Yi-Jing Fan, Hui-Qian Xu, Hong Li, Zi-Rui Zhang, Shu-Fang Zhang, Ai-Jun Du, Li-Zhi Zhou, Yang Wang
{"title":"不同强度的阻力训练对预防乳腺癌相关淋巴水肿的影响:一项为期1年的随机对照试验","authors":"Yi-Jing Fan, Hui-Qian Xu, Hong Li, Zi-Rui Zhang, Shu-Fang Zhang, Ai-Jun Du, Li-Zhi Zhou, Yang Wang","doi":"10.1016/j.clbc.2025.07.012","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Breast cancer-related lymphedema (BCRL) is a relatively common and harmful complication after breast cancer surgery, and there is currently no effective cure. We hypothesized that, compared with the control group, 12 weeks of resistance exercise at different intensities could reduce the incidence of BCRL after axillary lymph node dissection.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>114 breast cancer patients undergoing axillary lymph node dissection were randomly divided into a Control Group (CG), a Low-to-Moderate Intensity Exercise Group (L-MIEG, 40%-70% 1-RM) and a Moderate-to-High Intensity Exercise Group (M-HIEG, 60%-85% 1-RM).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>(1) The 12-month cumulative BCRL incidence was higher in the CG (16.3%, 6/37) than in the L-MIEG (8.3%, 3/36) and M-HIEG (5.5%, 2/37). (2) Postintervention and at 6-and 12- month follow-ups, both intervention groups had smaller interlimb differences than the CG (P < .05), and the M-HIEG had smaller differences at 6-month than the L-MIEG (P < .05). (3) InBody analysis showed both intervention groups outperformed CG in segmental water differences, extracellular water (ECW), and single-frequency bioelectrical impedance analysis (SFBIA) (P < .05), and the M-HIEG was better at 6-month (P < .05). (4) At 6-and 12-month follow-ups, both intervention groups improved grip strength more than CG (P < .05), and the M-HIEG was superior at 12 months (P < .05).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Different- intensity resistance exercises benefit BCRL prevention, with M-HIEG being more effective.</p>","PeriodicalId":10197,"journal":{"name":"Clinical breast cancer","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Effects of Resistance Training at Different Intensities on Preventing Breast Cancer-Related Lymphedema: A 1-Year Randomized Controlled Trial.\",\"authors\":\"Yi-Jing Fan, Hui-Qian Xu, Hong Li, Zi-Rui Zhang, Shu-Fang Zhang, Ai-Jun Du, Li-Zhi Zhou, Yang Wang\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.clbc.2025.07.012\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Breast cancer-related lymphedema (BCRL) is a relatively common and harmful complication after breast cancer surgery, and there is currently no effective cure. We hypothesized that, compared with the control group, 12 weeks of resistance exercise at different intensities could reduce the incidence of BCRL after axillary lymph node dissection.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>114 breast cancer patients undergoing axillary lymph node dissection were randomly divided into a Control Group (CG), a Low-to-Moderate Intensity Exercise Group (L-MIEG, 40%-70% 1-RM) and a Moderate-to-High Intensity Exercise Group (M-HIEG, 60%-85% 1-RM).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>(1) The 12-month cumulative BCRL incidence was higher in the CG (16.3%, 6/37) than in the L-MIEG (8.3%, 3/36) and M-HIEG (5.5%, 2/37). (2) Postintervention and at 6-and 12- month follow-ups, both intervention groups had smaller interlimb differences than the CG (P < .05), and the M-HIEG had smaller differences at 6-month than the L-MIEG (P < .05). (3) InBody analysis showed both intervention groups outperformed CG in segmental water differences, extracellular water (ECW), and single-frequency bioelectrical impedance analysis (SFBIA) (P < .05), and the M-HIEG was better at 6-month (P < .05). (4) At 6-and 12-month follow-ups, both intervention groups improved grip strength more than CG (P < .05), and the M-HIEG was superior at 12 months (P < .05).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Different- intensity resistance exercises benefit BCRL prevention, with M-HIEG being more effective.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":10197,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Clinical breast cancer\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-14\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Clinical breast cancer\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clbc.2025.07.012\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ONCOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical breast cancer","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clbc.2025.07.012","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Effects of Resistance Training at Different Intensities on Preventing Breast Cancer-Related Lymphedema: A 1-Year Randomized Controlled Trial.
Background: Breast cancer-related lymphedema (BCRL) is a relatively common and harmful complication after breast cancer surgery, and there is currently no effective cure. We hypothesized that, compared with the control group, 12 weeks of resistance exercise at different intensities could reduce the incidence of BCRL after axillary lymph node dissection.
Methods: 114 breast cancer patients undergoing axillary lymph node dissection were randomly divided into a Control Group (CG), a Low-to-Moderate Intensity Exercise Group (L-MIEG, 40%-70% 1-RM) and a Moderate-to-High Intensity Exercise Group (M-HIEG, 60%-85% 1-RM).
Results: (1) The 12-month cumulative BCRL incidence was higher in the CG (16.3%, 6/37) than in the L-MIEG (8.3%, 3/36) and M-HIEG (5.5%, 2/37). (2) Postintervention and at 6-and 12- month follow-ups, both intervention groups had smaller interlimb differences than the CG (P < .05), and the M-HIEG had smaller differences at 6-month than the L-MIEG (P < .05). (3) InBody analysis showed both intervention groups outperformed CG in segmental water differences, extracellular water (ECW), and single-frequency bioelectrical impedance analysis (SFBIA) (P < .05), and the M-HIEG was better at 6-month (P < .05). (4) At 6-and 12-month follow-ups, both intervention groups improved grip strength more than CG (P < .05), and the M-HIEG was superior at 12 months (P < .05).
Conclusions: Different- intensity resistance exercises benefit BCRL prevention, with M-HIEG being more effective.
期刊介绍:
Clinical Breast Cancer is a peer-reviewed bimonthly journal that publishes original articles describing various aspects of clinical and translational research of breast cancer. Clinical Breast Cancer is devoted to articles on detection, diagnosis, prevention, and treatment of breast cancer. The main emphasis is on recent scientific developments in all areas related to breast cancer. Specific areas of interest include clinical research reports from various therapeutic modalities, cancer genetics, drug sensitivity and resistance, novel imaging, tumor genomics, biomarkers, and chemoprevention strategies.