Jemi Ong Watts, Richard Tyler Epperson, Brooke Kawaguchi, Aaron Olsen, Josh Tam, Paul Pasquina, Brad Isaacson, Jeremy Gililland, Dustin Williams
{"title":"评估抗菌蓝光(aBL)处理经皮骨整合种植体皮肤-种植体界面生物膜负担的潜力。","authors":"Jemi Ong Watts, Richard Tyler Epperson, Brooke Kawaguchi, Aaron Olsen, Josh Tam, Paul Pasquina, Brad Isaacson, Jeremy Gililland, Dustin Williams","doi":"10.1002/jor.70039","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Percutaneous osseointegrated implants offer significant benefits to amputees, including improved mechanical feedback and reduced skin irritation. However, their percutaneous nature increases susceptibility to biofilm-associated infections. This study evaluated the potential efficacy of antimicrobial blue light (aBL) as a preventive strategy to manage biofilm burden in a 12-week ovine model wherein two treatment cycles were implemented. In this study, aBL was applied proactively to reduce surface colonization and prevent infection progression, rather than to treat confirmed or deep infections. Sheep were inoculated with Staphylococcus aureus biofilm and treated with aBL or systemic antibiotics, with or without a washing protocol. aBL with washing achieved the greatest bacterial reduction, lowering CFU levels to 3.0 ± 0.3 log<sub>10</sub> during the second treatment period, significantly outperforming washing alone, which resulted in 5.6 ± 0.4 log<sub>10</sub> (p < 0.05). The study also showed a lower observed infection rate (14% vs. 43%), when comparing aBL with washing to washing only based on histologic, microCT, and gross assessments, though no statistical comparison was performed. Despite these benefits, the aBL treatments induced notable tissue changes, including increased epithelial thickening, rete ridge elongation, and accelerated skin/tissue downgrowth. Systemic antibiotics were effective during the initial treatment period but failed to reduce biofilm burden during the second treatment cycle. Altogether, while aBL combined with washing shows promise as a localized preventive therapy for reducing biofilm burden and implant-related infection, the observed tissue remodeling and accelerated downgrowth highlight the need for further investigation to ensure long-term safety.</p>","PeriodicalId":16650,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Orthopaedic Research®","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Assessing the Potential of Antimicrobial Blue Light (aBL) to Manage Biofilm Burden at the Skin-Implant Interface of Percutaneous Osseointegrated Implants.\",\"authors\":\"Jemi Ong Watts, Richard Tyler Epperson, Brooke Kawaguchi, Aaron Olsen, Josh Tam, Paul Pasquina, Brad Isaacson, Jeremy Gililland, Dustin Williams\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/jor.70039\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Percutaneous osseointegrated implants offer significant benefits to amputees, including improved mechanical feedback and reduced skin irritation. However, their percutaneous nature increases susceptibility to biofilm-associated infections. This study evaluated the potential efficacy of antimicrobial blue light (aBL) as a preventive strategy to manage biofilm burden in a 12-week ovine model wherein two treatment cycles were implemented. In this study, aBL was applied proactively to reduce surface colonization and prevent infection progression, rather than to treat confirmed or deep infections. Sheep were inoculated with Staphylococcus aureus biofilm and treated with aBL or systemic antibiotics, with or without a washing protocol. aBL with washing achieved the greatest bacterial reduction, lowering CFU levels to 3.0 ± 0.3 log<sub>10</sub> during the second treatment period, significantly outperforming washing alone, which resulted in 5.6 ± 0.4 log<sub>10</sub> (p < 0.05). The study also showed a lower observed infection rate (14% vs. 43%), when comparing aBL with washing to washing only based on histologic, microCT, and gross assessments, though no statistical comparison was performed. Despite these benefits, the aBL treatments induced notable tissue changes, including increased epithelial thickening, rete ridge elongation, and accelerated skin/tissue downgrowth. Systemic antibiotics were effective during the initial treatment period but failed to reduce biofilm burden during the second treatment cycle. Altogether, while aBL combined with washing shows promise as a localized preventive therapy for reducing biofilm burden and implant-related infection, the observed tissue remodeling and accelerated downgrowth highlight the need for further investigation to ensure long-term safety.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":16650,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Orthopaedic Research®\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Orthopaedic Research®\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1002/jor.70039\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ORTHOPEDICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Orthopaedic Research®","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/jor.70039","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
Assessing the Potential of Antimicrobial Blue Light (aBL) to Manage Biofilm Burden at the Skin-Implant Interface of Percutaneous Osseointegrated Implants.
Percutaneous osseointegrated implants offer significant benefits to amputees, including improved mechanical feedback and reduced skin irritation. However, their percutaneous nature increases susceptibility to biofilm-associated infections. This study evaluated the potential efficacy of antimicrobial blue light (aBL) as a preventive strategy to manage biofilm burden in a 12-week ovine model wherein two treatment cycles were implemented. In this study, aBL was applied proactively to reduce surface colonization and prevent infection progression, rather than to treat confirmed or deep infections. Sheep were inoculated with Staphylococcus aureus biofilm and treated with aBL or systemic antibiotics, with or without a washing protocol. aBL with washing achieved the greatest bacterial reduction, lowering CFU levels to 3.0 ± 0.3 log10 during the second treatment period, significantly outperforming washing alone, which resulted in 5.6 ± 0.4 log10 (p < 0.05). The study also showed a lower observed infection rate (14% vs. 43%), when comparing aBL with washing to washing only based on histologic, microCT, and gross assessments, though no statistical comparison was performed. Despite these benefits, the aBL treatments induced notable tissue changes, including increased epithelial thickening, rete ridge elongation, and accelerated skin/tissue downgrowth. Systemic antibiotics were effective during the initial treatment period but failed to reduce biofilm burden during the second treatment cycle. Altogether, while aBL combined with washing shows promise as a localized preventive therapy for reducing biofilm burden and implant-related infection, the observed tissue remodeling and accelerated downgrowth highlight the need for further investigation to ensure long-term safety.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Orthopaedic Research is the forum for the rapid publication of high quality reports of new information on the full spectrum of orthopaedic research, including life sciences, engineering, translational, and clinical studies.