强制性报告是否提高了印尼环境信息披露的质量?

IF 2.3 Q2 DEVELOPMENT STUDIES
Indah Fajarini Sri Wahyuningrum , Sriningsih , Annisa Sila Puspita , Mochamad Arief Budihardjo , Amin Chegenizadeh , Hamid Nikraz
{"title":"强制性报告是否提高了印尼环境信息披露的质量?","authors":"Indah Fajarini Sri Wahyuningrum ,&nbsp;Sriningsih ,&nbsp;Annisa Sila Puspita ,&nbsp;Mochamad Arief Budihardjo ,&nbsp;Amin Chegenizadeh ,&nbsp;Hamid Nikraz","doi":"10.1016/j.wdp.2025.100718","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>This paper investigates the evolution of environmental disclosure practices among publicly listed Indonesian companies as they transitioned from voluntary to mandatory sustainability reporting between 2016 and 2022. Using a sample of 767 sustainability reports, the study employed a quantitative content analysis and a weighted scoring system ranging from zero to five, aligned with the Global Reporting Initiative (GRI) G4 and GRI Standards. This approach enabled an evaluation of the frequency and quality of environmental information disclosed over time. The findings indicate a substantial increase in reporting volume, with sustainability report submissions rising to 69 % between 2020 and 2021. However, this growth did not correspond to improvements in disclosure quality; in fact, the average environmental disclosure score declined by over 40 % during the same period. Supplier environmental assessments were often significantly underreported, while energy use and effluent management were the most frequently disclosed topics. Environmentally sensitive sectors, particularly energy, provided higher quality disclosures (average scores &gt; 0.30), whereas the finance sector produced the most reports but with the lowest average quality (&lt; 0.15). These findings highlight a trend of nominal compliance, suggesting that many companies prioritize regulatory adherence over substantive transparency. This study contributes a longitudinal empirical perspective from a developing context and calls for stronger, sector-specific regulatory enforcement.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":37831,"journal":{"name":"World Development Perspectives","volume":"39 ","pages":"Article 100718"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Has mandatory reporting improved environmental disclosure quality in Indonesia?\",\"authors\":\"Indah Fajarini Sri Wahyuningrum ,&nbsp;Sriningsih ,&nbsp;Annisa Sila Puspita ,&nbsp;Mochamad Arief Budihardjo ,&nbsp;Amin Chegenizadeh ,&nbsp;Hamid Nikraz\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.wdp.2025.100718\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>This paper investigates the evolution of environmental disclosure practices among publicly listed Indonesian companies as they transitioned from voluntary to mandatory sustainability reporting between 2016 and 2022. Using a sample of 767 sustainability reports, the study employed a quantitative content analysis and a weighted scoring system ranging from zero to five, aligned with the Global Reporting Initiative (GRI) G4 and GRI Standards. This approach enabled an evaluation of the frequency and quality of environmental information disclosed over time. The findings indicate a substantial increase in reporting volume, with sustainability report submissions rising to 69 % between 2020 and 2021. However, this growth did not correspond to improvements in disclosure quality; in fact, the average environmental disclosure score declined by over 40 % during the same period. Supplier environmental assessments were often significantly underreported, while energy use and effluent management were the most frequently disclosed topics. Environmentally sensitive sectors, particularly energy, provided higher quality disclosures (average scores &gt; 0.30), whereas the finance sector produced the most reports but with the lowest average quality (&lt; 0.15). These findings highlight a trend of nominal compliance, suggesting that many companies prioritize regulatory adherence over substantive transparency. This study contributes a longitudinal empirical perspective from a developing context and calls for stronger, sector-specific regulatory enforcement.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":37831,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"World Development Perspectives\",\"volume\":\"39 \",\"pages\":\"Article 100718\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-11\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"World Development Perspectives\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2452292925000633\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"DEVELOPMENT STUDIES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"World Development Perspectives","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2452292925000633","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"DEVELOPMENT STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文研究了印尼上市公司在2016年至2022年间从自愿向强制性可持续发展报告过渡期间环境披露实践的演变。该研究以767份可持续发展报告为样本,采用了定量内容分析和加权评分系统,评分范围从0到5,与全球报告倡议组织(GRI) G4和GRI标准保持一致。这种方法能够对一段时间内披露的环境信息的频率和质量进行评估。调查结果表明,报告数量大幅增加,2020年至2021年期间,可持续发展报告提交量上升至69%。然而,这一增长并未对应于披露质量的改善;事实上,同期环境信息披露的平均得分下降了40%以上。供应商的环境评估往往严重少报,而能源使用和污水管理是最经常披露的主题。环境敏感行业,特别是能源行业,提供了更高质量的信息披露(平均得分>;0.30),而金融业产出的报告最多,但平均质量最低(<;0.15)。这些发现凸显了名义合规的趋势,表明许多公司优先考虑遵守监管,而不是实质性的透明度。本研究提供了一个发展中背景下的纵向实证视角,并呼吁加强针对特定行业的监管执法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Has mandatory reporting improved environmental disclosure quality in Indonesia?
This paper investigates the evolution of environmental disclosure practices among publicly listed Indonesian companies as they transitioned from voluntary to mandatory sustainability reporting between 2016 and 2022. Using a sample of 767 sustainability reports, the study employed a quantitative content analysis and a weighted scoring system ranging from zero to five, aligned with the Global Reporting Initiative (GRI) G4 and GRI Standards. This approach enabled an evaluation of the frequency and quality of environmental information disclosed over time. The findings indicate a substantial increase in reporting volume, with sustainability report submissions rising to 69 % between 2020 and 2021. However, this growth did not correspond to improvements in disclosure quality; in fact, the average environmental disclosure score declined by over 40 % during the same period. Supplier environmental assessments were often significantly underreported, while energy use and effluent management were the most frequently disclosed topics. Environmentally sensitive sectors, particularly energy, provided higher quality disclosures (average scores > 0.30), whereas the finance sector produced the most reports but with the lowest average quality (< 0.15). These findings highlight a trend of nominal compliance, suggesting that many companies prioritize regulatory adherence over substantive transparency. This study contributes a longitudinal empirical perspective from a developing context and calls for stronger, sector-specific regulatory enforcement.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
World Development Perspectives
World Development Perspectives Social Sciences-Sociology and Political Science
CiteScore
4.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
65
审稿时长
84 days
期刊介绍: World Development Perspectives is a multi-disciplinary journal of international development. It seeks to explore ways of improving human well-being by examining the performance and impact of interventions designed to address issues related to: poverty alleviation, public health and malnutrition, agricultural production, natural resource governance, globalization and transnational processes, technological progress, gender and social discrimination, and participation in economic and political life. Above all, we are particularly interested in the role of historical, legal, social, economic, political, biophysical, and/or ecological contexts in shaping development processes and outcomes.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信