Ruxandra Copciag, Vladimir Bratu, Roxana Rimbas, Elena Stamate, Tudor Lixandru, Alexandru Corlan, Dragos Vinereanu
{"title":"急性冠脉综合征患者心肌功和左心室射血分数的比较再现性。","authors":"Ruxandra Copciag, Vladimir Bratu, Roxana Rimbas, Elena Stamate, Tudor Lixandru, Alexandru Corlan, Dragos Vinereanu","doi":"10.1111/echo.70215","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To assess reproducibility (interobserver variability and agreement) of global work efficiency (GWE) and left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF), assessed by 2D-echocardiography (2-DE) and 3D-echocardiography (3-DE), in patients with acute coronary syndrome (ACS), through measurements performed by operators with different levels of experience.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Echocardiographers with three levels of experience were involved in offline processing: advanced, who performed image acquisition-Reader 1 (5 years of training in 2-DE, 3 years in 3-DE); intermediate-Reader 2 (3 years of training in 2-DE, 1 year in 3-DE); and beginner-Reader 3 (1 year of training in 2-DE, 3 months in 3-DE). Measurements of GWE and LVEF were performed independently. Intraobserver and interobserver variability and agreement between readers were compared using Bland-Altman plots, as bias and limits of agreement (LOA), and Pearson correlations.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>90 patients (54 ± 9 years, 75 males) with ACS were analyzed. Comparing measurements of GWE, the following bias and LOA were obtained: R1 versus R2: bias -0.6, LOA -3-2 (r = 0.98, p < 0.001); R2 versus R3: bias -0.3, LOA -3-5 (r = 0.96, p < 0.001); R1 versus R3: bias -1, LOA -5-4 (r = 0.94, p < 0.001). Interobserver variability and agreement of GWE were comparable with LVEF by 3-DE: R1 versus R2: bias 0.6, -2, and -1.4; LOA -3-4, -7-4, and -6-4, respectively (r = 0.96, 0.91, and 0.94, respectively, all p < 0.001); however, for LVEF by 2-DE, interobserver variability was higher, while agreement was lower.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Reproducibility of GWE in patients after an ACS is independent of the experience of the operator and similar to the reproducibility of LVEF by 3-DE.</p>","PeriodicalId":50558,"journal":{"name":"Echocardiography-A Journal of Cardiovascular Ultrasound and Allied Techniques","volume":"42 8","pages":"e70215"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12335277/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparative Reproducibility of Myocardial Work and Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction in Patients After an Acute Coronary Syndrome.\",\"authors\":\"Ruxandra Copciag, Vladimir Bratu, Roxana Rimbas, Elena Stamate, Tudor Lixandru, Alexandru Corlan, Dragos Vinereanu\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/echo.70215\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To assess reproducibility (interobserver variability and agreement) of global work efficiency (GWE) and left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF), assessed by 2D-echocardiography (2-DE) and 3D-echocardiography (3-DE), in patients with acute coronary syndrome (ACS), through measurements performed by operators with different levels of experience.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Echocardiographers with three levels of experience were involved in offline processing: advanced, who performed image acquisition-Reader 1 (5 years of training in 2-DE, 3 years in 3-DE); intermediate-Reader 2 (3 years of training in 2-DE, 1 year in 3-DE); and beginner-Reader 3 (1 year of training in 2-DE, 3 months in 3-DE). Measurements of GWE and LVEF were performed independently. Intraobserver and interobserver variability and agreement between readers were compared using Bland-Altman plots, as bias and limits of agreement (LOA), and Pearson correlations.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>90 patients (54 ± 9 years, 75 males) with ACS were analyzed. Comparing measurements of GWE, the following bias and LOA were obtained: R1 versus R2: bias -0.6, LOA -3-2 (r = 0.98, p < 0.001); R2 versus R3: bias -0.3, LOA -3-5 (r = 0.96, p < 0.001); R1 versus R3: bias -1, LOA -5-4 (r = 0.94, p < 0.001). Interobserver variability and agreement of GWE were comparable with LVEF by 3-DE: R1 versus R2: bias 0.6, -2, and -1.4; LOA -3-4, -7-4, and -6-4, respectively (r = 0.96, 0.91, and 0.94, respectively, all p < 0.001); however, for LVEF by 2-DE, interobserver variability was higher, while agreement was lower.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Reproducibility of GWE in patients after an ACS is independent of the experience of the operator and similar to the reproducibility of LVEF by 3-DE.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":50558,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Echocardiography-A Journal of Cardiovascular Ultrasound and Allied Techniques\",\"volume\":\"42 8\",\"pages\":\"e70215\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12335277/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Echocardiography-A Journal of Cardiovascular Ultrasound and Allied Techniques\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1111/echo.70215\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Echocardiography-A Journal of Cardiovascular Ultrasound and Allied Techniques","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/echo.70215","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
目的:通过不同经验水平的操作人员进行测量,评估2d超声心动图(2-DE)和3d超声心动图(3-DE)评估急性冠脉综合征(ACS)患者整体工作效率(GWE)和左心室射血分数(LVEF)的可重复性(观察者间变异性和一致性)。方法:采用三级经验超声心动图师进行离线处理:高级超声心动图师进行图像采集-阅读器1 (2-DE培训5年,3- de培训3年);中级阅读2 (2- de 3年,3- de 1年);初级阅读3 (2-DE培训1年,3- de培训3个月)。GWE和LVEF的测量分别进行。使用Bland-Altman图比较观察者内部和观察者之间的可变性和读者之间的一致性,作为偏差和一致性限制(LOA),以及Pearson相关性。结果:共分析90例ACS患者(54±9岁,男性75例)。比较GWE的测量值,得到以下偏倚和LOA: R1对R2:偏倚-0.6,LOA -3-2 (r = 0.98, p < 0.001);R2与R3:偏倚-0.3,LOA -3-5 (r = 0.96, p < 0.001);R1与R3:偏倚-1,LOA -5-4 (r = 0.94, p < 0.001)。GWE的观察者间变异性和一致性与LVEF具有3-DE可比性:R1与R2:偏差0.6,-2和-1.4;LOA分别为-3-4、-7-4和-6-4 (r分别为0.96、0.91和0.94,p均< 0.001);然而,对于2-DE的LVEF,观察者之间的变异性较高,而一致性较低。结论:ACS患者术后GWE的可重复性与操作者的经验无关,与3-DE法测定LVEF的可重复性相似。
Comparative Reproducibility of Myocardial Work and Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction in Patients After an Acute Coronary Syndrome.
Purpose: To assess reproducibility (interobserver variability and agreement) of global work efficiency (GWE) and left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF), assessed by 2D-echocardiography (2-DE) and 3D-echocardiography (3-DE), in patients with acute coronary syndrome (ACS), through measurements performed by operators with different levels of experience.
Methods: Echocardiographers with three levels of experience were involved in offline processing: advanced, who performed image acquisition-Reader 1 (5 years of training in 2-DE, 3 years in 3-DE); intermediate-Reader 2 (3 years of training in 2-DE, 1 year in 3-DE); and beginner-Reader 3 (1 year of training in 2-DE, 3 months in 3-DE). Measurements of GWE and LVEF were performed independently. Intraobserver and interobserver variability and agreement between readers were compared using Bland-Altman plots, as bias and limits of agreement (LOA), and Pearson correlations.
Results: 90 patients (54 ± 9 years, 75 males) with ACS were analyzed. Comparing measurements of GWE, the following bias and LOA were obtained: R1 versus R2: bias -0.6, LOA -3-2 (r = 0.98, p < 0.001); R2 versus R3: bias -0.3, LOA -3-5 (r = 0.96, p < 0.001); R1 versus R3: bias -1, LOA -5-4 (r = 0.94, p < 0.001). Interobserver variability and agreement of GWE were comparable with LVEF by 3-DE: R1 versus R2: bias 0.6, -2, and -1.4; LOA -3-4, -7-4, and -6-4, respectively (r = 0.96, 0.91, and 0.94, respectively, all p < 0.001); however, for LVEF by 2-DE, interobserver variability was higher, while agreement was lower.
Conclusion: Reproducibility of GWE in patients after an ACS is independent of the experience of the operator and similar to the reproducibility of LVEF by 3-DE.
期刊介绍:
Echocardiography: A Journal of Cardiovascular Ultrasound and Allied Techniques is the official publication of the International Society of Cardiovascular Ultrasound. Widely recognized for its comprehensive peer-reviewed articles, case studies, original research, and reviews by international authors. Echocardiography keeps its readership of echocardiographers, ultrasound specialists, and cardiologists well informed of the latest developments in the field.