公共项目投资组合选择问题的综合层次分析法- gp - ga方法

IF 5.9 2区 工程技术 Q1 ENGINEERING, MULTIDISCIPLINARY
A.O. Mogbojuri , O.A. Olanrewaju
{"title":"公共项目投资组合选择问题的综合层次分析法- gp - ga方法","authors":"A.O. Mogbojuri ,&nbsp;O.A. Olanrewaju","doi":"10.1016/j.asej.2025.103644","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Strategically selecting projects and managing the project portfolio enables firms to enhance their comprehension of project risks and benefits. The capacity to choose a suitable combination of projects is a considerable benefit in the project selection process when confronted with budgetary and other limitations. The selection of projects via an effective methodology is rare, as numerous approaches are considered useless due to constraints on the number of projects available and the inability to identify cost-efficient initiatives. The study presents integrated models of the Analytic Hierarchy Process, Goal Programming, and Genetic Algorithm (AHP-GP-GA) by removing the bias of each model for Public PPSP and building a relationship between the developed models.</div><div>The AHP method was utilized to establish project selection criteria, allocate relative priority values to stakeholders, and calculate the overall weighting of project alternatives. The GP employed a computational approach to address numerous goals and limitations. The GA is a suitable mechanism for an efficient and versatile algorithm for optimisation that yields the best possible results. The empirical study demonstrates the fact the integrated approach effectively tackles wide ranging or multiplex issues involving various decision factors, yielding more optimal solutions and exhibiting resilience and adaptability in decision-making problems. The AHP-GP-GA model gives project selection criteria that are more significant in societal sustainability and the Public Project Portfolio Selection Problem (PPSP), has been used to more than 200 large projects, and has been contributed to the literature to improve the current approaches. It also removes the bias in selecting projects.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48648,"journal":{"name":"Ain Shams Engineering Journal","volume":"16 10","pages":"Article 103644"},"PeriodicalIF":5.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"An integrated AHP-GP-GA approach for public project portfolio selection problem\",\"authors\":\"A.O. Mogbojuri ,&nbsp;O.A. Olanrewaju\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.asej.2025.103644\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Strategically selecting projects and managing the project portfolio enables firms to enhance their comprehension of project risks and benefits. The capacity to choose a suitable combination of projects is a considerable benefit in the project selection process when confronted with budgetary and other limitations. The selection of projects via an effective methodology is rare, as numerous approaches are considered useless due to constraints on the number of projects available and the inability to identify cost-efficient initiatives. The study presents integrated models of the Analytic Hierarchy Process, Goal Programming, and Genetic Algorithm (AHP-GP-GA) by removing the bias of each model for Public PPSP and building a relationship between the developed models.</div><div>The AHP method was utilized to establish project selection criteria, allocate relative priority values to stakeholders, and calculate the overall weighting of project alternatives. The GP employed a computational approach to address numerous goals and limitations. The GA is a suitable mechanism for an efficient and versatile algorithm for optimisation that yields the best possible results. The empirical study demonstrates the fact the integrated approach effectively tackles wide ranging or multiplex issues involving various decision factors, yielding more optimal solutions and exhibiting resilience and adaptability in decision-making problems. The AHP-GP-GA model gives project selection criteria that are more significant in societal sustainability and the Public Project Portfolio Selection Problem (PPSP), has been used to more than 200 large projects, and has been contributed to the literature to improve the current approaches. It also removes the bias in selecting projects.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48648,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Ain Shams Engineering Journal\",\"volume\":\"16 10\",\"pages\":\"Article 103644\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":5.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-11\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Ain Shams Engineering Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2090447925003855\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"工程技术\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ENGINEERING, MULTIDISCIPLINARY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ain Shams Engineering Journal","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2090447925003855","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

战略性地选择项目和管理项目组合使公司能够增强对项目风险和收益的理解。当面临预算和其他限制时,选择合适的项目组合的能力在项目选择过程中是一个相当大的好处。通过有效的方法选择项目是罕见的,因为许多方法被认为是无用的,因为可用的项目数量有限,无法确定成本效益高的倡议。通过消除公共PPSP中各模型的偏差,建立各模型之间的关系,提出了层次分析法、目标规划和遗传算法(AHP-GP-GA)的集成模型。利用层次分析法建立项目选择标准,为利益相关者分配相对优先级值,并计算项目备选方案的总体权重。GP采用了一种计算方法来解决许多目标和限制。遗传算法是一种有效的、通用的优化算法,可以产生最好的结果。实证研究表明,综合方法可以有效地解决涉及多种决策因素的广泛或多重问题,产生更优的解决方案,并在决策问题中表现出弹性和适应性。AHP-GP-GA模型给出了在社会可持续性和公共项目组合选择问题(PPSP)中更重要的项目选择标准,已用于200多个大型项目,并已贡献给文献以改进现有方法。它还消除了选择项目时的偏见。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
An integrated AHP-GP-GA approach for public project portfolio selection problem
Strategically selecting projects and managing the project portfolio enables firms to enhance their comprehension of project risks and benefits. The capacity to choose a suitable combination of projects is a considerable benefit in the project selection process when confronted with budgetary and other limitations. The selection of projects via an effective methodology is rare, as numerous approaches are considered useless due to constraints on the number of projects available and the inability to identify cost-efficient initiatives. The study presents integrated models of the Analytic Hierarchy Process, Goal Programming, and Genetic Algorithm (AHP-GP-GA) by removing the bias of each model for Public PPSP and building a relationship between the developed models.
The AHP method was utilized to establish project selection criteria, allocate relative priority values to stakeholders, and calculate the overall weighting of project alternatives. The GP employed a computational approach to address numerous goals and limitations. The GA is a suitable mechanism for an efficient and versatile algorithm for optimisation that yields the best possible results. The empirical study demonstrates the fact the integrated approach effectively tackles wide ranging or multiplex issues involving various decision factors, yielding more optimal solutions and exhibiting resilience and adaptability in decision-making problems. The AHP-GP-GA model gives project selection criteria that are more significant in societal sustainability and the Public Project Portfolio Selection Problem (PPSP), has been used to more than 200 large projects, and has been contributed to the literature to improve the current approaches. It also removes the bias in selecting projects.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Ain Shams Engineering Journal
Ain Shams Engineering Journal Engineering-General Engineering
CiteScore
10.80
自引率
13.30%
发文量
441
审稿时长
49 weeks
期刊介绍: in Shams Engineering Journal is an international journal devoted to publication of peer reviewed original high-quality research papers and review papers in both traditional topics and those of emerging science and technology. Areas of both theoretical and fundamental interest as well as those concerning industrial applications, emerging instrumental techniques and those which have some practical application to an aspect of human endeavor, such as the preservation of the environment, health, waste disposal are welcome. The overall focus is on original and rigorous scientific research results which have generic significance. Ain Shams Engineering Journal focuses upon aspects of mechanical engineering, electrical engineering, civil engineering, chemical engineering, petroleum engineering, environmental engineering, architectural and urban planning engineering. Papers in which knowledge from other disciplines is integrated with engineering are especially welcome like nanotechnology, material sciences, and computational methods as well as applied basic sciences: engineering mathematics, physics and chemistry.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信