sum parameter.
Wastewater treatment plants (WWTPs) are a point source for the release of per- and polyfluorinated alkyl substances (PFAS) into the environment. In our study we investigated wastewater effluent and mixed liquor samples for PFAS in order to obtain information on the current PFAS contamination in municipal WWTPs in Bavaria, Germany. In addition to PFAS target analysis, the total oxidizable precursor (TOP) assay was used as a PFAS sum parameter to obtain information on the precursor concentration in the samples. The sewersheds of the investigated wastewater treatment plants were characterized according to the industrial sectors that discharge into the public sewer system using the Statistical Classification of Economic Activities in the European Community (NACE) code. Known PFAS were detected in all effluent samples, except one, and in concentrations up to 4.700 ng L-1. The concentrations in effluent samples varied widely between the different sampling dates at the individual WWTPs and also between the different WWTPs. The PFAS concentration in the effluent of 65 % of the WWTPs investigated increased significantly by a factor of 2.9 on average after the TOP assay. In the mixed liquor samples, the PFAS concentration ranged between 56 and 440 μg kg-1 dw. The concentration varied less than in the effluent samples. After the TOP assay the PFAS concentration in the mixed liquor samples increased on average by a factor of 4. The NACE codes alone cannot be used to determine whether low or high PFAS concentrations are to be expected in a municipal WWTP. However, they can provide an indication of PFAS dischargers and help to prioritize further investigations. Without the TOP assay, the PFAS concentration in the effluent and the mixed liquor samples is clearly underestimated. Our investigations identified hotspots with very high PFAS concentrations in the WWTP effluents. Measures must be taken at the sources to prevent the further release of PFAS into the environment via municipal WWTPs.