在欧洲三级转诊中心实施机器人辅助微创胃切除术(RAMIG)治疗胃癌。

IF 2.9 2区 医学 Q2 ONCOLOGY
Ejso Pub Date : 2025-10-01 Epub Date: 2025-07-16 DOI:10.1016/j.ejso.2025.110342
Lianne Triemstra, Cas de Jongh, Hylke J F Brenkman, Bas L A M Weusten, Jan Erik Freund, Richard van Hillegersberg, Jelle P Ruurda
{"title":"在欧洲三级转诊中心实施机器人辅助微创胃切除术(RAMIG)治疗胃癌。","authors":"Lianne Triemstra, Cas de Jongh, Hylke J F Brenkman, Bas L A M Weusten, Jan Erik Freund, Richard van Hillegersberg, Jelle P Ruurda","doi":"10.1016/j.ejso.2025.110342","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Our European tertiary referral center implemented robot-assisted minimally invasive gastrectomy (RAMIG) in September 2020, following experience with robot-assisted esophagectomy and multiquadrant surgery using the DaVinci Xi robot. RAMIG implementation was evaluated.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This single-center prospective cohort study compared 111 MIG patients (2014-2023) with the initial 75 RAMIG patients (2020-2023), operated by two experienced robotic upper-GI surgeons. After propensity-score-matching, surgical, oncological, and textbook outcomes for overall/distal/total RAMIG and MIG were compared. Cumulative sum (CUSUM) analysis assessed learning curves for operating time and nodal yield. Additionally, the transition from laparoscopic-circular stapled (MIG/RAMIG) to robot-assisted handsewn anastomosis (RAMIG-only) was evaluated.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>After propensity-score-matching, 75 RAMIG and 75 MIG patients were analyzed; 68% underwent total gastrectomy, and 78% neoadjuvant therapy. Postoperative complications, blood loss, hospitalization, R0-resections, and textbook outcomes were similar between groups (p>0.05). Distal RAMIG showed longer median operating time (214 versus 191 min; p=0.032), but less severe complications (13 % versus 38 % grade≥3A; p = 0.041). Total RAMIG showed higher median nodal yield (35 versus 22 nodes; p < 0.001). CUSUM-analysis showed plateaus for distal/total RAMIG at cases 10 and 24 for operating time, and 8 and 17 for nodal yield. Robot-assisted handsewn esophagojejunostomy seemed to show reduced anastomotic leakage (9% versus 28%), postoperative complications (45% versus 59%), and 30-day mortality (0% versus 5%).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Implementing RAMIG in our tertiary referral center resulted in similar perioperative outcomes with improved nodal yield, despite longer operating times. The robotic technique facilitated modification to handsewn esophagojejunostomy. Short learning curves (8-24 cases) for experienced robotic surgeons support adaption towards RAMIG.</p>","PeriodicalId":11522,"journal":{"name":"Ejso","volume":"51 10","pages":"110342"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Implementing robot-assisted minimally invasive gastrectomy (RAMIG) for gastric cancer in a European tertiary referral center.\",\"authors\":\"Lianne Triemstra, Cas de Jongh, Hylke J F Brenkman, Bas L A M Weusten, Jan Erik Freund, Richard van Hillegersberg, Jelle P Ruurda\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.ejso.2025.110342\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Our European tertiary referral center implemented robot-assisted minimally invasive gastrectomy (RAMIG) in September 2020, following experience with robot-assisted esophagectomy and multiquadrant surgery using the DaVinci Xi robot. RAMIG implementation was evaluated.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This single-center prospective cohort study compared 111 MIG patients (2014-2023) with the initial 75 RAMIG patients (2020-2023), operated by two experienced robotic upper-GI surgeons. After propensity-score-matching, surgical, oncological, and textbook outcomes for overall/distal/total RAMIG and MIG were compared. Cumulative sum (CUSUM) analysis assessed learning curves for operating time and nodal yield. Additionally, the transition from laparoscopic-circular stapled (MIG/RAMIG) to robot-assisted handsewn anastomosis (RAMIG-only) was evaluated.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>After propensity-score-matching, 75 RAMIG and 75 MIG patients were analyzed; 68% underwent total gastrectomy, and 78% neoadjuvant therapy. Postoperative complications, blood loss, hospitalization, R0-resections, and textbook outcomes were similar between groups (p>0.05). Distal RAMIG showed longer median operating time (214 versus 191 min; p=0.032), but less severe complications (13 % versus 38 % grade≥3A; p = 0.041). Total RAMIG showed higher median nodal yield (35 versus 22 nodes; p < 0.001). CUSUM-analysis showed plateaus for distal/total RAMIG at cases 10 and 24 for operating time, and 8 and 17 for nodal yield. Robot-assisted handsewn esophagojejunostomy seemed to show reduced anastomotic leakage (9% versus 28%), postoperative complications (45% versus 59%), and 30-day mortality (0% versus 5%).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Implementing RAMIG in our tertiary referral center resulted in similar perioperative outcomes with improved nodal yield, despite longer operating times. The robotic technique facilitated modification to handsewn esophagojejunostomy. Short learning curves (8-24 cases) for experienced robotic surgeons support adaption towards RAMIG.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":11522,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Ejso\",\"volume\":\"51 10\",\"pages\":\"110342\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Ejso\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejso.2025.110342\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/7/16 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ONCOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ejso","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejso.2025.110342","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/7/16 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:我们的欧洲三级转诊中心在使用达芬奇Xi机器人进行机器人辅助食管切除术和多象限手术后,于2020年9月实施了机器人辅助微创胃切除术(RAMIG)。评估RAMIG实施情况。方法:这项单中心前瞻性队列研究比较了111例MIG患者(2014-2023)和最初的75例RAMIG患者(2020-2023),由两名经验丰富的上消化道机器人外科医生进行手术。倾向评分匹配后,比较总体/远端/总RAMIG和MIG的手术、肿瘤和教科书结果。累积和(CUSUM)分析评估了操作时间和节点产量的学习曲线。此外,我们还评估了从腹腔镜-环形吻合术(MIG/RAMIG)到机器人辅助手缝吻合术(RAMIG-only)的过渡。结果:经倾向评分匹配,对75例RAMIG和75例MIG患者进行分析;68%接受全胃切除术,78%接受新辅助治疗。术后并发症、失血、住院、r0切除和教科书结局组间相似(p < 0.05)。远端RAMIG的中位手术时间更长(214比191分钟);p=0.032),但并发症较轻(分级≥3A;p = 0.041)。总RAMIG显示更高的中位淋巴结产率(35比22;结论:在我们的三级转诊中心实施RAMIG,尽管手术时间较长,但围手术期结果相似,淋巴结发生率提高。机器人技术有助于改进手工缝合食管空肠吻合术。经验丰富的机器人外科医生较短的学习曲线(8-24例)支持适应RAMIG。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Implementing robot-assisted minimally invasive gastrectomy (RAMIG) for gastric cancer in a European tertiary referral center.

Background: Our European tertiary referral center implemented robot-assisted minimally invasive gastrectomy (RAMIG) in September 2020, following experience with robot-assisted esophagectomy and multiquadrant surgery using the DaVinci Xi robot. RAMIG implementation was evaluated.

Methods: This single-center prospective cohort study compared 111 MIG patients (2014-2023) with the initial 75 RAMIG patients (2020-2023), operated by two experienced robotic upper-GI surgeons. After propensity-score-matching, surgical, oncological, and textbook outcomes for overall/distal/total RAMIG and MIG were compared. Cumulative sum (CUSUM) analysis assessed learning curves for operating time and nodal yield. Additionally, the transition from laparoscopic-circular stapled (MIG/RAMIG) to robot-assisted handsewn anastomosis (RAMIG-only) was evaluated.

Results: After propensity-score-matching, 75 RAMIG and 75 MIG patients were analyzed; 68% underwent total gastrectomy, and 78% neoadjuvant therapy. Postoperative complications, blood loss, hospitalization, R0-resections, and textbook outcomes were similar between groups (p>0.05). Distal RAMIG showed longer median operating time (214 versus 191 min; p=0.032), but less severe complications (13 % versus 38 % grade≥3A; p = 0.041). Total RAMIG showed higher median nodal yield (35 versus 22 nodes; p < 0.001). CUSUM-analysis showed plateaus for distal/total RAMIG at cases 10 and 24 for operating time, and 8 and 17 for nodal yield. Robot-assisted handsewn esophagojejunostomy seemed to show reduced anastomotic leakage (9% versus 28%), postoperative complications (45% versus 59%), and 30-day mortality (0% versus 5%).

Conclusions: Implementing RAMIG in our tertiary referral center resulted in similar perioperative outcomes with improved nodal yield, despite longer operating times. The robotic technique facilitated modification to handsewn esophagojejunostomy. Short learning curves (8-24 cases) for experienced robotic surgeons support adaption towards RAMIG.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Ejso
Ejso 医学-外科
CiteScore
6.40
自引率
2.60%
发文量
1148
审稿时长
41 days
期刊介绍: JSO - European Journal of Surgical Oncology ("the Journal of Cancer Surgery") is the Official Journal of the European Society of Surgical Oncology and BASO ~ the Association for Cancer Surgery. The EJSO aims to advance surgical oncology research and practice through the publication of original research articles, review articles, editorials, debates and correspondence.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信