小规模高密度集约化凡纳滨对虾养殖池碳收支研究

IF 2.4 3区 农林科学 Q2 FISHERIES
Hong Huang, Yang Li, Zhuo-Yi Zhu, Peng-Fei Cheng, Xu Zhao, Sheng-Nan Dang
{"title":"小规模高密度集约化凡纳滨对虾养殖池碳收支研究","authors":"Hong Huang,&nbsp;Yang Li,&nbsp;Zhuo-Yi Zhu,&nbsp;Peng-Fei Cheng,&nbsp;Xu Zhao,&nbsp;Sheng-Nan Dang","doi":"10.1007/s10499-025-02173-8","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>The growing global demand for aquaculture products has driven the emergence of ultra-intensive aquaculture systems, which are projected to dominate future aquaculture development. However, comprehensive assessments of carbon budgets in such high-density production models remain limited. This study conducted systematic carbon budget evaluations in two intensive <i>Litopenaeus vannamei</i> aquaculture ponds in Zhejiang Province, China. Our findings reveal that carbon inputs were predominantly attributed to commercial feed (81.87–82.04%), followed by inflow water (16.83–16.87%) and stocking shrimp inputs (0.6–0.7%). Carbon outputs were primarily discharged through effluent water (81.84–84.74%), with harvested shrimp biomass accounting for 15.3–22.2%. Notably, excessive stocking densities were associated with suboptimal growth performance (low growth rates, survival rates, and feed conversion efficiency). The observed feed conversion ratio (FCR) of 1.78 indicates significant resource inefficiency and increased operational costs. When incorporating unaccounted carbon fluxes and energy consumption, we estimated CO<sub>2</sub> emission equivalents of 6.54–6.60 kg CO<sub>2</sub>/kg shrimp production. Remarkably, only 8.1–8.9% of emissions originated directly from aquaculture operations, while 91.1–91.8% derived from electricity consumption required for system operation. Key implications include the following: (1) heavy reliance on formulated feeds (&gt; 80% carbon input) coupled with low conversion efficiency (11.1–12.5% carbon assimilation efficiency), (2) elevated carbon loading in effluent (6.4 times influent concentrations) posing environmental risks, and (3) energy consumption constituting the principal carbon footprint component. These findings highlight critical needs for optimizing stocking densities and feeding regimes while maintaining productivity, coupled with the development of energy-efficient practices. Future research should prioritize sustainable intensification strategies that balance production demands with environmental stewardship.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":8122,"journal":{"name":"Aquaculture International","volume":"33 6","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Study on carbon budget in small-scale high-density intensive Litopenaeus vannamei aquaculture ponds\",\"authors\":\"Hong Huang,&nbsp;Yang Li,&nbsp;Zhuo-Yi Zhu,&nbsp;Peng-Fei Cheng,&nbsp;Xu Zhao,&nbsp;Sheng-Nan Dang\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s10499-025-02173-8\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>The growing global demand for aquaculture products has driven the emergence of ultra-intensive aquaculture systems, which are projected to dominate future aquaculture development. However, comprehensive assessments of carbon budgets in such high-density production models remain limited. This study conducted systematic carbon budget evaluations in two intensive <i>Litopenaeus vannamei</i> aquaculture ponds in Zhejiang Province, China. Our findings reveal that carbon inputs were predominantly attributed to commercial feed (81.87–82.04%), followed by inflow water (16.83–16.87%) and stocking shrimp inputs (0.6–0.7%). Carbon outputs were primarily discharged through effluent water (81.84–84.74%), with harvested shrimp biomass accounting for 15.3–22.2%. Notably, excessive stocking densities were associated with suboptimal growth performance (low growth rates, survival rates, and feed conversion efficiency). The observed feed conversion ratio (FCR) of 1.78 indicates significant resource inefficiency and increased operational costs. When incorporating unaccounted carbon fluxes and energy consumption, we estimated CO<sub>2</sub> emission equivalents of 6.54–6.60 kg CO<sub>2</sub>/kg shrimp production. Remarkably, only 8.1–8.9% of emissions originated directly from aquaculture operations, while 91.1–91.8% derived from electricity consumption required for system operation. Key implications include the following: (1) heavy reliance on formulated feeds (&gt; 80% carbon input) coupled with low conversion efficiency (11.1–12.5% carbon assimilation efficiency), (2) elevated carbon loading in effluent (6.4 times influent concentrations) posing environmental risks, and (3) energy consumption constituting the principal carbon footprint component. These findings highlight critical needs for optimizing stocking densities and feeding regimes while maintaining productivity, coupled with the development of energy-efficient practices. Future research should prioritize sustainable intensification strategies that balance production demands with environmental stewardship.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":8122,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Aquaculture International\",\"volume\":\"33 6\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-11\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Aquaculture International\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"97\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10499-025-02173-8\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"农林科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"FISHERIES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Aquaculture International","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10499-025-02173-8","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"FISHERIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

全球对水产养殖产品需求的不断增长推动了超集约化水产养殖系统的出现,预计超集约化水产养殖系统将主导未来的水产养殖发展。然而,对这种高密度生产模式的碳预算的全面评估仍然有限。本研究对浙江省两个凡纳滨对虾集约化养殖池塘进行了系统的碳预算评价。结果表明:商业饲料的碳输入占比最大(81.87 ~ 82.04%),进水占比最大(16.83 ~ 16.87%),放养对虾占比最大(0.6 ~ 0.7%)。碳排放量主要通过废水排放(81.84-84.74%),捕虾生物量占15.3-22.2%。值得注意的是,过高的放养密度与次优生长性能(低生长率、存活率和饲料转换效率)有关。饲料转化率(FCR)为1.78,表明资源效率低下,运营成本增加。考虑到未计算的碳通量和能源消耗,我们估计二氧化碳排放量相当于每千克虾产量6.54-6.60千克二氧化碳。值得注意的是,只有8.1-8.9%的排放直接来自水产养殖作业,而91.1-91.8%的排放来自系统运行所需的电力消耗。主要影响包括:(1)对配方饲料的严重依赖(80%的碳输入)加上低转化效率(11.1-12.5%的碳同化效率),(2)污水中的碳负荷升高(6.4倍于进水浓度)构成环境风险,以及(3)能源消耗构成主要的碳足迹组成部分。这些发现突出了在保持生产力的同时优化放养密度和饲养制度以及发展节能做法的关键需求。未来的研究应优先考虑平衡生产需求和环境管理的可持续集约化战略。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Study on carbon budget in small-scale high-density intensive Litopenaeus vannamei aquaculture ponds

The growing global demand for aquaculture products has driven the emergence of ultra-intensive aquaculture systems, which are projected to dominate future aquaculture development. However, comprehensive assessments of carbon budgets in such high-density production models remain limited. This study conducted systematic carbon budget evaluations in two intensive Litopenaeus vannamei aquaculture ponds in Zhejiang Province, China. Our findings reveal that carbon inputs were predominantly attributed to commercial feed (81.87–82.04%), followed by inflow water (16.83–16.87%) and stocking shrimp inputs (0.6–0.7%). Carbon outputs were primarily discharged through effluent water (81.84–84.74%), with harvested shrimp biomass accounting for 15.3–22.2%. Notably, excessive stocking densities were associated with suboptimal growth performance (low growth rates, survival rates, and feed conversion efficiency). The observed feed conversion ratio (FCR) of 1.78 indicates significant resource inefficiency and increased operational costs. When incorporating unaccounted carbon fluxes and energy consumption, we estimated CO2 emission equivalents of 6.54–6.60 kg CO2/kg shrimp production. Remarkably, only 8.1–8.9% of emissions originated directly from aquaculture operations, while 91.1–91.8% derived from electricity consumption required for system operation. Key implications include the following: (1) heavy reliance on formulated feeds (> 80% carbon input) coupled with low conversion efficiency (11.1–12.5% carbon assimilation efficiency), (2) elevated carbon loading in effluent (6.4 times influent concentrations) posing environmental risks, and (3) energy consumption constituting the principal carbon footprint component. These findings highlight critical needs for optimizing stocking densities and feeding regimes while maintaining productivity, coupled with the development of energy-efficient practices. Future research should prioritize sustainable intensification strategies that balance production demands with environmental stewardship.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Aquaculture International
Aquaculture International 农林科学-渔业
CiteScore
5.10
自引率
6.90%
发文量
204
审稿时长
1.0 months
期刊介绍: Aquaculture International is an international journal publishing original research papers, short communications, technical notes and review papers on all aspects of aquaculture. The Journal covers topics such as the biology, physiology, pathology and genetics of cultured fish, crustaceans, molluscs and plants, especially new species; water quality of supply systems, fluctuations in water quality within farms and the environmental impacts of aquacultural operations; nutrition, feeding and stocking practices, especially as they affect the health and growth rates of cultured species; sustainable production techniques; bioengineering studies on the design and management of offshore and land-based systems; the improvement of quality and marketing of farmed products; sociological and societal impacts of aquaculture, and more. This is the official Journal of the European Aquaculture Society.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信