对1144名ECT接受者及其家人和朋友的调查:ECT有效吗?

IF 3.3 2区 医学 Q1 NURSING
John Read, Lucy Johnstone, Sarah Price Hancock, Chris Harrop, Lisa Morrison, Sue Cunliffe
{"title":"对1144名ECT接受者及其家人和朋友的调查:ECT有效吗?","authors":"John Read,&nbsp;Lucy Johnstone,&nbsp;Sarah Price Hancock,&nbsp;Chris Harrop,&nbsp;Lisa Morrison,&nbsp;Sue Cunliffe","doi":"10.1111/inm.70109","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>The last placebo-controlled ECT trial for depression occurred in 1985. While awaiting trials that meet today's standards of evidence-based medicine, this paper presents the responses, to an online survey, of 858 ECT recipients and 286 family members and friends, from 44 countries, on five effectiveness measures. The majority (55%–71%) reported either no benefit or a negative outcome on the five measures. The percentages reporting some benefit were: helped the specific problem for which ECT was given—45%; improved mood—41%; generally ‘helpful’—41%; improved ‘quality of life’—29%; reduced suicidality—33%. Respondents were, unusually, given the option, on four of these measures, to report that the variable had been made worse. The results were: specific problem made worse—37%; worse mood—29%; reduced quality of life—62%; and increased suicidality—19%. The findings were consistent with responses from family and friends. It is striking that nearly half (49%) reported that their quality of life was made ‘much worse’ (22%) or ‘very much worse’ (27%) by ECT. A partial explanation of this alarming outcome is that quality of life encompasses the adverse effects of ECT alongside any benefits. In conjunction with the absence of evidence that ECT is more effective than placebo, and the known long-term adverse effects on memory, these survey findings lead us to recommend a suspension of ECT in clinical settings pending independent large-scale placebo-controlled studies to determine whether ECT has any effectiveness relative to placebo, against which the many serious adverse effects can be weighed.</p>","PeriodicalId":14007,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Mental Health Nursing","volume":"34 4","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/inm.70109","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A Survey of 1144 ECT Recipients, Family Members and Friends: Does ECT Work?\",\"authors\":\"John Read,&nbsp;Lucy Johnstone,&nbsp;Sarah Price Hancock,&nbsp;Chris Harrop,&nbsp;Lisa Morrison,&nbsp;Sue Cunliffe\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/inm.70109\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>The last placebo-controlled ECT trial for depression occurred in 1985. While awaiting trials that meet today's standards of evidence-based medicine, this paper presents the responses, to an online survey, of 858 ECT recipients and 286 family members and friends, from 44 countries, on five effectiveness measures. The majority (55%–71%) reported either no benefit or a negative outcome on the five measures. The percentages reporting some benefit were: helped the specific problem for which ECT was given—45%; improved mood—41%; generally ‘helpful’—41%; improved ‘quality of life’—29%; reduced suicidality—33%. Respondents were, unusually, given the option, on four of these measures, to report that the variable had been made worse. The results were: specific problem made worse—37%; worse mood—29%; reduced quality of life—62%; and increased suicidality—19%. The findings were consistent with responses from family and friends. It is striking that nearly half (49%) reported that their quality of life was made ‘much worse’ (22%) or ‘very much worse’ (27%) by ECT. A partial explanation of this alarming outcome is that quality of life encompasses the adverse effects of ECT alongside any benefits. In conjunction with the absence of evidence that ECT is more effective than placebo, and the known long-term adverse effects on memory, these survey findings lead us to recommend a suspension of ECT in clinical settings pending independent large-scale placebo-controlled studies to determine whether ECT has any effectiveness relative to placebo, against which the many serious adverse effects can be weighed.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":14007,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Mental Health Nursing\",\"volume\":\"34 4\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/inm.70109\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Mental Health Nursing\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/inm.70109\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"NURSING\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Mental Health Nursing","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/inm.70109","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

最后一次用安慰剂控制的ECT治疗抑郁症的试验发生在1985年。在等待符合当今循证医学标准的试验的同时,这篇论文展示了对来自44个国家的858名ECT接受者和286名家庭成员和朋友进行的五项有效性调查的回应。大多数人(55%-71%)报告说,这五项措施要么没有好处,要么结果是负面的。报告有一些益处的百分比是:对ECT治疗的特定问题有帮助- 45%;改善情绪- 41%;通常“有用的”-41%;提高“生活质量”——29%;自杀倾向减少- 33%。不同寻常的是,受访者在其中四项指标上可以选择报告变量变得更糟了。结果是:特定问题变得更糟——37%;糟糕的心情- 29%;生活质量下降62%;并且增加了19%的自杀率。这一发现与家人和朋友的反应一致。令人震惊的是,近一半(49%)的人报告说,ECT使他们的生活质量“差得多”(22%)或“差得多”(27%)。对这一令人担忧的结果的部分解释是,生活质量包括了电痉挛疗法的副作用和任何好处。考虑到没有证据表明ECT比安慰剂更有效,以及已知的对记忆的长期不良影响,这些调查结果使我们建议在临床环境中暂停使用ECT,等待独立的大规模安慰剂对照研究,以确定ECT是否比安慰剂更有效,从而可以权衡许多严重的不良影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
A Survey of 1144 ECT Recipients, Family Members and Friends: Does ECT Work?

The last placebo-controlled ECT trial for depression occurred in 1985. While awaiting trials that meet today's standards of evidence-based medicine, this paper presents the responses, to an online survey, of 858 ECT recipients and 286 family members and friends, from 44 countries, on five effectiveness measures. The majority (55%–71%) reported either no benefit or a negative outcome on the five measures. The percentages reporting some benefit were: helped the specific problem for which ECT was given—45%; improved mood—41%; generally ‘helpful’—41%; improved ‘quality of life’—29%; reduced suicidality—33%. Respondents were, unusually, given the option, on four of these measures, to report that the variable had been made worse. The results were: specific problem made worse—37%; worse mood—29%; reduced quality of life—62%; and increased suicidality—19%. The findings were consistent with responses from family and friends. It is striking that nearly half (49%) reported that their quality of life was made ‘much worse’ (22%) or ‘very much worse’ (27%) by ECT. A partial explanation of this alarming outcome is that quality of life encompasses the adverse effects of ECT alongside any benefits. In conjunction with the absence of evidence that ECT is more effective than placebo, and the known long-term adverse effects on memory, these survey findings lead us to recommend a suspension of ECT in clinical settings pending independent large-scale placebo-controlled studies to determine whether ECT has any effectiveness relative to placebo, against which the many serious adverse effects can be weighed.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.60
自引率
8.90%
发文量
128
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The International Journal of Mental Health Nursing is the official journal of the Australian College of Mental Health Nurses Inc. It is a fully refereed journal that examines current trends and developments in mental health practice and research. The International Journal of Mental Health Nursing provides a forum for the exchange of ideas on all issues of relevance to mental health nursing. The Journal informs you of developments in mental health nursing practice and research, directions in education and training, professional issues, management approaches, policy development, ethical questions, theoretical inquiry, and clinical issues. The Journal publishes feature articles, review articles, clinical notes, research notes and book reviews. Contributions on any aspect of mental health nursing are welcomed. Statements and opinions expressed in the journal reflect the views of the authors and are not necessarily endorsed by the Australian College of Mental Health Nurses Inc.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信