建设产妇保健能力:产妇保健学习和创新中心的影响。

IF 1.9 4区 医学 Q2 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
Christine Tucker, Leah Daniel, Rakiah Anderson, Suzanna Larkin, Lauren Caton, Abby Cannon, Dorothy Cilenti
{"title":"建设产妇保健能力:产妇保健学习和创新中心的影响。","authors":"Christine Tucker, Leah Daniel, Rakiah Anderson, Suzanna Larkin, Lauren Caton, Abby Cannon, Dorothy Cilenti","doi":"10.1097/PHH.0000000000002194","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Context: </strong>To address the maternal health crisis, Health Resources and Services Administration funded the Maternal Health Learning and Innovation Center (MHLIC) in 2019 to provide capacity-building assistance (CBA) to maternal health practitioners nationally.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To measure whether and how MHLIC's capacity-building efforts increased maternal health practitioners' confidence in their team's capacity to address maternal health.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Mixed methods evaluation, including a retrospective post-test survey and semi-structured focus group interview among 9 state Maternal Health Innovation (MHI) awardee teams funded for 5 years.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>MHLIC served 9 state MHI teams initially, growing to 35 states nationally by 2024.</p><p><strong>Participants: </strong>From May-June 2024, 23 staff from 9 teams participated in the survey and these same staff and other teammates (n = 32) participated in a focus group interview.</p><p><strong>Intervention: </strong>MHLIC's CBA is multi-pronged, offering learning opportunities to help awardees gain and strengthen the skills, knowledge, and tools they need to implement innovations that reduce severe maternal morbidity and mortality. Learning opportunities included coaching, technical assistance, tailored consultation, training, peer learning, learning institutes, and national symposia.</p><p><strong>Outcome measures: </strong>The survey outcome was confidence in their team's ability to address 22 maternal health, engagement, and policy items before and after engaging with MHLIC. The focus group's main outcomes were evidence of improved maternal health capacity and the contribution of MHLIC's CBA.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There were statistically significant moderate increases in teams' reported confidence on every item from before to after engaging with MHLIC. All changes were roughly 0.5 points or higher on the 4-point scale. Interview evidence of improved capacity with support from MHLIC included equity, community engagement, implicit bias, data use and dissemination, strategic planning, and sustainability.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>MHLIC's CBA increased teams' maternal health capacity, enabling teams to achieve their MHI goals while laying a foundation for advancing maternal health beyond the scope of the program.</p>","PeriodicalId":47855,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Public Health Management and Practice","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Building Maternal Health Capacity: Impact of the Maternal Health Learning and Innovation Center.\",\"authors\":\"Christine Tucker, Leah Daniel, Rakiah Anderson, Suzanna Larkin, Lauren Caton, Abby Cannon, Dorothy Cilenti\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/PHH.0000000000002194\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Context: </strong>To address the maternal health crisis, Health Resources and Services Administration funded the Maternal Health Learning and Innovation Center (MHLIC) in 2019 to provide capacity-building assistance (CBA) to maternal health practitioners nationally.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To measure whether and how MHLIC's capacity-building efforts increased maternal health practitioners' confidence in their team's capacity to address maternal health.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Mixed methods evaluation, including a retrospective post-test survey and semi-structured focus group interview among 9 state Maternal Health Innovation (MHI) awardee teams funded for 5 years.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>MHLIC served 9 state MHI teams initially, growing to 35 states nationally by 2024.</p><p><strong>Participants: </strong>From May-June 2024, 23 staff from 9 teams participated in the survey and these same staff and other teammates (n = 32) participated in a focus group interview.</p><p><strong>Intervention: </strong>MHLIC's CBA is multi-pronged, offering learning opportunities to help awardees gain and strengthen the skills, knowledge, and tools they need to implement innovations that reduce severe maternal morbidity and mortality. Learning opportunities included coaching, technical assistance, tailored consultation, training, peer learning, learning institutes, and national symposia.</p><p><strong>Outcome measures: </strong>The survey outcome was confidence in their team's ability to address 22 maternal health, engagement, and policy items before and after engaging with MHLIC. The focus group's main outcomes were evidence of improved maternal health capacity and the contribution of MHLIC's CBA.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There were statistically significant moderate increases in teams' reported confidence on every item from before to after engaging with MHLIC. All changes were roughly 0.5 points or higher on the 4-point scale. Interview evidence of improved capacity with support from MHLIC included equity, community engagement, implicit bias, data use and dissemination, strategic planning, and sustainability.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>MHLIC's CBA increased teams' maternal health capacity, enabling teams to achieve their MHI goals while laying a foundation for advancing maternal health beyond the scope of the program.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":47855,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Public Health Management and Practice\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Public Health Management and Practice\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/PHH.0000000000002194\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Public Health Management and Practice","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/PHH.0000000000002194","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:为应对孕产妇健康危机,卫生资源和服务管理局于2019年资助了孕产妇健康学习与创新中心(MHLIC),为全国孕产妇保健从业人员提供能力建设援助(CBA)。目的:衡量MHLIC的能力建设工作是否以及如何提高孕产妇保健从业人员对其团队解决孕产妇保健问题的能力的信心。设计:混合方法评估,包括回顾性测试后调查和半结构化焦点小组访谈,对9个州孕产妇健康创新(MHI)获奖团队进行了为期5年的资助。背景:MHLIC最初服务于9个州的MHI团队,到2024年,全国范围内将增加到35个州。参与者:从2024年5月至6月,来自9个团队的23名员工参与了调查,这些员工和其他队友(n = 32)参加了焦点小组访谈。干预措施:MHLIC的CBA是多管齐下的,提供学习机会,帮助获奖者获得和加强他们实施降低严重孕产妇发病率和死亡率的创新所需的技能、知识和工具。学习机会包括指导、技术援助、量身定制的咨询、培训、同侪学习、学习机构和国家专题讨论会。结果测量:调查结果是对其团队在参与MHLIC之前和之后处理22个孕产妇保健、参与和政策项目的能力的信心。焦点小组的主要成果是孕产妇保健能力得到改善的证据以及MHLIC的CBA的贡献。结果:在参与MHLIC之前和之后,团队对每个项目的报告信心有统计学上显著的适度增加。在4分制中,所有的变化都在0.5分或更高。在MHLIC的支持下,能力得到改善的访谈证据包括公平、社区参与、隐性偏见、数据使用和传播、战略规划和可持续性。结论:MHLIC的CBA提高了团队的孕产妇保健能力,使团队能够实现其MHI目标,同时为在方案范围之外推进孕产妇保健奠定基础。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Building Maternal Health Capacity: Impact of the Maternal Health Learning and Innovation Center.

Context: To address the maternal health crisis, Health Resources and Services Administration funded the Maternal Health Learning and Innovation Center (MHLIC) in 2019 to provide capacity-building assistance (CBA) to maternal health practitioners nationally.

Objective: To measure whether and how MHLIC's capacity-building efforts increased maternal health practitioners' confidence in their team's capacity to address maternal health.

Design: Mixed methods evaluation, including a retrospective post-test survey and semi-structured focus group interview among 9 state Maternal Health Innovation (MHI) awardee teams funded for 5 years.

Setting: MHLIC served 9 state MHI teams initially, growing to 35 states nationally by 2024.

Participants: From May-June 2024, 23 staff from 9 teams participated in the survey and these same staff and other teammates (n = 32) participated in a focus group interview.

Intervention: MHLIC's CBA is multi-pronged, offering learning opportunities to help awardees gain and strengthen the skills, knowledge, and tools they need to implement innovations that reduce severe maternal morbidity and mortality. Learning opportunities included coaching, technical assistance, tailored consultation, training, peer learning, learning institutes, and national symposia.

Outcome measures: The survey outcome was confidence in their team's ability to address 22 maternal health, engagement, and policy items before and after engaging with MHLIC. The focus group's main outcomes were evidence of improved maternal health capacity and the contribution of MHLIC's CBA.

Results: There were statistically significant moderate increases in teams' reported confidence on every item from before to after engaging with MHLIC. All changes were roughly 0.5 points or higher on the 4-point scale. Interview evidence of improved capacity with support from MHLIC included equity, community engagement, implicit bias, data use and dissemination, strategic planning, and sustainability.

Conclusions: MHLIC's CBA increased teams' maternal health capacity, enabling teams to achieve their MHI goals while laying a foundation for advancing maternal health beyond the scope of the program.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Public Health Management and Practice
Journal of Public Health Management and Practice PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH-
CiteScore
3.40
自引率
9.10%
发文量
287
期刊介绍: Journal of Public Health Management and Practice publishes articles which focus on evidence based public health practice and research. The journal is a bi-monthly peer-reviewed publication guided by a multidisciplinary editorial board of administrators, practitioners and scientists. Journal of Public Health Management and Practice publishes in a wide range of population health topics including research to practice; emergency preparedness; bioterrorism; infectious disease surveillance; environmental health; community health assessment, chronic disease prevention and health promotion, and academic-practice linkages.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信