急性冠脉综合征患者心肌功和左心室射血分数的比较再现性。

IF 1.4 4区 医学 Q3 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS
Ruxandra Copciag, Vladimir Bratu, Roxana Rimbas, Elena Stamate, Tudor Lixandru, Alexandru Corlan, Dragos Vinereanu
{"title":"急性冠脉综合征患者心肌功和左心室射血分数的比较再现性。","authors":"Ruxandra Copciag, Vladimir Bratu, Roxana Rimbas, Elena Stamate, Tudor Lixandru, Alexandru Corlan, Dragos Vinereanu","doi":"10.1111/echo.70215","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To assess reproducibility (interobserver variability and agreement) of global work efficiency (GWE) and left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF), assessed by 2D-echocardiography (2-DE) and 3D-echocardiography (3-DE), in patients with acute coronary syndrome (ACS), through measurements performed by operators with different levels of experience.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Echocardiographers with three levels of experience were involved in offline processing: advanced, who performed image acquisition-Reader 1 (5 years of training in 2-DE, 3 years in 3-DE); intermediate-Reader 2 (3 years of training in 2-DE, 1 year in 3-DE); and beginner-Reader 3 (1 year of training in 2-DE, 3 months in 3-DE). Measurements of GWE and LVEF were performed independently. Intraobserver and interobserver variability and agreement between readers were compared using Bland-Altman plots, as bias and limits of agreement (LOA), and Pearson correlations.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>90 patients (54 ± 9 years, 75 males) with ACS were analyzed. Comparing measurements of GWE, the following bias and LOA were obtained: R1 versus R2: bias -0.6, LOA -3-2 (r = 0.98, p < 0.001); R2 versus R3: bias -0.3, LOA -3-5 (r = 0.96, p < 0.001); R1 versus R3: bias -1, LOA -5-4 (r = 0.94, p < 0.001). Interobserver variability and agreement of GWE were comparable with LVEF by 3-DE: R1 versus R2: bias 0.6, -2, and -1.4; LOA -3-4, -7-4, and -6-4, respectively (r = 0.96, 0.91, and 0.94, respectively, all p < 0.001); however, for LVEF by 2-DE, interobserver variability was higher, while agreement was lower.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Reproducibility of GWE in patients after an ACS is independent of the experience of the operator and similar to the reproducibility of LVEF by 3-DE.</p>","PeriodicalId":50558,"journal":{"name":"Echocardiography-A Journal of Cardiovascular Ultrasound and Allied Techniques","volume":"42 8","pages":"e70215"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12335277/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparative Reproducibility of Myocardial Work and Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction in Patients After an Acute Coronary Syndrome.\",\"authors\":\"Ruxandra Copciag, Vladimir Bratu, Roxana Rimbas, Elena Stamate, Tudor Lixandru, Alexandru Corlan, Dragos Vinereanu\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/echo.70215\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To assess reproducibility (interobserver variability and agreement) of global work efficiency (GWE) and left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF), assessed by 2D-echocardiography (2-DE) and 3D-echocardiography (3-DE), in patients with acute coronary syndrome (ACS), through measurements performed by operators with different levels of experience.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Echocardiographers with three levels of experience were involved in offline processing: advanced, who performed image acquisition-Reader 1 (5 years of training in 2-DE, 3 years in 3-DE); intermediate-Reader 2 (3 years of training in 2-DE, 1 year in 3-DE); and beginner-Reader 3 (1 year of training in 2-DE, 3 months in 3-DE). Measurements of GWE and LVEF were performed independently. Intraobserver and interobserver variability and agreement between readers were compared using Bland-Altman plots, as bias and limits of agreement (LOA), and Pearson correlations.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>90 patients (54 ± 9 years, 75 males) with ACS were analyzed. Comparing measurements of GWE, the following bias and LOA were obtained: R1 versus R2: bias -0.6, LOA -3-2 (r = 0.98, p < 0.001); R2 versus R3: bias -0.3, LOA -3-5 (r = 0.96, p < 0.001); R1 versus R3: bias -1, LOA -5-4 (r = 0.94, p < 0.001). Interobserver variability and agreement of GWE were comparable with LVEF by 3-DE: R1 versus R2: bias 0.6, -2, and -1.4; LOA -3-4, -7-4, and -6-4, respectively (r = 0.96, 0.91, and 0.94, respectively, all p < 0.001); however, for LVEF by 2-DE, interobserver variability was higher, while agreement was lower.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Reproducibility of GWE in patients after an ACS is independent of the experience of the operator and similar to the reproducibility of LVEF by 3-DE.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":50558,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Echocardiography-A Journal of Cardiovascular Ultrasound and Allied Techniques\",\"volume\":\"42 8\",\"pages\":\"e70215\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12335277/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Echocardiography-A Journal of Cardiovascular Ultrasound and Allied Techniques\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1111/echo.70215\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Echocardiography-A Journal of Cardiovascular Ultrasound and Allied Techniques","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/echo.70215","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:通过不同经验水平的操作人员进行测量,评估2d超声心动图(2-DE)和3d超声心动图(3-DE)评估急性冠脉综合征(ACS)患者整体工作效率(GWE)和左心室射血分数(LVEF)的可重复性(观察者间变异性和一致性)。方法:采用三级经验超声心动图师进行离线处理:高级超声心动图师进行图像采集-阅读器1 (2-DE培训5年,3- de培训3年);中级阅读2 (2- de 3年,3- de 1年);初级阅读3 (2-DE培训1年,3- de培训3个月)。GWE和LVEF的测量分别进行。使用Bland-Altman图比较观察者内部和观察者之间的可变性和读者之间的一致性,作为偏差和一致性限制(LOA),以及Pearson相关性。结果:共分析90例ACS患者(54±9岁,男性75例)。比较GWE的测量值,得到以下偏倚和LOA: R1对R2:偏倚-0.6,LOA -3-2 (r = 0.98, p < 0.001);R2与R3:偏倚-0.3,LOA -3-5 (r = 0.96, p < 0.001);R1与R3:偏倚-1,LOA -5-4 (r = 0.94, p < 0.001)。GWE的观察者间变异性和一致性与LVEF具有3-DE可比性:R1与R2:偏差0.6,-2和-1.4;LOA分别为-3-4、-7-4和-6-4 (r分别为0.96、0.91和0.94,p均< 0.001);然而,对于2-DE的LVEF,观察者之间的变异性较高,而一致性较低。结论:ACS患者术后GWE的可重复性与操作者的经验无关,与3-DE法测定LVEF的可重复性相似。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Comparative Reproducibility of Myocardial Work and Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction in Patients After an Acute Coronary Syndrome.

Comparative Reproducibility of Myocardial Work and Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction in Patients After an Acute Coronary Syndrome.

Comparative Reproducibility of Myocardial Work and Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction in Patients After an Acute Coronary Syndrome.

Comparative Reproducibility of Myocardial Work and Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction in Patients After an Acute Coronary Syndrome.

Purpose: To assess reproducibility (interobserver variability and agreement) of global work efficiency (GWE) and left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF), assessed by 2D-echocardiography (2-DE) and 3D-echocardiography (3-DE), in patients with acute coronary syndrome (ACS), through measurements performed by operators with different levels of experience.

Methods: Echocardiographers with three levels of experience were involved in offline processing: advanced, who performed image acquisition-Reader 1 (5 years of training in 2-DE, 3 years in 3-DE); intermediate-Reader 2 (3 years of training in 2-DE, 1 year in 3-DE); and beginner-Reader 3 (1 year of training in 2-DE, 3 months in 3-DE). Measurements of GWE and LVEF were performed independently. Intraobserver and interobserver variability and agreement between readers were compared using Bland-Altman plots, as bias and limits of agreement (LOA), and Pearson correlations.

Results: 90 patients (54 ± 9 years, 75 males) with ACS were analyzed. Comparing measurements of GWE, the following bias and LOA were obtained: R1 versus R2: bias -0.6, LOA -3-2 (r = 0.98, p < 0.001); R2 versus R3: bias -0.3, LOA -3-5 (r = 0.96, p < 0.001); R1 versus R3: bias -1, LOA -5-4 (r = 0.94, p < 0.001). Interobserver variability and agreement of GWE were comparable with LVEF by 3-DE: R1 versus R2: bias 0.6, -2, and -1.4; LOA -3-4, -7-4, and -6-4, respectively (r = 0.96, 0.91, and 0.94, respectively, all p < 0.001); however, for LVEF by 2-DE, interobserver variability was higher, while agreement was lower.

Conclusion: Reproducibility of GWE in patients after an ACS is independent of the experience of the operator and similar to the reproducibility of LVEF by 3-DE.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.40
自引率
6.70%
发文量
211
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: Echocardiography: A Journal of Cardiovascular Ultrasound and Allied Techniques is the official publication of the International Society of Cardiovascular Ultrasound. Widely recognized for its comprehensive peer-reviewed articles, case studies, original research, and reviews by international authors. Echocardiography keeps its readership of echocardiographers, ultrasound specialists, and cardiologists well informed of the latest developments in the field.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信