选择性局部麻醉对硬性隐形眼镜初始舒适度的影响。

IF 3.7 3区 医学 Q1 OPHTHALMOLOGY
Maria Navascues-Cornago, Carole Maldonado-Codina, Michael L Read, Philip B Morgan
{"title":"选择性局部麻醉对硬性隐形眼镜初始舒适度的影响。","authors":"Maria Navascues-Cornago, Carole Maldonado-Codina, Michael L Read, Philip B Morgan","doi":"10.1016/j.clae.2025.102474","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>The primary sensory location of contact lens discomfort remains unclear. This study utilised selective topical anaesthesia of the ocular surface to investigate if the relative contribution of different tissues to lens-related discomfort could be determined.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This was a randomised, subject-masked, contralateral eye pilot study involving 10 participants. Mechanical sensitivity was measured at three locations on the ocular surface (cornea, upper and lower eyelid marginal conjunctiva) using a Cochet-Bonnet aesthesiometer. Following sensitivity measurements, proxymetacaine hydrochloride 0.5% was topically applied to one of the three locations in one eye whilst 0.9% saline was applied to the corresponding location in the fellow eye as a placebo. Sensitivity measurements were then repeated. A pair of rigid contact lenses was subsequently applied and comfort scores were recorded after 5 min using a 0-100 visual analogue scale.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The sensitivity of the location anesthetised decreased significantly (all Bonferroni-adjusted p<0.006), whilst the sensitivity of the unanaesthetised remaining two locations showed no significant change (all p>0.05). There was no significant change in sensitivity following the application of saline (all p>0.05). There was no significant difference in comfort following lens application between the anaesthetic and saline for the cornea and lower lid marginal conjunctiva [LSM difference (95% CI): -3.0 (-11.3, 5.3) and 2.0 (-6.3, 10.3), respectively]. However, comfort was significantly better when the upper lid marginal conjunctiva was anaesthetised compared to saline application [12.3 (4.0, 20.6)].</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This work has demonstrated a novel technique which can successfully selectively anaesthetise specific regions of the ocular surface. The initial comfort of rigid lenses was better when the upper lid marginal conjunctiva was anaesthetised, which supports the hypothesis that initial comfort of rigid lenses may be driven by the interaction between the lens and the upper eyelid. This work may also have significant utility for investigating discomfort in soft contact lenses.</p>","PeriodicalId":49087,"journal":{"name":"Contact Lens & Anterior Eye","volume":" ","pages":"102474"},"PeriodicalIF":3.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Effect of selective topical anaesthesia on the initial comfort of rigid contact lenses.\",\"authors\":\"Maria Navascues-Cornago, Carole Maldonado-Codina, Michael L Read, Philip B Morgan\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.clae.2025.102474\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>The primary sensory location of contact lens discomfort remains unclear. This study utilised selective topical anaesthesia of the ocular surface to investigate if the relative contribution of different tissues to lens-related discomfort could be determined.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This was a randomised, subject-masked, contralateral eye pilot study involving 10 participants. Mechanical sensitivity was measured at three locations on the ocular surface (cornea, upper and lower eyelid marginal conjunctiva) using a Cochet-Bonnet aesthesiometer. Following sensitivity measurements, proxymetacaine hydrochloride 0.5% was topically applied to one of the three locations in one eye whilst 0.9% saline was applied to the corresponding location in the fellow eye as a placebo. Sensitivity measurements were then repeated. A pair of rigid contact lenses was subsequently applied and comfort scores were recorded after 5 min using a 0-100 visual analogue scale.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The sensitivity of the location anesthetised decreased significantly (all Bonferroni-adjusted p<0.006), whilst the sensitivity of the unanaesthetised remaining two locations showed no significant change (all p>0.05). There was no significant change in sensitivity following the application of saline (all p>0.05). There was no significant difference in comfort following lens application between the anaesthetic and saline for the cornea and lower lid marginal conjunctiva [LSM difference (95% CI): -3.0 (-11.3, 5.3) and 2.0 (-6.3, 10.3), respectively]. However, comfort was significantly better when the upper lid marginal conjunctiva was anaesthetised compared to saline application [12.3 (4.0, 20.6)].</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This work has demonstrated a novel technique which can successfully selectively anaesthetise specific regions of the ocular surface. The initial comfort of rigid lenses was better when the upper lid marginal conjunctiva was anaesthetised, which supports the hypothesis that initial comfort of rigid lenses may be driven by the interaction between the lens and the upper eyelid. This work may also have significant utility for investigating discomfort in soft contact lenses.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":49087,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Contact Lens & Anterior Eye\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"102474\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-06\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Contact Lens & Anterior Eye\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clae.2025.102474\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"OPHTHALMOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Contact Lens & Anterior Eye","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clae.2025.102474","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"OPHTHALMOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:隐形眼镜不适的主要感觉部位尚不清楚。本研究利用眼表选择性局部麻醉来研究不同组织对晶状体相关不适的相对影响是否可以确定。方法:这是一项随机、受试者隐藏、对侧眼先导研究,涉及10名参与者。采用Cochet-Bonnet美感计测量眼表三个位置(角膜、上、下眼睑边缘结膜)的机械灵敏度。敏感度测量后,将0.5%盐酸丙美他卡因局部涂抹在一只眼睛的三个位置之一,同时将0.9%生理盐水涂抹在另一只眼睛的相应位置作为安慰剂。然后重复灵敏度测量。随后使用一副硬性隐形眼镜,并在5分钟后使用0-100视觉模拟量表记录舒适度评分。结果:麻醉部位敏感性明显降低(经bonferroni校正p0.05)。应用生理盐水后,敏感性无显著变化(p < 0.05)。麻醉和生理盐水对角膜和下眼睑边缘结膜的舒适度无显著差异[LSM差异(95% CI)分别为-3.0(-11.3,5.3)和2.0(-6.3,10.3)]。然而,与生理盐水应用相比,上眼睑边缘结膜麻醉的舒适度明显更好[12.3(4.0,20.6)]。结论:这项工作证明了一种新的技术,可以成功地选择性麻醉特定区域的眼表。在上眼睑边缘结膜麻醉时,刚性晶状体的初始舒适度较好,支持了晶状体与上眼睑相互作用驱动刚性晶状体初始舒适度的假设。这项工作对于研究软性隐形眼镜的不适也有重要的实用价值。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Effect of selective topical anaesthesia on the initial comfort of rigid contact lenses.

Purpose: The primary sensory location of contact lens discomfort remains unclear. This study utilised selective topical anaesthesia of the ocular surface to investigate if the relative contribution of different tissues to lens-related discomfort could be determined.

Methods: This was a randomised, subject-masked, contralateral eye pilot study involving 10 participants. Mechanical sensitivity was measured at three locations on the ocular surface (cornea, upper and lower eyelid marginal conjunctiva) using a Cochet-Bonnet aesthesiometer. Following sensitivity measurements, proxymetacaine hydrochloride 0.5% was topically applied to one of the three locations in one eye whilst 0.9% saline was applied to the corresponding location in the fellow eye as a placebo. Sensitivity measurements were then repeated. A pair of rigid contact lenses was subsequently applied and comfort scores were recorded after 5 min using a 0-100 visual analogue scale.

Results: The sensitivity of the location anesthetised decreased significantly (all Bonferroni-adjusted p<0.006), whilst the sensitivity of the unanaesthetised remaining two locations showed no significant change (all p>0.05). There was no significant change in sensitivity following the application of saline (all p>0.05). There was no significant difference in comfort following lens application between the anaesthetic and saline for the cornea and lower lid marginal conjunctiva [LSM difference (95% CI): -3.0 (-11.3, 5.3) and 2.0 (-6.3, 10.3), respectively]. However, comfort was significantly better when the upper lid marginal conjunctiva was anaesthetised compared to saline application [12.3 (4.0, 20.6)].

Conclusion: This work has demonstrated a novel technique which can successfully selectively anaesthetise specific regions of the ocular surface. The initial comfort of rigid lenses was better when the upper lid marginal conjunctiva was anaesthetised, which supports the hypothesis that initial comfort of rigid lenses may be driven by the interaction between the lens and the upper eyelid. This work may also have significant utility for investigating discomfort in soft contact lenses.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.60
自引率
18.80%
发文量
198
审稿时长
55 days
期刊介绍: Contact Lens & Anterior Eye is a research-based journal covering all aspects of contact lens theory and practice, including original articles on invention and innovations, as well as the regular features of: Case Reports; Literary Reviews; Editorials; Instrumentation and Techniques and Dates of Professional Meetings.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信