{"title":"评价生物多样性森林中铁矿石开采的影响和可持续性的改进半定量框架","authors":"Rahul Kumar, Ashish Kumar, Pranjal Pathak, Biswajit Samanta","doi":"10.1016/j.envdev.2025.101306","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Mining in biodiversity-rich forest regions presents complex trade-offs between economic development and ecological integrity. This study assesses the sustainability of a major iron ore mine in eastern India using an integrated framework that combines a modified Folchi (2003) impact matrix with Phillips's (2010) sustainability scoring method. Three key innovations distinguish the proposed approach: (1) incorporation of forest-specific indicators such as biodiversity sensitivity, ecosystem services, and waste and infrastructure pressures; (2) use of signed impact scores to explicitly distinguish positive and negative effects across sustainability components; and (3) application of fuzzy similarity aggregation to reduce uncertainty in expert judgment by weighting inputs from 20 domain experts.</div><div>Results show pronounced environmental degradation, with high negative scores in use of territory (62.50), flora and fauna (54.14), biodiversity (51.05), and air quality (38.67), primarily driven by land resource alteration, ecological disturbance, and vehicular activity. In contrast, strong positive contributions were found in the economy (−78.29), livelihood (−40.90), and social development (−33.45), mainly due to employment generation and infrastructure development. Despite the mine's environmental initiatives, the overall sustainability score (S = 0.204) classifies it as ‘very poor’, indicating that environmental costs currently outweigh socio-economic benefits. The study demonstrates a more reliable, transparent, and context-sensitive approach for sustainability assessment in forested mining regions. It emphasizes the need for stricter environmental safeguards to balance development with biodiversity and ecosystem integrity.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":54269,"journal":{"name":"Environmental Development","volume":"57 ","pages":"Article 101306"},"PeriodicalIF":5.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A modified semi-quantitative framework for assessing the impacts and sustainability of iron ore mining in a biodiverse forest\",\"authors\":\"Rahul Kumar, Ashish Kumar, Pranjal Pathak, Biswajit Samanta\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.envdev.2025.101306\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Mining in biodiversity-rich forest regions presents complex trade-offs between economic development and ecological integrity. This study assesses the sustainability of a major iron ore mine in eastern India using an integrated framework that combines a modified Folchi (2003) impact matrix with Phillips's (2010) sustainability scoring method. Three key innovations distinguish the proposed approach: (1) incorporation of forest-specific indicators such as biodiversity sensitivity, ecosystem services, and waste and infrastructure pressures; (2) use of signed impact scores to explicitly distinguish positive and negative effects across sustainability components; and (3) application of fuzzy similarity aggregation to reduce uncertainty in expert judgment by weighting inputs from 20 domain experts.</div><div>Results show pronounced environmental degradation, with high negative scores in use of territory (62.50), flora and fauna (54.14), biodiversity (51.05), and air quality (38.67), primarily driven by land resource alteration, ecological disturbance, and vehicular activity. In contrast, strong positive contributions were found in the economy (−78.29), livelihood (−40.90), and social development (−33.45), mainly due to employment generation and infrastructure development. Despite the mine's environmental initiatives, the overall sustainability score (S = 0.204) classifies it as ‘very poor’, indicating that environmental costs currently outweigh socio-economic benefits. The study demonstrates a more reliable, transparent, and context-sensitive approach for sustainability assessment in forested mining regions. It emphasizes the need for stricter environmental safeguards to balance development with biodiversity and ecosystem integrity.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":54269,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Environmental Development\",\"volume\":\"57 \",\"pages\":\"Article 101306\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":5.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-05\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Environmental Development\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"93\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2211464525001721\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"环境科学与生态学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Environmental Development","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2211464525001721","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
A modified semi-quantitative framework for assessing the impacts and sustainability of iron ore mining in a biodiverse forest
Mining in biodiversity-rich forest regions presents complex trade-offs between economic development and ecological integrity. This study assesses the sustainability of a major iron ore mine in eastern India using an integrated framework that combines a modified Folchi (2003) impact matrix with Phillips's (2010) sustainability scoring method. Three key innovations distinguish the proposed approach: (1) incorporation of forest-specific indicators such as biodiversity sensitivity, ecosystem services, and waste and infrastructure pressures; (2) use of signed impact scores to explicitly distinguish positive and negative effects across sustainability components; and (3) application of fuzzy similarity aggregation to reduce uncertainty in expert judgment by weighting inputs from 20 domain experts.
Results show pronounced environmental degradation, with high negative scores in use of territory (62.50), flora and fauna (54.14), biodiversity (51.05), and air quality (38.67), primarily driven by land resource alteration, ecological disturbance, and vehicular activity. In contrast, strong positive contributions were found in the economy (−78.29), livelihood (−40.90), and social development (−33.45), mainly due to employment generation and infrastructure development. Despite the mine's environmental initiatives, the overall sustainability score (S = 0.204) classifies it as ‘very poor’, indicating that environmental costs currently outweigh socio-economic benefits. The study demonstrates a more reliable, transparent, and context-sensitive approach for sustainability assessment in forested mining regions. It emphasizes the need for stricter environmental safeguards to balance development with biodiversity and ecosystem integrity.
期刊介绍:
Environmental Development provides a future oriented, pro-active, authoritative source of information and learning for researchers, postgraduate students, policymakers, and managers, and bridges the gap between fundamental research and the application in management and policy practices. It stimulates the exchange and coupling of traditional scientific knowledge on the environment, with the experiential knowledge among decision makers and other stakeholders and also connects natural sciences and social and behavioral sciences. Environmental Development includes and promotes scientific work from the non-western world, and also strengthens the collaboration between the developed and developing world. Further it links environmental research to broader issues of economic and social-cultural developments, and is intended to shorten the delays between research and publication, while ensuring thorough peer review. Environmental Development also creates a forum for transnational communication, discussion and global action.
Environmental Development is open to a broad range of disciplines and authors. The journal welcomes, in particular, contributions from a younger generation of researchers, and papers expanding the frontiers of environmental sciences, pointing at new directions and innovative answers.
All submissions to Environmental Development are reviewed using the general criteria of quality, originality, precision, importance of topic and insights, clarity of exposition, which are in keeping with the journal''s aims and scope.