由多学科团队设计和提供的老年护理“速成班”提高了医学生自我评估的临床能力,并解决了自我认定的差距:一项试点研究。

IF 1.3 Q3 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH
Danielle Ní Chróinín
{"title":"由多学科团队设计和提供的老年护理“速成班”提高了医学生自我评估的临床能力,并解决了自我认定的差距:一项试点研究。","authors":"Danielle Ní Chróinín","doi":"10.1080/02701960.2025.2545771","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>As people live longer, most doctors will encounter increasing numbers of older patients. COVID-19 disrupted teaching across the globe. Our aim was to assess whether an Aged Care \"Crash Course\" is associated with improvements in self-assessed knowledge/ability and addresses gaps for medical students whose clinical experiences were disrupted by COVID-19. A 5-hour multidisciplinary aged care teaching session was designed for and delivered to mid-degree medical students. Lectorials and a workshop comprising \"rotation stations\" focussed on key topics in aged care. A voluntary, anonymous hard-copy survey was offered before/after the workshop. Amongst 24 attendees, 17 completed the \"before\" survey, 18 (75%) the \"after\" (76% female, mean age = 21.5 years). Common self-identified gaps pre-intervention included: physical examination skills, communicating with older patients/carers, delirium/dementia diagnosis/management, and managing medications. Median Likert scores (1-5) for self-assessed competence across key aged-care concepts all improved after the workshop (hand examination <i>p</i> = 0.03, all others <i>p</i> ≤ 0.001), with 1 to point increases in all. Asked if the workshop addressed gaps (\"after\"), 15/15 responding reported \"yes.\" Key take-home messages commonly referenced the \"5 Ps of delirium etiology,\" gait assessment and medication rationalisation/side-effects. Asked \"what worked well,\" \"rotation stations\" and teaching quality commonly featured. This model could be replicated in other settings.</p>","PeriodicalId":46431,"journal":{"name":"GERONTOLOGY & GERIATRICS EDUCATION","volume":" ","pages":"1-12"},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"An aged care 'Crash Course' designed and delivered by a multidisciplinary team improves medical student self-assessed clinical competence and addresses self-identified gaps: a pilot study.\",\"authors\":\"Danielle Ní Chróinín\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/02701960.2025.2545771\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>As people live longer, most doctors will encounter increasing numbers of older patients. COVID-19 disrupted teaching across the globe. Our aim was to assess whether an Aged Care \\\"Crash Course\\\" is associated with improvements in self-assessed knowledge/ability and addresses gaps for medical students whose clinical experiences were disrupted by COVID-19. A 5-hour multidisciplinary aged care teaching session was designed for and delivered to mid-degree medical students. Lectorials and a workshop comprising \\\"rotation stations\\\" focussed on key topics in aged care. A voluntary, anonymous hard-copy survey was offered before/after the workshop. Amongst 24 attendees, 17 completed the \\\"before\\\" survey, 18 (75%) the \\\"after\\\" (76% female, mean age = 21.5 years). Common self-identified gaps pre-intervention included: physical examination skills, communicating with older patients/carers, delirium/dementia diagnosis/management, and managing medications. Median Likert scores (1-5) for self-assessed competence across key aged-care concepts all improved after the workshop (hand examination <i>p</i> = 0.03, all others <i>p</i> ≤ 0.001), with 1 to point increases in all. Asked if the workshop addressed gaps (\\\"after\\\"), 15/15 responding reported \\\"yes.\\\" Key take-home messages commonly referenced the \\\"5 Ps of delirium etiology,\\\" gait assessment and medication rationalisation/side-effects. Asked \\\"what worked well,\\\" \\\"rotation stations\\\" and teaching quality commonly featured. This model could be replicated in other settings.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":46431,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"GERONTOLOGY & GERIATRICS EDUCATION\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"1-12\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-09\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"GERONTOLOGY & GERIATRICS EDUCATION\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/02701960.2025.2545771\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"GERONTOLOGY & GERIATRICS EDUCATION","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/02701960.2025.2545771","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

随着人们寿命的延长,大多数医生会遇到越来越多的老年病人。COVID-19扰乱了全球的教学。我们的目的是评估老年护理“速成班”是否与自我评估知识/能力的提高有关,并解决因COVID-19临床经历中断的医学生的差距。一个5小时的多学科老年护理教学课程是为中等医学学位的学生设计和交付的。讲座及由“轮换站”组成的工作坊,聚焦长者护理的主要议题。在研讨会前后提供了一份自愿的、匿名的纸质调查。在24名参与者中,17人完成了“之前”调查,18人(75%)完成了“之后”调查(76%为女性,平均年龄21.5岁)。干预前常见的自我认定差距包括:身体检查技能、与老年患者/护理人员的沟通、谵妄/痴呆的诊断/管理以及药物管理。自我评估能力的中位数李克特得分(1-5)在关键的老年护理概念中均在研讨会后得到改善(手部检查p = 0.03,其他所有p≤0.001),均有1到1点的提高。当被问及研讨会是否解决了差距(“之后”)时,15/15的受访者表示“是”。关键的关键信息通常是指“谵妄病因学的5p”,步态评估和药物合理化/副作用。在被问及“什么做得好”时,“轮岗”和教学质量是常见的特点。这种模式可以在其他环境中复制。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
An aged care 'Crash Course' designed and delivered by a multidisciplinary team improves medical student self-assessed clinical competence and addresses self-identified gaps: a pilot study.

As people live longer, most doctors will encounter increasing numbers of older patients. COVID-19 disrupted teaching across the globe. Our aim was to assess whether an Aged Care "Crash Course" is associated with improvements in self-assessed knowledge/ability and addresses gaps for medical students whose clinical experiences were disrupted by COVID-19. A 5-hour multidisciplinary aged care teaching session was designed for and delivered to mid-degree medical students. Lectorials and a workshop comprising "rotation stations" focussed on key topics in aged care. A voluntary, anonymous hard-copy survey was offered before/after the workshop. Amongst 24 attendees, 17 completed the "before" survey, 18 (75%) the "after" (76% female, mean age = 21.5 years). Common self-identified gaps pre-intervention included: physical examination skills, communicating with older patients/carers, delirium/dementia diagnosis/management, and managing medications. Median Likert scores (1-5) for self-assessed competence across key aged-care concepts all improved after the workshop (hand examination p = 0.03, all others p ≤ 0.001), with 1 to point increases in all. Asked if the workshop addressed gaps ("after"), 15/15 responding reported "yes." Key take-home messages commonly referenced the "5 Ps of delirium etiology," gait assessment and medication rationalisation/side-effects. Asked "what worked well," "rotation stations" and teaching quality commonly featured. This model could be replicated in other settings.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
GERONTOLOGY & GERIATRICS EDUCATION
GERONTOLOGY & GERIATRICS EDUCATION EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH-
CiteScore
3.00
自引率
18.80%
发文量
47
期刊介绍: Gerontology & Geriatrics Education is geared toward the exchange of information related to research, curriculum development, course and program evaluation, classroom and practice innovation, and other topics with educational implications for gerontology and geriatrics. It is designed to appeal to a broad range of students, teachers, practitioners, administrators, and policy makers and is dedicated to improving awareness of best practices and resources for gerontologists and gerontology/geriatrics educators. Peer Review Policy: All research articles in this journal have undergone rigorous peer review, based on initial editor screening and anonymous refereeing by two anonymous referees.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信