用贝叶斯正则化模拟年龄-时期-队列分析:使用随机游走模型的条件。

IF 2.6 3区 综合性期刊 Q1 MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES
PLoS ONE Pub Date : 2025-08-08 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0329223
Yuta Matsumoto
{"title":"用贝叶斯正则化模拟年龄-时期-队列分析:使用随机游走模型的条件。","authors":"Yuta Matsumoto","doi":"10.1371/journal.pone.0329223","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Age-period-cohort (APC) analysis, one of the fundamental time-series models, has an identification problem of the inability to separate linear components of the three effects. However, constraints to solve the problem are still controversial because multilevel analysis used in many studies results in the linear component of cohort effects being close to zero. In addition, previous studies do not compare the Bayesian cohort model proposed by Nakamura with the well-known intrinsic estimator. This paper focuses on three models of Bayesian regularization using priors of normal distributions. A random effects model refers to multilevel analysis, a ridge regression model is equivalent to the intrinsic estimator, and a random walk model refers to the Bayesian cohort model. Here, applying Bayesian regularization in APC analysis is to estimate linear components by using nonlinear components and priors. We aim to suggest conditions for using the random walk model by comparing the three models through some simulations with settings for the linear and nonlinear components. Simulation 1 emphasizes an impact of the indexes by making absolute values of the nonlinear components small. Simulation 2 randomly generates the amounts of change in the linear and nonlinear components. Simulation 3 randomly generates artificial parameters with only linear components are less likely to appear, to consider the Bayesian regularization assumption. As a result, Simulation 1 shows the random walk model, unlike the other two models, mitigates underestimating the linear component of cohort effects. On the other hand, in Simulation 2, none of the models can recover the artificial parameters. Finally, Simulation 3 shows the random walk model has less bias than the other models. Therefore, there is no one-size-fits-all APC analysis. However, this paper suggests the random walk model performs relatively well in data generating processes, where only linear components are unlikely to appear.</p>","PeriodicalId":20189,"journal":{"name":"PLoS ONE","volume":"20 8","pages":"e0329223"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12334005/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Some simulations of age-period-cohort analysis applying Bayesian regularization: Conditions for using random walk model.\",\"authors\":\"Yuta Matsumoto\",\"doi\":\"10.1371/journal.pone.0329223\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Age-period-cohort (APC) analysis, one of the fundamental time-series models, has an identification problem of the inability to separate linear components of the three effects. However, constraints to solve the problem are still controversial because multilevel analysis used in many studies results in the linear component of cohort effects being close to zero. In addition, previous studies do not compare the Bayesian cohort model proposed by Nakamura with the well-known intrinsic estimator. This paper focuses on three models of Bayesian regularization using priors of normal distributions. A random effects model refers to multilevel analysis, a ridge regression model is equivalent to the intrinsic estimator, and a random walk model refers to the Bayesian cohort model. Here, applying Bayesian regularization in APC analysis is to estimate linear components by using nonlinear components and priors. We aim to suggest conditions for using the random walk model by comparing the three models through some simulations with settings for the linear and nonlinear components. Simulation 1 emphasizes an impact of the indexes by making absolute values of the nonlinear components small. Simulation 2 randomly generates the amounts of change in the linear and nonlinear components. Simulation 3 randomly generates artificial parameters with only linear components are less likely to appear, to consider the Bayesian regularization assumption. As a result, Simulation 1 shows the random walk model, unlike the other two models, mitigates underestimating the linear component of cohort effects. On the other hand, in Simulation 2, none of the models can recover the artificial parameters. Finally, Simulation 3 shows the random walk model has less bias than the other models. Therefore, there is no one-size-fits-all APC analysis. However, this paper suggests the random walk model performs relatively well in data generating processes, where only linear components are unlikely to appear.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":20189,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"PLoS ONE\",\"volume\":\"20 8\",\"pages\":\"e0329223\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-08\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12334005/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"PLoS ONE\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"103\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0329223\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"综合性期刊\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"PLoS ONE","FirstCategoryId":"103","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0329223","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"综合性期刊","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

年龄-时期-队列(Age-period-cohort, APC)分析是一种基本的时间序列模型,其识别问题是无法分离这三种效应的线性成分。然而,解决这一问题的约束条件仍然存在争议,因为许多研究中使用的多水平分析导致队列效应的线性成分接近于零。此外,以往的研究并没有将Nakamura提出的贝叶斯队列模型与众所周知的内禀估计量进行比较。本文重点研究了三种利用正态分布先验的贝叶斯正则化模型。随机效应模型是指多水平分析,脊回归模型相当于内禀估计量,随机游走模型是指贝叶斯队列模型。这里,在APC分析中应用贝叶斯正则化是利用非线性分量和先验估计线性分量。我们的目的是通过一些模拟来比较三种模型,并设置线性和非线性成分,从而提出使用随机漫步模型的条件。仿真1通过使非线性分量的绝对值很小来强调指标的影响。模拟2随机生成线性和非线性分量的变化量。模拟3随机生成人工参数,只有线性分量不太可能出现,以考虑贝叶斯正则化假设。因此,模拟1显示随机漫步模型与其他两个模型不同,减轻了对队列效应线性成分的低估。另一方面,在模拟2中,没有一个模型可以恢复人工参数。最后,仿真3表明随机漫步模型比其他模型具有更小的偏差。因此,没有放之四海而皆准的APC分析。然而,本文认为随机漫步模型在数据生成过程中表现相对较好,其中只有线性分量不太可能出现。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Some simulations of age-period-cohort analysis applying Bayesian regularization: Conditions for using random walk model.

Age-period-cohort (APC) analysis, one of the fundamental time-series models, has an identification problem of the inability to separate linear components of the three effects. However, constraints to solve the problem are still controversial because multilevel analysis used in many studies results in the linear component of cohort effects being close to zero. In addition, previous studies do not compare the Bayesian cohort model proposed by Nakamura with the well-known intrinsic estimator. This paper focuses on three models of Bayesian regularization using priors of normal distributions. A random effects model refers to multilevel analysis, a ridge regression model is equivalent to the intrinsic estimator, and a random walk model refers to the Bayesian cohort model. Here, applying Bayesian regularization in APC analysis is to estimate linear components by using nonlinear components and priors. We aim to suggest conditions for using the random walk model by comparing the three models through some simulations with settings for the linear and nonlinear components. Simulation 1 emphasizes an impact of the indexes by making absolute values of the nonlinear components small. Simulation 2 randomly generates the amounts of change in the linear and nonlinear components. Simulation 3 randomly generates artificial parameters with only linear components are less likely to appear, to consider the Bayesian regularization assumption. As a result, Simulation 1 shows the random walk model, unlike the other two models, mitigates underestimating the linear component of cohort effects. On the other hand, in Simulation 2, none of the models can recover the artificial parameters. Finally, Simulation 3 shows the random walk model has less bias than the other models. Therefore, there is no one-size-fits-all APC analysis. However, this paper suggests the random walk model performs relatively well in data generating processes, where only linear components are unlikely to appear.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
PLoS ONE
PLoS ONE 生物-生物学
CiteScore
6.20
自引率
5.40%
发文量
14242
审稿时长
3.7 months
期刊介绍: PLOS ONE is an international, peer-reviewed, open-access, online publication. PLOS ONE welcomes reports on primary research from any scientific discipline. It provides: * Open-access—freely accessible online, authors retain copyright * Fast publication times * Peer review by expert, practicing researchers * Post-publication tools to indicate quality and impact * Community-based dialogue on articles * Worldwide media coverage
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信