探讨基于人工智能分析唾液腺肿瘤组织病理变异性的可行性。

IF 3.9 2区 综合性期刊 Q1 MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES
Ibrahim Alsanie, Adam Shephard, Neda Azarmehr, Pablo Vargas, Miranda Pring, Nasir M Rajpoot, Syed Ali Khurram
{"title":"探讨基于人工智能分析唾液腺肿瘤组织病理变异性的可行性。","authors":"Ibrahim Alsanie, Adam Shephard, Neda Azarmehr, Pablo Vargas, Miranda Pring, Nasir M Rajpoot, Syed Ali Khurram","doi":"10.1038/s41598-025-15249-5","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This study uses artificial intelligence (AI) for differentiation between salivary gland tumours (SGT) using digitised Haematoxylin and Eosin stained whole-slide images (WSI). Machine learning (ML) classifiers were developed and tested using 320 scanned WSI. These included a benign versus malignant classifier (BvM) for automated identification of benign and malignant tumours, a malignant sub-typing (MST) classifier for subtyping four most common malignant SGT and a third classifier for malignant tumour grading. ML results were also compared with deep learning models. All ML classifiers showed an excellent accuracy. An F1 score of 0.95 was seen for benign vs. malignant and malignant subtyping tasks and 0.87 for automated grading. In comparison, the best performing DL models showed F1 scores of 0.80, 0.60 and 0.70 for the same tasks respectively. External validation on an independent cohort demonstrated good accuracy, with an F1 score of 0.87 for both the benign vs. malignant and grading classifiers. A notable association between cellularity, nuclear haematoxylin, cytoplasmic eosin, and nucleus/cell ratio (p < 0.01) were seen between tumours. Our novel findings show that AI can be used for automated differentiation between SGT. Analysis of larger multicentre cohorts is required to establish the significance and clinical usefulness of these findings.</p>","PeriodicalId":21811,"journal":{"name":"Scientific Reports","volume":"15 1","pages":"29171"},"PeriodicalIF":3.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12335458/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Exploring the feasibility of AI-based analysis of histopathological variability in salivary gland tumours.\",\"authors\":\"Ibrahim Alsanie, Adam Shephard, Neda Azarmehr, Pablo Vargas, Miranda Pring, Nasir M Rajpoot, Syed Ali Khurram\",\"doi\":\"10.1038/s41598-025-15249-5\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>This study uses artificial intelligence (AI) for differentiation between salivary gland tumours (SGT) using digitised Haematoxylin and Eosin stained whole-slide images (WSI). Machine learning (ML) classifiers were developed and tested using 320 scanned WSI. These included a benign versus malignant classifier (BvM) for automated identification of benign and malignant tumours, a malignant sub-typing (MST) classifier for subtyping four most common malignant SGT and a third classifier for malignant tumour grading. ML results were also compared with deep learning models. All ML classifiers showed an excellent accuracy. An F1 score of 0.95 was seen for benign vs. malignant and malignant subtyping tasks and 0.87 for automated grading. In comparison, the best performing DL models showed F1 scores of 0.80, 0.60 and 0.70 for the same tasks respectively. External validation on an independent cohort demonstrated good accuracy, with an F1 score of 0.87 for both the benign vs. malignant and grading classifiers. A notable association between cellularity, nuclear haematoxylin, cytoplasmic eosin, and nucleus/cell ratio (p < 0.01) were seen between tumours. Our novel findings show that AI can be used for automated differentiation between SGT. Analysis of larger multicentre cohorts is required to establish the significance and clinical usefulness of these findings.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":21811,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Scientific Reports\",\"volume\":\"15 1\",\"pages\":\"29171\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-09\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12335458/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Scientific Reports\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"103\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-025-15249-5\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"综合性期刊\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Scientific Reports","FirstCategoryId":"103","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-025-15249-5","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"综合性期刊","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本研究使用人工智能(AI)通过数字化血红素和伊红染色全片图像(WSI)来区分唾液腺肿瘤(SGT)。机器学习(ML)分类器的开发和测试使用320扫描WSI。其中包括用于自动识别良性和恶性肿瘤的良性与恶性分类器(BvM),用于对四种最常见的恶性SGT进行分类的恶性分型(MST)分类器,以及用于恶性肿瘤分级的第三种分类器。ML结果也与深度学习模型进行了比较。所有ML分类器都显示出优异的准确率。良性与恶性和恶性亚型任务的F1得分为0.95,自动评分为0.87。相比之下,对于相同的任务,表现最好的DL模型的F1得分分别为0.80、0.60和0.70。独立队列的外部验证显示出良好的准确性,良性与恶性和分级分类器的F1得分均为0.87。细胞密度、核血红素、细胞质伊红和核/细胞比之间的显著关联(p
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Exploring the feasibility of AI-based analysis of histopathological variability in salivary gland tumours.

This study uses artificial intelligence (AI) for differentiation between salivary gland tumours (SGT) using digitised Haematoxylin and Eosin stained whole-slide images (WSI). Machine learning (ML) classifiers were developed and tested using 320 scanned WSI. These included a benign versus malignant classifier (BvM) for automated identification of benign and malignant tumours, a malignant sub-typing (MST) classifier for subtyping four most common malignant SGT and a third classifier for malignant tumour grading. ML results were also compared with deep learning models. All ML classifiers showed an excellent accuracy. An F1 score of 0.95 was seen for benign vs. malignant and malignant subtyping tasks and 0.87 for automated grading. In comparison, the best performing DL models showed F1 scores of 0.80, 0.60 and 0.70 for the same tasks respectively. External validation on an independent cohort demonstrated good accuracy, with an F1 score of 0.87 for both the benign vs. malignant and grading classifiers. A notable association between cellularity, nuclear haematoxylin, cytoplasmic eosin, and nucleus/cell ratio (p < 0.01) were seen between tumours. Our novel findings show that AI can be used for automated differentiation between SGT. Analysis of larger multicentre cohorts is required to establish the significance and clinical usefulness of these findings.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Scientific Reports
Scientific Reports Natural Science Disciplines-
CiteScore
7.50
自引率
4.30%
发文量
19567
审稿时长
3.9 months
期刊介绍: We publish original research from all areas of the natural sciences, psychology, medicine and engineering. You can learn more about what we publish by browsing our specific scientific subject areas below or explore Scientific Reports by browsing all articles and collections. Scientific Reports has a 2-year impact factor: 4.380 (2021), and is the 6th most-cited journal in the world, with more than 540,000 citations in 2020 (Clarivate Analytics, 2021). •Engineering Engineering covers all aspects of engineering, technology, and applied science. It plays a crucial role in the development of technologies to address some of the world''s biggest challenges, helping to save lives and improve the way we live. •Physical sciences Physical sciences are those academic disciplines that aim to uncover the underlying laws of nature — often written in the language of mathematics. It is a collective term for areas of study including astronomy, chemistry, materials science and physics. •Earth and environmental sciences Earth and environmental sciences cover all aspects of Earth and planetary science and broadly encompass solid Earth processes, surface and atmospheric dynamics, Earth system history, climate and climate change, marine and freshwater systems, and ecology. It also considers the interactions between humans and these systems. •Biological sciences Biological sciences encompass all the divisions of natural sciences examining various aspects of vital processes. The concept includes anatomy, physiology, cell biology, biochemistry and biophysics, and covers all organisms from microorganisms, animals to plants. •Health sciences The health sciences study health, disease and healthcare. This field of study aims to develop knowledge, interventions and technology for use in healthcare to improve the treatment of patients.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信