肥胖分类造成了肥胖悖论吗?脓毒症研究中肥胖定义的范围综述

IF 2.1 Q3 ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM
Clinical Obesity Pub Date : 2025-08-08 DOI:10.1111/cob.70039
Efris Kartikasari, Brian Robinson, Caz Hales
{"title":"肥胖分类造成了肥胖悖论吗?脓毒症研究中肥胖定义的范围综述","authors":"Efris Kartikasari, Brian Robinson, Caz Hales","doi":"10.1111/cob.70039","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Obesity appears to be associated with improved health outcomes in patients with sepsis, a phenomenon termed the obesity paradox. However, the potential influence of varying operational definitions of obesity on clinical outcomes within this paradox remains inadequately characterised. This scoping review aimed to identify, analyse, and synthesise the methodological approaches to obesity definition employed in sepsis research. A systematic literature search was conducted in August 2023 across MEDLINE, Embase, CINAHL, and CENTRAL databases. This review included original articles, systematic reviews, and meta-analyses reporting on adult patients with both obesity and sepsis. After removing 60 duplicates, 430 citations were screened, and 68 met the inclusion criteria. Among studies on the obesity paradox, 90.5% supporting and 88.6% refuting it employed body mass index-based definitions, with approximately three-quarters using retrospective designs. Studies supporting the obesity paradox identified patients with obesity as younger, predominantly female, and with higher comorbidity rates. In contrast, studies refuting the paradox reported more diverse age and sex distributions, yet consistently noted elevated chronic disease prevalence in patients with obesity. Both groups found similar or higher illness severity scores among patients with obesity. The lack of methodological rigour in obesity definitions within clinical research may contribute to the obesity paradox. Future studies should critically evaluate measurement methods and definitional variability to clarify their impact on clinical outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":10399,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Obesity","volume":" ","pages":"e70039"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Do Obesity Classifications Create the Obesity Paradox? A Scoping Review of Obesity Definitions Applied in Sepsis Research.\",\"authors\":\"Efris Kartikasari, Brian Robinson, Caz Hales\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/cob.70039\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Obesity appears to be associated with improved health outcomes in patients with sepsis, a phenomenon termed the obesity paradox. However, the potential influence of varying operational definitions of obesity on clinical outcomes within this paradox remains inadequately characterised. This scoping review aimed to identify, analyse, and synthesise the methodological approaches to obesity definition employed in sepsis research. A systematic literature search was conducted in August 2023 across MEDLINE, Embase, CINAHL, and CENTRAL databases. This review included original articles, systematic reviews, and meta-analyses reporting on adult patients with both obesity and sepsis. After removing 60 duplicates, 430 citations were screened, and 68 met the inclusion criteria. Among studies on the obesity paradox, 90.5% supporting and 88.6% refuting it employed body mass index-based definitions, with approximately three-quarters using retrospective designs. Studies supporting the obesity paradox identified patients with obesity as younger, predominantly female, and with higher comorbidity rates. In contrast, studies refuting the paradox reported more diverse age and sex distributions, yet consistently noted elevated chronic disease prevalence in patients with obesity. Both groups found similar or higher illness severity scores among patients with obesity. The lack of methodological rigour in obesity definitions within clinical research may contribute to the obesity paradox. Future studies should critically evaluate measurement methods and definitional variability to clarify their impact on clinical outcomes.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":10399,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Clinical Obesity\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"e70039\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-08\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Clinical Obesity\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1111/cob.70039\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Obesity","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/cob.70039","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

肥胖似乎与脓毒症患者健康状况的改善有关,这种现象被称为肥胖悖论。然而,在这个悖论中,肥胖的不同操作定义对临床结果的潜在影响仍然没有充分表征。本综述旨在识别、分析和综合脓毒症研究中肥胖定义的方法学方法。于2023年8月对MEDLINE、Embase、CINAHL和CENTRAL数据库进行了系统的文献检索。本综述包括了关于肥胖和败血症的成人患者的原始文章、系统综述和荟萃分析报告。在剔除60个重复后,筛选了430篇引文,其中68篇符合纳入标准。在关于肥胖悖论的研究中,90.5%的人支持肥胖悖论,88.6%的人反对肥胖悖论,其中约四分之三的人采用回顾性设计。支持肥胖悖论的研究表明,肥胖患者更年轻,以女性为主,且合并症发生率更高。相反,反驳这一悖论的研究报告了更多样化的年龄和性别分布,但一致指出肥胖患者的慢性疾病患病率升高。两组研究都发现肥胖患者的疾病严重程度评分相似或更高。在临床研究中,肥胖定义缺乏方法学上的严谨性可能导致肥胖悖论。未来的研究应该批判性地评估测量方法和定义变异性,以澄清它们对临床结果的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Do Obesity Classifications Create the Obesity Paradox? A Scoping Review of Obesity Definitions Applied in Sepsis Research.

Obesity appears to be associated with improved health outcomes in patients with sepsis, a phenomenon termed the obesity paradox. However, the potential influence of varying operational definitions of obesity on clinical outcomes within this paradox remains inadequately characterised. This scoping review aimed to identify, analyse, and synthesise the methodological approaches to obesity definition employed in sepsis research. A systematic literature search was conducted in August 2023 across MEDLINE, Embase, CINAHL, and CENTRAL databases. This review included original articles, systematic reviews, and meta-analyses reporting on adult patients with both obesity and sepsis. After removing 60 duplicates, 430 citations were screened, and 68 met the inclusion criteria. Among studies on the obesity paradox, 90.5% supporting and 88.6% refuting it employed body mass index-based definitions, with approximately three-quarters using retrospective designs. Studies supporting the obesity paradox identified patients with obesity as younger, predominantly female, and with higher comorbidity rates. In contrast, studies refuting the paradox reported more diverse age and sex distributions, yet consistently noted elevated chronic disease prevalence in patients with obesity. Both groups found similar or higher illness severity scores among patients with obesity. The lack of methodological rigour in obesity definitions within clinical research may contribute to the obesity paradox. Future studies should critically evaluate measurement methods and definitional variability to clarify their impact on clinical outcomes.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Clinical Obesity
Clinical Obesity ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM-
CiteScore
5.90
自引率
3.00%
发文量
59
期刊介绍: Clinical Obesity is an international peer-reviewed journal publishing high quality translational and clinical research papers and reviews focussing on obesity and its co-morbidities. Key areas of interest are: • Patient assessment, classification, diagnosis and prognosis • Drug treatments, clinical trials and supporting research • Bariatric surgery and follow-up issues • Surgical approaches to remove body fat • Pharmacological, dietary and behavioural approaches for weight loss • Clinical physiology • Clinically relevant epidemiology • Psychological aspects of obesity • Co-morbidities • Nursing and care of patients with obesity.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信