评估抗菌蓝光(aBL)处理经皮骨整合种植体皮肤-种植体界面生物膜负担的潜力。

IF 2.3 3区 医学 Q2 ORTHOPEDICS
Jemi Ong Watts, Richard Tyler Epperson, Brooke Kawaguchi, Aaron Olsen, Josh Tam, Paul Pasquina, Brad Isaacson, Jeremy Gililland, Dustin Williams
{"title":"评估抗菌蓝光(aBL)处理经皮骨整合种植体皮肤-种植体界面生物膜负担的潜力。","authors":"Jemi Ong Watts, Richard Tyler Epperson, Brooke Kawaguchi, Aaron Olsen, Josh Tam, Paul Pasquina, Brad Isaacson, Jeremy Gililland, Dustin Williams","doi":"10.1002/jor.70039","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Percutaneous osseointegrated implants offer significant benefits to amputees, including improved mechanical feedback and reduced skin irritation. However, their percutaneous nature increases susceptibility to biofilm-associated infections. This study evaluated the potential efficacy of antimicrobial blue light (aBL) as a preventive strategy to manage biofilm burden in a 12-week ovine model wherein two treatment cycles were implemented. In this study, aBL was applied proactively to reduce surface colonization and prevent infection progression, rather than to treat confirmed or deep infections. Sheep were inoculated with Staphylococcus aureus biofilm and treated with aBL or systemic antibiotics, with or without a washing protocol. aBL with washing achieved the greatest bacterial reduction, lowering CFU levels to 3.0 ± 0.3 log<sub>10</sub> during the second treatment period, significantly outperforming washing alone, which resulted in 5.6 ± 0.4 log<sub>10</sub> (p < 0.05). The study also showed a lower observed infection rate (14% vs. 43%), when comparing aBL with washing to washing only based on histologic, microCT, and gross assessments, though no statistical comparison was performed. Despite these benefits, the aBL treatments induced notable tissue changes, including increased epithelial thickening, rete ridge elongation, and accelerated skin/tissue downgrowth. Systemic antibiotics were effective during the initial treatment period but failed to reduce biofilm burden during the second treatment cycle. Altogether, while aBL combined with washing shows promise as a localized preventive therapy for reducing biofilm burden and implant-related infection, the observed tissue remodeling and accelerated downgrowth highlight the need for further investigation to ensure long-term safety.</p>","PeriodicalId":16650,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Orthopaedic Research®","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Assessing the Potential of Antimicrobial Blue Light (aBL) to Manage Biofilm Burden at the Skin-Implant Interface of Percutaneous Osseointegrated Implants.\",\"authors\":\"Jemi Ong Watts, Richard Tyler Epperson, Brooke Kawaguchi, Aaron Olsen, Josh Tam, Paul Pasquina, Brad Isaacson, Jeremy Gililland, Dustin Williams\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/jor.70039\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Percutaneous osseointegrated implants offer significant benefits to amputees, including improved mechanical feedback and reduced skin irritation. However, their percutaneous nature increases susceptibility to biofilm-associated infections. This study evaluated the potential efficacy of antimicrobial blue light (aBL) as a preventive strategy to manage biofilm burden in a 12-week ovine model wherein two treatment cycles were implemented. In this study, aBL was applied proactively to reduce surface colonization and prevent infection progression, rather than to treat confirmed or deep infections. Sheep were inoculated with Staphylococcus aureus biofilm and treated with aBL or systemic antibiotics, with or without a washing protocol. aBL with washing achieved the greatest bacterial reduction, lowering CFU levels to 3.0 ± 0.3 log<sub>10</sub> during the second treatment period, significantly outperforming washing alone, which resulted in 5.6 ± 0.4 log<sub>10</sub> (p < 0.05). The study also showed a lower observed infection rate (14% vs. 43%), when comparing aBL with washing to washing only based on histologic, microCT, and gross assessments, though no statistical comparison was performed. Despite these benefits, the aBL treatments induced notable tissue changes, including increased epithelial thickening, rete ridge elongation, and accelerated skin/tissue downgrowth. Systemic antibiotics were effective during the initial treatment period but failed to reduce biofilm burden during the second treatment cycle. Altogether, while aBL combined with washing shows promise as a localized preventive therapy for reducing biofilm burden and implant-related infection, the observed tissue remodeling and accelerated downgrowth highlight the need for further investigation to ensure long-term safety.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":16650,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Orthopaedic Research®\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Orthopaedic Research®\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1002/jor.70039\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ORTHOPEDICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Orthopaedic Research®","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/jor.70039","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

经皮骨整合植入物为截肢者提供了显著的益处,包括改善机械反馈和减少皮肤刺激。然而,它们的经皮性质增加了对生物膜相关感染的易感性。本研究在一个12周的羊模型中评估了抗菌蓝光(aBL)作为控制生物膜负荷的预防策略的潜在功效,其中实施了两个治疗周期。在本研究中,aBL被主动应用于减少表面定植和预防感染进展,而不是治疗确诊或深度感染。绵羊接种金黄色葡萄球菌生物膜,用aBL或全身抗生素治疗,有或没有清洗方案。洗涤aBL达到最大的细菌减少效果,在第二个处理期间将CFU水平降低到3.0±0.3 log10,明显优于单独洗涤的5.6±0.4 log10 (p
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Assessing the Potential of Antimicrobial Blue Light (aBL) to Manage Biofilm Burden at the Skin-Implant Interface of Percutaneous Osseointegrated Implants.

Percutaneous osseointegrated implants offer significant benefits to amputees, including improved mechanical feedback and reduced skin irritation. However, their percutaneous nature increases susceptibility to biofilm-associated infections. This study evaluated the potential efficacy of antimicrobial blue light (aBL) as a preventive strategy to manage biofilm burden in a 12-week ovine model wherein two treatment cycles were implemented. In this study, aBL was applied proactively to reduce surface colonization and prevent infection progression, rather than to treat confirmed or deep infections. Sheep were inoculated with Staphylococcus aureus biofilm and treated with aBL or systemic antibiotics, with or without a washing protocol. aBL with washing achieved the greatest bacterial reduction, lowering CFU levels to 3.0 ± 0.3 log10 during the second treatment period, significantly outperforming washing alone, which resulted in 5.6 ± 0.4 log10 (p < 0.05). The study also showed a lower observed infection rate (14% vs. 43%), when comparing aBL with washing to washing only based on histologic, microCT, and gross assessments, though no statistical comparison was performed. Despite these benefits, the aBL treatments induced notable tissue changes, including increased epithelial thickening, rete ridge elongation, and accelerated skin/tissue downgrowth. Systemic antibiotics were effective during the initial treatment period but failed to reduce biofilm burden during the second treatment cycle. Altogether, while aBL combined with washing shows promise as a localized preventive therapy for reducing biofilm burden and implant-related infection, the observed tissue remodeling and accelerated downgrowth highlight the need for further investigation to ensure long-term safety.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Orthopaedic Research®
Journal of Orthopaedic Research® 医学-整形外科
CiteScore
6.10
自引率
3.60%
发文量
261
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Orthopaedic Research is the forum for the rapid publication of high quality reports of new information on the full spectrum of orthopaedic research, including life sciences, engineering, translational, and clinical studies.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信