相对于普通的邻苯二甲酸盐,柠檬酸盐基增塑剂在生物聚合物生物降解过程中对塑料球细菌群落组成的影响最小。

IF 11.3 1区 环境科学与生态学 Q1 ENGINEERING, ENVIRONMENTAL
Rebecca L. Lyons, Clement Matthew Chan, Andrew R. Parry, Catherine M. E. Hodal, Jiarui Sun, Paul A. Lant, Steven Pratt, Bronwyn Laycock and Paul G. Dennis*, 
{"title":"相对于普通的邻苯二甲酸盐,柠檬酸盐基增塑剂在生物聚合物生物降解过程中对塑料球细菌群落组成的影响最小。","authors":"Rebecca L. Lyons,&nbsp;Clement Matthew Chan,&nbsp;Andrew R. Parry,&nbsp;Catherine M. E. Hodal,&nbsp;Jiarui Sun,&nbsp;Paul A. Lant,&nbsp;Steven Pratt,&nbsp;Bronwyn Laycock and Paul G. Dennis*,&nbsp;","doi":"10.1021/acs.est.5c01660","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p >Citrate-based plasticizers are often marketed as eco-friendly alternatives to phthalates like dibutyl phthalate (DBP). Here, we investigated these assertions by examining the response of soil microbial communities to biopolymer samples plasticized with acetyl tributyl citrate (ATBC), triethyl citrate (TEC), DBP, or nothing (control). Samples were buried in soil for 14 weeks, after which the biomass and diversity of bacterial and fungal communities associated with the biopolymer, attached soil, and bulk soil were characterized using metabarcoding and quantitative PCR. Differences between buried (incubated) and nonincubated biopolymer samples were also analyzed using X-ray microcomputed tomography, gel permeation chromatography, and <sup>1</sup>H-nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy to assess biopolymer degradation and plasticizer migration. Surface degradation and plasticizer migration were observed for all treatments, with minor impacts of plasticizers on microbial biomass and alpha diversity. Critically, however, plastisphere bacterial communities formed two groups that were compositionally distinct. One group comprised the DBP samples while the other comprised the control, ATBC, and TEC samples. This indicates that DBP can impact soil bacterial community composition on release from biopolymer blends, while the effects of the citrate-based plasticizers were reduced─supporting their use as potentially less environmentally impactful alternatives to phthalates.</p>","PeriodicalId":36,"journal":{"name":"环境科学与技术","volume":"59 32","pages":"17173–17187"},"PeriodicalIF":11.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Relative to a Common Phthalate, Citrate-Based Plasticizers Exert Minimal Impact on Plastisphere Bacterial Community Composition during Biopolymer Biodegradation\",\"authors\":\"Rebecca L. Lyons,&nbsp;Clement Matthew Chan,&nbsp;Andrew R. Parry,&nbsp;Catherine M. E. Hodal,&nbsp;Jiarui Sun,&nbsp;Paul A. Lant,&nbsp;Steven Pratt,&nbsp;Bronwyn Laycock and Paul G. Dennis*,&nbsp;\",\"doi\":\"10.1021/acs.est.5c01660\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p >Citrate-based plasticizers are often marketed as eco-friendly alternatives to phthalates like dibutyl phthalate (DBP). Here, we investigated these assertions by examining the response of soil microbial communities to biopolymer samples plasticized with acetyl tributyl citrate (ATBC), triethyl citrate (TEC), DBP, or nothing (control). Samples were buried in soil for 14 weeks, after which the biomass and diversity of bacterial and fungal communities associated with the biopolymer, attached soil, and bulk soil were characterized using metabarcoding and quantitative PCR. Differences between buried (incubated) and nonincubated biopolymer samples were also analyzed using X-ray microcomputed tomography, gel permeation chromatography, and <sup>1</sup>H-nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy to assess biopolymer degradation and plasticizer migration. Surface degradation and plasticizer migration were observed for all treatments, with minor impacts of plasticizers on microbial biomass and alpha diversity. Critically, however, plastisphere bacterial communities formed two groups that were compositionally distinct. One group comprised the DBP samples while the other comprised the control, ATBC, and TEC samples. This indicates that DBP can impact soil bacterial community composition on release from biopolymer blends, while the effects of the citrate-based plasticizers were reduced─supporting their use as potentially less environmentally impactful alternatives to phthalates.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":36,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"环境科学与技术\",\"volume\":\"59 32\",\"pages\":\"17173–17187\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":11.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-09\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"环境科学与技术\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/acs.est.5c01660\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"环境科学与生态学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ENGINEERING, ENVIRONMENTAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"环境科学与技术","FirstCategoryId":"1","ListUrlMain":"https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/acs.est.5c01660","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, ENVIRONMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

以柠檬酸盐为基础的增塑剂通常作为邻苯二甲酸二丁酯(DBP)等邻苯二甲酸酯的环保替代品销售。在这里,我们通过研究土壤微生物群落对柠檬酸乙酰三丁酯(ATBC)、柠檬酸三乙酯(TEC)、DBP或无(对照)塑化的生物聚合物样品的反应来研究这些断言。样品在土壤中埋藏14周后,利用元条形码和定量PCR对生物聚合物、附着土和散装土相关的细菌和真菌群落的生物量和多样性进行了表征。利用x射线微计算机断层扫描、凝胶渗透层析和1h核磁共振波谱分析埋置(孵育)和未孵育的生物聚合物样品之间的差异,以评估生物聚合物降解和增塑剂迁移。所有处理均观察到表面降解和增塑剂迁移,增塑剂对微生物生物量和α多样性的影响较小。然而,至关重要的是,塑料球细菌群落形成了两个组成不同的群体。一组包括DBP样本,另一组包括对照组、ATBC和TEC样本。这表明DBP可以通过生物聚合物混合物的释放影响土壤细菌群落组成,而柠檬酸盐基增塑剂的影响降低──支持它们作为邻苯二甲酸盐的潜在环境影响较小的替代品的使用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Relative to a Common Phthalate, Citrate-Based Plasticizers Exert Minimal Impact on Plastisphere Bacterial Community Composition during Biopolymer Biodegradation

Relative to a Common Phthalate, Citrate-Based Plasticizers Exert Minimal Impact on Plastisphere Bacterial Community Composition during Biopolymer Biodegradation

Citrate-based plasticizers are often marketed as eco-friendly alternatives to phthalates like dibutyl phthalate (DBP). Here, we investigated these assertions by examining the response of soil microbial communities to biopolymer samples plasticized with acetyl tributyl citrate (ATBC), triethyl citrate (TEC), DBP, or nothing (control). Samples were buried in soil for 14 weeks, after which the biomass and diversity of bacterial and fungal communities associated with the biopolymer, attached soil, and bulk soil were characterized using metabarcoding and quantitative PCR. Differences between buried (incubated) and nonincubated biopolymer samples were also analyzed using X-ray microcomputed tomography, gel permeation chromatography, and 1H-nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy to assess biopolymer degradation and plasticizer migration. Surface degradation and plasticizer migration were observed for all treatments, with minor impacts of plasticizers on microbial biomass and alpha diversity. Critically, however, plastisphere bacterial communities formed two groups that were compositionally distinct. One group comprised the DBP samples while the other comprised the control, ATBC, and TEC samples. This indicates that DBP can impact soil bacterial community composition on release from biopolymer blends, while the effects of the citrate-based plasticizers were reduced─supporting their use as potentially less environmentally impactful alternatives to phthalates.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
环境科学与技术
环境科学与技术 环境科学-工程:环境
CiteScore
17.50
自引率
9.60%
发文量
12359
审稿时长
2.8 months
期刊介绍: Environmental Science & Technology (ES&T) is a co-sponsored academic and technical magazine by the Hubei Provincial Environmental Protection Bureau and the Hubei Provincial Academy of Environmental Sciences. Environmental Science & Technology (ES&T) holds the status of Chinese core journals, scientific papers source journals of China, Chinese Science Citation Database source journals, and Chinese Academic Journal Comprehensive Evaluation Database source journals. This publication focuses on the academic field of environmental protection, featuring articles related to environmental protection and technical advancements.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信