Pedro Starzynski Bacchi, Fabio Carezzato, Talita di Santi, Paulo Suen, Felipe Silveira, Tiago Takeuchi, Joana Marczyk, Ricardo Trapé Trinca, Ronaldo Silva Torres, Silvia Brasiliano, Patricia Hochgraf
{"title":"扩大性别敏感和公平的药物使用护理模式:巴西社会心理单位妇女药物依赖治疗方案(PROMUD)复制的治疗保留分析。","authors":"Pedro Starzynski Bacchi, Fabio Carezzato, Talita di Santi, Paulo Suen, Felipe Silveira, Tiago Takeuchi, Joana Marczyk, Ricardo Trapé Trinca, Ronaldo Silva Torres, Silvia Brasiliano, Patricia Hochgraf","doi":"10.1007/s00737-025-01601-1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>This study examines the challenges and opportunities of implementing gender-equitable substance use disorder (SUD) treatment models in Brazil by revisiting a public policy initiative carried out between 2004 and 2006. During this initiative, a structured model of care, the Women's Drug Dependent Treatment Program (PROMUD), was replicated in two additional psychosocial care units in São Paulo. The study seeks to contribute to the visibility of a historically hidden population of women with SUD by comparing treatment retention across the three centers and identifying risk factors associated with dropout.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>This observational, non-randomized post hoc analysis examined clinical data from 200 women who enrolled in PROMUD-based programs across three distinct psychosocial care centers-CAPS-AD Centro (DT), CAPS-AD Jardim Nélia (JN), and the original PROMUD site. All centers implemented the model concurrently using a standardized protocol. Treatment retention was defined as weeks between program admission and dropout (max follow-up: 104 weeks). Drop-out was defined as leaving treatment for reasons other than referral, improved discharge, administrative discharge, or death. Kaplan-Meier survival curves were used to estimate retention, and Cox proportional hazards models identified predictors of dropout.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>200 women were included, PROMUD had a higher percentage of white, educated and employed participants. DT had the highest prevalence of unstable housing and prostitution history. PROMUD and JN showed comparable retention at 104 weeks (44.8% and 42.4%), whereas DT exhibited the lowest retention (17.3%). Age was a protective factor (HR = 0.94, p < 0.001), substance of choice was not significantly associated with dropout.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Gender-specific care models can be effectively implemented in resource-limited, community-responsive care units, though their success depends on local population characteristics and territorial dynamics. Despite the time gap since the original project, the challenges remain similar or have intensified.</p>","PeriodicalId":8369,"journal":{"name":"Archives of Women's Mental Health","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Expanding gender-sensitive and equitable substance use care models: treatment retention analysis of the women's drug dependent treatment program (PROMUD) replication in psychosocial units in Brazil.\",\"authors\":\"Pedro Starzynski Bacchi, Fabio Carezzato, Talita di Santi, Paulo Suen, Felipe Silveira, Tiago Takeuchi, Joana Marczyk, Ricardo Trapé Trinca, Ronaldo Silva Torres, Silvia Brasiliano, Patricia Hochgraf\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s00737-025-01601-1\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>This study examines the challenges and opportunities of implementing gender-equitable substance use disorder (SUD) treatment models in Brazil by revisiting a public policy initiative carried out between 2004 and 2006. During this initiative, a structured model of care, the Women's Drug Dependent Treatment Program (PROMUD), was replicated in two additional psychosocial care units in São Paulo. The study seeks to contribute to the visibility of a historically hidden population of women with SUD by comparing treatment retention across the three centers and identifying risk factors associated with dropout.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>This observational, non-randomized post hoc analysis examined clinical data from 200 women who enrolled in PROMUD-based programs across three distinct psychosocial care centers-CAPS-AD Centro (DT), CAPS-AD Jardim Nélia (JN), and the original PROMUD site. All centers implemented the model concurrently using a standardized protocol. Treatment retention was defined as weeks between program admission and dropout (max follow-up: 104 weeks). Drop-out was defined as leaving treatment for reasons other than referral, improved discharge, administrative discharge, or death. Kaplan-Meier survival curves were used to estimate retention, and Cox proportional hazards models identified predictors of dropout.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>200 women were included, PROMUD had a higher percentage of white, educated and employed participants. DT had the highest prevalence of unstable housing and prostitution history. PROMUD and JN showed comparable retention at 104 weeks (44.8% and 42.4%), whereas DT exhibited the lowest retention (17.3%). Age was a protective factor (HR = 0.94, p < 0.001), substance of choice was not significantly associated with dropout.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Gender-specific care models can be effectively implemented in resource-limited, community-responsive care units, though their success depends on local population characteristics and territorial dynamics. Despite the time gap since the original project, the challenges remain similar or have intensified.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":8369,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Archives of Women's Mental Health\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-09\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Archives of Women's Mental Health\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00737-025-01601-1\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHIATRY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Archives of Women's Mental Health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00737-025-01601-1","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
目的:本研究通过回顾2004年至2006年期间实施的一项公共政策倡议,探讨了在巴西实施性别平等的物质使用障碍(SUD)治疗模式的挑战和机遇。在这一倡议期间,一个结构化的护理模式,即妇女药物依赖治疗方案(PROMUD),在圣保罗的另外两个社会心理护理单位得到复制。该研究旨在通过比较三个中心的治疗保留情况并确定与辍学相关的风险因素,从而使历史上隐藏的患有SUD的女性人群可见。方法:这项观察性的、非随机的事后分析检查了200名妇女的临床数据,这些妇女在三个不同的社会心理护理中心——CAPS-AD Centro (DT)、CAPS-AD Jardim n忧郁中心(JN)和原始PROMUD站点——参加了基于PROMUD的项目。所有中心都使用标准化协议并发地实现该模型。治疗保留时间定义为从项目开始到退出的周数(最长随访:104周)。退出被定义为因转诊、改善出院、行政出院或死亡以外的原因而退出治疗。Kaplan-Meier生存曲线用于估计留任率,Cox比例风险模型确定了辍学的预测因子。结果:包括200名妇女,PROMUD的白人,受过教育和就业的参与者比例较高。DT的不稳定住房和卖淫史患病率最高。PROMUD和JN在104周的保留率相当(44.8%和42.4%),而DT的保留率最低(17.3%)。结论:基于性别的护理模式可以在资源有限的社区响应型护理单位中有效实施,但其成功与否取决于当地人口特征和地域动态。尽管与最初的项目有时间差距,但挑战仍然相似或加剧了。
Expanding gender-sensitive and equitable substance use care models: treatment retention analysis of the women's drug dependent treatment program (PROMUD) replication in psychosocial units in Brazil.
Purpose: This study examines the challenges and opportunities of implementing gender-equitable substance use disorder (SUD) treatment models in Brazil by revisiting a public policy initiative carried out between 2004 and 2006. During this initiative, a structured model of care, the Women's Drug Dependent Treatment Program (PROMUD), was replicated in two additional psychosocial care units in São Paulo. The study seeks to contribute to the visibility of a historically hidden population of women with SUD by comparing treatment retention across the three centers and identifying risk factors associated with dropout.
Method: This observational, non-randomized post hoc analysis examined clinical data from 200 women who enrolled in PROMUD-based programs across three distinct psychosocial care centers-CAPS-AD Centro (DT), CAPS-AD Jardim Nélia (JN), and the original PROMUD site. All centers implemented the model concurrently using a standardized protocol. Treatment retention was defined as weeks between program admission and dropout (max follow-up: 104 weeks). Drop-out was defined as leaving treatment for reasons other than referral, improved discharge, administrative discharge, or death. Kaplan-Meier survival curves were used to estimate retention, and Cox proportional hazards models identified predictors of dropout.
Results: 200 women were included, PROMUD had a higher percentage of white, educated and employed participants. DT had the highest prevalence of unstable housing and prostitution history. PROMUD and JN showed comparable retention at 104 weeks (44.8% and 42.4%), whereas DT exhibited the lowest retention (17.3%). Age was a protective factor (HR = 0.94, p < 0.001), substance of choice was not significantly associated with dropout.
Conclusion: Gender-specific care models can be effectively implemented in resource-limited, community-responsive care units, though their success depends on local population characteristics and territorial dynamics. Despite the time gap since the original project, the challenges remain similar or have intensified.
期刊介绍:
Archives of Women’s Mental Health is the official journal of the International Association for Women''s Mental Health, Marcé Society and the North American Society for Psychosocial Obstetrics and Gynecology (NASPOG). The exchange of knowledge between psychiatrists and obstetrician-gynecologists is one of the major aims of the journal. Its international scope includes psychodynamics, social and biological aspects of all psychiatric and psychosomatic disorders in women. The editors especially welcome interdisciplinary studies, focussing on the interface between psychiatry, psychosomatics, obstetrics and gynecology. Archives of Women’s Mental Health publishes rigorously reviewed research papers, short communications, case reports, review articles, invited editorials, historical perspectives, book reviews, letters to the editor, as well as conference abstracts. Only contributions written in English will be accepted. The journal assists clinicians, teachers and researchers to incorporate knowledge of all aspects of women’s mental health into current and future clinical care and research.