使用免疫分析方法在生物分析临床前安全性测试中使用替代基质:来自欧洲生物分析论坛的建议。

IF 1.8 4区 医学 Q3 BIOCHEMICAL RESEARCH METHODS
Bioanalysis Pub Date : 2025-07-01 Epub Date: 2025-08-09 DOI:10.1080/17576180.2025.2545136
Richard Hughes, Gregor Jordan, Yvonne Katterle, Birgit Jaitner, Charles Britten, Arnout Gerritsen, Deepa Reddy Bandi, Tobias Haslberger, Tinie van Boekel, Jens Sigh, Michaela Golob, Kyra J Cowan, Philip Timmerman
{"title":"使用免疫分析方法在生物分析临床前安全性测试中使用替代基质:来自欧洲生物分析论坛的建议。","authors":"Richard Hughes, Gregor Jordan, Yvonne Katterle, Birgit Jaitner, Charles Britten, Arnout Gerritsen, Deepa Reddy Bandi, Tobias Haslberger, Tinie van Boekel, Jens Sigh, Michaela Golob, Kyra J Cowan, Philip Timmerman","doi":"10.1080/17576180.2025.2545136","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The use of blank authentic matrix for bioanalytical method validation and sample analysis has long been standard practice within the bioanalytical community and is considered a requirement under current guidelines for bioanalytical method validation. However, this practice has been increasingly challenged as there are scientifically valid alternatives to replace blank authentic matrices with surrogate matrices. The use of authentic matrices from preclinical animal species conflicts with the ethical 3Rs principles (Replacement, Reduction, and Refinement), a concern that the European Bioanalysis Forum has been addressing for years through data-driven advocacy. In this manuscript, the EBF presents experimental data supporting the use of surrogate matrices in preclinical assays for immunoassay formats. This approach significantly reduces the reliance on authentic matrices, while preserving the quality and integrity of bioanalytical data. The findings advocate for revisiting or clarifying regulatory guidelines, such as ICH M10, to more widely accept the use of surrogate matrices, ensuring alignment with ethical standards without compromising scientific rigor.</p>","PeriodicalId":8797,"journal":{"name":"Bioanalysis","volume":" ","pages":"893-898"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12369609/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Use of surrogate matrices in bioanalytical preclinical safety testing using immunoassay methods: a recommendation from the European Bioanalysis Forum.\",\"authors\":\"Richard Hughes, Gregor Jordan, Yvonne Katterle, Birgit Jaitner, Charles Britten, Arnout Gerritsen, Deepa Reddy Bandi, Tobias Haslberger, Tinie van Boekel, Jens Sigh, Michaela Golob, Kyra J Cowan, Philip Timmerman\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/17576180.2025.2545136\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>The use of blank authentic matrix for bioanalytical method validation and sample analysis has long been standard practice within the bioanalytical community and is considered a requirement under current guidelines for bioanalytical method validation. However, this practice has been increasingly challenged as there are scientifically valid alternatives to replace blank authentic matrices with surrogate matrices. The use of authentic matrices from preclinical animal species conflicts with the ethical 3Rs principles (Replacement, Reduction, and Refinement), a concern that the European Bioanalysis Forum has been addressing for years through data-driven advocacy. In this manuscript, the EBF presents experimental data supporting the use of surrogate matrices in preclinical assays for immunoassay formats. This approach significantly reduces the reliance on authentic matrices, while preserving the quality and integrity of bioanalytical data. The findings advocate for revisiting or clarifying regulatory guidelines, such as ICH M10, to more widely accept the use of surrogate matrices, ensuring alignment with ethical standards without compromising scientific rigor.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":8797,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Bioanalysis\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"893-898\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12369609/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Bioanalysis\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/17576180.2025.2545136\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/8/9 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"BIOCHEMICAL RESEARCH METHODS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Bioanalysis","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/17576180.2025.2545136","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/8/9 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"BIOCHEMICAL RESEARCH METHODS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在生物分析方法验证和样品分析中使用空白真实矩阵长期以来一直是生物分析界的标准做法,并且被认为是当前生物分析方法验证指南的要求。然而,这种做法受到了越来越多的挑战,因为有科学有效的替代方案来代替空白的真实矩阵与代理矩阵。使用临床前动物物种的真实基质与伦理3Rs原则(替代,减少和改进)相冲突,这是欧洲生物分析论坛多年来通过数据驱动倡导解决的一个问题。在这份手稿中,EBF提出了支持在免疫分析格式的临床前分析中使用替代基质的实验数据。这种方法大大减少了对真实矩阵的依赖,同时保持了生物分析数据的质量和完整性。研究结果主张重新审视或澄清诸如ICH M10之类的监管指南,以便更广泛地接受替代基质的使用,确保在不损害科学严谨性的情况下与伦理标准保持一致。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Use of surrogate matrices in bioanalytical preclinical safety testing using immunoassay methods: a recommendation from the European Bioanalysis Forum.

The use of blank authentic matrix for bioanalytical method validation and sample analysis has long been standard practice within the bioanalytical community and is considered a requirement under current guidelines for bioanalytical method validation. However, this practice has been increasingly challenged as there are scientifically valid alternatives to replace blank authentic matrices with surrogate matrices. The use of authentic matrices from preclinical animal species conflicts with the ethical 3Rs principles (Replacement, Reduction, and Refinement), a concern that the European Bioanalysis Forum has been addressing for years through data-driven advocacy. In this manuscript, the EBF presents experimental data supporting the use of surrogate matrices in preclinical assays for immunoassay formats. This approach significantly reduces the reliance on authentic matrices, while preserving the quality and integrity of bioanalytical data. The findings advocate for revisiting or clarifying regulatory guidelines, such as ICH M10, to more widely accept the use of surrogate matrices, ensuring alignment with ethical standards without compromising scientific rigor.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Bioanalysis
Bioanalysis BIOCHEMICAL RESEARCH METHODS-CHEMISTRY, ANALYTICAL
CiteScore
3.30
自引率
16.70%
发文量
88
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: Reliable data obtained from selective, sensitive and reproducible analysis of xenobiotics and biotics in biological samples is a fundamental and crucial part of every successful drug development program. The same principles can also apply to many other areas of research such as forensic science, toxicology and sports doping testing. The bioanalytical field incorporates sophisticated techniques linking sample preparation and advanced separations with MS and NMR detection systems, automation and robotics. Standards set by regulatory bodies regarding method development and validation increasingly define the boundaries between speed and quality. Bioanalysis is a progressive discipline for which the future holds many exciting opportunities to further reduce sample volumes, analysis cost and environmental impact, as well as to improve sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, efficiency, assay throughput, data quality, data handling and processing. The journal Bioanalysis focuses on the techniques and methods used for the detection or quantitative study of analytes in human or animal biological samples. Bioanalysis encourages the submission of articles describing forward-looking applications, including biosensors, microfluidics, miniaturized analytical devices, and new hyphenated and multi-dimensional techniques. Bioanalysis delivers essential information in concise, at-a-glance article formats. Key advances in the field are reported and analyzed by international experts, providing an authoritative but accessible forum for the modern bioanalyst.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信