Thorsten Brenner , Sebastian O. Decker , Yevhen Vainshtein , Silke Grumaz , Mehdi Manoochehri , Manuel Feißt , Andrea Seidel-Glätzer , Mathias W. Pletz , Hendrik Bracht , Marc M. Berger , Kristina Fuest , Manfred Blobner , Friedhelm Bach , Onnen Moerer , Timo Brandenburger , Thomas Dimski , Klaudiusz Suchodolski , Ulrike Jäkel , Jana Zischkau , Helene Häberle , Hans-Jörg Gillmann
{"title":"临床宏基因组测序提高脓毒症或感染性休克的病原体鉴定。","authors":"Thorsten Brenner , Sebastian O. Decker , Yevhen Vainshtein , Silke Grumaz , Mehdi Manoochehri , Manuel Feißt , Andrea Seidel-Glätzer , Mathias W. Pletz , Hendrik Bracht , Marc M. Berger , Kristina Fuest , Manfred Blobner , Friedhelm Bach , Onnen Moerer , Timo Brandenburger , Thomas Dimski , Klaudiusz Suchodolski , Ulrike Jäkel , Jana Zischkau , Helene Häberle , Hans-Jörg Gillmann","doi":"10.1016/j.jinf.2025.106565","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objectives</h3><div>Despite limited sensitivity and specificity, blood cultures (BCs) still represent the gold standard of diagnostic care in septic patients. We aimed to overcome current diagnostic limitations by unbiased next-generation sequencing (NGS) of circulating microbial cell-free DNA (mcfDNA) in plasma samples.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>We performed a prospective, observational, non-interventional, multicenter study (<em>Next GeneSiS-Trial</em>) to compare positivity rates for NGS-based identification of causative pathogens with BCs in patients suffering from sepsis or septic shock. An independent expert panel (n=3) retrospectively evaluated the plausibility of NGS-based findings and the potential for anti-infective treatment adaptations based on NGS results.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>The positivity rate of NGS-based diagnostics (NGS+) for 491 septic patients was 70.5% compared to positive BCs (BC+) with 19.4% within the first three days after sepsis onset. NGS+ results were evaluated as plausible in 98.6% of cases by the expert panel. Based on the experts´ recommendations, additional knowledge of NGS-based pathogen findings would have resulted in anti-infective treatment adaptations in 32.6% of all patients. Potentially inadequately treated NGS+/blood culture negative (BC-) patients showed worse outcomes.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>The integration of NGS-based pathogen diagnostics in sepsis has the potential to improve patients´ outcomes as compared to a treatment strategy based on standard-of-care microbiological diagnostics alone.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":50180,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Infection","volume":"91 3","pages":"Article 106565"},"PeriodicalIF":11.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Improved pathogen identification in sepsis or septic shock by clinical metagenomic sequencing\",\"authors\":\"Thorsten Brenner , Sebastian O. Decker , Yevhen Vainshtein , Silke Grumaz , Mehdi Manoochehri , Manuel Feißt , Andrea Seidel-Glätzer , Mathias W. Pletz , Hendrik Bracht , Marc M. Berger , Kristina Fuest , Manfred Blobner , Friedhelm Bach , Onnen Moerer , Timo Brandenburger , Thomas Dimski , Klaudiusz Suchodolski , Ulrike Jäkel , Jana Zischkau , Helene Häberle , Hans-Jörg Gillmann\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jinf.2025.106565\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Objectives</h3><div>Despite limited sensitivity and specificity, blood cultures (BCs) still represent the gold standard of diagnostic care in septic patients. We aimed to overcome current diagnostic limitations by unbiased next-generation sequencing (NGS) of circulating microbial cell-free DNA (mcfDNA) in plasma samples.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>We performed a prospective, observational, non-interventional, multicenter study (<em>Next GeneSiS-Trial</em>) to compare positivity rates for NGS-based identification of causative pathogens with BCs in patients suffering from sepsis or septic shock. An independent expert panel (n=3) retrospectively evaluated the plausibility of NGS-based findings and the potential for anti-infective treatment adaptations based on NGS results.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>The positivity rate of NGS-based diagnostics (NGS+) for 491 septic patients was 70.5% compared to positive BCs (BC+) with 19.4% within the first three days after sepsis onset. NGS+ results were evaluated as plausible in 98.6% of cases by the expert panel. Based on the experts´ recommendations, additional knowledge of NGS-based pathogen findings would have resulted in anti-infective treatment adaptations in 32.6% of all patients. Potentially inadequately treated NGS+/blood culture negative (BC-) patients showed worse outcomes.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>The integration of NGS-based pathogen diagnostics in sepsis has the potential to improve patients´ outcomes as compared to a treatment strategy based on standard-of-care microbiological diagnostics alone.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":50180,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Infection\",\"volume\":\"91 3\",\"pages\":\"Article 106565\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":11.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-06\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Infection\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0163445325001598\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"INFECTIOUS DISEASES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Infection","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0163445325001598","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"INFECTIOUS DISEASES","Score":null,"Total":0}
Improved pathogen identification in sepsis or septic shock by clinical metagenomic sequencing
Objectives
Despite limited sensitivity and specificity, blood cultures (BCs) still represent the gold standard of diagnostic care in septic patients. We aimed to overcome current diagnostic limitations by unbiased next-generation sequencing (NGS) of circulating microbial cell-free DNA (mcfDNA) in plasma samples.
Methods
We performed a prospective, observational, non-interventional, multicenter study (Next GeneSiS-Trial) to compare positivity rates for NGS-based identification of causative pathogens with BCs in patients suffering from sepsis or septic shock. An independent expert panel (n=3) retrospectively evaluated the plausibility of NGS-based findings and the potential for anti-infective treatment adaptations based on NGS results.
Results
The positivity rate of NGS-based diagnostics (NGS+) for 491 septic patients was 70.5% compared to positive BCs (BC+) with 19.4% within the first three days after sepsis onset. NGS+ results were evaluated as plausible in 98.6% of cases by the expert panel. Based on the experts´ recommendations, additional knowledge of NGS-based pathogen findings would have resulted in anti-infective treatment adaptations in 32.6% of all patients. Potentially inadequately treated NGS+/blood culture negative (BC-) patients showed worse outcomes.
Conclusion
The integration of NGS-based pathogen diagnostics in sepsis has the potential to improve patients´ outcomes as compared to a treatment strategy based on standard-of-care microbiological diagnostics alone.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Infection publishes original papers on all aspects of infection - clinical, microbiological and epidemiological. The Journal seeks to bring together knowledge from all specialties involved in infection research and clinical practice, and present the best work in the ever-changing field of infection.
Each issue brings you Editorials that describe current or controversial topics of interest, high quality Reviews to keep you in touch with the latest developments in specific fields of interest, an Epidemiology section reporting studies in the hospital and the general community, and a lively correspondence section.