基于技术接受模型的算法意识对个性化社交媒体内容推荐接受度的影响

IF 2.7 4区 心理学 Q2 PSYCHOLOGY, EXPERIMENTAL
Acta Psychologica Pub Date : 2025-09-01 Epub Date: 2025-08-08 DOI:10.1016/j.actpsy.2025.105383
Yimu Huang, Lin Liu
{"title":"基于技术接受模型的算法意识对个性化社交媒体内容推荐接受度的影响","authors":"Yimu Huang, Lin Liu","doi":"10.1016/j.actpsy.2025.105383","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Concerns about personalization bias and opaque algorithmic control raise questions about trust and user agency. Despite widespread adoption, users often lack awareness of how recommendations are generated. This study examines how logic comprehension, bias perception, and transparency recognition influence trust, perceived usefulness, and behavioural intention within an extended technology acceptance model framework.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A cross-sectional survey of 1200 users from Twitter (X), TikTok, YouTube, and Facebook was conducted, stratified by algorithm awareness levels (low = 400, moderate = 400, high = 400). Validated and custom-developed scales were used to assess TAM constructs and algorithm-specific perceptions. Structural equation modelling (SEM) was performed using Python 3.9 (Semopy, Statsmodels; Python Software Foundation, USA). Qualitative outcomes were derived from 40 semi-structured interviews coded thematically using NVivo 14 (QSR International, Australia).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Algorithm awareness correlated positively with perceived usefulness (r = 0.62), ease of use (r = 0.55), trust (r = 0.48), and behavioural intention (r = 0.50). Structural equation modelling indicated direct effects on usefulness (β = 0.63, p = 0.002), ease of use (β = 0.58, p = 0.004), and trust (β = 0.51, p = 0.010), which jointly mediated the relationship between awareness and behavioural intention (indirect effects = 0.29-0.35). Moderation analyses showed that digital literacy, prior experience, and privacy concern significantly altered these paths (ΔR<sup>2</sup> = 0.05-0.07). Model fit indices were excellent (CFI = 0.98, TLI = 0.97, RMSEA = 0.04, SRMR = 0.05). Interview themes revealed user resistance strategies, including platform-switching, manual curation, and contesting recommendation logic.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Algorithm awareness enhances perceived utility but also intensifies skepticism, underscoring the need for transparent, user-controllable recommendation systems to sustain engagement while preserving trust. Altogether, these insights offer useful direction for making recommendation systems more transparent and better tuned to user needs.</p>","PeriodicalId":7141,"journal":{"name":"Acta Psychologica","volume":"259 ","pages":"105383"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The impact of algorithm awareness on the acceptance of personalized social media content recommendation based on the technology acceptance model.\",\"authors\":\"Yimu Huang, Lin Liu\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.actpsy.2025.105383\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Concerns about personalization bias and opaque algorithmic control raise questions about trust and user agency. Despite widespread adoption, users often lack awareness of how recommendations are generated. This study examines how logic comprehension, bias perception, and transparency recognition influence trust, perceived usefulness, and behavioural intention within an extended technology acceptance model framework.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A cross-sectional survey of 1200 users from Twitter (X), TikTok, YouTube, and Facebook was conducted, stratified by algorithm awareness levels (low = 400, moderate = 400, high = 400). Validated and custom-developed scales were used to assess TAM constructs and algorithm-specific perceptions. Structural equation modelling (SEM) was performed using Python 3.9 (Semopy, Statsmodels; Python Software Foundation, USA). Qualitative outcomes were derived from 40 semi-structured interviews coded thematically using NVivo 14 (QSR International, Australia).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Algorithm awareness correlated positively with perceived usefulness (r = 0.62), ease of use (r = 0.55), trust (r = 0.48), and behavioural intention (r = 0.50). Structural equation modelling indicated direct effects on usefulness (β = 0.63, p = 0.002), ease of use (β = 0.58, p = 0.004), and trust (β = 0.51, p = 0.010), which jointly mediated the relationship between awareness and behavioural intention (indirect effects = 0.29-0.35). Moderation analyses showed that digital literacy, prior experience, and privacy concern significantly altered these paths (ΔR<sup>2</sup> = 0.05-0.07). Model fit indices were excellent (CFI = 0.98, TLI = 0.97, RMSEA = 0.04, SRMR = 0.05). Interview themes revealed user resistance strategies, including platform-switching, manual curation, and contesting recommendation logic.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Algorithm awareness enhances perceived utility but also intensifies skepticism, underscoring the need for transparent, user-controllable recommendation systems to sustain engagement while preserving trust. Altogether, these insights offer useful direction for making recommendation systems more transparent and better tuned to user needs.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":7141,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Acta Psychologica\",\"volume\":\"259 \",\"pages\":\"105383\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Acta Psychologica\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"102\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actpsy.2025.105383\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"心理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/8/8 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHOLOGY, EXPERIMENTAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Acta Psychologica","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actpsy.2025.105383","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/8/8 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, EXPERIMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:对个性化偏见和不透明算法控制的担忧引发了对信任和用户代理的质疑。尽管被广泛采用,但用户往往缺乏对如何生成推荐的意识。本研究探讨了逻辑理解、偏见感知和透明度识别如何在扩展的技术接受模型框架内影响信任、感知有用性和行为意图。方法:对来自Twitter (X)、TikTok、YouTube和Facebook的1200名用户进行横断面调查,按算法认知水平(低= 400,中= 400,高= 400)进行分层。验证和定制开发的量表用于评估TAM结构和算法特定的感知。结构方程建模(SEM)使用Python 3.9 (Semopy, statmodels;Python软件基金会,美国)。定性结果来源于40个半结构化访谈,使用NVivo 14 (QSR International, Australia)进行主题编码。结果:算法意识与感知有用性(r = 0.62)、易用性(r = 0.55)、信任(r = 0.48)和行为意向(r = 0.50)呈正相关。结构方程模型表明,意识与行为意向之间存在直接影响(β = 0.63, p = 0.002)、直接影响(β = 0.58, p = 0.004)、直接影响(β = 0.51, p = 0.010),间接影响(β = 0.29-0.35)。适度分析显示,数字素养、先前经验和隐私担忧显著改变了这些路径(ΔR2 = 0.05-0.07)。模型拟合指标良好(CFI = 0.98, TLI = 0.97, RMSEA = 0.04, SRMR = 0.05)。访谈主题揭示了用户抵制策略,包括平台切换、人工管理和竞争性推荐逻辑。结论:算法意识增强了感知效用,但也加剧了怀疑,强调了透明、用户可控的推荐系统的必要性,以维持用户粘性,同时保持信任。总之,这些见解为使推荐系统更加透明和更好地适应用户需求提供了有用的方向。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The impact of algorithm awareness on the acceptance of personalized social media content recommendation based on the technology acceptance model.

Background: Concerns about personalization bias and opaque algorithmic control raise questions about trust and user agency. Despite widespread adoption, users often lack awareness of how recommendations are generated. This study examines how logic comprehension, bias perception, and transparency recognition influence trust, perceived usefulness, and behavioural intention within an extended technology acceptance model framework.

Methods: A cross-sectional survey of 1200 users from Twitter (X), TikTok, YouTube, and Facebook was conducted, stratified by algorithm awareness levels (low = 400, moderate = 400, high = 400). Validated and custom-developed scales were used to assess TAM constructs and algorithm-specific perceptions. Structural equation modelling (SEM) was performed using Python 3.9 (Semopy, Statsmodels; Python Software Foundation, USA). Qualitative outcomes were derived from 40 semi-structured interviews coded thematically using NVivo 14 (QSR International, Australia).

Results: Algorithm awareness correlated positively with perceived usefulness (r = 0.62), ease of use (r = 0.55), trust (r = 0.48), and behavioural intention (r = 0.50). Structural equation modelling indicated direct effects on usefulness (β = 0.63, p = 0.002), ease of use (β = 0.58, p = 0.004), and trust (β = 0.51, p = 0.010), which jointly mediated the relationship between awareness and behavioural intention (indirect effects = 0.29-0.35). Moderation analyses showed that digital literacy, prior experience, and privacy concern significantly altered these paths (ΔR2 = 0.05-0.07). Model fit indices were excellent (CFI = 0.98, TLI = 0.97, RMSEA = 0.04, SRMR = 0.05). Interview themes revealed user resistance strategies, including platform-switching, manual curation, and contesting recommendation logic.

Conclusion: Algorithm awareness enhances perceived utility but also intensifies skepticism, underscoring the need for transparent, user-controllable recommendation systems to sustain engagement while preserving trust. Altogether, these insights offer useful direction for making recommendation systems more transparent and better tuned to user needs.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Acta Psychologica
Acta Psychologica PSYCHOLOGY, EXPERIMENTAL-
CiteScore
3.00
自引率
5.60%
发文量
274
审稿时长
36 weeks
期刊介绍: Acta Psychologica publishes original articles and extended reviews on selected books in any area of experimental psychology. The focus of the Journal is on empirical studies and evaluative review articles that increase the theoretical understanding of human capabilities.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信