失序供体心脏分配:器官共享登记分析的联合网络。

IF 8.2 2区 医学 Q1 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS
Abigail R Benkert, Joseph B Lerman, Jacob N Schroder, Chetan B Patel, Adam D Devore, Kunal J Patel, Jeffrey E Keenan, Carmelo A Milano, Oliver K Jawitz
{"title":"失序供体心脏分配:器官共享登记分析的联合网络。","authors":"Abigail R Benkert, Joseph B Lerman, Jacob N Schroder, Chetan B Patel, Adam D Devore, Kunal J Patel, Jeffrey E Keenan, Carmelo A Milano, Oliver K Jawitz","doi":"10.1016/j.cardfail.2025.07.009","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Out-of-sequence (OOS) allocation is a mechanism by which donor organs are offered outside the standard match run, typically to expedite the placement of hard-to-match or time-sensitive allografts. Rising OOS rates are described in abdominal organ transplantation, but limited data exist regarding OOS practices in heart transplantation.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The United Network for Organ Sharing (UNOS) was used to identify all adult heart transplant recipients and corresponding donors between January 2015 and March 2024. The Potential Transplant Recipient file was then used to classify each donation as either in-sequence or out-of-sequence. We assessed temporal trends and practice patterns in relation to OOS allocation. Additionally, we evaluated donor and recipient characteristics and post-transplant survival outcomes.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Within the study period, there were 25,608 heart transplantations, of which 509 (2%) were from OOS donors. OOS allocation increased 2-fold over the study period (1.4%-3.1%). Use varied across Organ Procurement Organizations (OPOs) (0-5.4%) and transplant centers (0-16.7%), with a small subset of OPOs accounting for the majority of OOS allocations. Recipients of OOS-allocated allografts were more likely to be nonhospitalized older females with type O blood group. There was no significant difference in overall survival rates between OOS and in-sequence recipients at 1 year (93.1% vs 91.6%, respectively).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>OOS heart allocation, while rare, is increasing, and varies by geography and OPO. The OOS mechanism may provide an opportunity to improve organ recovery and support transplant access for harder-to-match candidates. However, standardization of OOS practices is needed to ensure equity in transplant access.</p>","PeriodicalId":15204,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Cardiac Failure","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":8.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Out-of-Sequence Donor Heart Allocation: A United Network for Organ Sharing Registry Analysis.\",\"authors\":\"Abigail R Benkert, Joseph B Lerman, Jacob N Schroder, Chetan B Patel, Adam D Devore, Kunal J Patel, Jeffrey E Keenan, Carmelo A Milano, Oliver K Jawitz\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.cardfail.2025.07.009\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Out-of-sequence (OOS) allocation is a mechanism by which donor organs are offered outside the standard match run, typically to expedite the placement of hard-to-match or time-sensitive allografts. Rising OOS rates are described in abdominal organ transplantation, but limited data exist regarding OOS practices in heart transplantation.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The United Network for Organ Sharing (UNOS) was used to identify all adult heart transplant recipients and corresponding donors between January 2015 and March 2024. The Potential Transplant Recipient file was then used to classify each donation as either in-sequence or out-of-sequence. We assessed temporal trends and practice patterns in relation to OOS allocation. Additionally, we evaluated donor and recipient characteristics and post-transplant survival outcomes.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Within the study period, there were 25,608 heart transplantations, of which 509 (2%) were from OOS donors. OOS allocation increased 2-fold over the study period (1.4%-3.1%). Use varied across Organ Procurement Organizations (OPOs) (0-5.4%) and transplant centers (0-16.7%), with a small subset of OPOs accounting for the majority of OOS allocations. Recipients of OOS-allocated allografts were more likely to be nonhospitalized older females with type O blood group. There was no significant difference in overall survival rates between OOS and in-sequence recipients at 1 year (93.1% vs 91.6%, respectively).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>OOS heart allocation, while rare, is increasing, and varies by geography and OPO. The OOS mechanism may provide an opportunity to improve organ recovery and support transplant access for harder-to-match candidates. However, standardization of OOS practices is needed to ensure equity in transplant access.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":15204,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Cardiac Failure\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":8.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-07\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Cardiac Failure\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cardfail.2025.07.009\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Cardiac Failure","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cardfail.2025.07.009","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:序外配型(OOS)配型是指在标准配型运行之外提供供体器官的一种机制,通常是为了加快难以配型或时间敏感的同种异体移植物的配型。虽然腹部器官移植的OOS发生率有所上升,但关于心脏移植的OOS实践数据有限。方法:利用联合器官共享网络(UNOS)对2015年1月至2024年3月期间的所有成人心脏移植受者和相应的供体进行识别。然后使用潜在移植受体(PTR)文件将每个捐赠分类为顺序或非顺序。我们评估了与OOS分配相关的时间趋势和实践模式。此外,我们评估了供体和受体的特征和移植后的生存结果。结果:在研究期间,共有25,608例心脏移植,其中509例(2%)来自OOS供体。OOS分配在研究期间增加了2倍(1.4-3.1%)。器官采购组织(opo)(0-5.4%)和移植中心(0-16.7%)的使用情况各不相同,一小部分opo占了大部分器官采购分配。OOS分配同种异体移植物的接受者更可能是未住院的O型血老年女性。OOS和顺位接受者一年的总生存率无显著差异(分别为93.1%和91.6%)。结论:OOS心脏分配虽然罕见,但正在增加,并因地理和OPO而异。OOS机制可能提供一个改善器官恢复的机会,并为难以匹配的候选人提供移植机会。然而,需要标准化OOS做法,以确保移植获得的公平性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Out-of-Sequence Donor Heart Allocation: A United Network for Organ Sharing Registry Analysis.

Background: Out-of-sequence (OOS) allocation is a mechanism by which donor organs are offered outside the standard match run, typically to expedite the placement of hard-to-match or time-sensitive allografts. Rising OOS rates are described in abdominal organ transplantation, but limited data exist regarding OOS practices in heart transplantation.

Methods: The United Network for Organ Sharing (UNOS) was used to identify all adult heart transplant recipients and corresponding donors between January 2015 and March 2024. The Potential Transplant Recipient file was then used to classify each donation as either in-sequence or out-of-sequence. We assessed temporal trends and practice patterns in relation to OOS allocation. Additionally, we evaluated donor and recipient characteristics and post-transplant survival outcomes.

Results: Within the study period, there were 25,608 heart transplantations, of which 509 (2%) were from OOS donors. OOS allocation increased 2-fold over the study period (1.4%-3.1%). Use varied across Organ Procurement Organizations (OPOs) (0-5.4%) and transplant centers (0-16.7%), with a small subset of OPOs accounting for the majority of OOS allocations. Recipients of OOS-allocated allografts were more likely to be nonhospitalized older females with type O blood group. There was no significant difference in overall survival rates between OOS and in-sequence recipients at 1 year (93.1% vs 91.6%, respectively).

Conclusions: OOS heart allocation, while rare, is increasing, and varies by geography and OPO. The OOS mechanism may provide an opportunity to improve organ recovery and support transplant access for harder-to-match candidates. However, standardization of OOS practices is needed to ensure equity in transplant access.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Cardiac Failure
Journal of Cardiac Failure 医学-心血管系统
CiteScore
7.80
自引率
8.30%
发文量
653
审稿时长
21 days
期刊介绍: Journal of Cardiac Failure publishes original, peer-reviewed communications of scientific excellence and review articles on clinical research, basic human studies, animal studies, and bench research with potential clinical applications to heart failure - pathogenesis, etiology, epidemiology, pathophysiological mechanisms, assessment, prevention, and treatment.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信