冲动和酒精使用的概况:揭示个性、认知特征和DSM诊断。

IF 2.7 Q2 SUBSTANCE ABUSE
Chloe Lau, Danielle Downie, R. Michael Bagby, Bruce G. Pollock, Anthony C. Ruocco, Lena C. Quilty
{"title":"冲动和酒精使用的概况:揭示个性、认知特征和DSM诊断。","authors":"Chloe Lau,&nbsp;Danielle Downie,&nbsp;R. Michael Bagby,&nbsp;Bruce G. Pollock,&nbsp;Anthony C. Ruocco,&nbsp;Lena C. Quilty","doi":"10.1111/acer.70116","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Background</h3>\n \n <p>Impulsivity is closely associated with alcohol use, but limited research has explored distinct latent profiles encompassing impulsivity traits and alcohol use disorder symptoms.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>This study used latent profile analysis (LPA) to investigate these patterns among 201 adult outpatients (50% female, 50% male) from a tertiary care setting. Participants completed self-reported measures such as the Alcohol Use Disorders Identification Test (AUDIT), Impaired Control Scale, and UPPS-P Impulsivity Scale, as well as performance-based tasks like the Probability Reward Task (PRT) and Stop Signal Reaction Time Task.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>LPA identified three profiles using AUDIT, impaired control, and UPPS-P: (1) Low-Risk Profile—characterized by low levels of alcohol use disorder (AUD) symptoms and impulsivity; (2) Emotionally Reactive Profile—characterized by elevated impulsivity with low AUD symptoms; and (3) High-Risk Profile—characterized by elevated levels of both AUD symptoms and impulsivity. ANCOVA results revealed that Emotionally Reactive individuals scored higher on neuroticism, negative affectivity, and psychoticism and lower on conscientiousness compared to the Low-Risk group. Both Emotionally Reactive and High-Risk groups showed lower agreeableness, antagonism, and disinhibition relative to the Low-Risk group. On cognitive tasks, the Low-Risk group outperformed the High-Risk group in PRT accuracy and discriminability, while Emotionally Reactive and Low-Risk groups showed similar advantages over High Risk.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\n \n <p>These findings reveal distinct personality and cognitive profiles linked to reward and control processes, informing tailored interventions for impulsivity and alcohol-related harms.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":72145,"journal":{"name":"Alcohol (Hanover, York County, Pa.)","volume":"49 9","pages":"2049-2063"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/acer.70116","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Profiles of impulsivity and alcohol use: Unveiling personality, cognitive traits, and DSM diagnoses\",\"authors\":\"Chloe Lau,&nbsp;Danielle Downie,&nbsp;R. Michael Bagby,&nbsp;Bruce G. Pollock,&nbsp;Anthony C. Ruocco,&nbsp;Lena C. Quilty\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/acer.70116\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n \\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Background</h3>\\n \\n <p>Impulsivity is closely associated with alcohol use, but limited research has explored distinct latent profiles encompassing impulsivity traits and alcohol use disorder symptoms.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Methods</h3>\\n \\n <p>This study used latent profile analysis (LPA) to investigate these patterns among 201 adult outpatients (50% female, 50% male) from a tertiary care setting. Participants completed self-reported measures such as the Alcohol Use Disorders Identification Test (AUDIT), Impaired Control Scale, and UPPS-P Impulsivity Scale, as well as performance-based tasks like the Probability Reward Task (PRT) and Stop Signal Reaction Time Task.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Results</h3>\\n \\n <p>LPA identified three profiles using AUDIT, impaired control, and UPPS-P: (1) Low-Risk Profile—characterized by low levels of alcohol use disorder (AUD) symptoms and impulsivity; (2) Emotionally Reactive Profile—characterized by elevated impulsivity with low AUD symptoms; and (3) High-Risk Profile—characterized by elevated levels of both AUD symptoms and impulsivity. ANCOVA results revealed that Emotionally Reactive individuals scored higher on neuroticism, negative affectivity, and psychoticism and lower on conscientiousness compared to the Low-Risk group. Both Emotionally Reactive and High-Risk groups showed lower agreeableness, antagonism, and disinhibition relative to the Low-Risk group. On cognitive tasks, the Low-Risk group outperformed the High-Risk group in PRT accuracy and discriminability, while Emotionally Reactive and Low-Risk groups showed similar advantages over High Risk.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\\n \\n <p>These findings reveal distinct personality and cognitive profiles linked to reward and control processes, informing tailored interventions for impulsivity and alcohol-related harms.</p>\\n </section>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":72145,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Alcohol (Hanover, York County, Pa.)\",\"volume\":\"49 9\",\"pages\":\"2049-2063\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-07\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/acer.70116\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Alcohol (Hanover, York County, Pa.)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/acer.70116\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"SUBSTANCE ABUSE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Alcohol (Hanover, York County, Pa.)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/acer.70116","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SUBSTANCE ABUSE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:冲动性与酒精使用密切相关,但有限的研究探索了不同的潜在特征,包括冲动性特征和酒精使用障碍症状。方法:本研究采用潜在特征分析(LPA)对201名来自三级医疗机构的成年门诊患者(50%为女性,50%为男性)进行调查。参与者完成了自我报告的测试,如酒精使用障碍识别测试(AUDIT)、控制障碍量表和UPPS-P冲动性量表,以及基于表现的任务,如概率奖励任务(PRT)和停止信号反应时间任务。结果:LPA通过审计、控制受损和UPPS-P确定了三种特征:(1)低风险特征——以低水平的酒精使用障碍(AUD)症状和冲动性为特征;(2)情绪反应概况-以冲动升高为特征,AUD症状较低;(3)高风险-以AUD症状和冲动水平升高为特征。ANCOVA结果显示,与低风险组相比,情绪反应型个体在神经质、消极情感和精神病方面得分较高,在责任心方面得分较低。与低风险组相比,情绪反应性和高风险组表现出较低的亲和性、对抗性和去抑制性。在认知任务中,低风险组在PRT准确性和可辨别性方面优于高风险组,而情绪反应组和低风险组在PRT准确性和可辨别性方面优于高风险组。结论:这些发现揭示了与奖励和控制过程相关的独特人格和认知概况,为冲动性和酒精相关危害提供了量身定制的干预措施。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Profiles of impulsivity and alcohol use: Unveiling personality, cognitive traits, and DSM diagnoses

Profiles of impulsivity and alcohol use: Unveiling personality, cognitive traits, and DSM diagnoses

Background

Impulsivity is closely associated with alcohol use, but limited research has explored distinct latent profiles encompassing impulsivity traits and alcohol use disorder symptoms.

Methods

This study used latent profile analysis (LPA) to investigate these patterns among 201 adult outpatients (50% female, 50% male) from a tertiary care setting. Participants completed self-reported measures such as the Alcohol Use Disorders Identification Test (AUDIT), Impaired Control Scale, and UPPS-P Impulsivity Scale, as well as performance-based tasks like the Probability Reward Task (PRT) and Stop Signal Reaction Time Task.

Results

LPA identified three profiles using AUDIT, impaired control, and UPPS-P: (1) Low-Risk Profile—characterized by low levels of alcohol use disorder (AUD) symptoms and impulsivity; (2) Emotionally Reactive Profile—characterized by elevated impulsivity with low AUD symptoms; and (3) High-Risk Profile—characterized by elevated levels of both AUD symptoms and impulsivity. ANCOVA results revealed that Emotionally Reactive individuals scored higher on neuroticism, negative affectivity, and psychoticism and lower on conscientiousness compared to the Low-Risk group. Both Emotionally Reactive and High-Risk groups showed lower agreeableness, antagonism, and disinhibition relative to the Low-Risk group. On cognitive tasks, the Low-Risk group outperformed the High-Risk group in PRT accuracy and discriminability, while Emotionally Reactive and Low-Risk groups showed similar advantages over High Risk.

Conclusions

These findings reveal distinct personality and cognitive profiles linked to reward and control processes, informing tailored interventions for impulsivity and alcohol-related harms.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信