同一天出院袖胃切除术在军事治疗设施:方案和初步结果。

IF 1.7 3区 医学 Q2 SURGERY
Journal of Surgical Research Pub Date : 2025-10-01 Epub Date: 2025-08-08 DOI:10.1016/j.jss.2025.07.013
Hannah Palmerton, Grace Pak, Bobby Zhang, Robert Shawhan, C Rees Porta
{"title":"同一天出院袖胃切除术在军事治疗设施:方案和初步结果。","authors":"Hannah Palmerton, Grace Pak, Bobby Zhang, Robert Shawhan, C Rees Porta","doi":"10.1016/j.jss.2025.07.013","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>The laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG) has become the most common bariatric surgery. Due to its relative safety and low complication rate, it has been more commonly performed as an ambulatory surgery. \"Outpatient\" or discharge from postanesthesia care unit within 23 h has been well studied in the civilian sector and has been shown to result in reduced costs, hospital-acquired infections, and improved patient satisfaction. Although there are numerous benefits to outpatient LSG, the military health system has been slow to adopt this practice. This study represents the first and only series on same day (SD)-LSG within the military and demonstrates our protocol, experience, and initial outcomes at Madigan Army Medical Center.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Twenty-eight patients underwent SD-LSG between April 28, 2021, and May 22, 2023. Before initiation of the SD-LSG, a multidisciplinary protocol to include all phases of care (surgical clinic, operating room, and the postanesthesia care unit) was created. Data were prospectively collected. Exclusion criteria included patients with BMI >50 kg/m<sup>2</sup>, expected operative time >2 h, nonambulatory, intermediate or high cardiac risk, severe obstructive sleep apnea, immunocompromised, or dialysis dependent. The primary outcomes included mortality, complications, and readmission rates. The secondary outcomes included patient satisfaction, operating room and postanesthesia care unit times, pIV patency rates, and percent excess body weight loss.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Our patient demographics were similar to national demographics for all LSG in the Metabolic and Bariatric Surgery Accreditation and Quality Improvement Program reported for the same period, with the exception of being slightly younger. During the study period in our institution, 76 LSG were performed in total, 46 of which were performed by participating surgeons and therefore included in the study. Of those included, 28 (61%) were same-day LSG, and 18 (39%) were inpatient LSG, as they did not qualify for the same-day protocol. Of the same-day group, none required unplanned postoperative admission. We had no mortality, reoperations, or readmissions. Metabolic and Bariatric Surgery Accreditation and Quality Improvement Program data for the same time frame showed 2.4% readmissions, 0.4% reoperations, and 0.1% mortality. We had one Clavien-Dindo class 2 complication of postoperative hematoma requiring transfusion (3.6%, n = 1/28), which is comparable to reported minor complication rates for LSG, ranging from 2.5% to 5.8% in the literature.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>SD-LSG can be a safe and feasible practice in the military health system, helping to offload the inpatient census. Initiating this protocol requires careful patient selection, a multidisciplinary approach, and appropriate coordination with all phases of patient care. SD-LSG has comparable risks to inpatient LSG while reducing inpatient hospital care burden and improving patient satisfaction.</p>","PeriodicalId":17030,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Surgical Research","volume":"314 ","pages":"284-290"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Same-Day Discharge Sleeve Gastrectomy at a Military Treatment Facility: Protocol and Initial Outcomes.\",\"authors\":\"Hannah Palmerton, Grace Pak, Bobby Zhang, Robert Shawhan, C Rees Porta\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jss.2025.07.013\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>The laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG) has become the most common bariatric surgery. Due to its relative safety and low complication rate, it has been more commonly performed as an ambulatory surgery. \\\"Outpatient\\\" or discharge from postanesthesia care unit within 23 h has been well studied in the civilian sector and has been shown to result in reduced costs, hospital-acquired infections, and improved patient satisfaction. Although there are numerous benefits to outpatient LSG, the military health system has been slow to adopt this practice. This study represents the first and only series on same day (SD)-LSG within the military and demonstrates our protocol, experience, and initial outcomes at Madigan Army Medical Center.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Twenty-eight patients underwent SD-LSG between April 28, 2021, and May 22, 2023. Before initiation of the SD-LSG, a multidisciplinary protocol to include all phases of care (surgical clinic, operating room, and the postanesthesia care unit) was created. Data were prospectively collected. Exclusion criteria included patients with BMI >50 kg/m<sup>2</sup>, expected operative time >2 h, nonambulatory, intermediate or high cardiac risk, severe obstructive sleep apnea, immunocompromised, or dialysis dependent. The primary outcomes included mortality, complications, and readmission rates. The secondary outcomes included patient satisfaction, operating room and postanesthesia care unit times, pIV patency rates, and percent excess body weight loss.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Our patient demographics were similar to national demographics for all LSG in the Metabolic and Bariatric Surgery Accreditation and Quality Improvement Program reported for the same period, with the exception of being slightly younger. During the study period in our institution, 76 LSG were performed in total, 46 of which were performed by participating surgeons and therefore included in the study. Of those included, 28 (61%) were same-day LSG, and 18 (39%) were inpatient LSG, as they did not qualify for the same-day protocol. Of the same-day group, none required unplanned postoperative admission. We had no mortality, reoperations, or readmissions. Metabolic and Bariatric Surgery Accreditation and Quality Improvement Program data for the same time frame showed 2.4% readmissions, 0.4% reoperations, and 0.1% mortality. We had one Clavien-Dindo class 2 complication of postoperative hematoma requiring transfusion (3.6%, n = 1/28), which is comparable to reported minor complication rates for LSG, ranging from 2.5% to 5.8% in the literature.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>SD-LSG can be a safe and feasible practice in the military health system, helping to offload the inpatient census. Initiating this protocol requires careful patient selection, a multidisciplinary approach, and appropriate coordination with all phases of patient care. SD-LSG has comparable risks to inpatient LSG while reducing inpatient hospital care burden and improving patient satisfaction.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":17030,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Surgical Research\",\"volume\":\"314 \",\"pages\":\"284-290\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Surgical Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jss.2025.07.013\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/8/8 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"SURGERY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Surgical Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jss.2025.07.013","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/8/8 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

腹腔镜袖式胃切除术(LSG)已成为最常见的减肥手术。由于其相对安全性和低并发症发生率,它更常作为门诊手术进行。民间部门对“门诊”或麻醉后护理单位在23小时内出院进行了深入研究,结果显示可降低费用、减少医院获得性感染并提高患者满意度。尽管门诊LSG有很多好处,但军队卫生系统采用这种做法的速度很慢。这项研究代表了第一个也是唯一一个在军队中进行的同日(SD)-LSG系列研究,并展示了我们在Madigan陆军医疗中心的方案、经验和初步结果。方法:28例患者于2021年4月28日至2023年5月22日期间接受了SD-LSG治疗。在SD-LSG启动之前,创建了一个包括所有护理阶段(外科诊所、手术室和麻醉后护理单元)的多学科协议。前瞻性地收集数据。排除标准包括BMI >50 kg/m2,预计手术时间bbb_1 2 h,非卧床,中度或高度心脏风险,严重阻塞性睡眠呼吸暂停,免疫功能受损或透析依赖的患者。主要结局包括死亡率、并发症和再入院率。次要结果包括患者满意度、手术室和麻醉后护理单位时间、pIV通畅率和体重减轻百分比。结果:我们的患者人口统计数据与同期代谢和减肥手术认证和质量改进计划中报告的所有LSG的国家人口统计数据相似,除了稍微年轻一些。在我院的研究期间,共进行了76例LSG手术,其中46例由参与研究的外科医生进行,因此纳入了研究。其中28例(61%)为当日LSG, 18例(39%)为住院LSG,因为他们不符合当日方案。在同一天的组中,没有人需要术后非计划住院。我们没有死亡、再手术或再入院。同一时间段的代谢和减肥手术认证和质量改进项目数据显示2.4%的再入院率,0.4%的再手术率和0.1%的死亡率。我们有一例Clavien-Dindo 2级并发症,术后血肿需要输血(3.6%,n = 1/28),这与文献中报道的LSG轻微并发症发生率相当,范围为2.5%至5.8%。结论:SD-LSG在军队卫生系统中是一种安全可行的做法,有助于减轻住院人口的负担。启动该方案需要仔细选择患者,采用多学科方法,并与患者护理的各个阶段进行适当协调。SD-LSG与住院LSG的风险相当,同时减轻了住院患者的医院护理负担,提高了患者满意度。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Same-Day Discharge Sleeve Gastrectomy at a Military Treatment Facility: Protocol and Initial Outcomes.

Introduction: The laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG) has become the most common bariatric surgery. Due to its relative safety and low complication rate, it has been more commonly performed as an ambulatory surgery. "Outpatient" or discharge from postanesthesia care unit within 23 h has been well studied in the civilian sector and has been shown to result in reduced costs, hospital-acquired infections, and improved patient satisfaction. Although there are numerous benefits to outpatient LSG, the military health system has been slow to adopt this practice. This study represents the first and only series on same day (SD)-LSG within the military and demonstrates our protocol, experience, and initial outcomes at Madigan Army Medical Center.

Methods: Twenty-eight patients underwent SD-LSG between April 28, 2021, and May 22, 2023. Before initiation of the SD-LSG, a multidisciplinary protocol to include all phases of care (surgical clinic, operating room, and the postanesthesia care unit) was created. Data were prospectively collected. Exclusion criteria included patients with BMI >50 kg/m2, expected operative time >2 h, nonambulatory, intermediate or high cardiac risk, severe obstructive sleep apnea, immunocompromised, or dialysis dependent. The primary outcomes included mortality, complications, and readmission rates. The secondary outcomes included patient satisfaction, operating room and postanesthesia care unit times, pIV patency rates, and percent excess body weight loss.

Results: Our patient demographics were similar to national demographics for all LSG in the Metabolic and Bariatric Surgery Accreditation and Quality Improvement Program reported for the same period, with the exception of being slightly younger. During the study period in our institution, 76 LSG were performed in total, 46 of which were performed by participating surgeons and therefore included in the study. Of those included, 28 (61%) were same-day LSG, and 18 (39%) were inpatient LSG, as they did not qualify for the same-day protocol. Of the same-day group, none required unplanned postoperative admission. We had no mortality, reoperations, or readmissions. Metabolic and Bariatric Surgery Accreditation and Quality Improvement Program data for the same time frame showed 2.4% readmissions, 0.4% reoperations, and 0.1% mortality. We had one Clavien-Dindo class 2 complication of postoperative hematoma requiring transfusion (3.6%, n = 1/28), which is comparable to reported minor complication rates for LSG, ranging from 2.5% to 5.8% in the literature.

Conclusions: SD-LSG can be a safe and feasible practice in the military health system, helping to offload the inpatient census. Initiating this protocol requires careful patient selection, a multidisciplinary approach, and appropriate coordination with all phases of patient care. SD-LSG has comparable risks to inpatient LSG while reducing inpatient hospital care burden and improving patient satisfaction.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.90
自引率
4.50%
发文量
627
审稿时长
138 days
期刊介绍: The Journal of Surgical Research: Clinical and Laboratory Investigation publishes original articles concerned with clinical and laboratory investigations relevant to surgical practice and teaching. The journal emphasizes reports of clinical investigations or fundamental research bearing directly on surgical management that will be of general interest to a broad range of surgeons and surgical researchers. The articles presented need not have been the products of surgeons or of surgical laboratories. The Journal of Surgical Research also features review articles and special articles relating to educational, research, or social issues of interest to the academic surgical community.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信