超声肝肾指标评估肝脂肪变性的可靠性:一项系统综述和荟萃分析。

IF 1.4 4区 医学 Q3 ACOUSTICS
Jin-Li Wang, Jian Dong, Si-Rui Wang, Chun-Li Cao, Jin Tong, WenXiao Li, Ting-Ting Du, Ting-Ting He, Xiao-Wu Yuan, Jun Li, Hong Zhai
{"title":"超声肝肾指标评估肝脂肪变性的可靠性:一项系统综述和荟萃分析。","authors":"Jin-Li Wang, Jian Dong, Si-Rui Wang, Chun-Li Cao, Jin Tong, WenXiao Li, Ting-Ting Du, Ting-Ting He, Xiao-Wu Yuan, Jun Li, Hong Zhai","doi":"10.1002/jcu.70006","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The accuracy of the ultrasound hepatorenal index (HRI) in diagnosing hepatic steatosis has varied significantly in different clinical trials. Therefore, we conducted a meta-analysis aimed at exploring the diagnostic accuracy of ultrasound HRI in the quantitative assessment of hepatic steatosis. Thirteen eligible studies published up to May 3, 2025, were obtained through a comprehensive search. We conducted a meta-analysis using a random-effects bivariate model to investigate the diagnostic accuracy of the ultrasound HRI in assessing hepatic steatosis. A total of 1496 cases were included that used liver biopsy or MRI-PDFF as the reference standard to determine the presence of hepatic steatosis. We synthesized the sensitivity, specificity, likelihood ratio, diagnostic advantage ratio, and area under the curve of the included studies to assess the performance of the HRI as a diagnostic tool. The meta-analysis demonstrated that ultrasound HRI had good performance in evaluating hepatic steatosis. However, there were significant differences in diagnostic performance and optimal cut-off values among the included studies, indicating the need for consensus on the optimal cut-off value for diagnosing hepatic steatosis. As an auxiliary means of ultrasonic analysis, ultrasonic HRI has achieved a good diagnostic effect in detecting hepatic steatosis.</p>","PeriodicalId":15386,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Clinical Ultrasound","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Reliability of Ultrasonic Hepatorenal Indices in Assessing Hepatic Steatosis: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.\",\"authors\":\"Jin-Li Wang, Jian Dong, Si-Rui Wang, Chun-Li Cao, Jin Tong, WenXiao Li, Ting-Ting Du, Ting-Ting He, Xiao-Wu Yuan, Jun Li, Hong Zhai\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/jcu.70006\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>The accuracy of the ultrasound hepatorenal index (HRI) in diagnosing hepatic steatosis has varied significantly in different clinical trials. Therefore, we conducted a meta-analysis aimed at exploring the diagnostic accuracy of ultrasound HRI in the quantitative assessment of hepatic steatosis. Thirteen eligible studies published up to May 3, 2025, were obtained through a comprehensive search. We conducted a meta-analysis using a random-effects bivariate model to investigate the diagnostic accuracy of the ultrasound HRI in assessing hepatic steatosis. A total of 1496 cases were included that used liver biopsy or MRI-PDFF as the reference standard to determine the presence of hepatic steatosis. We synthesized the sensitivity, specificity, likelihood ratio, diagnostic advantage ratio, and area under the curve of the included studies to assess the performance of the HRI as a diagnostic tool. The meta-analysis demonstrated that ultrasound HRI had good performance in evaluating hepatic steatosis. However, there were significant differences in diagnostic performance and optimal cut-off values among the included studies, indicating the need for consensus on the optimal cut-off value for diagnosing hepatic steatosis. As an auxiliary means of ultrasonic analysis, ultrasonic HRI has achieved a good diagnostic effect in detecting hepatic steatosis.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":15386,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Clinical Ultrasound\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-09\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Clinical Ultrasound\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1002/jcu.70006\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ACOUSTICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Clinical Ultrasound","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/jcu.70006","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ACOUSTICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

超声肝肾指数(HRI)诊断肝脂肪变性的准确性在不同的临床试验中存在显著差异。因此,我们进行了一项荟萃分析,旨在探讨超声HRI在肝脂肪变性定量评估中的诊断准确性。通过综合检索,获得截至2025年5月3日发表的13项符合条件的研究。我们进行了一项荟萃分析,使用随机效应双变量模型来研究超声HRI在评估肝脂肪变性中的诊断准确性。共纳入1496例,采用肝活检或MRI-PDFF作为判断肝脂肪变性存在的参考标准。我们综合了纳入研究的敏感性、特异性、似然比、诊断优势比和曲线下面积,以评估HRI作为诊断工具的性能。meta分析表明超声HRI在评估肝脂肪变性方面有良好的表现。然而,在纳入的研究中,诊断性能和最佳临界值存在显著差异,表明诊断肝脂肪变性的最佳临界值需要达成共识。超声HRI作为超声分析的辅助手段,在肝脏脂肪变性的诊断中取得了良好的效果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Reliability of Ultrasonic Hepatorenal Indices in Assessing Hepatic Steatosis: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

The accuracy of the ultrasound hepatorenal index (HRI) in diagnosing hepatic steatosis has varied significantly in different clinical trials. Therefore, we conducted a meta-analysis aimed at exploring the diagnostic accuracy of ultrasound HRI in the quantitative assessment of hepatic steatosis. Thirteen eligible studies published up to May 3, 2025, were obtained through a comprehensive search. We conducted a meta-analysis using a random-effects bivariate model to investigate the diagnostic accuracy of the ultrasound HRI in assessing hepatic steatosis. A total of 1496 cases were included that used liver biopsy or MRI-PDFF as the reference standard to determine the presence of hepatic steatosis. We synthesized the sensitivity, specificity, likelihood ratio, diagnostic advantage ratio, and area under the curve of the included studies to assess the performance of the HRI as a diagnostic tool. The meta-analysis demonstrated that ultrasound HRI had good performance in evaluating hepatic steatosis. However, there were significant differences in diagnostic performance and optimal cut-off values among the included studies, indicating the need for consensus on the optimal cut-off value for diagnosing hepatic steatosis. As an auxiliary means of ultrasonic analysis, ultrasonic HRI has achieved a good diagnostic effect in detecting hepatic steatosis.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
248
审稿时长
6 months
期刊介绍: The Journal of Clinical Ultrasound (JCU) is an international journal dedicated to the worldwide dissemination of scientific information on diagnostic and therapeutic applications of medical sonography. The scope of the journal includes--but is not limited to--the following areas: sonography of the gastrointestinal tract, genitourinary tract, vascular system, nervous system, head and neck, chest, breast, musculoskeletal system, and other superficial structures; Doppler applications; obstetric and pediatric applications; and interventional sonography. Studies comparing sonography with other imaging modalities are encouraged, as are studies evaluating the economic impact of sonography. Also within the journal''s scope are innovations and improvements in instrumentation and examination techniques and the use of contrast agents. JCU publishes original research articles, case reports, pictorial essays, technical notes, and letters to the editor. The journal is also dedicated to being an educational resource for its readers, through the publication of review articles and various scientific contributions from members of the editorial board and other world-renowned experts in sonography.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信