在英国建立公众参与慢性疼痛研究网络:经验教训

IF 3.2 3区 医学 Q2 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Sharon Grieve, Rosie Harrison, Carolyn Chew-Graham, Ian Taverner, Joanne Lloyd, Noureen Shivji, Ellen Readman, Adele Higginbottom, Colin Wilkinson, Lisa Austin, Edmund Keogh, Candida McCabe
{"title":"在英国建立公众参与慢性疼痛研究网络:经验教训","authors":"Sharon Grieve,&nbsp;Rosie Harrison,&nbsp;Carolyn Chew-Graham,&nbsp;Ian Taverner,&nbsp;Joanne Lloyd,&nbsp;Noureen Shivji,&nbsp;Ellen Readman,&nbsp;Adele Higginbottom,&nbsp;Colin Wilkinson,&nbsp;Lisa Austin,&nbsp;Edmund Keogh,&nbsp;Candida McCabe","doi":"10.1111/hex.70373","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Introduction</h3>\n \n <p>The Consortium to Research Individual, Interpersonal and Social Influences in Pain (CRIISP) is a 4-year UK university collaboration investigating how thoughts and feelings, personal relationships and lifestyle can affect chronic pain. Patient and public involvement in research recognises that researchers' conceptions of health and illness can be enriched and sense-checked by those of people experiencing a health condition. Published literature reports a gap in meaningful patient and public involvement in research into chronic pain, for example, during early study design. Input in this formative stage aimed to ensure the research proposed had a patient-centred focus which may benefit study implementation.</p>\n \n <p>We describe how the authors sought to address this gap and established a diverse public involvement (PI) network to support the CRIISP research.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>Thirty-six adult public contributors were appointed to work alongside the research teams. Lessons learned are presented under the themes: optimising collaborative working, recruitment of public contributors, supporting public involvement throughout CRIISP and the retention of public contributors. Throughout this paper, we refer to the term ‘public involvement’ rather than ‘patient and public involvement’ in accordance with the NIHR definition which incorporates people with a range of experiences.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>Working in partnership with our public contributors, we have embedded PI throughout a chronic pain research programme using an innovative and collaborative process.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\n \n <p>This model may inform others to maximise the potential of PI within their research.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Patient or Public Contribution</h3>\n \n <p>The paper reports the collaboration between public contributors with a lived experience of chronic pain and the Consortium to Research Individual, Interpersonal and Social influences in Pain (CRIISP) researchers, by means of a large public involvement network.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":55070,"journal":{"name":"Health Expectations","volume":"28 4","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/hex.70373","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Establishing a Public Involvement Network for Chronic Pain Research in the United Kingdom: Lessons Learned\",\"authors\":\"Sharon Grieve,&nbsp;Rosie Harrison,&nbsp;Carolyn Chew-Graham,&nbsp;Ian Taverner,&nbsp;Joanne Lloyd,&nbsp;Noureen Shivji,&nbsp;Ellen Readman,&nbsp;Adele Higginbottom,&nbsp;Colin Wilkinson,&nbsp;Lisa Austin,&nbsp;Edmund Keogh,&nbsp;Candida McCabe\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/hex.70373\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n \\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Introduction</h3>\\n \\n <p>The Consortium to Research Individual, Interpersonal and Social Influences in Pain (CRIISP) is a 4-year UK university collaboration investigating how thoughts and feelings, personal relationships and lifestyle can affect chronic pain. Patient and public involvement in research recognises that researchers' conceptions of health and illness can be enriched and sense-checked by those of people experiencing a health condition. Published literature reports a gap in meaningful patient and public involvement in research into chronic pain, for example, during early study design. Input in this formative stage aimed to ensure the research proposed had a patient-centred focus which may benefit study implementation.</p>\\n \\n <p>We describe how the authors sought to address this gap and established a diverse public involvement (PI) network to support the CRIISP research.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Methods</h3>\\n \\n <p>Thirty-six adult public contributors were appointed to work alongside the research teams. Lessons learned are presented under the themes: optimising collaborative working, recruitment of public contributors, supporting public involvement throughout CRIISP and the retention of public contributors. Throughout this paper, we refer to the term ‘public involvement’ rather than ‘patient and public involvement’ in accordance with the NIHR definition which incorporates people with a range of experiences.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Results</h3>\\n \\n <p>Working in partnership with our public contributors, we have embedded PI throughout a chronic pain research programme using an innovative and collaborative process.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\\n \\n <p>This model may inform others to maximise the potential of PI within their research.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Patient or Public Contribution</h3>\\n \\n <p>The paper reports the collaboration between public contributors with a lived experience of chronic pain and the Consortium to Research Individual, Interpersonal and Social influences in Pain (CRIISP) researchers, by means of a large public involvement network.</p>\\n </section>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":55070,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Health Expectations\",\"volume\":\"28 4\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/hex.70373\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Health Expectations\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/hex.70373\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Health Expectations","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/hex.70373","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

个人、人际和社会对疼痛的影响研究联盟(CRIISP)是一个为期4年的英国大学合作项目,旨在研究思想、情感、个人关系和生活方式如何影响慢性疼痛。患者和公众对研究的参与认识到,研究人员对健康和疾病的概念可以由经历健康状况的人来丰富和检查。已发表的文献报告称,在慢性疼痛研究中,患者和公众在有意义的参与方面存在差距,例如,在早期研究设计期间。在这个形成阶段的投入旨在确保提出的研究以患者为中心,这可能有利于研究的实施。我们描述了作者如何寻求解决这一差距,并建立了一个多样化的公众参与(PI)网络来支持crisp研究。方法指定36名成人公众贡献者与研究团队一起工作。总结的经验教训是在以下主题下提出的:优化协同工作,招募公共贡献者,支持公众参与整个CRIISP以及保留公共贡献者。在本文中,我们根据国家卫生研究院的定义,将具有一系列经验的人纳入其中,将“公众参与”一词称为“公众参与”,而不是“患者和公众参与”。结果:通过与公众合作,我们采用创新和协作的方式将PI嵌入到慢性疼痛研究项目中。该模型可以帮助其他人在其研究中最大化PI的潜力。本文报道了有慢性疼痛生活经验的公众贡献者与疼痛个体、人际和社会影响研究联盟(CRIISP)研究人员之间的合作,通过一个大型的公众参与网络。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Establishing a Public Involvement Network for Chronic Pain Research in the United Kingdom: Lessons Learned

Establishing a Public Involvement Network for Chronic Pain Research in the United Kingdom: Lessons Learned

Introduction

The Consortium to Research Individual, Interpersonal and Social Influences in Pain (CRIISP) is a 4-year UK university collaboration investigating how thoughts and feelings, personal relationships and lifestyle can affect chronic pain. Patient and public involvement in research recognises that researchers' conceptions of health and illness can be enriched and sense-checked by those of people experiencing a health condition. Published literature reports a gap in meaningful patient and public involvement in research into chronic pain, for example, during early study design. Input in this formative stage aimed to ensure the research proposed had a patient-centred focus which may benefit study implementation.

We describe how the authors sought to address this gap and established a diverse public involvement (PI) network to support the CRIISP research.

Methods

Thirty-six adult public contributors were appointed to work alongside the research teams. Lessons learned are presented under the themes: optimising collaborative working, recruitment of public contributors, supporting public involvement throughout CRIISP and the retention of public contributors. Throughout this paper, we refer to the term ‘public involvement’ rather than ‘patient and public involvement’ in accordance with the NIHR definition which incorporates people with a range of experiences.

Results

Working in partnership with our public contributors, we have embedded PI throughout a chronic pain research programme using an innovative and collaborative process.

Conclusion

This model may inform others to maximise the potential of PI within their research.

Patient or Public Contribution

The paper reports the collaboration between public contributors with a lived experience of chronic pain and the Consortium to Research Individual, Interpersonal and Social influences in Pain (CRIISP) researchers, by means of a large public involvement network.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Health Expectations
Health Expectations 医学-公共卫生、环境卫生与职业卫生
CiteScore
5.20
自引率
9.40%
发文量
251
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Health Expectations promotes critical thinking and informed debate about all aspects of patient and public involvement and engagement (PPIE) in health and social care, health policy and health services research including: • Person-centred care and quality improvement • Patients'' participation in decisions about disease prevention and management • Public perceptions of health services • Citizen involvement in health care policy making and priority-setting • Methods for monitoring and evaluating participation • Empowerment and consumerism • Patients'' role in safety and quality • Patient and public role in health services research • Co-production (researchers working with patients and the public) of research, health care and policy Health Expectations is a quarterly, peer-reviewed journal publishing original research, review articles and critical commentaries. It includes papers which clarify concepts, develop theories, and critically analyse and evaluate specific policies and practices. The Journal provides an inter-disciplinary and international forum in which researchers (including PPIE researchers) from a range of backgrounds and expertise can present their work to other researchers, policy-makers, health care professionals, managers, patients and consumer advocates.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信