平衡区域剥夺指数(bADI):增强健康指数的社会决定因素,以加强其与医疗保健临床结果、利用和成本的关联。

IF 1.9 4区 医学 Q2 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
Mohammad Amin Morid, Robert E Tillman, Eran Halperin
{"title":"平衡区域剥夺指数(bADI):增强健康指数的社会决定因素,以加强其与医疗保健临床结果、利用和成本的关联。","authors":"Mohammad Amin Morid, Robert E Tillman, Eran Halperin","doi":"10.1097/PHH.0000000000002201","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>With the rapid expansion of value-based care in the US health-care industry, addressing health disparities has become a central focus for stakeholders. Social determinants of health (SDoH) indices serve as critical tools for assessing neighborhood inequities and informing programs aimed at managing patient health and costs. The Area Deprivation Index (ADI), recently endorsed by the US Department of Health & Human Services, is widely used in these efforts. However, the ADI's reliance on housing-related variables, such as median home value, raises concerns about its applicability, particularly in regions with high property values. This reliance may obscure inequalities and poor health outcomes in communities with high living costs, limiting its effectiveness for population health initiatives led by accountable care organizations (ACOs).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>To address these limitations, we developed the balanced ADI (bADI), a novel SDoH index designed to reduce dependency on housing-related variables by standardizing construction factors. We evaluated the bADI's performance through extensive benchmarking using data from millions of Medicare beneficiaries enrolled in fee-for-service and Medicare Advantage (MA) programs. Correlation analyses were conducted to assess the bADI's relationship with clinical outcomes, life expectancy, health care utilization, and costs, and its performance was compared to that of the ADI.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The bADI demonstrated stronger correlations with clinical outcomes and life expectancy compared to the ADI. Notably, the bADI exhibited reduced dependence on housing variables in high-cost-of-living regions. Benchmarking results revealed that the bADI outperformed the ADI in predicting health care utilization and costs. While ADI research suggested that both the least and most disadvantaged neighborhoods incur higher annual health care costs, the bADI provided more nuanced insights: The least and most disadvantaged groups experienced higher and lower costs, respectively, relative to other patients.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The bADI's robust associations with health care outcomes highlight its potential to improve cost management and care management strategies aimed at reducing health disparities. By adopting the bADI, ACO programs could implement budget-neutral redistributions of resources, reallocating funding from less disadvantaged areas to the most deprived regions. This approach promises to enhance equity and effectiveness in addressing SDoH within the health care system.</p>","PeriodicalId":47855,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Public Health Management and Practice","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Balanced Area Deprivation Index (bADI): Enhancing Social Determinants of Health Indices to Strengthen Their Association With Healthcare Clinical Outcomes, Utilization, and Costs.\",\"authors\":\"Mohammad Amin Morid, Robert E Tillman, Eran Halperin\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/PHH.0000000000002201\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>With the rapid expansion of value-based care in the US health-care industry, addressing health disparities has become a central focus for stakeholders. Social determinants of health (SDoH) indices serve as critical tools for assessing neighborhood inequities and informing programs aimed at managing patient health and costs. The Area Deprivation Index (ADI), recently endorsed by the US Department of Health & Human Services, is widely used in these efforts. However, the ADI's reliance on housing-related variables, such as median home value, raises concerns about its applicability, particularly in regions with high property values. This reliance may obscure inequalities and poor health outcomes in communities with high living costs, limiting its effectiveness for population health initiatives led by accountable care organizations (ACOs).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>To address these limitations, we developed the balanced ADI (bADI), a novel SDoH index designed to reduce dependency on housing-related variables by standardizing construction factors. We evaluated the bADI's performance through extensive benchmarking using data from millions of Medicare beneficiaries enrolled in fee-for-service and Medicare Advantage (MA) programs. Correlation analyses were conducted to assess the bADI's relationship with clinical outcomes, life expectancy, health care utilization, and costs, and its performance was compared to that of the ADI.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The bADI demonstrated stronger correlations with clinical outcomes and life expectancy compared to the ADI. Notably, the bADI exhibited reduced dependence on housing variables in high-cost-of-living regions. Benchmarking results revealed that the bADI outperformed the ADI in predicting health care utilization and costs. While ADI research suggested that both the least and most disadvantaged neighborhoods incur higher annual health care costs, the bADI provided more nuanced insights: The least and most disadvantaged groups experienced higher and lower costs, respectively, relative to other patients.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The bADI's robust associations with health care outcomes highlight its potential to improve cost management and care management strategies aimed at reducing health disparities. By adopting the bADI, ACO programs could implement budget-neutral redistributions of resources, reallocating funding from less disadvantaged areas to the most deprived regions. This approach promises to enhance equity and effectiveness in addressing SDoH within the health care system.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":47855,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Public Health Management and Practice\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-05\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Public Health Management and Practice\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/PHH.0000000000002201\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Public Health Management and Practice","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/PHH.0000000000002201","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:随着以价值为基础的护理在美国医疗保健行业的迅速扩张,解决健康差距已成为利益相关者的中心焦点。健康的社会决定因素(SDoH)指数是评估社区不平等和为旨在管理患者健康和费用的规划提供信息的重要工具。最近得到美国卫生与公众服务部认可的地区剥夺指数(ADI)被广泛用于这些努力。然而,ADI对住房相关变量(如房屋中值)的依赖,引发了人们对其适用性的担忧,尤其是在房地产价值高的地区。这种依赖可能会掩盖生活成本高的社区的不平等和不良健康结果,限制其对负责任的保健组织(ACOs)领导的人口健康倡议的有效性。方法:为了解决这些限制,我们开发了平衡ADI (bADI),这是一种新的SDoH指数,旨在通过标准化建筑因素来减少对住房相关变量的依赖。我们通过广泛的基准测试来评估bADI的表现,这些基准测试使用了数百万参加付费服务和医疗保险优势(MA)计划的医疗保险受益人的数据。进行相关分析以评估bADI与临床结果、预期寿命、医疗保健利用和成本的关系,并将其性能与ADI进行比较。结果:与ADI相比,bADI与临床结果和预期寿命的相关性更强。值得注意的是,在生活成本高的地区,bADI对住房变量的依赖程度较低。基准测试结果显示,bADI在预测医疗保健利用和成本方面优于ADI。尽管美国医疗协会的研究表明,处境最不利的社区和处境最不利的社区每年的医疗费用都较高,但美国医疗协会提供了更细致入微的见解:相对于其他患者,处境最不利的群体和处境最不利的群体分别经历了更高和更低的成本。结论:bADI与卫生保健结果的强大关联突出了其改善成本管理和旨在减少卫生差距的卫生保健管理战略的潜力。通过采用bADI, ACO项目可以实现预算中性的资源再分配,将资金从较不贫困的地区重新分配给最贫困的地区。这种方法有望在卫生保健系统内提高解决SDoH问题的公平性和有效性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Balanced Area Deprivation Index (bADI): Enhancing Social Determinants of Health Indices to Strengthen Their Association With Healthcare Clinical Outcomes, Utilization, and Costs.

Background: With the rapid expansion of value-based care in the US health-care industry, addressing health disparities has become a central focus for stakeholders. Social determinants of health (SDoH) indices serve as critical tools for assessing neighborhood inequities and informing programs aimed at managing patient health and costs. The Area Deprivation Index (ADI), recently endorsed by the US Department of Health & Human Services, is widely used in these efforts. However, the ADI's reliance on housing-related variables, such as median home value, raises concerns about its applicability, particularly in regions with high property values. This reliance may obscure inequalities and poor health outcomes in communities with high living costs, limiting its effectiveness for population health initiatives led by accountable care organizations (ACOs).

Methods: To address these limitations, we developed the balanced ADI (bADI), a novel SDoH index designed to reduce dependency on housing-related variables by standardizing construction factors. We evaluated the bADI's performance through extensive benchmarking using data from millions of Medicare beneficiaries enrolled in fee-for-service and Medicare Advantage (MA) programs. Correlation analyses were conducted to assess the bADI's relationship with clinical outcomes, life expectancy, health care utilization, and costs, and its performance was compared to that of the ADI.

Results: The bADI demonstrated stronger correlations with clinical outcomes and life expectancy compared to the ADI. Notably, the bADI exhibited reduced dependence on housing variables in high-cost-of-living regions. Benchmarking results revealed that the bADI outperformed the ADI in predicting health care utilization and costs. While ADI research suggested that both the least and most disadvantaged neighborhoods incur higher annual health care costs, the bADI provided more nuanced insights: The least and most disadvantaged groups experienced higher and lower costs, respectively, relative to other patients.

Conclusions: The bADI's robust associations with health care outcomes highlight its potential to improve cost management and care management strategies aimed at reducing health disparities. By adopting the bADI, ACO programs could implement budget-neutral redistributions of resources, reallocating funding from less disadvantaged areas to the most deprived regions. This approach promises to enhance equity and effectiveness in addressing SDoH within the health care system.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Public Health Management and Practice
Journal of Public Health Management and Practice PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH-
CiteScore
3.40
自引率
9.10%
发文量
287
期刊介绍: Journal of Public Health Management and Practice publishes articles which focus on evidence based public health practice and research. The journal is a bi-monthly peer-reviewed publication guided by a multidisciplinary editorial board of administrators, practitioners and scientists. Journal of Public Health Management and Practice publishes in a wide range of population health topics including research to practice; emergency preparedness; bioterrorism; infectious disease surveillance; environmental health; community health assessment, chronic disease prevention and health promotion, and academic-practice linkages.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信