{"title":"是什么驱使我们走向绿色:自恋、美德信号和社会排斥的作用","authors":"Shayan Shaikh , Nicholas Ashill","doi":"10.1016/j.paid.2025.113392","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Understanding individual differences in pro-environmental values is crucial amid climate change. This study explores how grandiose and vulnerable narcissism relate to such values, using survey data from 609 British participants. Our findings reveal that grandiose narcissism is positively associated with pro-environmental values and virtue signaling mediates this relationship. This suggests that individuals high in grandiose narcissism may adopt pro-environmental values primarily to enhance their self-image. Conversely, although vulnerable narcissism shows a negative direct relationship with pro-environmental values, vulnerable narcissists also engage in virtue signaling, which positively influences their adoption of pro-environmental values. This indicates that their motivation may stem from a need to protect their fragile self-esteem. Additionally, while grandiose narcissism and vulnerable narcissism differ in how they relate to social exclusion, social exclusion does not significantly predict pro-environmental values. This implies that the emotional consequences of exclusion may not support the internalization of pro-environmental values. By highlighting the distinct motivational pathways of grandiose and vulnerable narcissism, this study deepens understanding of how self-focused traits influence environmental value adoption.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48467,"journal":{"name":"Personality and Individual Differences","volume":"247 ","pages":"Article 113392"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"What drives us to go green: The roles of narcissism, virtue signaling and social exclusion\",\"authors\":\"Shayan Shaikh , Nicholas Ashill\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.paid.2025.113392\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Understanding individual differences in pro-environmental values is crucial amid climate change. This study explores how grandiose and vulnerable narcissism relate to such values, using survey data from 609 British participants. Our findings reveal that grandiose narcissism is positively associated with pro-environmental values and virtue signaling mediates this relationship. This suggests that individuals high in grandiose narcissism may adopt pro-environmental values primarily to enhance their self-image. Conversely, although vulnerable narcissism shows a negative direct relationship with pro-environmental values, vulnerable narcissists also engage in virtue signaling, which positively influences their adoption of pro-environmental values. This indicates that their motivation may stem from a need to protect their fragile self-esteem. Additionally, while grandiose narcissism and vulnerable narcissism differ in how they relate to social exclusion, social exclusion does not significantly predict pro-environmental values. This implies that the emotional consequences of exclusion may not support the internalization of pro-environmental values. By highlighting the distinct motivational pathways of grandiose and vulnerable narcissism, this study deepens understanding of how self-focused traits influence environmental value adoption.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48467,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Personality and Individual Differences\",\"volume\":\"247 \",\"pages\":\"Article 113392\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-11\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Personality and Individual Differences\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"102\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S019188692500354X\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"心理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHOLOGY, SOCIAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Personality and Individual Differences","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S019188692500354X","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, SOCIAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
What drives us to go green: The roles of narcissism, virtue signaling and social exclusion
Understanding individual differences in pro-environmental values is crucial amid climate change. This study explores how grandiose and vulnerable narcissism relate to such values, using survey data from 609 British participants. Our findings reveal that grandiose narcissism is positively associated with pro-environmental values and virtue signaling mediates this relationship. This suggests that individuals high in grandiose narcissism may adopt pro-environmental values primarily to enhance their self-image. Conversely, although vulnerable narcissism shows a negative direct relationship with pro-environmental values, vulnerable narcissists also engage in virtue signaling, which positively influences their adoption of pro-environmental values. This indicates that their motivation may stem from a need to protect their fragile self-esteem. Additionally, while grandiose narcissism and vulnerable narcissism differ in how they relate to social exclusion, social exclusion does not significantly predict pro-environmental values. This implies that the emotional consequences of exclusion may not support the internalization of pro-environmental values. By highlighting the distinct motivational pathways of grandiose and vulnerable narcissism, this study deepens understanding of how self-focused traits influence environmental value adoption.
期刊介绍:
Personality and Individual Differences is devoted to the publication of articles (experimental, theoretical, review) which aim to integrate as far as possible the major factors of personality with empirical paradigms from experimental, physiological, animal, clinical, educational, criminological or industrial psychology or to seek an explanation for the causes and major determinants of individual differences in concepts derived from these disciplines. The editors are concerned with both genetic and environmental causes, and they are particularly interested in possible interaction effects.