EXPRESS:两阶段工作记忆训练范式中诱导近迁移的最小训练时间。

IF 1.4 3区 心理学 Q4 PHYSIOLOGY
Nan Ni, Hiroyuki Tsubomi, Satoru Saito
{"title":"EXPRESS:两阶段工作记忆训练范式中诱导近迁移的最小训练时间。","authors":"Nan Ni, Hiroyuki Tsubomi, Satoru Saito","doi":"10.1177/17470218251369061","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Working memory (WM) training typically induces large improvements on trained tasks, while evidence for whether these improvements transfer to other tasks remains mixed. Using a novel two-phase WM training paradigm, the present study investigated the role of training duration and the underlying mechanisms of training from the perspective of cognitive skill learning. In two experiments, we examined whether the cross-phase near transfer effects observed by Ni et al. (2023) could still be observed with minimal training durations. Both experiments involved two sets of adaptive training on serial order backward recall tasks with verbal or spatial stimulus domains. In Experiment 1, participants completed a single session of 100 trials in both training phases, but no evidence of transfer was observed. In Experiment 2, we extended the first training phase to three sessions with a total of 240 trials, and observed that backward digit span training positively transferred to subsequent backward letter span training. In contrast, backward circle span training did not enhance subsequent backward letter span training and instead showed a trend toward negative transfer. These findings suggest that transfer effects are unstable with these minimal training durations. Therefore, we recommend at least three to five training sessions per phase, as implemented by Ni et al. (2023), to ensure reliable acquisition and transfer of cognitive skills. Overall, this study highlights the potential of the two-phase training paradigm and provides practical guidance for developing more effective training protocols in future research.</p>","PeriodicalId":20869,"journal":{"name":"Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology","volume":" ","pages":"17470218251369061"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Minimal training duration inducing near transfer in two-phase working memory training paradigm.\",\"authors\":\"Nan Ni, Hiroyuki Tsubomi, Satoru Saito\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/17470218251369061\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Working memory (WM) training typically induces large improvements on trained tasks, while evidence for whether these improvements transfer to other tasks remains mixed. Using a novel two-phase WM training paradigm, the present study investigated the role of training duration and the underlying mechanisms of training from the perspective of cognitive skill learning. In two experiments, we examined whether the cross-phase near transfer effects observed by Ni et al. (2023) could still be observed with minimal training durations. Both experiments involved two sets of adaptive training on serial order backward recall tasks with verbal or spatial stimulus domains. In Experiment 1, participants completed a single session of 100 trials in both training phases, but no evidence of transfer was observed. In Experiment 2, we extended the first training phase to three sessions with a total of 240 trials, and observed that backward digit span training positively transferred to subsequent backward letter span training. In contrast, backward circle span training did not enhance subsequent backward letter span training and instead showed a trend toward negative transfer. These findings suggest that transfer effects are unstable with these minimal training durations. Therefore, we recommend at least three to five training sessions per phase, as implemented by Ni et al. (2023), to ensure reliable acquisition and transfer of cognitive skills. Overall, this study highlights the potential of the two-phase training paradigm and provides practical guidance for developing more effective training protocols in future research.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":20869,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"17470218251369061\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-09\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"102\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/17470218251369061\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"心理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"PHYSIOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/17470218251369061","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PHYSIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

工作记忆(WM)训练通常会在训练任务上产生很大的改善,而这些改善是否会转移到其他任务上的证据仍然是混合的。本研究采用一种新的两阶段训练范式,从认知技能学习的角度探讨了训练时间的作用和训练的潜在机制。在两个实验中,我们检验了在Ni等人(2023)中观察到的交叉相近转移效应是否仍然可以在最短的训练时间内观察到。这两个实验都涉及两组具有语言或空间刺激域的序列顺序向后回忆任务的适应性训练。在实验1中,参与者在两个训练阶段都完成了一次100次的训练,但没有观察到转移的证据。在实验2中,我们将第一个训练阶段扩展到三个阶段,共240次试验,并观察到反向数字广度训练正向迁移到后续的反向字母广度训练。相反,反向圆广度训练并没有促进后续反向字母广度训练,反而呈现负迁移的趋势。这些发现表明,在这些最短的训练时间内,迁移效果是不稳定的。因此,我们建议每个阶段至少进行三到五次培训,如Ni等人(2023)所实施的那样,以确保可靠地获得和转移认知技能。总的来说,本研究突出了两阶段训练范式的潜力,并为未来研究中制定更有效的训练方案提供了实践指导。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Minimal training duration inducing near transfer in two-phase working memory training paradigm.

Working memory (WM) training typically induces large improvements on trained tasks, while evidence for whether these improvements transfer to other tasks remains mixed. Using a novel two-phase WM training paradigm, the present study investigated the role of training duration and the underlying mechanisms of training from the perspective of cognitive skill learning. In two experiments, we examined whether the cross-phase near transfer effects observed by Ni et al. (2023) could still be observed with minimal training durations. Both experiments involved two sets of adaptive training on serial order backward recall tasks with verbal or spatial stimulus domains. In Experiment 1, participants completed a single session of 100 trials in both training phases, but no evidence of transfer was observed. In Experiment 2, we extended the first training phase to three sessions with a total of 240 trials, and observed that backward digit span training positively transferred to subsequent backward letter span training. In contrast, backward circle span training did not enhance subsequent backward letter span training and instead showed a trend toward negative transfer. These findings suggest that transfer effects are unstable with these minimal training durations. Therefore, we recommend at least three to five training sessions per phase, as implemented by Ni et al. (2023), to ensure reliable acquisition and transfer of cognitive skills. Overall, this study highlights the potential of the two-phase training paradigm and provides practical guidance for developing more effective training protocols in future research.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.50
自引率
5.90%
发文量
178
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Promoting the interests of scientific psychology and its researchers, QJEP, the journal of the Experimental Psychology Society, is a leading journal with a long-standing tradition of publishing cutting-edge research. Several articles have become classic papers in the fields of attention, perception, learning, memory, language, and reasoning. The journal publishes original articles on any topic within the field of experimental psychology (including comparative research). These include substantial experimental reports, review papers, rapid communications (reporting novel techniques or ground breaking results), comments (on articles previously published in QJEP or on issues of general interest to experimental psychologists), and book reviews. Experimental results are welcomed from all relevant techniques, including behavioural testing, brain imaging and computational modelling. QJEP offers a competitive publication time-scale. Accepted Rapid Communications have priority in the publication cycle and usually appear in print within three months. We aim to publish all accepted (but uncorrected) articles online within seven days. Our Latest Articles page offers immediate publication of articles upon reaching their final form. The journal offers an open access option called Open Select, enabling authors to meet funder requirements to make their article free to read online for all in perpetuity. Authors also benefit from a broad and diverse subscription base that delivers the journal contents to a world-wide readership. Together these features ensure that the journal offers authors the opportunity to raise the visibility of their work to a global audience.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信