瑞士原发性乳腺癌和卵巢癌患者生殖系BRCA1/2致病突变基因检测的障碍

IF 2.5 3区 医学 Q2 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY
Christian Braun, Lucie Krautova, Kathrin Schwedler, Corina Christmann, Christine Brambs
{"title":"瑞士原发性乳腺癌和卵巢癌患者生殖系BRCA1/2致病突变基因检测的障碍","authors":"Christian Braun,&nbsp;Lucie Krautova,&nbsp;Kathrin Schwedler,&nbsp;Corina Christmann,&nbsp;Christine Brambs","doi":"10.1007/s00404-025-08138-9","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Purpose</h3><p>Approximately 5–10% of breast and up to 25% of ovarian cancer cases are hereditary, predominantly associated with germline BRCA1/2 pathogenic variants. Identifying these mutations is essential for personalized treatment, prevention strategies, and cascade testing in families. However, integrating genetic testing into routine care faces substantial barriers globally and within Switzerland.</p><h3>Methods</h3><p>This retrospective, quantitative study analyzed 209 patients treated for non-mucinous ovarian carcinoma or primary breast cancer at the Women’s Cantonal Hospital, Lucerne (2017–2022). All patients met Swiss clinical (SAKK) criteria for genetic testing, and recommendations for counseling were documented. Data were collected via anonymized questionnaires evaluating demographics, counseling experiences, emotional responses, and testing barriers. Statistical analyses examined factors influencing counseling uptake, including timing, referral source, education, and informational resources.</p><h3>Results</h3><p>Out of 73 respondents (32.6% response rate), 70 questionnaires were analyzed. Acceptance of genetic counseling was 81.4%. Recommendations by gynecologists significantly enhanced uptake (<i>p</i> = 0.002), especially when provided postoperatively or at diagnosis (<i>p</i> = 0.011). Higher education levels (<i>p</i> = 0.009) and prior informational materials (<i>p</i> = 0.014) positively influenced acceptance. Emotional responses differed, with breast cancer patients reporting more fear, whereas ovarian cancer patients reported greater curiosity. Family involvement supported patient engagement, while perceptions of minimal personal benefit and family disinterest were common reasons for declining<b>.</b></p><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>Timely, well-communicated recommendations and informational resources significantly improve genetic counseling uptake among breast and ovarian cancer patients. Addressing systemic and patient-specific barriers will enhance equitable access, optimize targeted therapies and preventive strategies, and should be supported by national registries, qualitative research, and digital integration.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":8330,"journal":{"name":"Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics","volume":"312 4","pages":"1365 - 1373"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s00404-025-08138-9.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Obstacles in genetic testing for germline BRCA1/2 pathogenic mutations in patients with primary breast and ovarian cancer in Switzerland\",\"authors\":\"Christian Braun,&nbsp;Lucie Krautova,&nbsp;Kathrin Schwedler,&nbsp;Corina Christmann,&nbsp;Christine Brambs\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s00404-025-08138-9\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Purpose</h3><p>Approximately 5–10% of breast and up to 25% of ovarian cancer cases are hereditary, predominantly associated with germline BRCA1/2 pathogenic variants. Identifying these mutations is essential for personalized treatment, prevention strategies, and cascade testing in families. However, integrating genetic testing into routine care faces substantial barriers globally and within Switzerland.</p><h3>Methods</h3><p>This retrospective, quantitative study analyzed 209 patients treated for non-mucinous ovarian carcinoma or primary breast cancer at the Women’s Cantonal Hospital, Lucerne (2017–2022). All patients met Swiss clinical (SAKK) criteria for genetic testing, and recommendations for counseling were documented. Data were collected via anonymized questionnaires evaluating demographics, counseling experiences, emotional responses, and testing barriers. Statistical analyses examined factors influencing counseling uptake, including timing, referral source, education, and informational resources.</p><h3>Results</h3><p>Out of 73 respondents (32.6% response rate), 70 questionnaires were analyzed. Acceptance of genetic counseling was 81.4%. Recommendations by gynecologists significantly enhanced uptake (<i>p</i> = 0.002), especially when provided postoperatively or at diagnosis (<i>p</i> = 0.011). Higher education levels (<i>p</i> = 0.009) and prior informational materials (<i>p</i> = 0.014) positively influenced acceptance. Emotional responses differed, with breast cancer patients reporting more fear, whereas ovarian cancer patients reported greater curiosity. Family involvement supported patient engagement, while perceptions of minimal personal benefit and family disinterest were common reasons for declining<b>.</b></p><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>Timely, well-communicated recommendations and informational resources significantly improve genetic counseling uptake among breast and ovarian cancer patients. Addressing systemic and patient-specific barriers will enhance equitable access, optimize targeted therapies and preventive strategies, and should be supported by national registries, qualitative research, and digital integration.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":8330,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics\",\"volume\":\"312 4\",\"pages\":\"1365 - 1373\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-09\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s00404-025-08138-9.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s00404-025-08138-9\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s00404-025-08138-9","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:大约5-10%的乳腺癌和高达25%的卵巢癌病例是遗传性的,主要与种系BRCA1/2致病变异有关。识别这些突变对于个性化治疗、预防策略和家庭级联检测至关重要。然而,将基因检测纳入常规护理面临着全球和瑞士国内的重大障碍。方法:本回顾性定量研究分析了2017-2022年在卢塞恩妇女州立医院治疗的209例非粘液性卵巢癌或原发性乳腺癌患者。所有患者均符合瑞士临床(SAKK)基因检测标准,并记录了咨询建议。数据通过匿名问卷收集,评估人口统计、咨询经验、情绪反应和测试障碍。统计分析检查了影响咨询接受的因素,包括时间、转诊来源、教育和信息资源。结果:73名被调查者(32.6%)共分析70份问卷。接受遗传咨询的比例为81.4%。妇科医生的建议显著提高了摄取(p = 0.002),尤其是在术后或诊断时提供的建议(p = 0.011)。高等教育水平(p = 0.009)和先前的信息材料(p = 0.014)正影响接受度。情绪反应不同,乳腺癌患者表现出更多的恐惧,而卵巢癌患者表现出更多的好奇。家庭参与支持患者参与,而个人利益最小和家庭不感兴趣的看法是下降的常见原因。结论:及时、沟通良好的建议和信息资源可显著提高乳腺癌和卵巢癌患者接受遗传咨询的程度。解决系统性和患者特异性障碍将促进公平获取,优化靶向治疗和预防战略,并应得到国家登记、定性研究和数字整合的支持。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Obstacles in genetic testing for germline BRCA1/2 pathogenic mutations in patients with primary breast and ovarian cancer in Switzerland

Purpose

Approximately 5–10% of breast and up to 25% of ovarian cancer cases are hereditary, predominantly associated with germline BRCA1/2 pathogenic variants. Identifying these mutations is essential for personalized treatment, prevention strategies, and cascade testing in families. However, integrating genetic testing into routine care faces substantial barriers globally and within Switzerland.

Methods

This retrospective, quantitative study analyzed 209 patients treated for non-mucinous ovarian carcinoma or primary breast cancer at the Women’s Cantonal Hospital, Lucerne (2017–2022). All patients met Swiss clinical (SAKK) criteria for genetic testing, and recommendations for counseling were documented. Data were collected via anonymized questionnaires evaluating demographics, counseling experiences, emotional responses, and testing barriers. Statistical analyses examined factors influencing counseling uptake, including timing, referral source, education, and informational resources.

Results

Out of 73 respondents (32.6% response rate), 70 questionnaires were analyzed. Acceptance of genetic counseling was 81.4%. Recommendations by gynecologists significantly enhanced uptake (p = 0.002), especially when provided postoperatively or at diagnosis (p = 0.011). Higher education levels (p = 0.009) and prior informational materials (p = 0.014) positively influenced acceptance. Emotional responses differed, with breast cancer patients reporting more fear, whereas ovarian cancer patients reported greater curiosity. Family involvement supported patient engagement, while perceptions of minimal personal benefit and family disinterest were common reasons for declining.

Conclusion

Timely, well-communicated recommendations and informational resources significantly improve genetic counseling uptake among breast and ovarian cancer patients. Addressing systemic and patient-specific barriers will enhance equitable access, optimize targeted therapies and preventive strategies, and should be supported by national registries, qualitative research, and digital integration.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.70
自引率
15.40%
发文量
493
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: Founded in 1870 as "Archiv für Gynaekologie", Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics has a long and outstanding tradition. Since 1922 the journal has been the Organ of the Deutsche Gesellschaft für Gynäkologie und Geburtshilfe. "The Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics" is circulated in over 40 countries world wide and is indexed in "PubMed/Medline" and "Science Citation Index Expanded/Journal Citation Report". The journal publishes invited and submitted reviews; peer-reviewed original articles about clinical topics and basic research as well as news and views and guidelines and position statements from all sub-specialties in gynecology and obstetrics.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信