Richard Hughes, Gregor Jordan, Yvonne Katterle, Birgit Jaitner, Charles Britten, Arnout Gerritsen, Deepa Reddy Bandi, Tobias Haslberger, Tinie van Boekel, Jens Sigh, Michaela Golob, Kyra J Cowan, Philip Timmerman
{"title":"使用免疫分析方法在生物分析临床前安全性测试中使用替代基质:来自欧洲生物分析论坛的建议。","authors":"Richard Hughes, Gregor Jordan, Yvonne Katterle, Birgit Jaitner, Charles Britten, Arnout Gerritsen, Deepa Reddy Bandi, Tobias Haslberger, Tinie van Boekel, Jens Sigh, Michaela Golob, Kyra J Cowan, Philip Timmerman","doi":"10.1080/17576180.2025.2545136","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The use of blank authentic matrix for bioanalytical method validation and sample analysis has long been standard practice within the bioanalytical community and is considered a requirement under current guidelines for bioanalytical method validation. However, this practice has been increasingly challenged as there are scientifically valid alternatives to replace blank authentic matrices with surrogate matrices. The use of authentic matrices from preclinical animal species conflicts with the ethical 3Rs principles (Replacement, Reduction, and Refinement), a concern that the European Bioanalysis Forum has been addressing for years through data-driven advocacy. In this manuscript, the EBF presents experimental data supporting the use of surrogate matrices in preclinical assays for immunoassay formats. This approach significantly reduces the reliance on authentic matrices, while preserving the quality and integrity of bioanalytical data. The findings advocate for revisiting or clarifying regulatory guidelines, such as ICH M10, to more widely accept the use of surrogate matrices, ensuring alignment with ethical standards without compromising scientific rigor.</p>","PeriodicalId":8797,"journal":{"name":"Bioanalysis","volume":" ","pages":"893-898"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12369609/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Use of surrogate matrices in bioanalytical preclinical safety testing using immunoassay methods: a recommendation from the European Bioanalysis Forum.\",\"authors\":\"Richard Hughes, Gregor Jordan, Yvonne Katterle, Birgit Jaitner, Charles Britten, Arnout Gerritsen, Deepa Reddy Bandi, Tobias Haslberger, Tinie van Boekel, Jens Sigh, Michaela Golob, Kyra J Cowan, Philip Timmerman\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/17576180.2025.2545136\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>The use of blank authentic matrix for bioanalytical method validation and sample analysis has long been standard practice within the bioanalytical community and is considered a requirement under current guidelines for bioanalytical method validation. However, this practice has been increasingly challenged as there are scientifically valid alternatives to replace blank authentic matrices with surrogate matrices. The use of authentic matrices from preclinical animal species conflicts with the ethical 3Rs principles (Replacement, Reduction, and Refinement), a concern that the European Bioanalysis Forum has been addressing for years through data-driven advocacy. In this manuscript, the EBF presents experimental data supporting the use of surrogate matrices in preclinical assays for immunoassay formats. This approach significantly reduces the reliance on authentic matrices, while preserving the quality and integrity of bioanalytical data. The findings advocate for revisiting or clarifying regulatory guidelines, such as ICH M10, to more widely accept the use of surrogate matrices, ensuring alignment with ethical standards without compromising scientific rigor.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":8797,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Bioanalysis\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"893-898\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12369609/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Bioanalysis\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/17576180.2025.2545136\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/8/9 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"BIOCHEMICAL RESEARCH METHODS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Bioanalysis","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/17576180.2025.2545136","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/8/9 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"BIOCHEMICAL RESEARCH METHODS","Score":null,"Total":0}
Use of surrogate matrices in bioanalytical preclinical safety testing using immunoassay methods: a recommendation from the European Bioanalysis Forum.
The use of blank authentic matrix for bioanalytical method validation and sample analysis has long been standard practice within the bioanalytical community and is considered a requirement under current guidelines for bioanalytical method validation. However, this practice has been increasingly challenged as there are scientifically valid alternatives to replace blank authentic matrices with surrogate matrices. The use of authentic matrices from preclinical animal species conflicts with the ethical 3Rs principles (Replacement, Reduction, and Refinement), a concern that the European Bioanalysis Forum has been addressing for years through data-driven advocacy. In this manuscript, the EBF presents experimental data supporting the use of surrogate matrices in preclinical assays for immunoassay formats. This approach significantly reduces the reliance on authentic matrices, while preserving the quality and integrity of bioanalytical data. The findings advocate for revisiting or clarifying regulatory guidelines, such as ICH M10, to more widely accept the use of surrogate matrices, ensuring alignment with ethical standards without compromising scientific rigor.
BioanalysisBIOCHEMICAL RESEARCH METHODS-CHEMISTRY, ANALYTICAL
CiteScore
3.30
自引率
16.70%
发文量
88
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍:
Reliable data obtained from selective, sensitive and reproducible analysis of xenobiotics and biotics in biological samples is a fundamental and crucial part of every successful drug development program. The same principles can also apply to many other areas of research such as forensic science, toxicology and sports doping testing.
The bioanalytical field incorporates sophisticated techniques linking sample preparation and advanced separations with MS and NMR detection systems, automation and robotics. Standards set by regulatory bodies regarding method development and validation increasingly define the boundaries between speed and quality.
Bioanalysis is a progressive discipline for which the future holds many exciting opportunities to further reduce sample volumes, analysis cost and environmental impact, as well as to improve sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, efficiency, assay throughput, data quality, data handling and processing.
The journal Bioanalysis focuses on the techniques and methods used for the detection or quantitative study of analytes in human or animal biological samples. Bioanalysis encourages the submission of articles describing forward-looking applications, including biosensors, microfluidics, miniaturized analytical devices, and new hyphenated and multi-dimensional techniques.
Bioanalysis delivers essential information in concise, at-a-glance article formats. Key advances in the field are reported and analyzed by international experts, providing an authoritative but accessible forum for the modern bioanalyst.