Chan Young Yang , Jun Sung Bae , Ga Won Kim , Chae Won Lee , Eun Ha Jeong , Mun-Gyeong Kwon , Jung Soo Seo , Chan-Il Park , Ji-Hoon Lee
{"title":"苯并咪唑类驱虫药对黑岩鱼小子叶鳃吸虫的药理学评价","authors":"Chan Young Yang , Jun Sung Bae , Ga Won Kim , Chae Won Lee , Eun Ha Jeong , Mun-Gyeong Kwon , Jung Soo Seo , Chan-Il Park , Ji-Hoon Lee","doi":"10.1016/j.vetpar.2025.110573","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>This study comprehensively evaluated the <em>in vitro</em> and <em>in vivo</em> anthelmintic efficacy and pharmacokinetics of four benzimidazole compounds: febantel (FB), fenbendazole (FBZ), albendazole (ABZ), and mebendazole (MBZ) against the gill fluke <em>Microcotyle sebastis</em> in cultured black rockfish (<em>Sebastes schlegelii</em>). <em>In vitro</em> tests with isolated adult parasites demonstrated that ABZ exhibited the highest efficacy, followed by FBZ, while MBZ showed minimal activity and FB remained largely inactive at lower concentrations. At the highest concentration tested (200 mg/L), FB showed only weak, nonspecific activity. In <em>in vivo</em> experiments, ABZ was the most effective drug when orally administered at 50 mg/kg for three consecutive days, while FB demonstrated greater efficacy than FBZ, and MBZ exhibited the lowest efficacy under the tested conditions. Pharmacokinetic analysis revealed marked variation among the drugs, with FB achieving the highest active metabolite levels at 100 mg/kg. ABZ, at 50 mg/kg, achieved comparable systemic exposure to FBZ at 100 mg/kg through its active metabolite albendazole sulfoxide (ABZSO). These findings highlight ABZ as the most efficacious compound, with FB showing promise through metabolic conversion to FBZ, and MBZ demonstrating limited efficacy due to poor absorption and rapid inactivation. Overall, this study provides an integrated evaluation of both efficacy and pharmacokinetics, indicating that ABZ and FB are effective candidates for managing <em>M. sebastis</em> infections in aquaculture.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":23716,"journal":{"name":"Veterinary parasitology","volume":"339 ","pages":"Article 110573"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Pharmacological evaluation on benzimidazole anthelmintics for eradication of the gill fluke Microcotyle sebastis infesting a black rockfish, Sebastes schlegelii\",\"authors\":\"Chan Young Yang , Jun Sung Bae , Ga Won Kim , Chae Won Lee , Eun Ha Jeong , Mun-Gyeong Kwon , Jung Soo Seo , Chan-Il Park , Ji-Hoon Lee\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.vetpar.2025.110573\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>This study comprehensively evaluated the <em>in vitro</em> and <em>in vivo</em> anthelmintic efficacy and pharmacokinetics of four benzimidazole compounds: febantel (FB), fenbendazole (FBZ), albendazole (ABZ), and mebendazole (MBZ) against the gill fluke <em>Microcotyle sebastis</em> in cultured black rockfish (<em>Sebastes schlegelii</em>). <em>In vitro</em> tests with isolated adult parasites demonstrated that ABZ exhibited the highest efficacy, followed by FBZ, while MBZ showed minimal activity and FB remained largely inactive at lower concentrations. At the highest concentration tested (200 mg/L), FB showed only weak, nonspecific activity. In <em>in vivo</em> experiments, ABZ was the most effective drug when orally administered at 50 mg/kg for three consecutive days, while FB demonstrated greater efficacy than FBZ, and MBZ exhibited the lowest efficacy under the tested conditions. Pharmacokinetic analysis revealed marked variation among the drugs, with FB achieving the highest active metabolite levels at 100 mg/kg. ABZ, at 50 mg/kg, achieved comparable systemic exposure to FBZ at 100 mg/kg through its active metabolite albendazole sulfoxide (ABZSO). These findings highlight ABZ as the most efficacious compound, with FB showing promise through metabolic conversion to FBZ, and MBZ demonstrating limited efficacy due to poor absorption and rapid inactivation. Overall, this study provides an integrated evaluation of both efficacy and pharmacokinetics, indicating that ABZ and FB are effective candidates for managing <em>M. sebastis</em> infections in aquaculture.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":23716,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Veterinary parasitology\",\"volume\":\"339 \",\"pages\":\"Article 110573\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-07\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Veterinary parasitology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"97\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0304401725001840\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"农林科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"PARASITOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Veterinary parasitology","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0304401725001840","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PARASITOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Pharmacological evaluation on benzimidazole anthelmintics for eradication of the gill fluke Microcotyle sebastis infesting a black rockfish, Sebastes schlegelii
This study comprehensively evaluated the in vitro and in vivo anthelmintic efficacy and pharmacokinetics of four benzimidazole compounds: febantel (FB), fenbendazole (FBZ), albendazole (ABZ), and mebendazole (MBZ) against the gill fluke Microcotyle sebastis in cultured black rockfish (Sebastes schlegelii). In vitro tests with isolated adult parasites demonstrated that ABZ exhibited the highest efficacy, followed by FBZ, while MBZ showed minimal activity and FB remained largely inactive at lower concentrations. At the highest concentration tested (200 mg/L), FB showed only weak, nonspecific activity. In in vivo experiments, ABZ was the most effective drug when orally administered at 50 mg/kg for three consecutive days, while FB demonstrated greater efficacy than FBZ, and MBZ exhibited the lowest efficacy under the tested conditions. Pharmacokinetic analysis revealed marked variation among the drugs, with FB achieving the highest active metabolite levels at 100 mg/kg. ABZ, at 50 mg/kg, achieved comparable systemic exposure to FBZ at 100 mg/kg through its active metabolite albendazole sulfoxide (ABZSO). These findings highlight ABZ as the most efficacious compound, with FB showing promise through metabolic conversion to FBZ, and MBZ demonstrating limited efficacy due to poor absorption and rapid inactivation. Overall, this study provides an integrated evaluation of both efficacy and pharmacokinetics, indicating that ABZ and FB are effective candidates for managing M. sebastis infections in aquaculture.
期刊介绍:
The journal Veterinary Parasitology has an open access mirror journal,Veterinary Parasitology: X, sharing the same aims and scope, editorial team, submission system and rigorous peer review.
This journal is concerned with those aspects of helminthology, protozoology and entomology which are of interest to animal health investigators, veterinary practitioners and others with a special interest in parasitology. Papers of the highest quality dealing with all aspects of disease prevention, pathology, treatment, epidemiology, and control of parasites in all domesticated animals, fall within the scope of the journal. Papers of geographically limited (local) interest which are not of interest to an international audience will not be accepted. Authors who submit papers based on local data will need to indicate why their paper is relevant to a broader readership.
Parasitological studies on laboratory animals fall within the scope of the journal only if they provide a reasonably close model of a disease of domestic animals. Additionally the journal will consider papers relating to wildlife species where they may act as disease reservoirs to domestic animals, or as a zoonotic reservoir. Case studies considered to be unique or of specific interest to the journal, will also be considered on occasions at the Editors'' discretion. Papers dealing exclusively with the taxonomy of parasites do not fall within the scope of the journal.