自闭症儿童或青少年(CYP)和成人中创伤后应激障碍(PTSD)的患病率:系统回顾和荟萃分析。

IF 12.2 1区 心理学 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL
Clinical Psychology Review Pub Date : 2025-08-01 Epub Date: 2025-07-19 DOI:10.1016/j.cpr.2025.102621
Hassan Mansour, Suman Kurana, Aphrodite Eshetu, Sarah Hoare, Celine El Baou, Isabelle Arnold, Clemence Halys, Gavin R Stewart, Roopal Desai, Amber John, Will Mandy, Elizabeth O'Nions, Joshua Stott
{"title":"自闭症儿童或青少年(CYP)和成人中创伤后应激障碍(PTSD)的患病率:系统回顾和荟萃分析。","authors":"Hassan Mansour, Suman Kurana, Aphrodite Eshetu, Sarah Hoare, Celine El Baou, Isabelle Arnold, Clemence Halys, Gavin R Stewart, Roopal Desai, Amber John, Will Mandy, Elizabeth O'Nions, Joshua Stott","doi":"10.1016/j.cpr.2025.102621","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Autistic individuals are more likely to encounter traumatic events and mental health challenges throughout their lives. While multiple studies have explored the link between autism and post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD), no meta-analysis has comprehensively synthesised PTSD prevalence rates according to DSM or ICD diagnostic manuals. This is important for ensuring appropriate intervention for this underserved population. Therefore, the current meta-analysis investigated the point and lifetime prevalence of PTSD among diagnosed autistic children or young people (CYP) and adults. A thorough systematic search identified 17 studies involving 53,918 autistic CYP and 13 studies with 142,081 autistic adults. Random-effects meta-analyses indicated a point prevalence of 1.11 % (95 % CI: 0.32; 2.38) among autistic CYP and 2.06 % (95 % CI: 0.00; 11.97) among autistic adults. Lifetime prevalence was 5.74 % (95 % CI: 2.12; 10.99) for autistic CYP and 2.72 % (95 % CI: 2.54; 2.90) for autistic adults. Subgroup analyses identified several factors influencing rates: co-occurring intellectual disability, gender proportion, diagnostic criteria (e.g., DSM vs. ICD), and informant type (self-report vs. combined self and carer/parent). Although PTSD prevalence rates are similar to general population estimates, they contrast with previous studies using screening tools, which reported substantially higher PTSD symptomatology in autistic individuals. This discrepancy may highlight some limitations of current PTSD diagnostic criteria, which may not fully capture how trauma is experienced and expressed by autistic individuals, leading to underdiagnosis and potentially significant adverse outcomes. Future research should focus on developing autism-specific diagnostic guidelines to better identify and address PTSD in this population, ensuring more timely support.</p>","PeriodicalId":48458,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Psychology Review","volume":"120 ","pages":"102621"},"PeriodicalIF":12.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Prevalence of Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD) in autistic children or young people (CYP) and adults: A systematic review and meta-analysis.\",\"authors\":\"Hassan Mansour, Suman Kurana, Aphrodite Eshetu, Sarah Hoare, Celine El Baou, Isabelle Arnold, Clemence Halys, Gavin R Stewart, Roopal Desai, Amber John, Will Mandy, Elizabeth O'Nions, Joshua Stott\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.cpr.2025.102621\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Autistic individuals are more likely to encounter traumatic events and mental health challenges throughout their lives. While multiple studies have explored the link between autism and post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD), no meta-analysis has comprehensively synthesised PTSD prevalence rates according to DSM or ICD diagnostic manuals. This is important for ensuring appropriate intervention for this underserved population. Therefore, the current meta-analysis investigated the point and lifetime prevalence of PTSD among diagnosed autistic children or young people (CYP) and adults. A thorough systematic search identified 17 studies involving 53,918 autistic CYP and 13 studies with 142,081 autistic adults. Random-effects meta-analyses indicated a point prevalence of 1.11 % (95 % CI: 0.32; 2.38) among autistic CYP and 2.06 % (95 % CI: 0.00; 11.97) among autistic adults. Lifetime prevalence was 5.74 % (95 % CI: 2.12; 10.99) for autistic CYP and 2.72 % (95 % CI: 2.54; 2.90) for autistic adults. Subgroup analyses identified several factors influencing rates: co-occurring intellectual disability, gender proportion, diagnostic criteria (e.g., DSM vs. ICD), and informant type (self-report vs. combined self and carer/parent). Although PTSD prevalence rates are similar to general population estimates, they contrast with previous studies using screening tools, which reported substantially higher PTSD symptomatology in autistic individuals. This discrepancy may highlight some limitations of current PTSD diagnostic criteria, which may not fully capture how trauma is experienced and expressed by autistic individuals, leading to underdiagnosis and potentially significant adverse outcomes. Future research should focus on developing autism-specific diagnostic guidelines to better identify and address PTSD in this population, ensuring more timely support.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48458,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Clinical Psychology Review\",\"volume\":\"120 \",\"pages\":\"102621\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":12.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Clinical Psychology Review\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"102\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cpr.2025.102621\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"心理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/7/19 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Psychology Review","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cpr.2025.102621","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/7/19 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

自闭症患者一生中更有可能遇到创伤性事件和心理健康挑战。虽然有多项研究探索了自闭症和创伤后应激障碍(PTSD)之间的联系,但没有一项荟萃分析根据DSM或ICD诊断手册全面综合了PTSD的患病率。这对于确保对这一得不到充分服务的人群进行适当干预至关重要。因此,本荟萃分析调查了诊断为自闭症的儿童或青少年(CYP)和成人中创伤后应激障碍的点和终生患病率。一项全面的系统搜索确定了17项研究,涉及53,918名自闭症CYP和13项研究,涉及142,081名自闭症成年人。随机效应荟萃分析显示,点患病率为1.11% (95% CI: 0.32;2.38), 2.06% (95% CI: 0.00;11.97)。终生患病率为5.74% (95% CI: 2.12;10.99), 2.72% (95% CI: 2.54;2.90)。亚组分析确定了影响发生率的几个因素:共同发生的智力残疾、性别比例、诊断标准(例如,DSM vs. ICD)和信息提供者类型(自我报告vs.自我和照顾者/父母联合报告)。尽管PTSD患病率与一般人群估计相似,但它们与先前使用筛查工具的研究形成对比,后者报告自闭症个体的PTSD症状明显较高。这种差异可能突出了当前PTSD诊断标准的一些局限性,这些标准可能没有完全捕捉到自闭症患者是如何经历和表达创伤的,从而导致诊断不足和潜在的严重不良后果。未来的研究应侧重于制定自闭症特异性诊断指南,以更好地识别和解决这一人群的创伤后应激障碍,确保更及时的支持。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Prevalence of Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD) in autistic children or young people (CYP) and adults: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Autistic individuals are more likely to encounter traumatic events and mental health challenges throughout their lives. While multiple studies have explored the link between autism and post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD), no meta-analysis has comprehensively synthesised PTSD prevalence rates according to DSM or ICD diagnostic manuals. This is important for ensuring appropriate intervention for this underserved population. Therefore, the current meta-analysis investigated the point and lifetime prevalence of PTSD among diagnosed autistic children or young people (CYP) and adults. A thorough systematic search identified 17 studies involving 53,918 autistic CYP and 13 studies with 142,081 autistic adults. Random-effects meta-analyses indicated a point prevalence of 1.11 % (95 % CI: 0.32; 2.38) among autistic CYP and 2.06 % (95 % CI: 0.00; 11.97) among autistic adults. Lifetime prevalence was 5.74 % (95 % CI: 2.12; 10.99) for autistic CYP and 2.72 % (95 % CI: 2.54; 2.90) for autistic adults. Subgroup analyses identified several factors influencing rates: co-occurring intellectual disability, gender proportion, diagnostic criteria (e.g., DSM vs. ICD), and informant type (self-report vs. combined self and carer/parent). Although PTSD prevalence rates are similar to general population estimates, they contrast with previous studies using screening tools, which reported substantially higher PTSD symptomatology in autistic individuals. This discrepancy may highlight some limitations of current PTSD diagnostic criteria, which may not fully capture how trauma is experienced and expressed by autistic individuals, leading to underdiagnosis and potentially significant adverse outcomes. Future research should focus on developing autism-specific diagnostic guidelines to better identify and address PTSD in this population, ensuring more timely support.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Clinical Psychology Review
Clinical Psychology Review PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL-
CiteScore
23.10
自引率
1.60%
发文量
65
期刊介绍: Clinical Psychology Review serves as a platform for substantial reviews addressing pertinent topics in clinical psychology. Encompassing a spectrum of issues, from psychopathology to behavior therapy, cognition to cognitive therapies, behavioral medicine to community mental health, assessment, and child development, the journal seeks cutting-edge papers that significantly contribute to advancing the science and/or practice of clinical psychology. While maintaining a primary focus on topics directly related to clinical psychology, the journal occasionally features reviews on psychophysiology, learning therapy, experimental psychopathology, and social psychology, provided they demonstrate a clear connection to research or practice in clinical psychology. Integrative literature reviews and summaries of innovative ongoing clinical research programs find a place within its pages. However, reports on individual research studies and theoretical treatises or clinical guides lacking an empirical base are deemed inappropriate for publication.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信