独立和依赖中风后个体坐立的动力学和运动学差异。

IF 1.4 3区 医学 Q4 ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL
Clinical Biomechanics Pub Date : 2025-10-01 Epub Date: 2025-08-05 DOI:10.1016/j.clinbiomech.2025.106636
Naoyuki Motojima, Sumiko Yamamoto, Toshiyuki Kohno
{"title":"独立和依赖中风后个体坐立的动力学和运动学差异。","authors":"Naoyuki Motojima, Sumiko Yamamoto, Toshiyuki Kohno","doi":"10.1016/j.clinbiomech.2025.106636","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The sit-to-stand movement is important for the rehabilitation of individuals with poststroke hemiplegia. This study aimed to clarify the variation in kinetic and kinematic characteristics of sit-to-stand movements according to differences in the ability of individuals with poststroke hemiplegia.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Twenty five individuals in the subacute phase of stroke-induced hemiplegia, who needed assistance to practice the sit-to-stand movement (dependent group) and 25 individuals in the subacute phase of stroke-induced hemiplegia who could stand up independently (independent group) were selected for the study. To ensure a fair comparison, the two groups were matched for age, sex, body size, and the paretic side. The sit-to-stand movement was quantified using a three-dimensional motion-analysis system, and the resulting kinetics, kinematics of thorax, pelvis and lower limb, and weight bearing were compared.</p><p><strong>Findings: </strong>The dependent group exhibited significantly reduced hip flexion torque and significantly greater thoracic and pelvic anterior tilt prior to seat-off than the independent group. After seat-off, the dependent group exhibited significantly reduced paretic knee extension torque and significantly greater weight bearing on the nonparetic side, along with significantly elevated hip extension torque on the paretic and non-paretic sides, in comparison to the independent group.</p><p><strong>Interpretation: </strong>The kinetic and kinematic characteristics of the sit-to-stand maneuver before seat-off in the dependent group poststroke differ from those in the independent poststroke individuals, as previously reported. These findings also suggest that weight-bearing on the non- paretic side is key in the sit-to-stand movement of dependent individuals.</p>","PeriodicalId":50992,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Biomechanics","volume":"129 ","pages":"106636"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Differences in kinetics and kinematics of sit-to-stand between independent and dependent post-stroke individuals.\",\"authors\":\"Naoyuki Motojima, Sumiko Yamamoto, Toshiyuki Kohno\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.clinbiomech.2025.106636\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The sit-to-stand movement is important for the rehabilitation of individuals with poststroke hemiplegia. This study aimed to clarify the variation in kinetic and kinematic characteristics of sit-to-stand movements according to differences in the ability of individuals with poststroke hemiplegia.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Twenty five individuals in the subacute phase of stroke-induced hemiplegia, who needed assistance to practice the sit-to-stand movement (dependent group) and 25 individuals in the subacute phase of stroke-induced hemiplegia who could stand up independently (independent group) were selected for the study. To ensure a fair comparison, the two groups were matched for age, sex, body size, and the paretic side. The sit-to-stand movement was quantified using a three-dimensional motion-analysis system, and the resulting kinetics, kinematics of thorax, pelvis and lower limb, and weight bearing were compared.</p><p><strong>Findings: </strong>The dependent group exhibited significantly reduced hip flexion torque and significantly greater thoracic and pelvic anterior tilt prior to seat-off than the independent group. After seat-off, the dependent group exhibited significantly reduced paretic knee extension torque and significantly greater weight bearing on the nonparetic side, along with significantly elevated hip extension torque on the paretic and non-paretic sides, in comparison to the independent group.</p><p><strong>Interpretation: </strong>The kinetic and kinematic characteristics of the sit-to-stand maneuver before seat-off in the dependent group poststroke differ from those in the independent poststroke individuals, as previously reported. These findings also suggest that weight-bearing on the non- paretic side is key in the sit-to-stand movement of dependent individuals.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":50992,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Clinical Biomechanics\",\"volume\":\"129 \",\"pages\":\"106636\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Clinical Biomechanics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clinbiomech.2025.106636\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/8/5 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Biomechanics","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clinbiomech.2025.106636","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/8/5 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:坐立运动对脑卒中后偏瘫患者的康复非常重要。本研究旨在阐明根据中风后偏瘫患者能力的差异,坐立运动的动力学和运动学特征的变化。方法:选取25例脑卒中偏瘫亚急性期需要辅助练习坐立动作的患者(依赖组)和25例脑卒中偏瘫亚急性期能够独立站立的患者(独立组)。为了确保公平的比较,两组在年龄、性别、体型和父母侧进行了匹配。使用三维运动分析系统对坐姿到站立的运动进行量化,并比较由此产生的动力学、胸部、骨盆和下肢的运动学以及负重。结果:与独立组相比,依赖组在取下座椅前表现出明显降低的髋关节屈曲力矩和明显增大的胸椎和骨盆前倾。与独立组相比,在离开座椅后,依赖组表现出明显降低的失稳膝关节伸展扭矩和显著增加的非失稳侧负重,以及显著升高的失稳侧和非失稳侧髋关节伸展扭矩。解释:正如之前报道的那样,依赖组卒中后脱座前的坐立动作的动力学和运动学特征与独立组卒中后个体不同。这些发现还表明,非双亲侧的负重是依赖个体坐立运动的关键。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Differences in kinetics and kinematics of sit-to-stand between independent and dependent post-stroke individuals.

Background: The sit-to-stand movement is important for the rehabilitation of individuals with poststroke hemiplegia. This study aimed to clarify the variation in kinetic and kinematic characteristics of sit-to-stand movements according to differences in the ability of individuals with poststroke hemiplegia.

Methods: Twenty five individuals in the subacute phase of stroke-induced hemiplegia, who needed assistance to practice the sit-to-stand movement (dependent group) and 25 individuals in the subacute phase of stroke-induced hemiplegia who could stand up independently (independent group) were selected for the study. To ensure a fair comparison, the two groups were matched for age, sex, body size, and the paretic side. The sit-to-stand movement was quantified using a three-dimensional motion-analysis system, and the resulting kinetics, kinematics of thorax, pelvis and lower limb, and weight bearing were compared.

Findings: The dependent group exhibited significantly reduced hip flexion torque and significantly greater thoracic and pelvic anterior tilt prior to seat-off than the independent group. After seat-off, the dependent group exhibited significantly reduced paretic knee extension torque and significantly greater weight bearing on the nonparetic side, along with significantly elevated hip extension torque on the paretic and non-paretic sides, in comparison to the independent group.

Interpretation: The kinetic and kinematic characteristics of the sit-to-stand maneuver before seat-off in the dependent group poststroke differ from those in the independent poststroke individuals, as previously reported. These findings also suggest that weight-bearing on the non- paretic side is key in the sit-to-stand movement of dependent individuals.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Clinical Biomechanics
Clinical Biomechanics 医学-工程:生物医学
CiteScore
3.30
自引率
5.60%
发文量
189
审稿时长
12.3 weeks
期刊介绍: Clinical Biomechanics is an international multidisciplinary journal of biomechanics with a focus on medical and clinical applications of new knowledge in the field. The science of biomechanics helps explain the causes of cell, tissue, organ and body system disorders, and supports clinicians in the diagnosis, prognosis and evaluation of treatment methods and technologies. Clinical Biomechanics aims to strengthen the links between laboratory and clinic by publishing cutting-edge biomechanics research which helps to explain the causes of injury and disease, and which provides evidence contributing to improved clinical management. A rigorous peer review system is employed and every attempt is made to process and publish top-quality papers promptly. Clinical Biomechanics explores all facets of body system, organ, tissue and cell biomechanics, with an emphasis on medical and clinical applications of the basic science aspects. The role of basic science is therefore recognized in a medical or clinical context. The readership of the journal closely reflects its multi-disciplinary contents, being a balance of scientists, engineers and clinicians. The contents are in the form of research papers, brief reports, review papers and correspondence, whilst special interest issues and supplements are published from time to time. Disciplines covered include biomechanics and mechanobiology at all scales, bioengineering and use of tissue engineering and biomaterials for clinical applications, biophysics, as well as biomechanical aspects of medical robotics, ergonomics, physical and occupational therapeutics and rehabilitation.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信