髓质海绵肾患者结石负荷间期变化的准确评估:体积法。

IF 2.8 2区 医学 Q1 UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY
Journal of endourology Pub Date : 2025-08-01 Epub Date: 2025-08-08 DOI:10.1177/08927790251366899
Andrei D Cumpanas, Aymon Ali, Eman N Chaudhri, Mariah C Hernandez, Candices M Tran, Thao N Vu, Yezan F Hadidi, Bruce M Gao, Zachary E Tano, Sohrab N Ali, Roshan M Patel, Jaime Landman, Ralph V Clayman
{"title":"髓质海绵肾患者结石负荷间期变化的准确评估:体积法。","authors":"Andrei D Cumpanas, Aymon Ali, Eman N Chaudhri, Mariah C Hernandez, Candices M Tran, Thao N Vu, Yezan F Hadidi, Bruce M Gao, Zachary E Tano, Sohrab N Ali, Roshan M Patel, Jaime Landman, Ralph V Clayman","doi":"10.1177/08927790251366899","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b><i>Introduction:</i></b> Medullary sponge kidney (MSK) and nephrocalcinosis (NC) are radiographically characterized by the formation of innumerable intrarenal concretions. Accurate determination of disease progression is challenging given the large and typically sporadic calcific burden, limiting the utility of traditional manual linear measurements on non-contrast computerized tomography (NCCT). Progression of stone size or quantity is an important predictor of morbidity in recurrent stone formers. As such, among these patients, we sought to test the accuracy of serial NCCT reports indicating a \"stable/unchanged\" stone burden against actual stone volume measurements using 3-dimensional Slicer®. <b><i>Materials and Methods:</i></b> 20 MSK/NC patients with a \"stable/unchanged\" stone burden report between January 2018 and September 2023 were retrospectively enrolled in this study. A second group of 50 patients with a single stone was also evaluated during the same time period. Volumetric stone burden measurements were completed by a physician reviewer with over 200 hours of experience with 3D Slicer®. The reviewer was blinded to the dates of the NCCT. Based on volume measurements, we determined the failure to detect a 15%, 25%, or 50% increase in stone volume. A two-tailed chi-square test was used to compare the two patient groups. <b><i>Results:</i></b> The mean time between paired NCCTs was 15.23 months ±8.58. In 49% of MSK patients, the \"stable/unchanged\" stone burden report was incorrect. Indeed, among these patients, there was a median stone growth of 297 mm<sup>3</sup> (IQR: 128.88-745.55 mm<sup>3</sup>). An increase in stone burden of 15%, 25%, or 50% was missed in 49%, 39%, and 20% of cases, respectively. In contrast, for the single-stone patients the rate of \"stable/unchanged\" stone burden misclassification was significantly lower, with an increase in stone burden of 15%, 25%, or 50% being missed in 24%, 9%, and 7% of cases, respectively. <b><i>Conclusion:</i></b> NCCT volumetric progression of nephrolithiasis at a mean time of 15 months among MSK patients was misread as \"stable/unchanged\" stone disease in almost half of our patients.</p>","PeriodicalId":15723,"journal":{"name":"Journal of endourology","volume":" ","pages":"766-771"},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Accurate Assessment of Interval Change in Stone Burden Among Patients with Medullary Sponge Kidney: A Volumetric Approach.\",\"authors\":\"Andrei D Cumpanas, Aymon Ali, Eman N Chaudhri, Mariah C Hernandez, Candices M Tran, Thao N Vu, Yezan F Hadidi, Bruce M Gao, Zachary E Tano, Sohrab N Ali, Roshan M Patel, Jaime Landman, Ralph V Clayman\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/08927790251366899\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p><b><i>Introduction:</i></b> Medullary sponge kidney (MSK) and nephrocalcinosis (NC) are radiographically characterized by the formation of innumerable intrarenal concretions. Accurate determination of disease progression is challenging given the large and typically sporadic calcific burden, limiting the utility of traditional manual linear measurements on non-contrast computerized tomography (NCCT). Progression of stone size or quantity is an important predictor of morbidity in recurrent stone formers. As such, among these patients, we sought to test the accuracy of serial NCCT reports indicating a \\\"stable/unchanged\\\" stone burden against actual stone volume measurements using 3-dimensional Slicer®. <b><i>Materials and Methods:</i></b> 20 MSK/NC patients with a \\\"stable/unchanged\\\" stone burden report between January 2018 and September 2023 were retrospectively enrolled in this study. A second group of 50 patients with a single stone was also evaluated during the same time period. Volumetric stone burden measurements were completed by a physician reviewer with over 200 hours of experience with 3D Slicer®. The reviewer was blinded to the dates of the NCCT. Based on volume measurements, we determined the failure to detect a 15%, 25%, or 50% increase in stone volume. A two-tailed chi-square test was used to compare the two patient groups. <b><i>Results:</i></b> The mean time between paired NCCTs was 15.23 months ±8.58. In 49% of MSK patients, the \\\"stable/unchanged\\\" stone burden report was incorrect. Indeed, among these patients, there was a median stone growth of 297 mm<sup>3</sup> (IQR: 128.88-745.55 mm<sup>3</sup>). An increase in stone burden of 15%, 25%, or 50% was missed in 49%, 39%, and 20% of cases, respectively. In contrast, for the single-stone patients the rate of \\\"stable/unchanged\\\" stone burden misclassification was significantly lower, with an increase in stone burden of 15%, 25%, or 50% being missed in 24%, 9%, and 7% of cases, respectively. <b><i>Conclusion:</i></b> NCCT volumetric progression of nephrolithiasis at a mean time of 15 months among MSK patients was misread as \\\"stable/unchanged\\\" stone disease in almost half of our patients.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":15723,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of endourology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"766-771\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of endourology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/08927790251366899\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/8/8 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of endourology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/08927790251366899","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/8/8 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

髓样海绵肾(MSK)和肾钙质沉着症(NC)的影像学特征是肾内形成无数的结核。鉴于大量且典型的零星钙化负担,准确确定疾病进展具有挑战性,这限制了传统的手工线性测量在非对比计算机断层扫描(NCCT)上的应用。结石大小或数量的进展是复发性结石发病率的重要预测因素。因此,在这些患者中,我们试图测试一系列NCCT报告的准确性,这些报告表明“稳定/不变”的结石负荷与使用3-dimensional Slicer®测量的实际结石体积相对应。材料和方法:本研究回顾性纳入2018年1月至2023年9月期间20例“稳定/不变”结石负担报告的MSK/NC患者。第二组50名患有单一结石的患者也在同一时期进行了评估。体积结石负荷测量由具有超过200小时3D切片机®经验的医师审稿人完成。审稿人对NCCT的日期一无所知。根据体积测量,我们确定未能检测到石块体积增加15%,25%或50%。采用双尾卡方检验对两组患者进行比较。结果:配对ncct的平均间隔时间为15.23个月±8.58个月。在49%的MSK患者中,“稳定/不变”的结石负担报告是不正确的。确实,在这些患者中,中位结石生长为297 mm3 (IQR: 128.88-745.55 mm3)。分别有49%、39%和20%的病例遗漏了增加15%、25%或50%的结石负担。相比之下,对于单一结石患者,“稳定/不变”结石负荷的错误分类率明显较低,分别在24%、9%和7%的病例中,结石负荷增加了15%、25%和50%。结论:在MSK患者中,NCCT体积进展的平均时间为15个月,几乎一半的患者被误解为“稳定/不变”的结石疾病。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Accurate Assessment of Interval Change in Stone Burden Among Patients with Medullary Sponge Kidney: A Volumetric Approach.

Introduction: Medullary sponge kidney (MSK) and nephrocalcinosis (NC) are radiographically characterized by the formation of innumerable intrarenal concretions. Accurate determination of disease progression is challenging given the large and typically sporadic calcific burden, limiting the utility of traditional manual linear measurements on non-contrast computerized tomography (NCCT). Progression of stone size or quantity is an important predictor of morbidity in recurrent stone formers. As such, among these patients, we sought to test the accuracy of serial NCCT reports indicating a "stable/unchanged" stone burden against actual stone volume measurements using 3-dimensional Slicer®. Materials and Methods: 20 MSK/NC patients with a "stable/unchanged" stone burden report between January 2018 and September 2023 were retrospectively enrolled in this study. A second group of 50 patients with a single stone was also evaluated during the same time period. Volumetric stone burden measurements were completed by a physician reviewer with over 200 hours of experience with 3D Slicer®. The reviewer was blinded to the dates of the NCCT. Based on volume measurements, we determined the failure to detect a 15%, 25%, or 50% increase in stone volume. A two-tailed chi-square test was used to compare the two patient groups. Results: The mean time between paired NCCTs was 15.23 months ±8.58. In 49% of MSK patients, the "stable/unchanged" stone burden report was incorrect. Indeed, among these patients, there was a median stone growth of 297 mm3 (IQR: 128.88-745.55 mm3). An increase in stone burden of 15%, 25%, or 50% was missed in 49%, 39%, and 20% of cases, respectively. In contrast, for the single-stone patients the rate of "stable/unchanged" stone burden misclassification was significantly lower, with an increase in stone burden of 15%, 25%, or 50% being missed in 24%, 9%, and 7% of cases, respectively. Conclusion: NCCT volumetric progression of nephrolithiasis at a mean time of 15 months among MSK patients was misread as "stable/unchanged" stone disease in almost half of our patients.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of endourology
Journal of endourology 医学-泌尿学与肾脏学
CiteScore
5.50
自引率
14.80%
发文量
254
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: Journal of Endourology, JE Case Reports, and Videourology are the leading peer-reviewed journal, case reports publication, and innovative videojournal companion covering all aspects of minimally invasive urology research, applications, and clinical outcomes. The leading journal of minimally invasive urology for over 30 years, Journal of Endourology is the essential publication for practicing surgeons who want to keep up with the latest surgical technologies in endoscopic, laparoscopic, robotic, and image-guided procedures as they apply to benign and malignant diseases of the genitourinary tract. This flagship journal includes the companion videojournal Videourology™ with every subscription. While Journal of Endourology remains focused on publishing rigorously peer reviewed articles, Videourology accepts original videos containing material that has not been reported elsewhere, except in the form of an abstract or a conference presentation. Journal of Endourology coverage includes: The latest laparoscopic, robotic, endoscopic, and image-guided techniques for treating both benign and malignant conditions Pioneering research articles Controversial cases in endourology Techniques in endourology with accompanying videos Reviews and epochs in endourology Endourology survey section of endourology relevant manuscripts published in other journals.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信