脑卒中后上肢运动障碍的神经影像学和运动学生物标志物。

IF 3.6 2区 医学 Q2 NEUROIMAGING
Joyce L Chen, Timothy K Lam, Melanie C Baniña, Daniele Piscitelli, Mindy F Levin
{"title":"脑卒中后上肢运动障碍的神经影像学和运动学生物标志物。","authors":"Joyce L Chen, Timothy K Lam, Melanie C Baniña, Daniele Piscitelli, Mindy F Levin","doi":"10.1016/j.nicl.2025.103854","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Structural and functional biomarkers derived from magnetic resonance imaging explain some variance in post-stroke motor impairment. The understanding of the nature of impairment and the discrimination between true behavioural motor recovery/restitution and motor compensation may be improved by the addition of kinematic information. The aim of the study was to determine the influence of neuroimaging combined with kinematic biomarkers in explaining the variance in motor impairment of the upper limb. People living with late sub-acute to chronic stroke (n = 25) underwent the Fugl Meyer Assessment - Upper Limb (FMA-UL), magnetic resonance imaging, and completed a reaching task where upper limb and trunk kinematics were recorded. Regression analyses were performed to determine the amount of variability in FMA-UL explained by the following biomarkers: the amount of corticospinal tract impacted by the stroke lesion (CST involvement), interhemispheric and ipsilesional resting state connectivity, and the Trunk-based Index of Performance (IPt) that measures skilled reaching ability while accounting for trunk compensation. CST involvement, interhemispheric connectivity, and the IPt, together explained ∼49 % of the variance in the FMA-UL (F(3,21) = 8.694, p = 0.001, R<sup>2</sup><sub>adj</sub> = 0.49). The IPt explained an additional 14 % of the variance in the FMA-UL compared to CST involvement alone (p = 0.02). The IPt is a relevant kinematic biomarker of post-stroke upper limb motor impairment. Our findings suggest the importance of using multiple categories of biomarkers to better understand the level of post-stroke motor impairment.</p>","PeriodicalId":54359,"journal":{"name":"Neuroimage-Clinical","volume":"48 ","pages":"103854"},"PeriodicalIF":3.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12356466/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Neuroimaging and kinematic biomarkers of post-stroke upper limb motor impairment.\",\"authors\":\"Joyce L Chen, Timothy K Lam, Melanie C Baniña, Daniele Piscitelli, Mindy F Levin\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.nicl.2025.103854\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Structural and functional biomarkers derived from magnetic resonance imaging explain some variance in post-stroke motor impairment. The understanding of the nature of impairment and the discrimination between true behavioural motor recovery/restitution and motor compensation may be improved by the addition of kinematic information. The aim of the study was to determine the influence of neuroimaging combined with kinematic biomarkers in explaining the variance in motor impairment of the upper limb. People living with late sub-acute to chronic stroke (n = 25) underwent the Fugl Meyer Assessment - Upper Limb (FMA-UL), magnetic resonance imaging, and completed a reaching task where upper limb and trunk kinematics were recorded. Regression analyses were performed to determine the amount of variability in FMA-UL explained by the following biomarkers: the amount of corticospinal tract impacted by the stroke lesion (CST involvement), interhemispheric and ipsilesional resting state connectivity, and the Trunk-based Index of Performance (IPt) that measures skilled reaching ability while accounting for trunk compensation. CST involvement, interhemispheric connectivity, and the IPt, together explained ∼49 % of the variance in the FMA-UL (F(3,21) = 8.694, p = 0.001, R<sup>2</sup><sub>adj</sub> = 0.49). The IPt explained an additional 14 % of the variance in the FMA-UL compared to CST involvement alone (p = 0.02). The IPt is a relevant kinematic biomarker of post-stroke upper limb motor impairment. Our findings suggest the importance of using multiple categories of biomarkers to better understand the level of post-stroke motor impairment.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":54359,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Neuroimage-Clinical\",\"volume\":\"48 \",\"pages\":\"103854\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-28\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12356466/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Neuroimage-Clinical\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nicl.2025.103854\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"NEUROIMAGING\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Neuroimage-Clinical","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nicl.2025.103854","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"NEUROIMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

磁共振成像的结构和功能生物标志物解释了脑卒中后运动障碍的一些差异。对损伤性质的理解以及真正的行为运动恢复/恢复和运动补偿之间的区别可以通过添加运动学信息来改进。该研究的目的是确定神经影像学结合运动学生物标志物在解释上肢运动损伤变异方面的影响。晚期亚急性到慢性中风患者(n = 25)接受了Fugl Meyer上肢评估(FMA-UL)、磁共振成像,并完成了上肢和躯干运动学记录的到达任务。进行回归分析以确定由以下生物标志物解释的FMA-UL变异性的数量:脑卒中病变影响的皮质脊髓束的数量(CST受累),半球间和同侧静息状态连通性,以及基于主干的性能指数(IPt),该指数在考虑主干代偿的同时衡量熟练的到达能力。CST受累、半球间连通性和IPt共同解释了FMA-UL中约49%的差异(F(3,21) = 8.694, p = 0.001, r2 = 0.49)。与CST单独受累相比,IPt解释了FMA-UL额外14%的差异(p = 0.02)。IPt是卒中后上肢运动损伤的相关运动学生物标志物。我们的研究结果表明,使用多种生物标志物来更好地了解中风后运动损伤水平的重要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Neuroimaging and kinematic biomarkers of post-stroke upper limb motor impairment.

Structural and functional biomarkers derived from magnetic resonance imaging explain some variance in post-stroke motor impairment. The understanding of the nature of impairment and the discrimination between true behavioural motor recovery/restitution and motor compensation may be improved by the addition of kinematic information. The aim of the study was to determine the influence of neuroimaging combined with kinematic biomarkers in explaining the variance in motor impairment of the upper limb. People living with late sub-acute to chronic stroke (n = 25) underwent the Fugl Meyer Assessment - Upper Limb (FMA-UL), magnetic resonance imaging, and completed a reaching task where upper limb and trunk kinematics were recorded. Regression analyses were performed to determine the amount of variability in FMA-UL explained by the following biomarkers: the amount of corticospinal tract impacted by the stroke lesion (CST involvement), interhemispheric and ipsilesional resting state connectivity, and the Trunk-based Index of Performance (IPt) that measures skilled reaching ability while accounting for trunk compensation. CST involvement, interhemispheric connectivity, and the IPt, together explained ∼49 % of the variance in the FMA-UL (F(3,21) = 8.694, p = 0.001, R2adj = 0.49). The IPt explained an additional 14 % of the variance in the FMA-UL compared to CST involvement alone (p = 0.02). The IPt is a relevant kinematic biomarker of post-stroke upper limb motor impairment. Our findings suggest the importance of using multiple categories of biomarkers to better understand the level of post-stroke motor impairment.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Neuroimage-Clinical
Neuroimage-Clinical NEUROIMAGING-
CiteScore
7.50
自引率
4.80%
发文量
368
审稿时长
52 days
期刊介绍: NeuroImage: Clinical, a journal of diseases, disorders and syndromes involving the Nervous System, provides a vehicle for communicating important advances in the study of abnormal structure-function relationships of the human nervous system based on imaging. The focus of NeuroImage: Clinical is on defining changes to the brain associated with primary neurologic and psychiatric diseases and disorders of the nervous system as well as behavioral syndromes and developmental conditions. The main criterion for judging papers is the extent of scientific advancement in the understanding of the pathophysiologic mechanisms of diseases and disorders, in identification of functional models that link clinical signs and symptoms with brain function and in the creation of image based tools applicable to a broad range of clinical needs including diagnosis, monitoring and tracking of illness, predicting therapeutic response and development of new treatments. Papers dealing with structure and function in animal models will also be considered if they reveal mechanisms that can be readily translated to human conditions.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信