{"title":"公共项目投资组合选择问题的综合层次分析法- gp - ga方法","authors":"A.O. Mogbojuri , O.A. Olanrewaju","doi":"10.1016/j.asej.2025.103644","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Strategically selecting projects and managing the project portfolio enables firms to enhance their comprehension of project risks and benefits. The capacity to choose a suitable combination of projects is a considerable benefit in the project selection process when confronted with budgetary and other limitations. The selection of projects via an effective methodology is rare, as numerous approaches are considered useless due to constraints on the number of projects available and the inability to identify cost-efficient initiatives. The study presents integrated models of the Analytic Hierarchy Process, Goal Programming, and Genetic Algorithm (AHP-GP-GA) by removing the bias of each model for Public PPSP and building a relationship between the developed models.</div><div>The AHP method was utilized to establish project selection criteria, allocate relative priority values to stakeholders, and calculate the overall weighting of project alternatives. The GP employed a computational approach to address numerous goals and limitations. The GA is a suitable mechanism for an efficient and versatile algorithm for optimisation that yields the best possible results. The empirical study demonstrates the fact the integrated approach effectively tackles wide ranging or multiplex issues involving various decision factors, yielding more optimal solutions and exhibiting resilience and adaptability in decision-making problems. The AHP-GP-GA model gives project selection criteria that are more significant in societal sustainability and the Public Project Portfolio Selection Problem (PPSP), has been used to more than 200 large projects, and has been contributed to the literature to improve the current approaches. It also removes the bias in selecting projects.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48648,"journal":{"name":"Ain Shams Engineering Journal","volume":"16 10","pages":"Article 103644"},"PeriodicalIF":5.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"An integrated AHP-GP-GA approach for public project portfolio selection problem\",\"authors\":\"A.O. Mogbojuri , O.A. Olanrewaju\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.asej.2025.103644\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Strategically selecting projects and managing the project portfolio enables firms to enhance their comprehension of project risks and benefits. The capacity to choose a suitable combination of projects is a considerable benefit in the project selection process when confronted with budgetary and other limitations. The selection of projects via an effective methodology is rare, as numerous approaches are considered useless due to constraints on the number of projects available and the inability to identify cost-efficient initiatives. The study presents integrated models of the Analytic Hierarchy Process, Goal Programming, and Genetic Algorithm (AHP-GP-GA) by removing the bias of each model for Public PPSP and building a relationship between the developed models.</div><div>The AHP method was utilized to establish project selection criteria, allocate relative priority values to stakeholders, and calculate the overall weighting of project alternatives. The GP employed a computational approach to address numerous goals and limitations. The GA is a suitable mechanism for an efficient and versatile algorithm for optimisation that yields the best possible results. The empirical study demonstrates the fact the integrated approach effectively tackles wide ranging or multiplex issues involving various decision factors, yielding more optimal solutions and exhibiting resilience and adaptability in decision-making problems. The AHP-GP-GA model gives project selection criteria that are more significant in societal sustainability and the Public Project Portfolio Selection Problem (PPSP), has been used to more than 200 large projects, and has been contributed to the literature to improve the current approaches. It also removes the bias in selecting projects.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48648,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Ain Shams Engineering Journal\",\"volume\":\"16 10\",\"pages\":\"Article 103644\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":5.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-11\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Ain Shams Engineering Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2090447925003855\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"工程技术\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ENGINEERING, MULTIDISCIPLINARY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ain Shams Engineering Journal","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2090447925003855","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
An integrated AHP-GP-GA approach for public project portfolio selection problem
Strategically selecting projects and managing the project portfolio enables firms to enhance their comprehension of project risks and benefits. The capacity to choose a suitable combination of projects is a considerable benefit in the project selection process when confronted with budgetary and other limitations. The selection of projects via an effective methodology is rare, as numerous approaches are considered useless due to constraints on the number of projects available and the inability to identify cost-efficient initiatives. The study presents integrated models of the Analytic Hierarchy Process, Goal Programming, and Genetic Algorithm (AHP-GP-GA) by removing the bias of each model for Public PPSP and building a relationship between the developed models.
The AHP method was utilized to establish project selection criteria, allocate relative priority values to stakeholders, and calculate the overall weighting of project alternatives. The GP employed a computational approach to address numerous goals and limitations. The GA is a suitable mechanism for an efficient and versatile algorithm for optimisation that yields the best possible results. The empirical study demonstrates the fact the integrated approach effectively tackles wide ranging or multiplex issues involving various decision factors, yielding more optimal solutions and exhibiting resilience and adaptability in decision-making problems. The AHP-GP-GA model gives project selection criteria that are more significant in societal sustainability and the Public Project Portfolio Selection Problem (PPSP), has been used to more than 200 large projects, and has been contributed to the literature to improve the current approaches. It also removes the bias in selecting projects.
期刊介绍:
in Shams Engineering Journal is an international journal devoted to publication of peer reviewed original high-quality research papers and review papers in both traditional topics and those of emerging science and technology. Areas of both theoretical and fundamental interest as well as those concerning industrial applications, emerging instrumental techniques and those which have some practical application to an aspect of human endeavor, such as the preservation of the environment, health, waste disposal are welcome. The overall focus is on original and rigorous scientific research results which have generic significance.
Ain Shams Engineering Journal focuses upon aspects of mechanical engineering, electrical engineering, civil engineering, chemical engineering, petroleum engineering, environmental engineering, architectural and urban planning engineering. Papers in which knowledge from other disciplines is integrated with engineering are especially welcome like nanotechnology, material sciences, and computational methods as well as applied basic sciences: engineering mathematics, physics and chemistry.