纠缠的风险:与环卫工人共同生产知识,以应对肯尼亚非正规住区处理月经废物的当前和未来挑战。

IF 4.1
Health & place Pub Date : 2025-09-01 Epub Date: 2025-08-07 DOI:10.1016/j.healthplace.2025.103513
Sarah Dickin, Sara Gabrielsson, Collins Rutto, Priscilla Tatani, Neville Okwaro
{"title":"纠缠的风险:与环卫工人共同生产知识,以应对肯尼亚非正规住区处理月经废物的当前和未来挑战。","authors":"Sarah Dickin, Sara Gabrielsson, Collins Rutto, Priscilla Tatani, Neville Okwaro","doi":"10.1016/j.healthplace.2025.103513","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This paper reports on the challenges of handling menstrual waste in informal settlements in Kisumu, Kenya, and the emerging conflicts between reducing the use of these 'complicated plastics' and ensuring human health and dignity. To investigate these interconnections, we draw on a survey conducted among sanitation workers conducting manual pit emptying. We then conducted a knowledge co-production workshop including generating maps showing flows of menstrual waste around Kisumu. The maps were used as the basis for a discussion of desirable futures in the context of waste and sanitation adapted from the Three Horizons methodology. Findings indicated that sanitation workers deal with large quantities of menstrual waste when conducting their day-to-day work, which produces a range of health, environmental, and social risks that are difficult to mitigate. Men were more likely than women workers to be unregistered, producing additional health and social risks due to this form of work often being conducted at night. Maps of waste flows in Kisumu showed very different realities among sanitation workers compared with other stakeholder groups such as government officials. When considering desirable waste futures, government and civil society stakeholders were in favour of an aspirational 'zero waste' future where plastic products are phased out in favour of reusable or biodegradable products. This was in tension with the future vision of sanitation workers who do not want to reduce waste, which is their main livelihood, and preferred better managed waste streams that reduced their risks and improved their standing in the community. These findings highlight conflicting priorities among stakeholders when addressing taboo waste streams such as menstrual waste, and the challenges of focusing on aspirational sustainability transitions that may harm socially marginalized groups.</p>","PeriodicalId":94024,"journal":{"name":"Health & place","volume":"95 ","pages":"103513"},"PeriodicalIF":4.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Entangled risks: knowledge co-production with sanitation workers to address current and future challenges of handling menstrual waste in informal settlements in Kenya.\",\"authors\":\"Sarah Dickin, Sara Gabrielsson, Collins Rutto, Priscilla Tatani, Neville Okwaro\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.healthplace.2025.103513\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>This paper reports on the challenges of handling menstrual waste in informal settlements in Kisumu, Kenya, and the emerging conflicts between reducing the use of these 'complicated plastics' and ensuring human health and dignity. To investigate these interconnections, we draw on a survey conducted among sanitation workers conducting manual pit emptying. We then conducted a knowledge co-production workshop including generating maps showing flows of menstrual waste around Kisumu. The maps were used as the basis for a discussion of desirable futures in the context of waste and sanitation adapted from the Three Horizons methodology. Findings indicated that sanitation workers deal with large quantities of menstrual waste when conducting their day-to-day work, which produces a range of health, environmental, and social risks that are difficult to mitigate. Men were more likely than women workers to be unregistered, producing additional health and social risks due to this form of work often being conducted at night. Maps of waste flows in Kisumu showed very different realities among sanitation workers compared with other stakeholder groups such as government officials. When considering desirable waste futures, government and civil society stakeholders were in favour of an aspirational 'zero waste' future where plastic products are phased out in favour of reusable or biodegradable products. This was in tension with the future vision of sanitation workers who do not want to reduce waste, which is their main livelihood, and preferred better managed waste streams that reduced their risks and improved their standing in the community. These findings highlight conflicting priorities among stakeholders when addressing taboo waste streams such as menstrual waste, and the challenges of focusing on aspirational sustainability transitions that may harm socially marginalized groups.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":94024,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Health & place\",\"volume\":\"95 \",\"pages\":\"103513\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Health & place\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.healthplace.2025.103513\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/8/7 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Health & place","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.healthplace.2025.103513","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/8/7 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文报道了在肯尼亚Kisumu的非正式定居点处理月经废物的挑战,以及减少这些“复杂塑料”的使用与确保人类健康和尊严之间正在出现的冲突。为了调查这些相互联系,我们在进行人工排空坑的环卫工人中进行了一项调查。然后,我们举办了一个知识合作生产研讨会,包括制作显示基苏木周围月经排泄物流动的地图。这些地图被用作根据“三个地平线”方法讨论废物和卫生方面的理想未来的基础。调查结果表明,环卫工人在进行日常工作时要处理大量月经排泄物,这会产生一系列难以减轻的健康、环境和社会风险。男性工人比女性工人更有可能未登记,由于这种工作形式往往在夜间进行,因此产生了额外的健康和社会风险。基苏木的废物流动地图显示,与政府官员等其他利益相关者群体相比,环卫工人的现实情况截然不同。在考虑理想的废物未来时,政府和民间社会利益相关者都赞成理想的“零废物”未来,即塑料产品逐步淘汰,取而代之的是可重复使用或可生物降解的产品。这与环卫工人的未来愿景相矛盾,他们不想减少废物,这是他们的主要生计,他们更喜欢更好地管理废物流,以降低他们的风险,提高他们在社区中的地位。这些发现突出了利益相关者在处理禁忌废物流(如月经废物)时优先考虑的问题之间的冲突,以及关注可能伤害社会边缘化群体的理想可持续性转型的挑战。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Entangled risks: knowledge co-production with sanitation workers to address current and future challenges of handling menstrual waste in informal settlements in Kenya.

This paper reports on the challenges of handling menstrual waste in informal settlements in Kisumu, Kenya, and the emerging conflicts between reducing the use of these 'complicated plastics' and ensuring human health and dignity. To investigate these interconnections, we draw on a survey conducted among sanitation workers conducting manual pit emptying. We then conducted a knowledge co-production workshop including generating maps showing flows of menstrual waste around Kisumu. The maps were used as the basis for a discussion of desirable futures in the context of waste and sanitation adapted from the Three Horizons methodology. Findings indicated that sanitation workers deal with large quantities of menstrual waste when conducting their day-to-day work, which produces a range of health, environmental, and social risks that are difficult to mitigate. Men were more likely than women workers to be unregistered, producing additional health and social risks due to this form of work often being conducted at night. Maps of waste flows in Kisumu showed very different realities among sanitation workers compared with other stakeholder groups such as government officials. When considering desirable waste futures, government and civil society stakeholders were in favour of an aspirational 'zero waste' future where plastic products are phased out in favour of reusable or biodegradable products. This was in tension with the future vision of sanitation workers who do not want to reduce waste, which is their main livelihood, and preferred better managed waste streams that reduced their risks and improved their standing in the community. These findings highlight conflicting priorities among stakeholders when addressing taboo waste streams such as menstrual waste, and the challenges of focusing on aspirational sustainability transitions that may harm socially marginalized groups.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信