透气机胶带与微创法治疗压力性尿失禁的比较。

IF 0.9 4区 医学 Q4 UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY
Suleyman Sagir, Ozlem Basgut, Adem Tuncekin, Muslum Ergun, Omer Turgut
{"title":"透气机胶带与微创法治疗压力性尿失禁的比较。","authors":"Suleyman Sagir, Ozlem Basgut, Adem Tuncekin, Muslum Ergun, Omer Turgut","doi":"10.56434/j.arch.esp.urol.20257806.91","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>This study aims to evaluate and compare the transobturator tape and minisling surgical techniques in the treatment of stress urinary incontinence, focusing on their effectiveness and postoperative outcomes.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This retrospective analysis included 113 patients who underwent midurethral sling surgery for stress urinary incontinence at Islahiye State Hospital between January 2016 and October 2022. The patients were divided into two groups: Those treated with transobturator tape (Group 1, n = 70) and those treated with minisling (Group 2, n = 43). Data were collected from medical records and follow-up interviews. The variables assessed included demographics (age and body mass index), preoperative and postoperative Urinary Incontinence Quality of Life Scale scores, and postoperative pain details. Operative details, such as procedure duration and hospital stay length, were recorded. Patients were also asked about postoperative symptoms, including groin pain and dyspareunia. Additionally, the duration of symptom-free months following surgery was documented. Binary logistic regression analysis was conducted to evaluate the effect of surgical methods on long-term well-being.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The transobturator tape and minisling techniques demonstrated similar improvements in postoperative Urinary Incontinence Quality of Life Scale scores (<i>p</i> = 0.213). However, the minisling procedure had significantly shorter operative time (29.2 min vs. 52.2 min, <i>p</i> < 0.001) and hospital stay (1.33 days vs. 1.96 days, <i>p</i> = 0.003) than transobturator tape. Postoperative complications were notably higher in the transobturator tape group, with significantly more patients reporting groin pain (28.6% vs. 4.7%, <i>p</i> = 0.002) and dyspareunia (20.0% vs. 0.0%, <i>p</i> = 0.002). Logistic regression analysis identified surgical method as the primary predictor of long-term well-being beyond one year (<i>p</i> = 0.040).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>While the transobturator tape and minisling surgeries are effective for treating stress urinary incontinence, the minisling method offers advantages, such as shorter operative time, reduced hospital stay, and fewer postoperative complications, over the transobturator tape method. These findings suggest that the minisling approach may provide a more favorable patient experience, particularly due to reduced postoperative pain and quick recovery, than the transobturator tape method.</p>","PeriodicalId":48852,"journal":{"name":"Archivos Espanoles De Urologia","volume":"78 6","pages":"677-683"},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparison of the Transobturator Tape and Minisling Methods in the Treatment of Stress Urinary Incontinence.\",\"authors\":\"Suleyman Sagir, Ozlem Basgut, Adem Tuncekin, Muslum Ergun, Omer Turgut\",\"doi\":\"10.56434/j.arch.esp.urol.20257806.91\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>This study aims to evaluate and compare the transobturator tape and minisling surgical techniques in the treatment of stress urinary incontinence, focusing on their effectiveness and postoperative outcomes.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This retrospective analysis included 113 patients who underwent midurethral sling surgery for stress urinary incontinence at Islahiye State Hospital between January 2016 and October 2022. The patients were divided into two groups: Those treated with transobturator tape (Group 1, n = 70) and those treated with minisling (Group 2, n = 43). Data were collected from medical records and follow-up interviews. The variables assessed included demographics (age and body mass index), preoperative and postoperative Urinary Incontinence Quality of Life Scale scores, and postoperative pain details. Operative details, such as procedure duration and hospital stay length, were recorded. Patients were also asked about postoperative symptoms, including groin pain and dyspareunia. Additionally, the duration of symptom-free months following surgery was documented. Binary logistic regression analysis was conducted to evaluate the effect of surgical methods on long-term well-being.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The transobturator tape and minisling techniques demonstrated similar improvements in postoperative Urinary Incontinence Quality of Life Scale scores (<i>p</i> = 0.213). However, the minisling procedure had significantly shorter operative time (29.2 min vs. 52.2 min, <i>p</i> < 0.001) and hospital stay (1.33 days vs. 1.96 days, <i>p</i> = 0.003) than transobturator tape. Postoperative complications were notably higher in the transobturator tape group, with significantly more patients reporting groin pain (28.6% vs. 4.7%, <i>p</i> = 0.002) and dyspareunia (20.0% vs. 0.0%, <i>p</i> = 0.002). Logistic regression analysis identified surgical method as the primary predictor of long-term well-being beyond one year (<i>p</i> = 0.040).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>While the transobturator tape and minisling surgeries are effective for treating stress urinary incontinence, the minisling method offers advantages, such as shorter operative time, reduced hospital stay, and fewer postoperative complications, over the transobturator tape method. These findings suggest that the minisling approach may provide a more favorable patient experience, particularly due to reduced postoperative pain and quick recovery, than the transobturator tape method.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48852,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Archivos Espanoles De Urologia\",\"volume\":\"78 6\",\"pages\":\"677-683\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Archivos Espanoles De Urologia\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.56434/j.arch.esp.urol.20257806.91\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Archivos Espanoles De Urologia","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.56434/j.arch.esp.urol.20257806.91","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:本研究旨在评估和比较经通气带和微创手术技术治疗压力性尿失禁的效果和术后结果。方法:回顾性分析2016年1月至2022年10月在Islahiye州立医院接受尿道中吊带手术治疗压力性尿失禁的113例患者。患者分为两组:经通气胶带组(组1,n = 70)和微创组(组2,n = 43)。数据收集自医疗记录和随访访谈。评估的变量包括人口统计学(年龄和体重指数)、术前和术后尿失禁生活质量量表评分和术后疼痛细节。记录手术细节,如手术时间和住院时间。患者还被问及术后症状,包括腹股沟疼痛和性交困难。此外,记录了手术后无症状的持续时间。采用二元logistic回归分析评估手术方式对患者长期幸福感的影响。结果:经通气带和微创技术在术后尿失禁生活质量评分方面表现出相似的改善(p = 0.213)。然而,微创手术的手术时间(29.2分钟vs. 52.2分钟,p < 0.001)和住院时间(1.33天vs. 1.96天,p = 0.003)明显短于经通气胶带。经通气带组的术后并发症明显更高,有更多的患者报告腹股沟疼痛(28.6%比4.7%,p = 0.002)和性交困难(20.0%比0.0%,p = 0.002)。Logistic回归分析发现手术方式是1年以上长期健康状况的主要预测因素(p = 0.040)。结论:经膨隆带与缩窄术治疗压力性尿失禁是有效的,缩窄术相比于经膨隆带具有手术时间短、住院时间短、术后并发症少等优点。这些发现表明,与经通气带方法相比,缩小入路可能提供更有利的患者体验,特别是由于减少了术后疼痛和快速恢复。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Comparison of the Transobturator Tape and Minisling Methods in the Treatment of Stress Urinary Incontinence.

Background: This study aims to evaluate and compare the transobturator tape and minisling surgical techniques in the treatment of stress urinary incontinence, focusing on their effectiveness and postoperative outcomes.

Methods: This retrospective analysis included 113 patients who underwent midurethral sling surgery for stress urinary incontinence at Islahiye State Hospital between January 2016 and October 2022. The patients were divided into two groups: Those treated with transobturator tape (Group 1, n = 70) and those treated with minisling (Group 2, n = 43). Data were collected from medical records and follow-up interviews. The variables assessed included demographics (age and body mass index), preoperative and postoperative Urinary Incontinence Quality of Life Scale scores, and postoperative pain details. Operative details, such as procedure duration and hospital stay length, were recorded. Patients were also asked about postoperative symptoms, including groin pain and dyspareunia. Additionally, the duration of symptom-free months following surgery was documented. Binary logistic regression analysis was conducted to evaluate the effect of surgical methods on long-term well-being.

Results: The transobturator tape and minisling techniques demonstrated similar improvements in postoperative Urinary Incontinence Quality of Life Scale scores (p = 0.213). However, the minisling procedure had significantly shorter operative time (29.2 min vs. 52.2 min, p < 0.001) and hospital stay (1.33 days vs. 1.96 days, p = 0.003) than transobturator tape. Postoperative complications were notably higher in the transobturator tape group, with significantly more patients reporting groin pain (28.6% vs. 4.7%, p = 0.002) and dyspareunia (20.0% vs. 0.0%, p = 0.002). Logistic regression analysis identified surgical method as the primary predictor of long-term well-being beyond one year (p = 0.040).

Conclusions: While the transobturator tape and minisling surgeries are effective for treating stress urinary incontinence, the minisling method offers advantages, such as shorter operative time, reduced hospital stay, and fewer postoperative complications, over the transobturator tape method. These findings suggest that the minisling approach may provide a more favorable patient experience, particularly due to reduced postoperative pain and quick recovery, than the transobturator tape method.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Archivos Espanoles De Urologia
Archivos Espanoles De Urologia UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY-
CiteScore
0.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
111
期刊介绍: Archivos Españoles de Urología published since 1944, is an international peer review, susbscription Journal on Urology with original and review articles on different subjets in Urology: oncology, endourology, laparoscopic, andrology, lithiasis, pediatrics , urodynamics,... Case Report are also admitted.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信