{"title":"由多学科团队设计和提供的老年护理“速成班”提高了医学生自我评估的临床能力,并解决了自我认定的差距:一项试点研究。","authors":"Danielle Ní Chróinín","doi":"10.1080/02701960.2025.2545771","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>As people live longer, most doctors will encounter increasing numbers of older patients. COVID-19 disrupted teaching across the globe. Our aim was to assess whether an Aged Care \"Crash Course\" is associated with improvements in self-assessed knowledge/ability and addresses gaps for medical students whose clinical experiences were disrupted by COVID-19. A 5-hour multidisciplinary aged care teaching session was designed for and delivered to mid-degree medical students. Lectorials and a workshop comprising \"rotation stations\" focussed on key topics in aged care. A voluntary, anonymous hard-copy survey was offered before/after the workshop. Amongst 24 attendees, 17 completed the \"before\" survey, 18 (75%) the \"after\" (76% female, mean age = 21.5 years). Common self-identified gaps pre-intervention included: physical examination skills, communicating with older patients/carers, delirium/dementia diagnosis/management, and managing medications. Median Likert scores (1-5) for self-assessed competence across key aged-care concepts all improved after the workshop (hand examination <i>p</i> = 0.03, all others <i>p</i> ≤ 0.001), with 1 to point increases in all. Asked if the workshop addressed gaps (\"after\"), 15/15 responding reported \"yes.\" Key take-home messages commonly referenced the \"5 Ps of delirium etiology,\" gait assessment and medication rationalisation/side-effects. Asked \"what worked well,\" \"rotation stations\" and teaching quality commonly featured. This model could be replicated in other settings.</p>","PeriodicalId":46431,"journal":{"name":"GERONTOLOGY & GERIATRICS EDUCATION","volume":" ","pages":"1-12"},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"An aged care 'Crash Course' designed and delivered by a multidisciplinary team improves medical student self-assessed clinical competence and addresses self-identified gaps: a pilot study.\",\"authors\":\"Danielle Ní Chróinín\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/02701960.2025.2545771\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>As people live longer, most doctors will encounter increasing numbers of older patients. COVID-19 disrupted teaching across the globe. Our aim was to assess whether an Aged Care \\\"Crash Course\\\" is associated with improvements in self-assessed knowledge/ability and addresses gaps for medical students whose clinical experiences were disrupted by COVID-19. A 5-hour multidisciplinary aged care teaching session was designed for and delivered to mid-degree medical students. Lectorials and a workshop comprising \\\"rotation stations\\\" focussed on key topics in aged care. A voluntary, anonymous hard-copy survey was offered before/after the workshop. Amongst 24 attendees, 17 completed the \\\"before\\\" survey, 18 (75%) the \\\"after\\\" (76% female, mean age = 21.5 years). Common self-identified gaps pre-intervention included: physical examination skills, communicating with older patients/carers, delirium/dementia diagnosis/management, and managing medications. Median Likert scores (1-5) for self-assessed competence across key aged-care concepts all improved after the workshop (hand examination <i>p</i> = 0.03, all others <i>p</i> ≤ 0.001), with 1 to point increases in all. Asked if the workshop addressed gaps (\\\"after\\\"), 15/15 responding reported \\\"yes.\\\" Key take-home messages commonly referenced the \\\"5 Ps of delirium etiology,\\\" gait assessment and medication rationalisation/side-effects. Asked \\\"what worked well,\\\" \\\"rotation stations\\\" and teaching quality commonly featured. This model could be replicated in other settings.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":46431,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"GERONTOLOGY & GERIATRICS EDUCATION\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"1-12\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-09\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"GERONTOLOGY & GERIATRICS EDUCATION\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/02701960.2025.2545771\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"GERONTOLOGY & GERIATRICS EDUCATION","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/02701960.2025.2545771","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
An aged care 'Crash Course' designed and delivered by a multidisciplinary team improves medical student self-assessed clinical competence and addresses self-identified gaps: a pilot study.
As people live longer, most doctors will encounter increasing numbers of older patients. COVID-19 disrupted teaching across the globe. Our aim was to assess whether an Aged Care "Crash Course" is associated with improvements in self-assessed knowledge/ability and addresses gaps for medical students whose clinical experiences were disrupted by COVID-19. A 5-hour multidisciplinary aged care teaching session was designed for and delivered to mid-degree medical students. Lectorials and a workshop comprising "rotation stations" focussed on key topics in aged care. A voluntary, anonymous hard-copy survey was offered before/after the workshop. Amongst 24 attendees, 17 completed the "before" survey, 18 (75%) the "after" (76% female, mean age = 21.5 years). Common self-identified gaps pre-intervention included: physical examination skills, communicating with older patients/carers, delirium/dementia diagnosis/management, and managing medications. Median Likert scores (1-5) for self-assessed competence across key aged-care concepts all improved after the workshop (hand examination p = 0.03, all others p ≤ 0.001), with 1 to point increases in all. Asked if the workshop addressed gaps ("after"), 15/15 responding reported "yes." Key take-home messages commonly referenced the "5 Ps of delirium etiology," gait assessment and medication rationalisation/side-effects. Asked "what worked well," "rotation stations" and teaching quality commonly featured. This model could be replicated in other settings.
期刊介绍:
Gerontology & Geriatrics Education is geared toward the exchange of information related to research, curriculum development, course and program evaluation, classroom and practice innovation, and other topics with educational implications for gerontology and geriatrics. It is designed to appeal to a broad range of students, teachers, practitioners, administrators, and policy makers and is dedicated to improving awareness of best practices and resources for gerontologists and gerontology/geriatrics educators. Peer Review Policy: All research articles in this journal have undergone rigorous peer review, based on initial editor screening and anonymous refereeing by two anonymous referees.