{"title":"ICU患者24小时血压模式与死亡率的关系:一项多中心回顾性研究","authors":"Xiao Zhao, Hao Li, Feng Liu, Yuanyuan Ren, Feng Gao","doi":"10.1111/jch.70116","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Blood pressure (BP) is a crucial component of the APACHE II scoring system for assessing the severity of illness in ICU patients, and it plays a pivotal role in predicting patient mortality. Based on fluctuations, the 24-h BP patterns of ICU patients can be categorized into dippers (10% ≤ the fall < 20%), extreme-dippers (fall ≥ 20%), non-dippers (0% ≤ the fall < 10%), and reverse-dippers (fall < 0%). This study aims to investigate whether there are statistically significant differences in ICU mortality, in-hospital mortality, 28-day mortality, and 1-year mortality among the dipper, non-dipper, extreme-dipper, and reverse-dipper groups. We enrolled all adult patients with continuous BP monitoring within 24 h of ICU admission. Using Navicat Premium 16 software, we extracted the first 24-h BP values of 10462 patients from the MIMIC IV v2.2 database. Patients were then classified into the dipper group (<i>n</i> = 1244), non-dipper group (<i>n</i> = 6162), reverse-dipper group (<i>n</i> = 2940), and extreme-dipper group (<i>n</i> = 116). Among ICU patients, the non-dipper pattern group constituted the largest proportion (58.90%), followed by the reverse-dipper pattern group (28.10%). After adjusting for relevant confounding factors, we found that the reverse-dipper group had the strongest correlation with in-hospital mortality (OR: 1.592, <i>p</i> < 0.05), 28-day mortality (OR: 1.607, <i>p</i> < 0.01), 90-day mortality (OR: 1.402, <i>p</i> < 0.01), 180-day mortality (OR: 1.403, <i>p</i> < 0.01), and 1-year mortality (OR: 1.525, <i>p</i> < 0.001), with statistical significance observed for all these associations. In the ICU setting, the non-dipper BP pattern is the most prevalent. However, the reverse-dipper pattern is the most significantly associated with mortality.</p>","PeriodicalId":50237,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Clinical Hypertension","volume":"27 8","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/jch.70116","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Association of 24-h Blood Pressure Pattern With Mortality in ICU Patients: A Multicenter Retrospective Study\",\"authors\":\"Xiao Zhao, Hao Li, Feng Liu, Yuanyuan Ren, Feng Gao\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/jch.70116\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>Blood pressure (BP) is a crucial component of the APACHE II scoring system for assessing the severity of illness in ICU patients, and it plays a pivotal role in predicting patient mortality. Based on fluctuations, the 24-h BP patterns of ICU patients can be categorized into dippers (10% ≤ the fall < 20%), extreme-dippers (fall ≥ 20%), non-dippers (0% ≤ the fall < 10%), and reverse-dippers (fall < 0%). This study aims to investigate whether there are statistically significant differences in ICU mortality, in-hospital mortality, 28-day mortality, and 1-year mortality among the dipper, non-dipper, extreme-dipper, and reverse-dipper groups. We enrolled all adult patients with continuous BP monitoring within 24 h of ICU admission. Using Navicat Premium 16 software, we extracted the first 24-h BP values of 10462 patients from the MIMIC IV v2.2 database. Patients were then classified into the dipper group (<i>n</i> = 1244), non-dipper group (<i>n</i> = 6162), reverse-dipper group (<i>n</i> = 2940), and extreme-dipper group (<i>n</i> = 116). Among ICU patients, the non-dipper pattern group constituted the largest proportion (58.90%), followed by the reverse-dipper pattern group (28.10%). After adjusting for relevant confounding factors, we found that the reverse-dipper group had the strongest correlation with in-hospital mortality (OR: 1.592, <i>p</i> < 0.05), 28-day mortality (OR: 1.607, <i>p</i> < 0.01), 90-day mortality (OR: 1.402, <i>p</i> < 0.01), 180-day mortality (OR: 1.403, <i>p</i> < 0.01), and 1-year mortality (OR: 1.525, <i>p</i> < 0.001), with statistical significance observed for all these associations. In the ICU setting, the non-dipper BP pattern is the most prevalent. However, the reverse-dipper pattern is the most significantly associated with mortality.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":50237,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Clinical Hypertension\",\"volume\":\"27 8\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/jch.70116\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Clinical Hypertension\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jch.70116\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Clinical Hypertension","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jch.70116","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
血压(BP)是APACHE II评分系统评估ICU患者病情严重程度的重要组成部分,在预测患者死亡率方面起着关键作用。根据波动情况,ICU患者24小时血压模式可分为下降型(10%≤下降<;20%),极端下沉(下降≥20%),非下沉(0%≤下降<;10%),以及反向下沉(下跌<;0%)。本研究旨在探讨使用倒勺、不使用倒勺、极端倒勺和反向倒勺组的ICU死亡率、住院死亡率、28天死亡率和1年死亡率是否存在统计学差异。我们纳入了所有在ICU入院24小时内持续血压监测的成年患者。使用Navicat Premium 16软件,我们从MIMIC IV v2.2数据库中提取了10462例患者的第一个24小时血压值。然后将患者分为杓斗组(n = 1244)、不杓斗组(n = 6162)、反杓斗组(n = 2940)和极杓斗组(n = 116)。在ICU患者中,非倾斜模式组所占比例最大(58.90%),其次是反向倾斜模式组(28.10%)。在校正相关混杂因素后,我们发现倒勺组与住院死亡率相关性最强(OR: 1.592, p <;0.05), 28天死亡率(OR: 1.607, p <;0.01), 90天死亡率(OR: 1.402, p <;0.01), 180天死亡率(OR: 1.403, p <;0.01), 1年死亡率(OR: 1.525, p <;0.001),所有这些关联均有统计学意义。在ICU环境中,非倾角血压模式是最普遍的。然而,倒勺模式与死亡率的关系最为显著。
Association of 24-h Blood Pressure Pattern With Mortality in ICU Patients: A Multicenter Retrospective Study
Blood pressure (BP) is a crucial component of the APACHE II scoring system for assessing the severity of illness in ICU patients, and it plays a pivotal role in predicting patient mortality. Based on fluctuations, the 24-h BP patterns of ICU patients can be categorized into dippers (10% ≤ the fall < 20%), extreme-dippers (fall ≥ 20%), non-dippers (0% ≤ the fall < 10%), and reverse-dippers (fall < 0%). This study aims to investigate whether there are statistically significant differences in ICU mortality, in-hospital mortality, 28-day mortality, and 1-year mortality among the dipper, non-dipper, extreme-dipper, and reverse-dipper groups. We enrolled all adult patients with continuous BP monitoring within 24 h of ICU admission. Using Navicat Premium 16 software, we extracted the first 24-h BP values of 10462 patients from the MIMIC IV v2.2 database. Patients were then classified into the dipper group (n = 1244), non-dipper group (n = 6162), reverse-dipper group (n = 2940), and extreme-dipper group (n = 116). Among ICU patients, the non-dipper pattern group constituted the largest proportion (58.90%), followed by the reverse-dipper pattern group (28.10%). After adjusting for relevant confounding factors, we found that the reverse-dipper group had the strongest correlation with in-hospital mortality (OR: 1.592, p < 0.05), 28-day mortality (OR: 1.607, p < 0.01), 90-day mortality (OR: 1.402, p < 0.01), 180-day mortality (OR: 1.403, p < 0.01), and 1-year mortality (OR: 1.525, p < 0.001), with statistical significance observed for all these associations. In the ICU setting, the non-dipper BP pattern is the most prevalent. However, the reverse-dipper pattern is the most significantly associated with mortality.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Clinical Hypertension is a peer-reviewed, monthly publication that serves internists, cardiologists, nephrologists, endocrinologists, hypertension specialists, primary care practitioners, pharmacists and all professionals interested in hypertension by providing objective, up-to-date information and practical recommendations on the full range of clinical aspects of hypertension. Commentaries and columns by experts in the field provide further insights into our original research articles as well as on major articles published elsewhere. Major guidelines for the management of hypertension are also an important feature of the Journal. Through its partnership with the World Hypertension League, JCH will include a new focus on hypertension and public health, including major policy issues, that features research and reviews related to disease characteristics and management at the population level.