物种原生性作为物种保护的文化范式

IF 4.4 1区 环境科学与生态学 Q1 BIODIVERSITY CONSERVATION
Lily M. van Eeden , Jeff Vance Martin , Jonathan Fisk , Lisa Lehnen , Erle C. Ellis , Michael C. Gavin , Adam C. Landon , Lincoln R. Larson , Kirsten M. Leong , Wayne Linklater , Christopher K. Williams , Richard E.W. Berl
{"title":"物种原生性作为物种保护的文化范式","authors":"Lily M. van Eeden ,&nbsp;Jeff Vance Martin ,&nbsp;Jonathan Fisk ,&nbsp;Lisa Lehnen ,&nbsp;Erle C. Ellis ,&nbsp;Michael C. Gavin ,&nbsp;Adam C. Landon ,&nbsp;Lincoln R. Larson ,&nbsp;Kirsten M. Leong ,&nbsp;Wayne Linklater ,&nbsp;Christopher K. Williams ,&nbsp;Richard E.W. Berl","doi":"10.1016/j.biocon.2025.111415","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Conservation entails cultural practices shaped by our worldviews, values, beliefs, and priorities for our interactions with nature. These inform how we categorize which species we want to occur in which landscapes. In Western conservation organizations, conceptualizations of species ‘belonging’ typically align with a dichotomy of native versus introduced species. This is a cultural paradigm, informed by biological considerations, and it is not uniformly shared across different cultures, resulting in varied conceptualizations of species belonging. These conceptualizations may continue to evolve as socio-ecological systems change over time. Thus, misalignment in perceptions of species belonging can manifest in seemingly intractable conflicts. We apply a cultural evolutionary lens to: (1) consider the social history of the native-introduced dichotomy; (2) describe social and ecological factors causing friction around the dichotomy; (3) explore how conservation can integrate diverse and changing values about species belonging, and (4) make predictions about future socio-ecological change that may shape conservation governance and our categorization of species. In doing so, we encourage conservation scientists and practitioners to practice reflexivity about the cultural nature of conservation and management of introduced species. This application of cultural evolution presents a unique lens for recognizing the inevitability of both social and ecological change and inspires critical consideration of how diverse and changing values might be integrated into, and shape, the future of conservation.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":55375,"journal":{"name":"Biological Conservation","volume":"311 ","pages":"Article 111415"},"PeriodicalIF":4.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Species nativeness as a cultural paradigm in conservation\",\"authors\":\"Lily M. van Eeden ,&nbsp;Jeff Vance Martin ,&nbsp;Jonathan Fisk ,&nbsp;Lisa Lehnen ,&nbsp;Erle C. Ellis ,&nbsp;Michael C. Gavin ,&nbsp;Adam C. Landon ,&nbsp;Lincoln R. Larson ,&nbsp;Kirsten M. Leong ,&nbsp;Wayne Linklater ,&nbsp;Christopher K. Williams ,&nbsp;Richard E.W. Berl\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.biocon.2025.111415\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Conservation entails cultural practices shaped by our worldviews, values, beliefs, and priorities for our interactions with nature. These inform how we categorize which species we want to occur in which landscapes. In Western conservation organizations, conceptualizations of species ‘belonging’ typically align with a dichotomy of native versus introduced species. This is a cultural paradigm, informed by biological considerations, and it is not uniformly shared across different cultures, resulting in varied conceptualizations of species belonging. These conceptualizations may continue to evolve as socio-ecological systems change over time. Thus, misalignment in perceptions of species belonging can manifest in seemingly intractable conflicts. We apply a cultural evolutionary lens to: (1) consider the social history of the native-introduced dichotomy; (2) describe social and ecological factors causing friction around the dichotomy; (3) explore how conservation can integrate diverse and changing values about species belonging, and (4) make predictions about future socio-ecological change that may shape conservation governance and our categorization of species. In doing so, we encourage conservation scientists and practitioners to practice reflexivity about the cultural nature of conservation and management of introduced species. This application of cultural evolution presents a unique lens for recognizing the inevitability of both social and ecological change and inspires critical consideration of how diverse and changing values might be integrated into, and shape, the future of conservation.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":55375,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Biological Conservation\",\"volume\":\"311 \",\"pages\":\"Article 111415\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-11\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Biological Conservation\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"93\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0006320725004525\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"环境科学与生态学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"BIODIVERSITY CONSERVATION\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Biological Conservation","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0006320725004525","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BIODIVERSITY CONSERVATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

保护需要我们的世界观、价值观、信仰以及我们与自然互动的优先顺序所塑造的文化实践。这些信息告诉我们如何对我们希望在哪种景观中出现的物种进行分类。在西方保护组织中,物种“归属”的概念通常与本地物种和引进物种的二分法相一致。这是一种基于生物学考虑的文化范式,它在不同的文化中并不统一,导致物种归属的不同概念。随着社会生态系统的变化,这些概念可能会继续演变。因此,物种归属观念的错位可以在看似棘手的冲突中表现出来。我们运用文化进化的视角:(1)考虑本土引入的二分法的社会历史;(2)围绕二分法描述引起摩擦的社会和生态因素;(3)探索保护如何整合物种归属的多样性和不断变化的价值;(4)对未来可能影响保护治理和物种分类的社会生态变化做出预测。在此过程中,我们鼓励保护科学家和从业者对引进物种的保护和管理的文化本质进行反思。文化进化的这种应用为认识社会和生态变化的必然性提供了一个独特的视角,并激发了对如何将多样化和不断变化的价值观融入并塑造保护未来的批判性思考。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Species nativeness as a cultural paradigm in conservation
Conservation entails cultural practices shaped by our worldviews, values, beliefs, and priorities for our interactions with nature. These inform how we categorize which species we want to occur in which landscapes. In Western conservation organizations, conceptualizations of species ‘belonging’ typically align with a dichotomy of native versus introduced species. This is a cultural paradigm, informed by biological considerations, and it is not uniformly shared across different cultures, resulting in varied conceptualizations of species belonging. These conceptualizations may continue to evolve as socio-ecological systems change over time. Thus, misalignment in perceptions of species belonging can manifest in seemingly intractable conflicts. We apply a cultural evolutionary lens to: (1) consider the social history of the native-introduced dichotomy; (2) describe social and ecological factors causing friction around the dichotomy; (3) explore how conservation can integrate diverse and changing values about species belonging, and (4) make predictions about future socio-ecological change that may shape conservation governance and our categorization of species. In doing so, we encourage conservation scientists and practitioners to practice reflexivity about the cultural nature of conservation and management of introduced species. This application of cultural evolution presents a unique lens for recognizing the inevitability of both social and ecological change and inspires critical consideration of how diverse and changing values might be integrated into, and shape, the future of conservation.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Biological Conservation
Biological Conservation 环境科学-环境科学
CiteScore
10.20
自引率
3.40%
发文量
295
审稿时长
61 days
期刊介绍: Biological Conservation is an international leading journal in the discipline of conservation biology. The journal publishes articles spanning a diverse range of fields that contribute to the biological, sociological, and economic dimensions of conservation and natural resource management. The primary aim of Biological Conservation is the publication of high-quality papers that advance the science and practice of conservation, or which demonstrate the application of conservation principles for natural resource management and policy. Therefore it will be of interest to a broad international readership.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信