不同类型高胆固醇血症的分类、患病率和心血管风险。

IF 4.9 2区 医学 Q1 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS
Fernando Civeira, Estíbaliz Jarauta, Victoria Marco-Benedí, Ana M Bea, Rocío Mateo-Gallego, Itziar Lamiquiz-Moneo, Irene Gracia-Rubio, Daniel Bello-Álvarez, Martín Laclaustra, María Teresa Tejedor, Salvador Olmos, Ana Cenarro
{"title":"不同类型高胆固醇血症的分类、患病率和心血管风险。","authors":"Fernando Civeira, Estíbaliz Jarauta, Victoria Marco-Benedí, Ana M Bea, Rocío Mateo-Gallego, Itziar Lamiquiz-Moneo, Irene Gracia-Rubio, Daniel Bello-Álvarez, Martín Laclaustra, María Teresa Tejedor, Salvador Olmos, Ana Cenarro","doi":"10.1016/j.rec.2025.07.004","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction and objectives: </strong>The frequency, clinical characteristics and risk of atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD) of the different types of hypercholesterolemia are not well established. The primary and secondary objectives of this study were to determine the cause of hypercholesterolemia and whether the cause confers a different ASCVD prognosis.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The analysis included 3474 probands with primary hypercholesterolemia, of whom 3283 (94.8%) were followed up for 9.33± 5.8 years for ASCVD. Genetic analysis of familial hypercholesterolemia (FH) genes, polygenic risk score for hypercholesterolemia, and lipid concentrations, including lipoprotein(a), were used to classify hypercholesterolemia.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The diagnoses were heterozygous FH, n=400 (11.5%); hyperlipoproteinemia(a), n=181 (5.2%); polygenic hypercholesterolemia, n=434 (12.5%); hyperlipoproteinemia(a) plus polygenic hypercholesterolemia, n=128 (3.7%); multifactorial, n=1562 (45.0%); and idiopathic, n=769 (22.1%). At baseline, low-density lipoprotein cholesterol levels were higher in heterozygous FH, and the prevalence of ASCVD was higher in hyperlipoproteinemia(a). Other clinical and biochemical characteristics did not differ among hypercholesterolemia subgroups. The survival rate was lower in participants with hyperlipoproteinemia(a) than in the other hypercholesterolemia groups (P=.001). Variables independently associated with ASCVD events during follow-up were age, male sex, the presence of ASCVD, diabetes or hypertension at baseline, current smoking, lipoprotein(a) concentration, and high-density lipoprotein cholesterol concentration, the latter being inversely associated with ASCVD events. Total mortality was independent of the type of hypercholesterolemia.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Genetic hypercholesterolemia has a worse prognosis for ASCVD than nongenetic hypercholesterolemia. Among individuals with genetic hypercholesterolemia, those with elevated lipoprotein(a) have the worst prognosis. Conventional lipid-lowering treatment for low-density lipoprotein cholesterol appears to be less effective in hypercholesterolemia due to hyperlipoproteinemia(a) than in other forms of hypercholesterolemia.</p>","PeriodicalId":38430,"journal":{"name":"Revista española de cardiología (English ed.)","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Classification, prevalence and cardiovascular risk of different types of hypercholesterolemia.\",\"authors\":\"Fernando Civeira, Estíbaliz Jarauta, Victoria Marco-Benedí, Ana M Bea, Rocío Mateo-Gallego, Itziar Lamiquiz-Moneo, Irene Gracia-Rubio, Daniel Bello-Álvarez, Martín Laclaustra, María Teresa Tejedor, Salvador Olmos, Ana Cenarro\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.rec.2025.07.004\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction and objectives: </strong>The frequency, clinical characteristics and risk of atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD) of the different types of hypercholesterolemia are not well established. The primary and secondary objectives of this study were to determine the cause of hypercholesterolemia and whether the cause confers a different ASCVD prognosis.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The analysis included 3474 probands with primary hypercholesterolemia, of whom 3283 (94.8%) were followed up for 9.33± 5.8 years for ASCVD. Genetic analysis of familial hypercholesterolemia (FH) genes, polygenic risk score for hypercholesterolemia, and lipid concentrations, including lipoprotein(a), were used to classify hypercholesterolemia.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The diagnoses were heterozygous FH, n=400 (11.5%); hyperlipoproteinemia(a), n=181 (5.2%); polygenic hypercholesterolemia, n=434 (12.5%); hyperlipoproteinemia(a) plus polygenic hypercholesterolemia, n=128 (3.7%); multifactorial, n=1562 (45.0%); and idiopathic, n=769 (22.1%). At baseline, low-density lipoprotein cholesterol levels were higher in heterozygous FH, and the prevalence of ASCVD was higher in hyperlipoproteinemia(a). Other clinical and biochemical characteristics did not differ among hypercholesterolemia subgroups. The survival rate was lower in participants with hyperlipoproteinemia(a) than in the other hypercholesterolemia groups (P=.001). Variables independently associated with ASCVD events during follow-up were age, male sex, the presence of ASCVD, diabetes or hypertension at baseline, current smoking, lipoprotein(a) concentration, and high-density lipoprotein cholesterol concentration, the latter being inversely associated with ASCVD events. Total mortality was independent of the type of hypercholesterolemia.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Genetic hypercholesterolemia has a worse prognosis for ASCVD than nongenetic hypercholesterolemia. Among individuals with genetic hypercholesterolemia, those with elevated lipoprotein(a) have the worst prognosis. Conventional lipid-lowering treatment for low-density lipoprotein cholesterol appears to be less effective in hypercholesterolemia due to hyperlipoproteinemia(a) than in other forms of hypercholesterolemia.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":38430,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Revista española de cardiología (English ed.)\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-07\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Revista española de cardiología (English ed.)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rec.2025.07.004\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Revista española de cardiología (English ed.)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rec.2025.07.004","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

前言和目的:不同类型高胆固醇血症的发生频率、临床特征和发生动脉粥样硬化性心血管疾病(ASCVD)的风险尚不明确。本研究的主要和次要目的是确定高胆固醇血症的原因,以及该原因是否会导致不同的ASCVD预后。方法:分析3474例原发性高胆固醇血症先证患者,其中3283例(94.8%)因ASCVD随访9.33±5.8年。家族性高胆固醇血症(FH)基因的遗传分析、高胆固醇血症的多基因风险评分和脂质浓度,包括脂蛋白(a),被用来对高胆固醇血症进行分类。结果:诊断为杂合性FH, n = 400例(11.5%);高脂蛋白血症(a), n = 181 (5.2%);多基因高胆固醇血症,n = 434 (12.5%);高脂蛋白血症(a)加多基因高胆固醇血症,n = 128 (3.7%);多因素,n = 1562 (45.0%);特发性,n = 769(22.1%)。基线时,杂合子FH患者低密度脂蛋白胆固醇水平较高,高脂蛋白血症患者ASCVD患病率较高(a)。其他临床和生化特征在高胆固醇血症亚组之间没有差异。高脂蛋白血症(a)患者的生存率低于其他高胆固醇血症组(P = .001)。随访期间与ASCVD事件独立相关的变量有年龄、男性、是否存在ASCVD、基线时是否患有糖尿病或高血压、当前吸烟、脂蛋白(a)浓度和高密度脂蛋白胆固醇浓度,后者与ASCVD事件呈负相关。总死亡率与高胆固醇血症的类型无关。结论:遗传性高胆固醇血症比非遗传性高胆固醇血症对ASCVD的预后更差。在遗传性高胆固醇血症患者中,脂蛋白(a)升高的患者预后最差。传统的低密度脂蛋白胆固醇降脂治疗在高脂蛋白血症引起的高胆固醇血症(a)中似乎不如其他形式的高胆固醇血症有效。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Classification, prevalence and cardiovascular risk of different types of hypercholesterolemia.

Introduction and objectives: The frequency, clinical characteristics and risk of atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD) of the different types of hypercholesterolemia are not well established. The primary and secondary objectives of this study were to determine the cause of hypercholesterolemia and whether the cause confers a different ASCVD prognosis.

Methods: The analysis included 3474 probands with primary hypercholesterolemia, of whom 3283 (94.8%) were followed up for 9.33± 5.8 years for ASCVD. Genetic analysis of familial hypercholesterolemia (FH) genes, polygenic risk score for hypercholesterolemia, and lipid concentrations, including lipoprotein(a), were used to classify hypercholesterolemia.

Results: The diagnoses were heterozygous FH, n=400 (11.5%); hyperlipoproteinemia(a), n=181 (5.2%); polygenic hypercholesterolemia, n=434 (12.5%); hyperlipoproteinemia(a) plus polygenic hypercholesterolemia, n=128 (3.7%); multifactorial, n=1562 (45.0%); and idiopathic, n=769 (22.1%). At baseline, low-density lipoprotein cholesterol levels were higher in heterozygous FH, and the prevalence of ASCVD was higher in hyperlipoproteinemia(a). Other clinical and biochemical characteristics did not differ among hypercholesterolemia subgroups. The survival rate was lower in participants with hyperlipoproteinemia(a) than in the other hypercholesterolemia groups (P=.001). Variables independently associated with ASCVD events during follow-up were age, male sex, the presence of ASCVD, diabetes or hypertension at baseline, current smoking, lipoprotein(a) concentration, and high-density lipoprotein cholesterol concentration, the latter being inversely associated with ASCVD events. Total mortality was independent of the type of hypercholesterolemia.

Conclusions: Genetic hypercholesterolemia has a worse prognosis for ASCVD than nongenetic hypercholesterolemia. Among individuals with genetic hypercholesterolemia, those with elevated lipoprotein(a) have the worst prognosis. Conventional lipid-lowering treatment for low-density lipoprotein cholesterol appears to be less effective in hypercholesterolemia due to hyperlipoproteinemia(a) than in other forms of hypercholesterolemia.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
219
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信