样品均匀性对生物质液化油CHNS、水和ICP分析影响的实验室间研究

IF 5.3 3区 工程技术 Q2 ENERGY & FUELS
Philip Bulsink*, Leslie Nguyen, Murlidhar Gupta, François-Xavier Collard, Axel Funke, Jawad Jeaidi and Benjamin Bronson, 
{"title":"样品均匀性对生物质液化油CHNS、水和ICP分析影响的实验室间研究","authors":"Philip Bulsink*,&nbsp;Leslie Nguyen,&nbsp;Murlidhar Gupta,&nbsp;François-Xavier Collard,&nbsp;Axel Funke,&nbsp;Jawad Jeaidi and Benjamin Bronson,&nbsp;","doi":"10.1021/acs.energyfuels.5c01309","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p >Five biomass liquefaction oils (BLOs) comprising four different lignocellulosic fast pyrolysis bio-oils (FPBO) and one algae-derived hydrothermal liquefaction (HTL) biocrude were subject to an interlaboratory study (ILS). Participating laboratories were asked to analyze all BLOs after gentle sample mixing and again but with vigorous mixing. Blind duplicates were included to improve the statistical power. Requested analysis included CHN, water, trace nitrogen, and sulfur (using solvent-miscible solvents) and ICP by an independently developed method. Blind duplicates applied in this study indicated that representative sampling was achieved to the extent required for bulk composition analysis. More vigorous sample mixing did not yield benefits for precision or reproducibility for composition analysis; however, the importance of consistent and precise sample mixing is underscored. Results of CHN and water showed performance similar to those of previous studies. However, adapted trace nitrogen methods consistently report 25–50% lower nitrogen content compared to ASTM D5291 and highlight the need for reconciliation. Poor performance of ICP across eight participant laboratories further underscores the need for standardization. ICP sample preparation by dissolution is generally ineffective for the recovery of more recalcitrant multivalent analytes. Digestion is recommended as the sample preparation of choice for ICP analysis of BLOs.</p>","PeriodicalId":35,"journal":{"name":"Energy & Fuels","volume":"39 29","pages":"14223–14236"},"PeriodicalIF":5.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://pubs.acs.org/doi/pdf/10.1021/acs.energyfuels.5c01309","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Interlaboratory Study of Sample Homogeneity Impact on CHNS, Water, and ICP Analysis of Biomass Liquefaction Oils\",\"authors\":\"Philip Bulsink*,&nbsp;Leslie Nguyen,&nbsp;Murlidhar Gupta,&nbsp;François-Xavier Collard,&nbsp;Axel Funke,&nbsp;Jawad Jeaidi and Benjamin Bronson,&nbsp;\",\"doi\":\"10.1021/acs.energyfuels.5c01309\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p >Five biomass liquefaction oils (BLOs) comprising four different lignocellulosic fast pyrolysis bio-oils (FPBO) and one algae-derived hydrothermal liquefaction (HTL) biocrude were subject to an interlaboratory study (ILS). Participating laboratories were asked to analyze all BLOs after gentle sample mixing and again but with vigorous mixing. Blind duplicates were included to improve the statistical power. Requested analysis included CHN, water, trace nitrogen, and sulfur (using solvent-miscible solvents) and ICP by an independently developed method. Blind duplicates applied in this study indicated that representative sampling was achieved to the extent required for bulk composition analysis. More vigorous sample mixing did not yield benefits for precision or reproducibility for composition analysis; however, the importance of consistent and precise sample mixing is underscored. Results of CHN and water showed performance similar to those of previous studies. However, adapted trace nitrogen methods consistently report 25–50% lower nitrogen content compared to ASTM D5291 and highlight the need for reconciliation. Poor performance of ICP across eight participant laboratories further underscores the need for standardization. ICP sample preparation by dissolution is generally ineffective for the recovery of more recalcitrant multivalent analytes. Digestion is recommended as the sample preparation of choice for ICP analysis of BLOs.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":35,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Energy & Fuels\",\"volume\":\"39 29\",\"pages\":\"14223–14236\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":5.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://pubs.acs.org/doi/pdf/10.1021/acs.energyfuels.5c01309\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Energy & Fuels\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/acs.energyfuels.5c01309\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"工程技术\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ENERGY & FUELS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Energy & Fuels","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/acs.energyfuels.5c01309","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENERGY & FUELS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

对5种生物质液化油(BLOs)进行了实验室间研究(ILS),其中包括4种不同的木质纤维素快速热解生物油(FPBO)和1种藻类衍生的水热液化(HTL)生物原油。参与的实验室被要求在温和混合和再次剧烈混合后分析所有BLOs。为了提高统计效能,我们加入了盲重复。要求的分析包括CHN,水,微量氮和硫(使用溶剂混溶溶剂)和ICP,采用独立开发的方法。本研究中应用的盲重复表明,代表性取样达到了散装成分分析所需的程度。更有力的样品混合并没有产生精度或可重复性的成分分析的好处;然而,一致和精确的样品混合的重要性被强调。CHN和水的结果与以往的研究结果相似。然而,与ASTM D5291相比,适应的微量氮方法报告的氮含量始终降低25-50%,并强调需要校准。八个参与实验室的ICP表现不佳,进一步强调了标准化的必要性。溶出法制备ICP样品通常对难溶多价分析物的回收无效。建议将消解法作为ICP分析BLOs的样品制备方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Interlaboratory Study of Sample Homogeneity Impact on CHNS, Water, and ICP Analysis of Biomass Liquefaction Oils

Five biomass liquefaction oils (BLOs) comprising four different lignocellulosic fast pyrolysis bio-oils (FPBO) and one algae-derived hydrothermal liquefaction (HTL) biocrude were subject to an interlaboratory study (ILS). Participating laboratories were asked to analyze all BLOs after gentle sample mixing and again but with vigorous mixing. Blind duplicates were included to improve the statistical power. Requested analysis included CHN, water, trace nitrogen, and sulfur (using solvent-miscible solvents) and ICP by an independently developed method. Blind duplicates applied in this study indicated that representative sampling was achieved to the extent required for bulk composition analysis. More vigorous sample mixing did not yield benefits for precision or reproducibility for composition analysis; however, the importance of consistent and precise sample mixing is underscored. Results of CHN and water showed performance similar to those of previous studies. However, adapted trace nitrogen methods consistently report 25–50% lower nitrogen content compared to ASTM D5291 and highlight the need for reconciliation. Poor performance of ICP across eight participant laboratories further underscores the need for standardization. ICP sample preparation by dissolution is generally ineffective for the recovery of more recalcitrant multivalent analytes. Digestion is recommended as the sample preparation of choice for ICP analysis of BLOs.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Energy & Fuels
Energy & Fuels 工程技术-工程:化工
CiteScore
9.20
自引率
13.20%
发文量
1101
审稿时长
2.1 months
期刊介绍: Energy & Fuels publishes reports of research in the technical area defined by the intersection of the disciplines of chemistry and chemical engineering and the application domain of non-nuclear energy and fuels. This includes research directed at the formation of, exploration for, and production of fossil fuels and biomass; the properties and structure or molecular composition of both raw fuels and refined products; the chemistry involved in the processing and utilization of fuels; fuel cells and their applications; and the analytical and instrumental techniques used in investigations of the foregoing areas.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信