混合环境下伙伴关系实践的周期性变化

IF 6.4 1区 管理学 Q1 BUSINESS
Christiana Weber, Marit Grewe-Salfeld, Markus Göbel, Barbara Harsman, Yuka Matsuo, Rick Vogel
{"title":"混合环境下伙伴关系实践的周期性变化","authors":"Christiana Weber,&nbsp;Marit Grewe-Salfeld,&nbsp;Markus Göbel,&nbsp;Barbara Harsman,&nbsp;Yuka Matsuo,&nbsp;Rick Vogel","doi":"10.1111/joms.13185","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Practice-driven institutionalism (PDI) is a conceptual lens that explains how practices connect macro-level phenomena with micro-level behaviours. Effective practices matter in hybrid organisational settings, such as cross-sector partnerships, where actors from diverse institutional backgrounds collaborate. Despite its potential, PDI has yet to fully explore the dynamics and interactions among practices, which are essential for understanding their collective and temporal impact in any hybrid setting. Our study addresses this gap through a qualitative multi-case analysis of three cross-sector partnerships tackling complex social and environmental challenges. We identify three interconnected sets of partnership practices that help actors navigate the complexities that occur when the logics of business, government, and civil society clash. We reveal a cyclical pattern where collaboration oscillates between motivation and fatigue, driven by these practices. We introduce a conceptual model that transcends the so far static and isolated view on practices, advancing the PDI lens beyond its current limitations. Furthermore, it illuminates the role of the individual in hybrid settings of collaboration.</p>","PeriodicalId":48445,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Management Studies","volume":"62 6","pages":"2241-2273"},"PeriodicalIF":6.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/joms.13185","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Cyclical Change of Partnership Practices in Hybrid Settings\",\"authors\":\"Christiana Weber,&nbsp;Marit Grewe-Salfeld,&nbsp;Markus Göbel,&nbsp;Barbara Harsman,&nbsp;Yuka Matsuo,&nbsp;Rick Vogel\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/joms.13185\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>Practice-driven institutionalism (PDI) is a conceptual lens that explains how practices connect macro-level phenomena with micro-level behaviours. Effective practices matter in hybrid organisational settings, such as cross-sector partnerships, where actors from diverse institutional backgrounds collaborate. Despite its potential, PDI has yet to fully explore the dynamics and interactions among practices, which are essential for understanding their collective and temporal impact in any hybrid setting. Our study addresses this gap through a qualitative multi-case analysis of three cross-sector partnerships tackling complex social and environmental challenges. We identify three interconnected sets of partnership practices that help actors navigate the complexities that occur when the logics of business, government, and civil society clash. We reveal a cyclical pattern where collaboration oscillates between motivation and fatigue, driven by these practices. We introduce a conceptual model that transcends the so far static and isolated view on practices, advancing the PDI lens beyond its current limitations. Furthermore, it illuminates the role of the individual in hybrid settings of collaboration.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48445,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Management Studies\",\"volume\":\"62 6\",\"pages\":\"2241-2273\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":6.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-24\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/joms.13185\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Management Studies\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"91\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/joms.13185\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"管理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"BUSINESS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Management Studies","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/joms.13185","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BUSINESS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

实践驱动的制度主义(PDI)是一个解释实践如何将宏观层面的现象与微观层面的行为联系起来的概念镜头。有效的实践在混合组织环境中很重要,例如跨部门伙伴关系,其中来自不同机构背景的参与者进行合作。尽管具有潜力,但PDI尚未充分探索实践之间的动态和相互作用,这对于理解它们在任何混合环境中的集体和时间影响至关重要。我们的研究通过对应对复杂社会和环境挑战的三个跨部门伙伴关系进行定性多案例分析,解决了这一差距。我们确定了三套相互关联的伙伴关系实践,以帮助参与者应对企业、政府和公民社会的逻辑发生冲突时出现的复杂性。我们揭示了一种循环模式,在这些实践的驱动下,协作在动力和疲劳之间摇摆。我们介绍了一个概念模型,它超越了迄今为止关于实践的静态和孤立的观点,使PDI镜头超越了其当前的局限性。此外,它阐明了个人在混合协作环境中的作用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Cyclical Change of Partnership Practices in Hybrid Settings

Cyclical Change of Partnership Practices in Hybrid Settings

Practice-driven institutionalism (PDI) is a conceptual lens that explains how practices connect macro-level phenomena with micro-level behaviours. Effective practices matter in hybrid organisational settings, such as cross-sector partnerships, where actors from diverse institutional backgrounds collaborate. Despite its potential, PDI has yet to fully explore the dynamics and interactions among practices, which are essential for understanding their collective and temporal impact in any hybrid setting. Our study addresses this gap through a qualitative multi-case analysis of three cross-sector partnerships tackling complex social and environmental challenges. We identify three interconnected sets of partnership practices that help actors navigate the complexities that occur when the logics of business, government, and civil society clash. We reveal a cyclical pattern where collaboration oscillates between motivation and fatigue, driven by these practices. We introduce a conceptual model that transcends the so far static and isolated view on practices, advancing the PDI lens beyond its current limitations. Furthermore, it illuminates the role of the individual in hybrid settings of collaboration.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
16.40
自引率
5.70%
发文量
99
期刊介绍: The Journal of Management Studies is a prestigious publication that specializes in multidisciplinary research in the field of business and management. With a rich history of excellence, we are dedicated to publishing innovative articles that contribute to the advancement of management and organization studies. Our journal welcomes empirical and conceptual contributions that are relevant to various areas including organization theory, organizational behavior, human resource management, strategy, international business, entrepreneurship, innovation, and critical management studies. We embrace diversity and are open to a wide range of methodological approaches and philosophical perspectives.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信