Anja Oštrbenk, Helle Pedersen, Mario Poljak, Jesper Bonde
{"title":"Allplex HPV HR检测法符合SurePath样本的初级宫颈筛查的国际指南要求,并有资格作为第二代HPV比较试验。","authors":"Anja Oštrbenk, Helle Pedersen, Mario Poljak, Jesper Bonde","doi":"10.1016/j.jcv.2025.105853","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>A key parameter for the continued success of cervical cancer screening is quality-controlled use of human papillomavirus (HPV) tests that are clinically validated according to international guidelines. The clinical accuracy for cervical screening of the Allplex HPV HR Detection (Allplex), which concurrently detects and distinguishes 12 high-risk HPV types (16,18,31,33,35,39,45,51,52,56,58,59) and HPV66 and HPV68 was assessed on SurePath samples by comparing its performance to the second-generation comparator BD Onclarity HPV assay (Onclarity). The absolute clinical sensitivity, assessed on 76 samples derived from a screening population with underlying CIN2+, of Allplex and Onclarity was 98.7 % (95 % CI, 92.9-100.0 %) and 100.0 % (95 % CI, 95.2-100.0 %), respectively, with relative sensitivity of Allplex of 0.99 (95 % CI; 0.96-1.01). The absolute clinical specificity, assessed on 801 consecutive clinician-collected cervical samples obtained from women 30 to 59 years old attending the routine Danish cervical screening program, for Allplex and Onclarity was 92.5 % (95 % CI, 90.4-94.2 %) and 92.5 % (95 % CI, 90.4-94.2 %), respectively, with relative specificity of Allplex of 1.00 (95 % CI; 0.99-1.01). With thresholds mandated by international guidelines of ≥90 % for relative clinical sensitivity (p = 0.001) and ≥98 % for relative clinical specificity (p = 0.0018), Allplex was non-inferior to Onclarity. Excellent intra- and inter-laboratory agreement of Allplex was observed, both overall (99.2 % and 99.6 %) and at the genotype level (range: 99.6-100.0 %). By fulfilling all guideline requirements for clinical sensitivity, specificity, and reproducibility, Allplex can be considered clinically validated for primary cervical screening using clinician-collected SurePath samples. With this study, Allplex also meets the criteria for a second-generation HPV comparator test.</p>","PeriodicalId":15517,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Clinical Virology","volume":"180 ","pages":"105853"},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Allplex HPV HR Detection assay fulfils international guideline requirements for primary cervical screening on SurePath samples and qualifies as a second-generation HPV comparator test.\",\"authors\":\"Anja Oštrbenk, Helle Pedersen, Mario Poljak, Jesper Bonde\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jcv.2025.105853\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>A key parameter for the continued success of cervical cancer screening is quality-controlled use of human papillomavirus (HPV) tests that are clinically validated according to international guidelines. The clinical accuracy for cervical screening of the Allplex HPV HR Detection (Allplex), which concurrently detects and distinguishes 12 high-risk HPV types (16,18,31,33,35,39,45,51,52,56,58,59) and HPV66 and HPV68 was assessed on SurePath samples by comparing its performance to the second-generation comparator BD Onclarity HPV assay (Onclarity). The absolute clinical sensitivity, assessed on 76 samples derived from a screening population with underlying CIN2+, of Allplex and Onclarity was 98.7 % (95 % CI, 92.9-100.0 %) and 100.0 % (95 % CI, 95.2-100.0 %), respectively, with relative sensitivity of Allplex of 0.99 (95 % CI; 0.96-1.01). The absolute clinical specificity, assessed on 801 consecutive clinician-collected cervical samples obtained from women 30 to 59 years old attending the routine Danish cervical screening program, for Allplex and Onclarity was 92.5 % (95 % CI, 90.4-94.2 %) and 92.5 % (95 % CI, 90.4-94.2 %), respectively, with relative specificity of Allplex of 1.00 (95 % CI; 0.99-1.01). With thresholds mandated by international guidelines of ≥90 % for relative clinical sensitivity (p = 0.001) and ≥98 % for relative clinical specificity (p = 0.0018), Allplex was non-inferior to Onclarity. Excellent intra- and inter-laboratory agreement of Allplex was observed, both overall (99.2 % and 99.6 %) and at the genotype level (range: 99.6-100.0 %). By fulfilling all guideline requirements for clinical sensitivity, specificity, and reproducibility, Allplex can be considered clinically validated for primary cervical screening using clinician-collected SurePath samples. With this study, Allplex also meets the criteria for a second-generation HPV comparator test.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":15517,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Clinical Virology\",\"volume\":\"180 \",\"pages\":\"105853\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Clinical Virology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcv.2025.105853\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/8/6 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"VIROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Clinical Virology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcv.2025.105853","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/8/6 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"VIROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
The Allplex HPV HR Detection assay fulfils international guideline requirements for primary cervical screening on SurePath samples and qualifies as a second-generation HPV comparator test.
A key parameter for the continued success of cervical cancer screening is quality-controlled use of human papillomavirus (HPV) tests that are clinically validated according to international guidelines. The clinical accuracy for cervical screening of the Allplex HPV HR Detection (Allplex), which concurrently detects and distinguishes 12 high-risk HPV types (16,18,31,33,35,39,45,51,52,56,58,59) and HPV66 and HPV68 was assessed on SurePath samples by comparing its performance to the second-generation comparator BD Onclarity HPV assay (Onclarity). The absolute clinical sensitivity, assessed on 76 samples derived from a screening population with underlying CIN2+, of Allplex and Onclarity was 98.7 % (95 % CI, 92.9-100.0 %) and 100.0 % (95 % CI, 95.2-100.0 %), respectively, with relative sensitivity of Allplex of 0.99 (95 % CI; 0.96-1.01). The absolute clinical specificity, assessed on 801 consecutive clinician-collected cervical samples obtained from women 30 to 59 years old attending the routine Danish cervical screening program, for Allplex and Onclarity was 92.5 % (95 % CI, 90.4-94.2 %) and 92.5 % (95 % CI, 90.4-94.2 %), respectively, with relative specificity of Allplex of 1.00 (95 % CI; 0.99-1.01). With thresholds mandated by international guidelines of ≥90 % for relative clinical sensitivity (p = 0.001) and ≥98 % for relative clinical specificity (p = 0.0018), Allplex was non-inferior to Onclarity. Excellent intra- and inter-laboratory agreement of Allplex was observed, both overall (99.2 % and 99.6 %) and at the genotype level (range: 99.6-100.0 %). By fulfilling all guideline requirements for clinical sensitivity, specificity, and reproducibility, Allplex can be considered clinically validated for primary cervical screening using clinician-collected SurePath samples. With this study, Allplex also meets the criteria for a second-generation HPV comparator test.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Clinical Virology, an esteemed international publication, serves as the official journal for both the Pan American Society for Clinical Virology and The European Society for Clinical Virology. Dedicated to advancing the understanding of human virology in clinical settings, the Journal of Clinical Virology focuses on disseminating research papers and reviews pertaining to the clinical aspects of virology. Its scope encompasses articles discussing diagnostic methodologies and virus-induced clinical conditions, with an emphasis on practicality and relevance to clinical practice.
The journal publishes on topics that include:
• new diagnostic technologies
• nucleic acid amplification and serologic testing
• targeted and metagenomic next-generation sequencing
• emerging pandemic viral threats
• respiratory viruses
• transplant viruses
• chronic viral infections
• cancer-associated viruses
• gastrointestinal viruses
• central nervous system viruses
• one health (excludes animal health)