Lina Liang, Ruogang Huang, Yun Li, Zhufeng Wang, Kang Peng, Junfeng Lin, Feifei Huang, Xiaoyin Yao, Jinping Zheng, Yi Gao
{"title":"Turbuhaler®用于支气管哮喘儿童的技术评估:检查表和吸入参数的组合","authors":"Lina Liang, Ruogang Huang, Yun Li, Zhufeng Wang, Kang Peng, Junfeng Lin, Feifei Huang, Xiaoyin Yao, Jinping Zheng, Yi Gao","doi":"10.1186/s12890-025-03834-3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The Turbuhaler<sup>®</sup> is a dry powder inhaler (DPI) that is commonly used in the treatment of asthmatic patients aged 5 years and above. Nevertheless, the technique of using the Turbuhaler<sup>®</sup> in the real world remains ambiguous. This study aims to evaluate techniques in using Turbuhaler<sup>®</sup> by combining a checklist with inhalation parameters and to investigate the association between the patient characteristics and inhaler technique.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This study recruited asthmatic children aged 4 to 14 years who were using the Turbuhaler<sup>®</sup> from The First Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University from August 2023 to August 2024. The technique of using Turbuhaler<sup>®</sup> was evaluated step by step, and the inhalation parameters of patients were subsequently tested. Influencing factors related to inhaler technique were analyzed by ordered logistic regression analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of the 141 enrolled patients, 50 (35.5%) scored 10 points on the checklist. Overall, 105 (74.4%), 28 (19.9%) and 8 (5.7%) patients performed good, moderate, and poor inhaler technique, respectively. The three common improper steps were ''exhale to residual volume'' (35.5%), \"inhale forcefully and deeply\" (13.5%), \"rinse mouth after inhalation\" (13.5%). The three common inappropriate inhalation parameters were \"Effective inspiratory time(EIT) < 2s\" (90.8%), \"Peak inspiratory flow rate(PIFR) < 60L/min\" (41.8%), and \"Breath-hold time(BHT) < 5s\" (27.0%). In the three groups with good, moderate, poor inhaler techniques, 0, 2 (7.1%), and 2 (25.0%) patients did not reach the minimum PIFR. Meanwhile, 38 (36.2%), 15 (53.6%), and 6 (75.0%) patients did not reach the optimal PIFR, respectively. The results of ordered logistic regression analysis indicated that low medication adherence (P = 0.045), PIFR (P = 0.041), BHT (P = 0.003) and the duration of Turbuhaler<sup>®</sup> use (P = 0.009) were the primary factors influencing asthmatic children's inhaler technique.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The improper use of inhalers and inappropriate inhalation parameters are common among asthmatic children. Using checklist and inhalation parameters enables a more comprehensive evaluation of the patients' inhalation maneuvers and inspiratory effort.</p><p><strong>Trial registration: </strong>This study is registered at Chictr.org with the identifier number ChiCTR2200056579.</p>","PeriodicalId":9148,"journal":{"name":"BMC Pulmonary Medicine","volume":"25 1","pages":"381"},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12333242/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Technical evaluation of Turbuhaler<sup>®</sup> use in children with bronchial asthma: combination of a checklist and inhalation parameters.\",\"authors\":\"Lina Liang, Ruogang Huang, Yun Li, Zhufeng Wang, Kang Peng, Junfeng Lin, Feifei Huang, Xiaoyin Yao, Jinping Zheng, Yi Gao\",\"doi\":\"10.1186/s12890-025-03834-3\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The Turbuhaler<sup>®</sup> is a dry powder inhaler (DPI) that is commonly used in the treatment of asthmatic patients aged 5 years and above. Nevertheless, the technique of using the Turbuhaler<sup>®</sup> in the real world remains ambiguous. This study aims to evaluate techniques in using Turbuhaler<sup>®</sup> by combining a checklist with inhalation parameters and to investigate the association between the patient characteristics and inhaler technique.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This study recruited asthmatic children aged 4 to 14 years who were using the Turbuhaler<sup>®</sup> from The First Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University from August 2023 to August 2024. The technique of using Turbuhaler<sup>®</sup> was evaluated step by step, and the inhalation parameters of patients were subsequently tested. Influencing factors related to inhaler technique were analyzed by ordered logistic regression analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of the 141 enrolled patients, 50 (35.5%) scored 10 points on the checklist. Overall, 105 (74.4%), 28 (19.9%) and 8 (5.7%) patients performed good, moderate, and poor inhaler technique, respectively. The three common improper steps were ''exhale to residual volume'' (35.5%), \\\"inhale forcefully and deeply\\\" (13.5%), \\\"rinse mouth after inhalation\\\" (13.5%). The three common inappropriate inhalation parameters were \\\"Effective inspiratory time(EIT) < 2s\\\" (90.8%), \\\"Peak inspiratory flow rate(PIFR) < 60L/min\\\" (41.8%), and \\\"Breath-hold time(BHT) < 5s\\\" (27.0%). In the three groups with good, moderate, poor inhaler techniques, 0, 2 (7.1%), and 2 (25.0%) patients did not reach the minimum PIFR. Meanwhile, 38 (36.2%), 15 (53.6%), and 6 (75.0%) patients did not reach the optimal PIFR, respectively. The results of ordered logistic regression analysis indicated that low medication adherence (P = 0.045), PIFR (P = 0.041), BHT (P = 0.003) and the duration of Turbuhaler<sup>®</sup> use (P = 0.009) were the primary factors influencing asthmatic children's inhaler technique.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The improper use of inhalers and inappropriate inhalation parameters are common among asthmatic children. Using checklist and inhalation parameters enables a more comprehensive evaluation of the patients' inhalation maneuvers and inspiratory effort.</p><p><strong>Trial registration: </strong>This study is registered at Chictr.org with the identifier number ChiCTR2200056579.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":9148,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"BMC Pulmonary Medicine\",\"volume\":\"25 1\",\"pages\":\"381\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-08\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12333242/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"BMC Pulmonary Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12890-025-03834-3\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"RESPIRATORY SYSTEM\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Pulmonary Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12890-025-03834-3","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"RESPIRATORY SYSTEM","Score":null,"Total":0}
Technical evaluation of Turbuhaler® use in children with bronchial asthma: combination of a checklist and inhalation parameters.
Background: The Turbuhaler® is a dry powder inhaler (DPI) that is commonly used in the treatment of asthmatic patients aged 5 years and above. Nevertheless, the technique of using the Turbuhaler® in the real world remains ambiguous. This study aims to evaluate techniques in using Turbuhaler® by combining a checklist with inhalation parameters and to investigate the association between the patient characteristics and inhaler technique.
Methods: This study recruited asthmatic children aged 4 to 14 years who were using the Turbuhaler® from The First Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University from August 2023 to August 2024. The technique of using Turbuhaler® was evaluated step by step, and the inhalation parameters of patients were subsequently tested. Influencing factors related to inhaler technique were analyzed by ordered logistic regression analysis.
Results: Of the 141 enrolled patients, 50 (35.5%) scored 10 points on the checklist. Overall, 105 (74.4%), 28 (19.9%) and 8 (5.7%) patients performed good, moderate, and poor inhaler technique, respectively. The three common improper steps were ''exhale to residual volume'' (35.5%), "inhale forcefully and deeply" (13.5%), "rinse mouth after inhalation" (13.5%). The three common inappropriate inhalation parameters were "Effective inspiratory time(EIT) < 2s" (90.8%), "Peak inspiratory flow rate(PIFR) < 60L/min" (41.8%), and "Breath-hold time(BHT) < 5s" (27.0%). In the three groups with good, moderate, poor inhaler techniques, 0, 2 (7.1%), and 2 (25.0%) patients did not reach the minimum PIFR. Meanwhile, 38 (36.2%), 15 (53.6%), and 6 (75.0%) patients did not reach the optimal PIFR, respectively. The results of ordered logistic regression analysis indicated that low medication adherence (P = 0.045), PIFR (P = 0.041), BHT (P = 0.003) and the duration of Turbuhaler® use (P = 0.009) were the primary factors influencing asthmatic children's inhaler technique.
Conclusion: The improper use of inhalers and inappropriate inhalation parameters are common among asthmatic children. Using checklist and inhalation parameters enables a more comprehensive evaluation of the patients' inhalation maneuvers and inspiratory effort.
Trial registration: This study is registered at Chictr.org with the identifier number ChiCTR2200056579.
期刊介绍:
BMC Pulmonary Medicine is an open access, peer-reviewed journal that considers articles on all aspects of the prevention, diagnosis and management of pulmonary and associated disorders, as well as related molecular genetics, pathophysiology, and epidemiology.