心理学家主导的筛选和基于模块的心理干预在澳大利亚重症监护病房的发展和可行性:一项试点研究。

IF 2.7 3区 医学 Q2 CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE
Jessica M Hampton, Elizabeth C Ward, Lynette Morrison, Kellie Sosnowski, James Banham, Marilia Libera, Chanelle Louwen, Hayden White, Rachael Watson, Melissa A Day
{"title":"心理学家主导的筛选和基于模块的心理干预在澳大利亚重症监护病房的发展和可行性:一项试点研究。","authors":"Jessica M Hampton, Elizabeth C Ward, Lynette Morrison, Kellie Sosnowski, James Banham, Marilia Libera, Chanelle Louwen, Hayden White, Rachael Watson, Melissa A Day","doi":"10.1016/j.aucc.2025.101301","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Psychological distress is common among intensive care unit (ICU) patients and can lead to long-term adverse psychological sequelae. While early psychological interventions may help mitigate these effects, their feasibility within critical care settings remains largely unexplored. Additionally, the role of psychologists in delivering such interventions in Australia remains unclear, particularly given inconsistencies in workforce availability and integration into standard care.</p><p><strong>Aims/objectives: </strong>The aim of this study was to (i) outline the development of a psychologist-led screening and intervention protocol in an Australian ICU and (ii) evaluate its preliminary feasibility. It also examined the suitability of a potential outcome measure to inform future trial design.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The Medical Research Council's framework for developing complex interventions in health was applied. The intervention was designed for an Australian metropolitan ICU. It consisted of a modular-based psychological intervention tailored to the patient's level of psychological distress. A single-arm prospective pilot study was conducted, and 30 patients were recruited. Feasibility was assessed based on recruitment rates, patient engagement, and outcome measure completion.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Recruitment challenges were observed, with a low eligibility screening rate. Staffing constraints and consent-related barriers further limited recruitment. Intervention engagement was high, with 96% of consenting participants completing at least one intervention component. Outcome measure completion rates supported the feasibility of a larger trial, with preliminary findings suggesting a significant reduction in negative emotional affect over time. Consistent with the Medical Research Council's framework, refinements to the intervention are recommended.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The findings support the feasibility of a psychologist-led intervention in the ICU, though refinements are necessary to improve recruitment, streamline delivery, and enhance engagement. This study highlights the potential of early psychological interventions to improve patients' emotional well-being. Addressing staffing limitations and consent barriers could enhance accessibility and effectiveness in future trials.</p><p><strong>Registration: </strong>This trial was registered with the Australian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry (ACTRN12623000619640), with the first participant recruited on 4/07/2023.</p>","PeriodicalId":51239,"journal":{"name":"Australian Critical Care","volume":"38 6","pages":"101301"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The development and feasibility of a psychologist-led screening and modular-based psychological intervention in an Australian intensive care unit: A pilot study.\",\"authors\":\"Jessica M Hampton, Elizabeth C Ward, Lynette Morrison, Kellie Sosnowski, James Banham, Marilia Libera, Chanelle Louwen, Hayden White, Rachael Watson, Melissa A Day\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.aucc.2025.101301\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Psychological distress is common among intensive care unit (ICU) patients and can lead to long-term adverse psychological sequelae. While early psychological interventions may help mitigate these effects, their feasibility within critical care settings remains largely unexplored. Additionally, the role of psychologists in delivering such interventions in Australia remains unclear, particularly given inconsistencies in workforce availability and integration into standard care.</p><p><strong>Aims/objectives: </strong>The aim of this study was to (i) outline the development of a psychologist-led screening and intervention protocol in an Australian ICU and (ii) evaluate its preliminary feasibility. It also examined the suitability of a potential outcome measure to inform future trial design.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The Medical Research Council's framework for developing complex interventions in health was applied. The intervention was designed for an Australian metropolitan ICU. It consisted of a modular-based psychological intervention tailored to the patient's level of psychological distress. A single-arm prospective pilot study was conducted, and 30 patients were recruited. Feasibility was assessed based on recruitment rates, patient engagement, and outcome measure completion.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Recruitment challenges were observed, with a low eligibility screening rate. Staffing constraints and consent-related barriers further limited recruitment. Intervention engagement was high, with 96% of consenting participants completing at least one intervention component. Outcome measure completion rates supported the feasibility of a larger trial, with preliminary findings suggesting a significant reduction in negative emotional affect over time. Consistent with the Medical Research Council's framework, refinements to the intervention are recommended.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The findings support the feasibility of a psychologist-led intervention in the ICU, though refinements are necessary to improve recruitment, streamline delivery, and enhance engagement. This study highlights the potential of early psychological interventions to improve patients' emotional well-being. Addressing staffing limitations and consent barriers could enhance accessibility and effectiveness in future trials.</p><p><strong>Registration: </strong>This trial was registered with the Australian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry (ACTRN12623000619640), with the first participant recruited on 4/07/2023.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":51239,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Australian Critical Care\",\"volume\":\"38 6\",\"pages\":\"101301\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-07\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Australian Critical Care\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aucc.2025.101301\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Australian Critical Care","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aucc.2025.101301","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:心理困扰在重症监护病房(ICU)患者中很常见,并可导致长期的不良心理后遗症。虽然早期心理干预可能有助于减轻这些影响,但其在重症监护环境中的可行性在很大程度上仍未得到探索。此外,心理学家在澳大利亚提供此类干预措施方面的作用尚不清楚,特别是考虑到劳动力可用性和融入标准护理的不一致性。目的/目的:本研究的目的是(i)概述澳大利亚ICU中心理学家主导的筛查和干预方案的发展,(ii)评估其初步可行性。它还检查了潜在结果测量的适用性,以告知未来的试验设计。方法:采用医学研究理事会制定的制定复杂卫生干预措施的框架。该干预措施是为澳大利亚大都市ICU设计的。它包括一个基于模块的心理干预量身定制的病人的心理困扰水平。进行了一项单臂前瞻性先导研究,招募了30名患者。可行性根据招募率、患者参与度和结果测量完成情况进行评估。结果:观察到招募困难,合格筛选率低。人员配备限制和与同意有关的障碍进一步限制了征聘。干预的参与度很高,96%的同意参与者完成了至少一个干预部分。结果测量完成率支持更大规模试验的可行性,初步结果表明,随着时间的推移,负面情绪影响显著减少。根据医学研究理事会的框架,建议对干预措施进行改进。结论:研究结果支持在ICU进行心理学家主导的干预的可行性,尽管需要改进以改善招募、简化交付和增强参与。这项研究强调了早期心理干预对改善患者情绪健康的潜力。解决人员配备限制和同意障碍可以提高未来试验的可及性和有效性。注册:该试验已在澳大利亚新西兰临床试验注册中心注册(ACTRN12623000619640),第一位受试者于2023年7月4日招募。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The development and feasibility of a psychologist-led screening and modular-based psychological intervention in an Australian intensive care unit: A pilot study.

Background: Psychological distress is common among intensive care unit (ICU) patients and can lead to long-term adverse psychological sequelae. While early psychological interventions may help mitigate these effects, their feasibility within critical care settings remains largely unexplored. Additionally, the role of psychologists in delivering such interventions in Australia remains unclear, particularly given inconsistencies in workforce availability and integration into standard care.

Aims/objectives: The aim of this study was to (i) outline the development of a psychologist-led screening and intervention protocol in an Australian ICU and (ii) evaluate its preliminary feasibility. It also examined the suitability of a potential outcome measure to inform future trial design.

Methods: The Medical Research Council's framework for developing complex interventions in health was applied. The intervention was designed for an Australian metropolitan ICU. It consisted of a modular-based psychological intervention tailored to the patient's level of psychological distress. A single-arm prospective pilot study was conducted, and 30 patients were recruited. Feasibility was assessed based on recruitment rates, patient engagement, and outcome measure completion.

Results: Recruitment challenges were observed, with a low eligibility screening rate. Staffing constraints and consent-related barriers further limited recruitment. Intervention engagement was high, with 96% of consenting participants completing at least one intervention component. Outcome measure completion rates supported the feasibility of a larger trial, with preliminary findings suggesting a significant reduction in negative emotional affect over time. Consistent with the Medical Research Council's framework, refinements to the intervention are recommended.

Conclusions: The findings support the feasibility of a psychologist-led intervention in the ICU, though refinements are necessary to improve recruitment, streamline delivery, and enhance engagement. This study highlights the potential of early psychological interventions to improve patients' emotional well-being. Addressing staffing limitations and consent barriers could enhance accessibility and effectiveness in future trials.

Registration: This trial was registered with the Australian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry (ACTRN12623000619640), with the first participant recruited on 4/07/2023.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Australian Critical Care
Australian Critical Care NURSING-NURSING
CiteScore
4.90
自引率
9.10%
发文量
148
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Australian Critical Care is the official journal of the Australian College of Critical Care Nurses (ACCCN). It is a bi-monthly peer-reviewed journal, providing clinically relevant research, reviews and articles of interest to the critical care community. Australian Critical Care publishes peer-reviewed scholarly papers that report research findings, research-based reviews, discussion papers and commentaries which are of interest to an international readership of critical care practitioners, educators, administrators and researchers. Interprofessional articles are welcomed.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信